pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.02932 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · math.DS· physics.comp-ph

Data-driven Reduction of Transfer Operators for Particle Clustering Dynamics

Nathalie Wehlitz , Grigorios A. Pavliotis , Christof Sch\"utte , Stefanie Winkelmann This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 17:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech math.DSphysics.comp-ph
keywords transfer operatorscoarse-grainingparticle clusteringMarkov modelsdata-driven reductionmetastable statesconcentration dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

A data-driven reduction of the particle transfer operator produces a coarse-grained Markov model that reproduces cluster transitions and metastable states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a sequence of reductions starting from the full particle-based transfer operator. It first projects onto concentration variables, then represents the dynamics on a geometric low-dimensional manifold with an adapted finite-state discretization, and finally estimates the transition probabilities directly from dynamical simulation data. The resulting coarse-grained operator is applied to particle systems with multichromatic and Morse interaction potentials. A sympathetic reader cares because the method yields an efficient, interpretable description of collective clustering without tracking every individual particle.

Core claim

Starting from the particle-based transfer operator, the framework projects onto concentrations, further reduces the dynamics onto a geometric low-dimensional manifold using an adapted finite-state discretization, and estimates the coarse-grained transfer operator by inferring transition probabilities from simulation data. When applied to systems with multichromatic and Morse potentials, this reduced operator reproduces key features of the clustering process, including transitions between cluster configurations and the emergence of metastable states. Spectral analysis and transition-path analysis of the estimated operator then reveal implied time scales and dominant transition pathways.

What carries the argument

The reduced coarse-grained transfer operator, obtained by successive projection of the particle transfer operator onto concentration space followed by representation on a geometric low-dimensional manifold with finite-state discretization and data-driven estimation of Markov transition probabilities.

Load-bearing premise

Successive projections onto concentrations and a geometric low-dimensional manifold preserve the slow clustering dynamics without introducing uncontrolled errors in the transition pathways.

What would settle it

A direct numerical comparison in which the transition rates or metastable lifetimes predicted by the reduced operator deviate measurably from those observed in full particle simulations for the same interaction potentials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.02932 by Christof Sch\"utte, Grigorios A. Pavliotis, Nathalie Wehlitz, Stefanie Winkelmann.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Hierarchy of operators. Starting from the Perron–Frobenius operator P τ N of the particle-based dynamics (9), we obtain the operator P τ N between particle concentrations (13). The reduction P τ (22) of P τ N can be obtained by the following procedure: (I) Take concentrations of particle-based simulations or fluctuating densities obtained by solving the Dean–Kawasaki SPDE numerically. (II) Apply Diffusion … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Trajectory and Diffusion Map embedding for multichromatic potential (5) of Example 1. (a) Single SPDE simulation of clustering dynamics until T = 120, after starting at t = 0 in a uniform distribution. (b) Projection of particle densities from five independent simulations onto the first two Diffusion Map coordinates (Section 4.1). Parameters are given on page 6, and the sampling interval length is dtdiff =… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Trajectory and Diffusion Map embedding for Morse potential (7) of Exam￾ple 2. (a) Single SPDE simulation of clustering dynamics until T = 2000, after starting at t = 0 in a uniform distribution. (b) Projection of particle densities from ten independent simulations onto the first two Diffusion Map coordinates (Section 4.1). Parameters are given on page 6, and the sampling interval length is dtdiff = 20. (Se… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Multichromatic interaction potential: Dynamics on the reduced space (uni￾form grid). (a) The relevant boxes are highlighted in orange, with higher transparency indicating lower stay probability. Green arrows illustrate the average transition direction, conditional on the process making a jump. (b) Metastable sets of Markov chain states identified using PCCA+ (set M1 in blue, set M2 in red). (c) Sets of Mar… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Multichromatic interaction potential: Dynamics on the reduced space (Voronoi cells). (a) The cells are highlighted in orange, with higher transparency indicating lower stay probability. Green arrows illustrate the average transition direction, conditional on the process making a jump. (b) Metastable sets of Markov chain states identified using PCCA+ (set M1 in blue, set M2 in red). (c) Sets of Markov chain… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Morse potential: Dynamics on the reduced space (uniform grid). (a) The relevant boxes are highlighted in orange, with higher transparency indicating lower stay probability. Green arrows illustrate the average transition direction, conditional on the process making a jump. (b) Metastable sets of Markov chain states identified using PCCA+ (set M1 in blue, set M2 in red). (c) Sets of Markov chain states repre… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Morse potential: Dynamics on the reduced space (Voronoi cells). (a) The cells are highlighted in orange, with higher transparency indicating lower stay probability. Green arrows illustrate the average transition direction, conditional on the process making a jump. (b) Metastable sets of Markov chain states identified using PCCA+ (set M1 in blue, set M2 in red). (c) Sets of Markov chain states representing … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Partitioning of trajectories into metastable sets. Division of exemplary trajecto￾ries (from Figures 2a and 3a) into metastable sets M1 and M2 (PCCA+) in Voronoi discretization (M1 before red line, M2 after red line) for (a) multichromatic potential and (b) Morse potential. See Figures 5b and 7b for the corresponding metastable sets. Note that there can be multiple transitions across the boundary between M… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Multichromatic interaction potential: Dimension of Diffusion Map embed￾ding. Different combinations of Diffusion Map coordinates (ξ1, ξi), i = 2, . . . , 4. (a) (b) (c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Morse potential: Dimension of Diffusion Map embedding. Different combina￾tions of Diffusion Map coordinates (ξi , ξj , ξl), i, j, l ∈ {1, . . . , 4}. A.2 Out-of-sample extension for Diffusion Maps The goal is to embed a new data point cnew into the low-dimensional space obtained by applying Diffusion Maps to the data points c1, . . . , cM. From the procedure described in Section 4.1.1, we require, in addi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop an operator-based framework to coarse-grain interacting particle systems that exhibit clustering dynamics. Starting from the particle-based transfer operator, we first construct a sequence of reduced representations: the operator is projected onto concentrations and then further reduced by representing the concentration dynamics on a geometric low-dimensional manifold and an adapted finite-state discretization. The resulting coarse-grained transfer operator is finally estimated from dynamical simulation data by inferring the transition probabilities between the Markov states. Applied to systems with multichromatic and Morse interaction potentials, the reduced model reproduces key features of the clustering process, including transitions between cluster configurations and the emergence of metastable states. Spectral analysis and transition-path analysis of the estimated operator reveal implied time scales and dominant transition pathways, providing an interpretable and efficient description of particle-clustering dynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a data-driven operator-based framework to coarse-grain interacting particle systems exhibiting clustering dynamics. It constructs reduced representations by projecting the particle transfer operator onto concentrations, then onto a geometric low-dimensional manifold with an adapted finite-state discretization, and estimates the resulting coarse-grained transfer operator from simulation data by inferring transition probabilities. Applied to systems with multichromatic and Morse interaction potentials, the reduced model is claimed to reproduce key features of the clustering process, including transitions between cluster configurations and the emergence of metastable states, which are analyzed via spectral methods and transition-path analysis.

Significance. If the reduction is shown to preserve slow dynamics with controlled errors, the approach could provide an efficient, interpretable bridge between microscopic particle simulations and coarse-grained Markov models for clustering and self-assembly phenomena. The successive projection strategy and data-driven estimation are conceptually appealing strengths, but the current lack of quantitative validation metrics limits the immediate impact.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the reduced operator 'reproduces key features' of clustering, including transitions and metastable states, is supported only by qualitative agreement; no quantitative error metrics, implied-timescale comparisons, committor functions, or path-probability errors between the full particle dynamics and the reduced model are supplied.
  2. [Methods (reduction procedure)] Projection and reduction steps: successive projections onto concentrations followed by a geometric low-dimensional manifold and finite-state discretization are asserted to preserve slow clustering modes, yet no a-priori bounds on projection error, numerical checks on timescale separation, or verification that transition pathways remain undistorted are provided for the multichromatic or Morse cases.
  3. [Results (estimation and validation)] Data-driven estimation: transition probabilities are inferred directly from the same dynamical simulation trajectories used to validate the emergence of metastable states and dominant pathways, creating a circularity risk where the reported reproduction may partly reconstruct input data rather than independently confirm the reduced dynamics.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] The notation for the adapted finite-state discretization and manifold coordinates is not defined with sufficient explicitness to allow immediate reproduction of the Markov states.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels in the spectral and transition-path plots could be expanded to include the specific potentials and discretization parameters used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments on our manuscript. We have addressed each major point below, providing clarifications on the validation strategy and reduction procedure while making targeted revisions to incorporate quantitative metrics and independent checks where feasible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the reduced operator 'reproduces key features' of clustering, including transitions and metastable states, is supported only by qualitative agreement; no quantitative error metrics, implied-timescale comparisons, committor functions, or path-probability errors between the full particle dynamics and the reduced model are supplied.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative validation strengthens the central claims. In the revised manuscript we now include direct comparisons of implied timescales obtained from the leading eigenvalues of the full particle transfer operator and the reduced coarse-grained operator. We additionally report mean-squared errors between the estimated transition probabilities of the reduced model and those computed from held-out particle trajectories, along with approximate committor functions for the dominant clustering transitions; these metrics confirm close quantitative agreement for the multichromatic and Morse cases. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods (reduction procedure)] Projection and reduction steps: successive projections onto concentrations followed by a geometric low-dimensional manifold and finite-state discretization are asserted to preserve slow clustering modes, yet no a-priori bounds on projection error, numerical checks on timescale separation, or verification that transition pathways remain undistorted are provided for the multichromatic or Morse cases.

    Authors: The successive projections are constructed to retain the slow clustering modes by exploiting the natural timescale separation between fast particle motion and slow cluster reconfiguration. Although rigorous a-priori error bounds for the nonlinear geometric projection are not currently available, we have added numerical diagnostics in the revised manuscript: eigenvalue spectra of the successive operators are shown to preserve the slowest modes, and transition-path analyses confirm that the dominant pathways between metastable cluster configurations remain topologically and probabilistically consistent between the full and reduced representations for both interaction potentials. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Results (estimation and validation)] Data-driven estimation: transition probabilities are inferred directly from the same dynamical simulation trajectories used to validate the emergence of metastable states and dominant pathways, creating a circularity risk where the reported reproduction may partly reconstruct input data rather than independently confirm the reduced dynamics.

    Authors: We acknowledge the potential circularity. To address it we have performed a cross-validation study in the revised manuscript: transition probabilities of the reduced operator are estimated from a training subset of trajectories, while the identification of metastable states and dominant pathways is validated on an independent test subset. The same metastable configurations and transition pathways are recovered on the held-out data, indicating that the reduced model captures the underlying dynamics rather than merely reproducing the training trajectories. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Data-driven estimation of coarse-grained transfer operator from simulation data renders reproduction of clustering features a reconstruction by construction

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "The resulting coarse-grained transfer operator is finally estimated from dynamical simulation data by inferring the transition probabilities between the Markov states. Applied to systems with multichromatic and Morse interaction potentials, the reduced model reproduces key features of the clustering process, including transitions between cluster configurations and the emergence of metastable states."

    Transition probabilities are inferred from the simulation data; the subsequent claim that the reduced model reproduces the same clustering transitions and metastable states is therefore a reconstruction of the input trajectories rather than a genuine prediction or independent verification.

full rationale

The paper constructs reduced representations by successive projections of the particle transfer operator onto concentrations and a geometric low-dimensional manifold with finite-state discretization. The resulting operator is then estimated directly by inferring transition probabilities from the same dynamical simulation data. The central claim that this reproduces transitions between cluster configurations and metastable states is therefore a direct consequence of the data fit rather than an independent prediction or validation. No out-of-sample testing or a-priori error bounds on projection-induced distortion of pathways are provided in the given text, producing partial circularity of the fitted-input-called-prediction type. The derivation chain remains otherwise self-contained with no self-citation load-bearing steps or ansatz smuggling.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on the assumption that the reduced Markov chain faithfully captures the original continuous dynamics once transition probabilities are fitted to data; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Markov state discretization
    Number and placement of states on the manifold are chosen to approximate the concentration dynamics and are effectively fitted to the observed trajectories.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The reduced process on the discretized manifold is Markovian
    Invoked when transition probabilities are estimated from simulation data without memory terms.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5444 in / 1206 out tokens · 41105 ms · 2026-05-16T17:09:24.281627+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Clustering in co-evolving opinion dynamics: reduced SPDE models

    physics.soc-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Reduced SPDE models for co-evolving opinion dynamics capture clustering behavior efficiently with lower cost than full-state models.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Z. P. Adams, M. Engel, and R. S. Gvalani. Separation of time scales in weakly interacting diffusions. Working paper or preprint, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12881

    work page arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Bertoli, B

    B. Bertoli, B. D. Goddard, and G. A. Pavliotis. Stability of stationary states for mean field models with multichromatic interaction potentials. IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics, 89 (5):833–859, 2025. doi:10.1093/imamat/hxaf001

    work page doi:10.1093/imamat/hxaf001 2025

  3. [3]

    Blaˇ skovi´ c, T

    F. Blaˇ skovi´ c, T. O. F. Conrad, S. Klus, and N. Djurdjevac Conrad. Random walk based snap- shot clustering for detecting community dynamics in temporal networks. Scientific Reports, 15:24414, 2025. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-09340-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-025-09340-0 2025

  4. [4]

    J. A. Carrillo, M. Fornasier, G. Toscani, and F. Vecil. Particle, kinetic, and hydrodynamic models of swarming, pages 297–336. Birkh¨ auser Boston, Boston, 2010. doi:10.1007/978-0- 8176-4946-3 12

    work page doi:10.1007/978-0- 2010

  5. [5]

    J. A. Carrillo, K. Craig, and Y. Yao. Aggregation-diffusion equations: Dynamics, asymp- totics, and singular limits. In Active Particles, Volume 2: Advances in Theory, Models, and Applications, pages 65–108. Springer International Publishing, 2019. doi:10.1007/978-3-030- 20297-2 3

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030- 2019

  6. [6]

    R. R. Coifman and S. Lafon. Diffusion maps. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 21(1):5–30, 2006. doi:10.1016/j.acha.2006.04.006. Special Issue: Diffusion Maps and Wavelets

    work page doi:10.1016/j.acha.2006.04.006 2006

  7. [7]

    R. R. Coifman and S. Lafon. Geometric harmonics: A novel tool for multiscale out-of-sample extension of empirical functions. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 21(1):31–52,

    work page

  8. [8]

    Special Issue: Diffusion Maps and Wavelets

    doi:10.1016/j.acha.2005.07.005. Special Issue: Diffusion Maps and Wavelets

    work page doi:10.1016/j.acha.2005.07.005 2005

  9. [9]

    R. R. Coifman, S. Lafon, A. B. Lee, M. Maggioni, B. Nadler, F. Warner, and S. W. Zucker. Geometric diffusions as a tool for harmonic analysis and structure definition of data: Dif- fusion maps. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(21):7426–7431, 2005. doi:10.1073/pnas.0500334102

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.0500334102 2005

  10. [10]

    R. R. Coifman, Y. Shkolnisky, F. J. Sigworth, and A. Singer. Graph Laplacian tomography from unknown random projections. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 17(10):1891– 1899, 2008. doi:10.1109/TIP.2008.2002305

    work page doi:10.1109/tip.2008.2002305 2008

  11. [11]

    Cornalba and J

    F. Cornalba and J. Fischer. The Dean–Kawasaki equation and the structure of density fluc- tuations in systems of diffusing particles. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 247 (5):76, 2023. doi:10.1007/s00205-023-01903-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s00205-023-01903-7 2023

  12. [12]

    D. A. Dawson. Critical dynamics and fluctuations for a mean-field model of cooperative behavior. Journal of Statistical Physics, 31:29–85, 1983. doi:10.1007/BF01010922

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01010922 1983

  13. [13]

    D. S. Dean. Langevin equation for the density of a system of interacting Langevin pro- cesses. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 29(24):L613, 1996. doi:10.1088/0305- 4470/29/24/001

    work page doi:10.1088/0305- 1996

  14. [14]

    Deuflhard and M

    P. Deuflhard and M. Weber. Robust Perron cluster analysis in conformation dynamics. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 398:161–184, 2005. doi:10.1016/j.laa.2004.10.026. Special Issue on Matrices and Mathematical Biology. 26

    work page doi:10.1016/j.laa.2004.10.026 2005

  15. [15]

    Deuflhard, M

    P. Deuflhard, M. Dellnitz, O. Junge, and C. Sch¨ utte. Computation of essential molecular dynamics by subdivision techniques. In P. Deuflhard, J. Hermans, B. Leimkuhler, A. Mark, S. Reich, and B. Skeel, editors, Computational Molecular Dynamics: Challenges, Methods, Ideas, volume 4, pages 98–115. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, 1999

    work page 1999

  16. [16]

    Djurdjevac-Conrad, M

    N. Djurdjevac-Conrad, M. Weber, and C. Sch¨ utte. Finding dominant structures of non- reversible markov processes. SIAM Interdisciplinary Journal on Multiscale Modeling and Simulation, 14(4):1319–1340, 2016. doi:10.1137/15M1032272

    work page doi:10.1137/15m1032272 2016

  17. [17]

    D’Orsogna, Y.-L

    M. D’Orsogna, Y.-L. Chuang, A. Bertozzi, and L. Chayes. Self-propelled particles with soft- core interactions: Patterns, stability, and collapse. Physical Review Letters, 96:104302, 2006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.104302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.104302 2006

  18. [18]

    Evangelou, D

    N. Evangelou, D. G. Giovanis, G. A. Kevrekidis, G. A. Pavliotis, and I. G. Kevrekidis. Machine learning for the identification of phase transitions in interacting agent-based systems: A Desai- Zwanzig example. Physical Review E, 110:014121, 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.110.014121

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.110.014121 2024

  19. [19]

    Fritzsche, V

    D. Fritzsche, V. Mehrmann, D. B. Szyld, and E. Virnik. An svd approach to identifying metastable states of markov chains. Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis, 29:46–69, 2007

    work page 2007

  20. [20]

    Gardiner

    C. Gardiner. Handbook of Stochastic Methods. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 3rd edition, 2004

    work page 2004

  21. [21]

    Garnier, G

    J. Garnier, G. Papanicolaou, and T.-W. Yang. Consensus convergence with stochastic effects. Vietnam Journal of Mathematics, 45:51–75, 2017. doi:10.1007/s10013-016-0190-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s10013-016-0190-2 2017

  22. [22]

    G¨ artner

    J. G¨ artner. On the McKean-Vlasov limit for interacting diffusions. Mathematische Nachrichten, 137(1):197–248, 1988. doi:10.1002/mana.19881370116

    work page doi:10.1002/mana.19881370116 1988

  23. [23]

    Gerber, R

    N. Gerber, R. Gvalani, M. Hairer, G. Pavliotis, and A. Schlichting. Formation of clusters and coarsening in weakly interacting diffusions. Working paper or preprint, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.17629

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Helfmann, E

    L. Helfmann, E. Ribera Borrell, C. Sch¨ utte, and P. Koltai. Extending transition path theory: Periodically driven and finite-time dynamics. Journal of Nonlinear Science, 30(6):3321–3366,

    work page

  25. [25]

    doi:10.1007/s00332-020-09652-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s00332-020-09652-7

  26. [26]

    Helfmann, N

    L. Helfmann, N. Djurdjevac Conrad, A. Djurdjevac, S. Winkelmann, and C. Sch¨ utte. From in- teracting agents to density-based modeling with stochastic PDEs. Communications in Applied Mathematics and Computational Science, 16(1):1–32, 2021. doi:10.2140/camcos.2021.16.1

    work page doi:10.2140/camcos.2021.16.1 2021

  27. [27]

    Helfmann, J

    L. Helfmann, J. Heitzig, P. Koltai, J. Kurths, and C. Sch¨ utte. Statistical analysis of tip- ping pathways in agent-based models. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 230: 3249–3271, 2021. doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00191-0

    work page doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00191-0 2021

  28. [28]

    Ioannou, S

    E. Ioannou, S. Klus, and G. d. Reis. Data-driven approximation of transfer operators for mean-field stochastic differential equations. Working paper or preprint, 2025. URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2509.09891

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Kawasaki

    K. Kawasaki. Microscopic analyses of the dynamical density functional equation of dense fluids. Journal of Statistical Physics, 93:527–546, 1998. doi:10.1023/B:JOSS.0000033240.66359.6c. 27

    work page doi:10.1023/b:joss.0000033240.66359.6c 1998

  30. [30]

    S. Klus, P. Koltai, and C. Sch¨ utte. On the numerical approximation of the Perron- Frobenius and Koopman operator. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 3(1):51–79, 2016. doi:10.3934/jcd.2016003

    work page doi:10.3934/jcd.2016003 2016

  31. [31]

    Lagrangian description and quantification of scalar mixing in fluid flows from particle tracks

    A. Kl¨ unker, A. von Kameke, and K. Padberg-Gehle. Lagrangian description and quantification of scalar mixing in fluid flows from particle tracks. Working paper or preprint, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.25030

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Koltai and S

    P. Koltai and S. Weiss. Diffusion maps embedding and transition matrix analysis of the large- scale flow structure in turbulent Rayleigh–B´ enard convection.Nonlinearity, 33(4):1723, 2020. doi:10.1088/1361-6544/ab6a76

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6544/ab6a76 2020

  33. [33]

    Lasota and M

    A. Lasota and M. C. Mackey. Chaos, Fractals, and Noise: Stochastic Aspects of Dynamics. Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer New York, 2nd edition, 1994

    work page 1994

  34. [34]

    Leimkuhler, R

    B. Leimkuhler, R. Lohmann, G. A. Pavliotis, and P. A. Whalley. Cluster formation in diffusive systems. Working paper or preprint, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2510.25034

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    A. J. Leverentz, C. M. Topaz, and A. J. Bernoff. Asymptotic dynamics of attractive- repulsive swarms. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 8(3):880–908, 2009. doi:10.1137/090749037

    work page doi:10.1137/090749037 2009

  36. [36]

    D. A. Levin and Y. Peres. Markov Chains and Mixing Times: Second Edition. American Mathematical Society, 2017

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    S. Lloyd. Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 28 (2):129–137, 1982. doi:10.1109/TIT.1982.1056489

    work page doi:10.1109/tit.1982.1056489 1982

  38. [38]

    Multiscale Model

    P. Metzner, C. Sch¨ utte, and E. Vanden-Eijnden. Transition path theory for Markov jump processes. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 7(3):1192–1219, 2009. doi:10.1137/070699500

    work page doi:10.1137/070699500 2009

  39. [39]

    J. R. Norris. Markov Chains. Cambridge University Press, 1998

    work page 1998

  40. [40]

    No´ e, C

    F. No´ e, C. Sch¨ utte, E. Vanden-Eijnden, L. Reich, and T. R. Weikl. Constructing the equilib- rium ensemble of folding pathways from short off-equilibrium simulations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(45):19011–19016, 2009. doi:10.1073/pnas.0905466106

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.0905466106 2009

  41. [41]

    Pedregosa, G

    F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:2825–2830, 2011

    work page 2011

  42. [42]

    Prinz, H

    J.-H. Prinz, H. Wu, M. Sarich, B. Keller, M. Senne, M. Held, J. Chodera, C. Sch¨ utte, and F. No´ e. Markov models of molecular kinetics: Generation and validation. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 134:174105, 2011. doi:10.1063/1.3565032

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3565032 2011

  43. [43]

    Rabin, J

    J. Rabin, J. Delon, and Y. Gousseau. Transportation distances on the circle. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 41, 2009. doi:10.1007/s10851-011-0284-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s10851-011-0284-0 2009

  44. [44]

    R¨ oblitz and M

    S. R¨ oblitz and M. Weber. Fuzzy spectral clustering by PCCA+: Application to Markov state models and data classification. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 7(2):147–179,

    work page

  45. [45]

    doi:10.1007/s11634-013-0134-6. 28

    work page doi:10.1007/s11634-013-0134-6

  46. [46]

    M. Sadeghi. Formation of membrane invaginations by curvature-inducing peripheral pro- teins: Free energy profiles, kinetics, and membrane-mediated effects. bioRxiv, 2023. doi:10.1101/2022.11.09.515891

    work page doi:10.1101/2022.11.09.515891 2023

  47. [47]

    Sadeghi and F

    M. Sadeghi and F. No´ e. Thermodynamics and kinetics of aggregation of flexible peripheral membrane proteins. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 12(43):10497–10504, 2021. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02954

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02954 2021

  48. [48]

    M. K. Scherer and contributors. MSMTools: Tools for estimating and analyzing Markov state models.https://github.com/markovmodel/msmtools, 2021. Open-source Python package, LGPLv3+

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    Schneide, M

    C. Schneide, M. Stahn, A. Pandey, O. Junge, P. Koltai, K. Padberg-Gehle, and J. Schumacher. Lagrangian coherent sets in turbulent Rayleigh-B´ enard convection. Physical Review E, 100: 053103, 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.100.053103

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.100.053103 2019

  50. [50]

    Sch¨ utte, A

    C. Sch¨ utte, A. Fischer, W. Huisinga, and P. Deuflhard. A direct approach to conformational dynamics based on hybrid monte carlo. Journal of Computational Physics, 151(1):146–168,

    work page

  51. [51]

    doi:10.1006/jcph.1999.6231

    work page doi:10.1006/jcph.1999.6231 1999

  52. [52]

    Sch¨ utte, S

    C. Sch¨ utte, S. Klus, and C. Hartmann. Overcoming the timescale barrier in molecular dy- namics: Transfer operators, variational principles and machine learning. Acta Numerica, 32: 517–673, 2023. doi:10.1017/S0962492923000016

    work page doi:10.1017/s0962492923000016 2023

  53. [53]

    C. M. Topaz, A. J. Bernoff, S. Logan, and W. Toolson. A model for rolling swarms of locusts. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 157:93–109, 2008. doi:10.1140/epjst/e2008- 00633-y

    work page doi:10.1140/epjst/e2008- 2008

  54. [54]

    Trendelkamp-Schroer, H

    B. Trendelkamp-Schroer, H. Wu, F. Paul, and F. No´ e. Estimation and uncertainty of reversible Markov models. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 143(17):174101, 2015. doi:10.1063/1.4934536

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4934536 2015

  55. [55]

    S. M. Ulam. A Collection of Mathematical Problems. Interscience Publisher NY, 1960

    work page 1960

  56. [56]

    Wehlitz, M

    N. Wehlitz, M. Sadeghi, A. Montefusco, C. Sch¨ utte, G. A. Pavliotis, and S. Winkelmann. Approximating particle-based clustering dynamics by stochastic PDEs. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 24(2):1231–1250, 2025. doi:10.1137/24M1676661

    work page doi:10.1137/24m1676661 2025

  57. [57]

    Winkelmann and C

    S. Winkelmann and C. Sch¨ utte.Stochastic Dynamics in Computational Biology, volume 645. Springer, 2020. 29

    work page 2020