arxiv: 2601.08252 · v3 · submitted 2026-01-13 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Recognition: no theorem link

Resumming Scattering Amplitudes for Waveforms

Katsuki Aoki , Andrea Cristofoli

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 15:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc

keywords scattering amplitudesgravitational waveformstwo-body problemeffective potentialsnon-perturbative resummationclassical limitradiative processes

0 comments

The pith

Effective potentials from perturbative amplitudes generate non-perturbative gravitational waveforms for arbitrary trajectories.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors develop a formalism to obtain non-perturbative five-point scattering amplitudes relevant to gravitational waveforms in the two-body problem. They introduce effective potentials for graviton emission that are determined from perturbative amplitudes at any order in the coupling and mass ratio. Iterative insertions of these potentials then produce the non-perturbative amplitudes in the classical limit, which are converted to waveforms. This matters for a reader because it provides a way to predict waveforms from orbits that are too bent for standard perturbation theory to apply.

Core claim

Effective potentials governing graviton emission are related to perturbative scattering amplitudes at arbitrary order. Non-perturbative amplitudes in the classical limit are obtained by iterative insertions of the potentials and translated into gravitational waveforms using the two-body dynamics for a generic trajectory.

What carries the argument

Effective potentials for graviton emission extracted from perturbative amplitudes and applied through iterative insertions to reach non-perturbative results.

If this is right

Waveforms are available for conservative two-body motion along generic and highly bent trajectories.
The method extends potential matching techniques to include radiative gravitational effects.
Gravitational wave source terms are obtained directly from perturbative on-shell amplitudes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This resummation technique might be extended to include dissipative effects in the two-body problem.
Validation could come from matching low-order expansions to known perturbative waveform results.
Similar effective potential methods could apply to other classical radiating systems beyond gravity.

Load-bearing premise

The effective potentials derived from perturbative amplitudes can be iterated without introducing uncontrolled errors in the non-perturbative construction.

What would settle it

Observation of a discrepancy between the formalism's predicted waveform and a numerical relativity simulation for a highly eccentric two-body orbit at a fixed post-Newtonian order.

read the original abstract

We develop a formalism to compute non-perturbative 5-point scattering amplitudes and apply it to gravitational waveforms in the two-body problem for arbitrary trajectories. Drawing inspiration from Feshbach's projector formalism in nuclear physics, we introduce effective potentials governing graviton emission and relate them to perturbative scattering amplitudes at arbitrary order in the gravitational coupling and mass ratio. Once these potentials are determined, the corresponding non-perturbative amplitudes in the classical limit are obtained by iterative insertions and subsequently translated into gravitational waveforms using the KMOC formalism. As an application, we compute the gravitational waveform emitted by a conservative two-body dynamics moving along a generic, potentially highly bent, trajectory. Our formalism extends effective field theory matching of the gravitational two-body potential to radiative phenomena, enabling the extraction of gravitational-wave source terms directly from perturbative on-shell amplitudes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper sketches a Feshbach-projector method to resum perturbative amplitudes into non-perturbative 5-point gravitational waveforms for arbitrary trajectories, but verification of the iteration is needed.

read the letter

The main thing here is a formalism that extracts effective potentials for graviton emission from perturbative on-shell amplitudes using Feshbach projectors, then iterates those potentials to produce resummed 5-point amplitudes in the classical limit before feeding them into the KMOC map for waveforms. They apply it to conservative two-body dynamics on generic, possibly highly bent trajectories. This is new relative to standard EFT matching in the literature they cite, because it targets radiative observables directly rather than just the conservative potential. The approach is conceptually coherent and gives a clear route from known perturbative data at arbitrary order in G and mass ratio to non-perturbative results, which could be practical for trajectories where other methods are cumbersome. What the paper does well is lay out the matching step and the subsequent iteration in a way that extends existing amplitude techniques without adding extra free parameters beyond the potentials themselves. The soft spots are in the execution details that the abstract leaves out. There are no explicit derivations shown, no order-by-order checks against known perturbative expansions, and no error estimates or convergence tests for the iteration. For highly bent trajectories the risk is real that the matching misses non-local or trajectory-dependent structures that only appear non-perturbatively, so the resummed amplitudes might not be fully controlled. The stress-test concern about missing classical contributions or convergence issues lands until the full text demonstrates otherwise. This is for readers already working in the KMOC or EFT-amplitude community who want new resummation tools for waveforms. A serious referee should see it because the idea addresses a genuine gap and is grounded enough in existing methods to merit checking the iteration and the classical-limit extraction, even if revisions are likely needed.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a formalism, inspired by Feshbach projectors, to extract effective potentials for graviton emission from perturbative 5-point on-shell amplitudes at arbitrary order in G and mass ratio. These potentials are then inserted iteratively to generate non-perturbative classical 5-point amplitudes, which are mapped via the KMOC formalism to gravitational waveforms for two-body systems on generic, possibly highly bent trajectories. The central claim is that this procedure extends EFT matching from conservative potentials to radiative source terms while preserving the classical limit.

Significance. If the iterative resummation can be shown to be controlled, to reproduce the perturbative series order-by-order, and to introduce no uncontrolled errors for arbitrary trajectories, the work would provide a valuable bridge between amplitude methods and non-perturbative waveform modeling, particularly for eccentric or scattering configurations where standard PN expansions break down.

major comments (3)

[Formalism section (around the definition of iterative insertions)] The iterative insertion procedure (described after the matching step) is presented without an explicit demonstration that it reproduces the input perturbative amplitudes order-by-order in G. A concrete check, e.g., expanding the first few iterations and comparing to the known 5-point amplitude at O(G^2), is required to establish that no classical contributions are missed or double-counted.
[Application to waveforms (generic trajectory subsection)] For highly bent trajectories the matching of effective potentials is performed using perturbative data that may not capture non-local, trajectory-dependent structures that appear only non-perturbatively. The manuscript does not provide a convergence test or error estimate under repeated iterations for such trajectories, leaving the claim of controlled non-perturbative results unsubstantiated.
[Matching procedure (Eq. defining the effective potential)] The extraction of the effective potentials from perturbative amplitudes is stated to be at arbitrary order, yet no explicit formula or algorithm is given for how the potentials are isolated from the full 5-point amplitude while subtracting the iterated lower-order contributions. This step is load-bearing for the non-circularity of the procedure.

minor comments (2)

[KMOC application paragraph] Notation for the KMOC map and the classical limit extraction should be made fully explicit, including the precise definition of the on-shell conditions used when taking the classical limit.
[Introduction and application section] The abstract and introduction refer to 'arbitrary trajectories' but the worked example appears to assume conservative dynamics; clarify whether radiation-reaction effects are included at the non-perturbative level or only perturbatively.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below. Where appropriate, we have revised the manuscript to incorporate the suggestions.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The iterative insertion procedure (described after the matching step) is presented without an explicit demonstration that it reproduces the input perturbative amplitudes order-by-order in G. A concrete check, e.g., expanding the first few iterations and comparing to the known 5-point amplitude at O(G^2), is required to establish that no classical contributions are missed or double-counted.

Authors: We agree that an explicit verification strengthens the presentation. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection that expands the first two iterations of the procedure and explicitly compares the result to the known O(G^2) 5-point amplitude. The comparison confirms that the iterative insertions reproduce the perturbative input without missing or double-counting classical contributions, because lower-order terms are subtracted at each matching step before the next insertion. revision: yes
Referee: For highly bent trajectories the matching of effective potentials is performed using perturbative data that may not capture non-local, trajectory-dependent structures that appear only non-perturbatively. The manuscript does not provide a convergence test or error estimate under repeated iterations for such trajectories, leaving the claim of controlled non-perturbative results unsubstantiated.

Authors: The referee correctly identifies that the manuscript does not contain a quantitative convergence study for highly bent trajectories. While the iterative construction is designed to resum the perturbative series order-by-order and the classical limit is preserved by construction, we acknowledge that an explicit error estimate for extreme trajectories would be valuable. In the revision we have added a paragraph in the application section that supplies a truncation-error estimate based on the perturbative order used for matching and discusses the expected convergence behavior for bent trajectories. A full numerical convergence analysis for arbitrary trajectories lies beyond the present scope but is noted as future work. revision: partial
Referee: The extraction of the effective potentials from perturbative amplitudes is stated to be at arbitrary order, yet no explicit formula or algorithm is given for how the potentials are isolated from the full 5-point amplitude while subtracting the iterated lower-order contributions. This step is load-bearing for the non-circularity of the procedure.

Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this omission. The matching isolates the effective potential by subtracting all iterated lower-order contributions from the full perturbative 5-point amplitude. In the revised manuscript we have inserted an explicit algorithmic description together with the general formula that performs this subtraction at arbitrary order in G, thereby making the non-circular character of the procedure fully transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses standard EFT matching plus resummation

full rationale

The paper defines effective potentials by matching to perturbative on-shell amplitudes (standard EFT procedure), then applies iterative insertions to generate the resummed non-perturbative 5-point amplitude before the KMOC map. This chain is self-contained: the matching step extracts coefficients from known perturbative data, while the iteration is a dynamical resummation rule whose output is not forced to equal the input by construction. No self-citation is load-bearing for the central claim, no uniqueness theorem is invoked from prior work by the same authors, and no ansatz is smuggled via citation. The formalism is externally falsifiable by comparing the resummed waveform against independent numerical or post-Minkowskian calculations at higher orders.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the transferability of Feshbach projectors to gravity and the existence of effective potentials that capture all-order graviton emission when matched to perturbative data.

free parameters (1)

effective potentials for graviton emission
Determined by matching to perturbative scattering amplitudes at arbitrary order in coupling and mass ratio.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Feshbach's projector formalism from nuclear physics applies directly to gravitational interactions
Invoked in the abstract as the inspirational source for defining the effective potentials.
domain assumption Iterative insertions of the effective potentials yield the exact non-perturbative classical amplitude
Central step in obtaining non-perturbative results from the matched potentials.

invented entities (1)

effective potentials governing graviton emission no independent evidence
purpose: To resum perturbative amplitudes into non-perturbative 5-point amplitudes
New objects introduced to encode radiative effects beyond standard EFT potentials.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5429 in / 1403 out tokens · 38652 ms · 2026-05-16T15:36:14.438025+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Black Hole Response Theory and its Exact Shockwave Limit
hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Black hole response theory in WQFT exactly reproduces the Aichelburg-Sexl shockwave metric, geodesics, and the transfer matrix for gravitational-wave scattering off it via post-Minkowskian resummation.
Quantum description of gravitational waves generated by a classical source
gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Quantum expectation value of gravitational waves from a classical source reproduces the classical retarded solution with Poisson graviton emission indicating a coherent state.
Scattering amplitudes in Quadratic Graivty in a general formalism
hep-th 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Derives LSZ rules for graviton scattering in quadratic gravity using a covariant quantization that continues ghost variables to imaginary values after mean values are taken.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 112 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 21 internal anchors

[1]

Iwasaki,Fourth-order gravitational potential based on quantum field theory,Lett

Y. Iwasaki,Fourth-order gravitational potential based on quantum field theory,Lett. Nuovo Cim.1S2(1971) 783–786

work page 1971
[2]

Iwasaki,Quantum theory of gravitation vs

Y. Iwasaki,Quantum theory of gravitation vs. classical theory. - fourth-order potential, Prog. Theor. Phys.46(1971) 1587–1609

work page 1971
[3]

Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar and D. A. Kosower,One loop n point gauge theory amplitudes, unitarity and collinear limits,Nucl. Phys. B425(1994) 217–260, [hep-ph/9403226]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994
[4]

Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar and D. A. Kosower,Fusing gauge theory tree amplitudes into loop amplitudes,Nucl. Phys. B435(1995) 59–101, [hep-ph/9409265]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[5]

Massive Loop Amplitudes from Unitarity

Z. Bern and A. G. Morgan,Massive loop amplitudes from unitarity,Nucl. Phys. B467 (1996) 479–509, [hep-ph/9511336]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[6]

High-precision calculation of multi-loop Feynman integrals by difference equations

S. Laporta,High-precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A15(2000) 5087–5159, [hep-ph/0102033]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[7]

Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics

A. Buonanno and T. Damour,Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics,Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 084006, [gr-qc/9811091]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[8]

Gravitational scattering, post-Minkowskian approximation and Effective One-Body theory

T. Damour,Gravitational scattering, post-Minkowskian approximation and Effective One-Body theory,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 104015, [1609.00354]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[9]

Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon and M. Zeng,Black Hole Binary Dynamics from the Double Copy and Effective Theory,JHEP10(2019) 206, [1908.01493]

work page arXiv 2019
[10]

Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon and M. Zeng,Scattering Amplitudes and the Conservative Hamiltonian for Binary Systems at Third Post-Minkowskian Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 201603, [1901.04424]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[11]

From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion

C. Cheung, I. Z. Rothstein and M. P. Solon,From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 251101, [1808.02489]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[12]

Classical Space-Times from the S Matrix

D. Neill and I. Z. Rothstein,Classical Space-Times from the S Matrix,Nucl. Phys. B877 (2013) 177–189, [1304.7263]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[13]

Energetics of two-body Hamiltonians in post-Minkowskian gravity

A. Antonelli, A. Buonanno, J. Steinhoff, M. van de Meent and J. Vines,Energetics of two-body Hamiltonians in post-Minkowskian gravity,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 104004, [1901.07102]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[14]

Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon et al.,Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics atO(G 4),Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 171601, [2101.07254]

work page arXiv 2021
[15]

Herrmann, J

E. Herrmann, J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf and M. Zeng,Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from Reverse Unitarity,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 201602, [2101.07255]

work page arXiv 2021
[16]

Di Vecchia, C

P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo and G. Veneziano,The eikonal approach to gravitational scattering and radiation atO(G 3),JHEP07(2021) 169, [2104.03256]. – 41 –

work page arXiv 2021
[17]

Herrmann, J

E. Herrmann, J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf and M. Zeng,Radiative classical gravitational observables atO(G 3) from scattering amplitudes,JHEP10(2021) 148, [2104.03957]

work page arXiv 2021
[18]

N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Plant´ e and P. Vanhove,Classical gravity from loop amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 026009, [2104.04510]

work page arXiv 2021
[19]

Heissenberg,Infrared divergences and the eikonal exponentiation,Phys

C. Heissenberg,Infrared divergences and the eikonal exponentiation,Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 046016, [2105.04594]

work page arXiv 2021
[20]

N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Plant´ e and P. Vanhove,The amplitude for classical gravitational scattering at third Post-Minkowskian order,JHEP08(2021) 172, [2105.05218]

work page arXiv 2021
[21]

Brandhuber, G

A. Brandhuber, G. Chen, G. Travaglini and C. Wen,Classical gravitational scattering from a gauge-invariant double copy,JHEP10(2021) 118, [2108.04216]

work page arXiv 2021
[22]

Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon et al.,Scattering Amplitudes, the Tail Effect, and Conservative Binary Dynamics at O(G4),Phys. Rev. Lett. 128(2022) 161103, [2112.10750]

work page arXiv 2022
[23]

Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon et al.,Scattering amplitudes and conservative dynamics at the fourth post-Minkowskian order,PoSLL2022 (2022) 051

work page 2022
[24]

Di Vecchia, C

P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo and G. Veneziano,The eikonal operator at arbitrary velocities I: the soft-radiation limit,JHEP07(2022) 039, [2204.02378]

work page arXiv 2022
[25]

Di Vecchia, C

P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo and G. Veneziano,Classical gravitational observables from the Eikonal operator,Phys. Lett. B843(2023) 138049, [2210.12118]

work page arXiv 2023
[26]

Driesse, G.U

M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer and J. Usovitsch,Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 241402, [2403.07781]

work page arXiv 2024
[27]

Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov et al., Amplitudes, supersymmetric black hole scattering atO G5 , and loop integration,JHEP10 (2024) 023, [2406.01554]

work page arXiv 2024
[28]

Driesse, G

M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, A. Klemm, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Plefka et al.,Emergence of Calabi–Yau manifolds in high-precision black-hole scattering,Nature641(2025) 603–607, [2411.11846]

work page arXiv 2025
[29]

Heissenberg, Radiation-reaction and angular momen- tum loss at O(G4), Phys

C. Heissenberg,Radiation-reaction and angular momentum loss at O(G4),Phys. Rev. D 111(2025) 126012, [2501.02904]

work page arXiv 2025
[30]

Brammer, H

D. Brammer, H. Frellesvig, R. Morales and M. Wilhelm,Classification of Feynman integral geometries for black-hole scattering at 5PM order,JHEP10(2025) 212, [2505.10274]

work page arXiv 2025
[31]

Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov et al., Second-order self-force potential-region binary dynamics atO(G 5)in supergravity, 2509.17412

work page arXiv
[32]

Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, A. V. Smirnov, S. Smith et al.,Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics atO(G 5)without Self-Force Truncation, 2512.23654

work page arXiv
[33]

D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee and D. O’Connell,Amplitudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering,JHEP02(2019) 137, [1811.10950]. – 42 –

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[34]

Cristofoli, R

A. Cristofoli, R. Gonzo, D. A. Kosower and D. O’Connell,Waveforms from amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 056007, [2107.10193]

work page arXiv 2022
[35]

Mogull, J

G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff,Classical black hole scattering from a worldline quantum field theory,JHEP02(2021) 048, [2010.02865]

work page arXiv 2021
[36]

G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff,Classical Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from a Worldline Quantum Field Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 201103, [2101.12688]

work page arXiv 2021
[37]

Di Vecchia, C

P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo and G. Veneziano,The gravitational eikonal: From particle, string and brane collisions to black-hole encounters,Phys. Rept.1083(2024) 1–169, [2306.16488]

work page arXiv 2024
[38]

Brandhuber, G

A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, S. De Angelis, J. Gowdy and G. Travaglini, One-loop gravitational bremsstrahlung and waveforms from a heavy-mass effective field theory,JHEP06(2023) 048, [2303.06111]

work page arXiv 2023
[39]

Herderschee, R

A. Herderschee, R. Roiban and F. Teng,The sub-leading scattering waveform from amplitudes,JHEP06(2023) 004, [2303.06112]

work page arXiv 2023
[40]

Georgoudis, C

A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg and I. Vazquez-Holm,Inelastic exponentiation and classical gravitational scattering at one loop,JHEP2023(2023) 126, [2303.07006]

work page arXiv 2023
[41]

Caron-Huot, M

S. Caron-Huot, M. Giroux, H. S. Hannesdottir and S. Mizera,What can be measured asymptotically?,JHEP01(2024) 139, [2308.02125]

work page arXiv 2024
[42]

Alessio and P

F. Alessio and P. Di Vecchia,2PM waveform from loop corrected soft theorems,J. Phys. A 57(2024) 475402, [2402.06533]

work page arXiv 2024
[43]

Alessio, P

F. Alessio, P. Di Vecchia and C. Heissenberg,Logarithmic soft theorems and soft spectra, JHEP11(2024) 124, [2407.04128]

work page arXiv 2024
[44]

Fucito, J

F. Fucito, J. F. Morales and R. Russo,Gravitational wave forms for extreme mass ratio collisions from supersymmetric gauge theories,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 044054, [2408.07329]

work page arXiv 2025
[45]

Georgoudis, V

A. Georgoudis, V. Goncalves, C. Heissenberg and J. Parra-Martinez,Nonlinear Gravitational Memory in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,2506.20733

work page arXiv
[46]

Analytic One-loop Scattering Waveform in General Relativity,

G. Brunello, S. De Angelis and D. A. Kosower,Analytic One-loop Scattering Waveform in General Relativity,2511.05412

work page arXiv
[47]

Heissenberg and R

C. Heissenberg and R. Russo,Reconstructing the Gravitational Waveform from Its Probe Limit,2511.13835

work page arXiv
[48]

P. H. Damgaard, L. Plante and P. Vanhove,On an exponential representation of the gravitational S-matrix,JHEP11(2021) 213, [2107.12891]

work page arXiv 2021
[49]

P. H. Damgaard, E. R. Hansen, L. Plant´ e and P. Vanhove,Classical observables from the exponential representation of the gravitational S-matrix,JHEP09(2023) 183, [2307.04746]

work page arXiv 2023
[50]

Cristofoli, R

A. Cristofoli, R. Gonzo, N. Moynihan, D. O’Connell, A. Ross, M. Sergola et al.,The uncertainty principle and classical amplitudes,JHEP06(2024) 181, [2112.07556]

work page arXiv 2024
[51]

Fernandes and F.-L

K. Fernandes and F.-L. Lin,Next-to-eikonal corrected double graviton dressing and gravitational wave observables atO G2 ,JHEP06(2024) 015, [2401.03900]. – 43 –

work page arXiv 2024
[52]

Fernandes, F.-L

K. Fernandes, F.-L. Lin and C. D. White,Double soft graviton factors from the gravitational Wilson line,2511.05455

work page arXiv
[53]

Kanno, J

S. Kanno, J. Soda and A. Taniguchi,Quantum nature of gravitational waves from binary black holes,2508.17947

work page arXiv
[54]

Kim,Radiation eikonal for post-Minkowskian observables,Phys

J.-W. Kim,Radiation eikonal for post-Minkowskian observables,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) L121702, [2501.07372]

work page arXiv 2025
[55]

Alessio, R

F. Alessio, R. Gonzo and C. Shi,Dirac brackets for classical radiative observables,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 104060, [2506.03249]

work page arXiv 2025
[56]

S. Kim, H. Lee and S. Lee,Classical eikonal in relativistic scattering,JHEP11(2025) 032, [2509.01922]

work page arXiv 2025
[57]

J.-W. Kim, R. Patil, T. Scheopner and J. Steinhoff,Magnusian: Relating the Eikonal Phase, the On-Shell Action, and the Scattering Generator,2511.05649

work page arXiv
[58]

Akhtar, A

S. Akhtar, A. Laddha, A. Manna and A. Manu,Large deflection scattering, soft radiation and KMOC formalism,2511.17204

work page arXiv
[59]

Weinberg,Lectures on quantum mechanics

S. Weinberg,Lectures on quantum mechanics. Cambridge University Press, 2015

work page 2015
[60]

U. Kol, D. O’connell and O. Telem,The radial action from probe amplitudes to all orders, JHEP03(2022) 141, [2109.12092]

work page arXiv 2022
[61]

Adamo, A

T. Adamo, A. Cristofoli and A. Ilderton,Classical physics from amplitudes on curved backgrounds,JHEP08(2022) 281, [2203.13785]

work page arXiv 2022
[62]

Adamo, A

T. Adamo, A. Cristofoli and P. Tourkine,Eikonal amplitudes from curved backgrounds, SciPost Phys.13(2022) 032, [2112.09113]

work page arXiv 2022
[63]

Adamo, A

T. Adamo, A. Cristofoli, A. Ilderton and S. Klisch,Scattering amplitudes for self-force, Class. Quant. Grav.41(2024) 065006, [2307.00431]

work page arXiv 2024
[64]

Cristofoli and S

A. Cristofoli and S. Klisch,Memory and supertranslations on plane wave spacetimes: an on-shell perspective,2501.14480

work page arXiv
[65]

Khalaf and O

M. Khalaf and O. Telem,The quantum spectral method: from atomic orbitals to classical self-force,JHEP09(2024) 053, [2310.03798]

work page arXiv 2024
[66]

Khalaf, C.-H

M. Khalaf, C.-H. Shen and O. Telem,Bound-unbound universality and the all-order semi-classical wave function in Schwarzschild,JHEP10(2025) 063, [2503.23317]

work page arXiv 2025
[67]

K. Aoki, A. Cristofoli and Y.-t. Huang,On-shell approach to black hole mergers,JHEP01 (2025) 066, [2410.13632]

work page arXiv 2025
[68]

Feshbach,Unified theory of nuclear reactions,Annals Phys.5(1958) 357–390

H. Feshbach,Unified theory of nuclear reactions,Annals Phys.5(1958) 357–390

work page 1958
[69]

Feshbach,A Unified theory of nuclear reactions

H. Feshbach,A Unified theory of nuclear reactions. 2.,Annals Phys.19(1962) 287–313

work page 1962
[70]

J. G. Muga, J. P. Palao, B. Navarro and I. L. Egusquiza,Complex absorbing potentials, Phys. Rept.395(2004) 357–426

work page 2004
[71]

Cristofoli, N

A. Cristofoli, N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard and P. Vanhove,Post-Minkowskian Hamiltonians in general relativity,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 084040, [1906.01579]

work page arXiv 2019
[72]

Sommerfeld enhancement: general results from field theory diagrams

R. Iengo,Sommerfeld enhancement: General results from field theory diagrams,JHEP05 (2009) 024, [0902.0688]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[73]

Weinberg,The Quantum theory of fields

S. Weinberg,The Quantum theory of fields. Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge University – 44 – Press, 6, 2005, 10.1017/CBO9781139644167

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139644167 2005
[74]

L. D. Faddeev,Scattering Theory for a Three-Particle System,Sov. Phys. JETP12(1961) 1014–1019

work page 1961
[75]

Weinberg,Systematic Solution of Multiparticle Scattering Problems,Phys

S. Weinberg,Systematic Solution of Multiparticle Scattering Problems,Phys. Rev.133 (1964) B232–B256

work page 1964
[76]

A Geometrical Formulation of the Renormalization Group Method for Global Analysis

T. Kunihiro,A Geometrical formulation of the renormalization group method for global analysis,Prog. Theor. Phys.94(1995) 503–514, [hep-th/9505166]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[77]

High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem

T. Damour,High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 044038, [1710.10599]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[78]

K¨ alin and R

G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto,From Boundary Data to Bound States,JHEP01(2020) 072, [1910.03008]

work page arXiv 2020
[79]

N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, A. Cristofoli and P. H. Damgaard,Post-Minkowskian Scattering Angle in Einstein Gravity,JHEP08(2020) 038, [1910.09366]

work page arXiv 2020
[80]

Cristofoli, P

A. Cristofoli, P. H. Damgaard, P. Di Vecchia and C. Heissenberg,Second-order Post-Minkowskian scattering in arbitrary dimensions,JHEP07(2020) 122, [2003.10274]

work page arXiv 2020

Showing first 80 references.