Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 1 cited by

Einsteinian cubic gravity horizonless objects are claimed to host static stable timelike circular orbits that coincide with the ISCO and produce the Aschenbach effect.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 08:05 UTC pith:MREGA6C7

load-bearing objection A clean analytic application of the static-orbit formalism to ECG horizonless solutions, with a wrong ZAMO velocity formula and unverified numerics standing between the qualitative claims and full credibility. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2601.18122 v3 pith:MREGA6C7 submitted 2026-01-26 gr-qc

Static stable timelike circular orbits and Aschenbach effect in horizonless solutions of Einsteinian cubic gravity

Zhen-Hua Zhao , Yong-Qiang Wang This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords Einsteinian cubic gravityhorizonless compact objectsstatic stable circular orbitsISCOAschenbach effecttimelike geodesicshigher-curvature gravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that horizonless compact objects in Einsteinian cubic gravity — a purely gravitational, electrically neutral, static and spherically symmetric setting — possess static stable timelike circular orbits, on which a massive test particle stays at rest relative to a distant observer. These orbits are shown to coincide with the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) of the spacetime, because inside them the metric function f(r) has negative slope and circular orbits are forbidden. The same configurations display the Aschenbach effect: the orbital velocity measured by a zero-angular-momentum observer first rises and then falls as the orbit approaches the center, reversing the monotonic Schwarzschild behavior. The paper further finds a 'double stable region' structure and stable near-center orbits with specific energy greater than one, implying that an infalling particle can release more than its own rest-mass energy. If these claims hold, ECG horizonless objects would give a clean, purely gravitational testbed for static-orbit signatures that could be distinguished from black holes observationally.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that in ECG horizonless spacetimes the existence condition for a static stable timelike circular orbit reduces to f(r)>0, f'(r)=0 and f''(r)>0 at a single radius — the minimum of the metric function f(r). Numerically integrating the ECG field equation (their Eq. 2.4) with asymptotic flatness and positive central value f0, the authors find such a minimum in both solution branches (for f0=0.9 and f0=0.5), with the location depending on the coupling λ. Since f'(r)<0 for r<r_SSCO, this radius is also the ISCO (r_ISCO=r_SSCO). The paper verifies stability by perturbing geodesics angularly and radially. It then shows that the ZAMO-measured circular velocity v^(phi)=sqr

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the metric function f(r). All the paper's results flow from its radial behavior: a circular orbit exists where the effective potential Veff(r)=1/2 f(r)(1+L^2/r^2) has a stationary point, and a static orbit requires L=0 and Ω=0, which forces f'(r)=0. The stability condition f''(r)≥0 makes the static orbit a minimum of Veff, and because f'(r)<0 is forbidden inside that radius, the same radius is the ISCO. The ZAMO velocity v^(phi)=sqrt(r f'(r)/2)/f(r) and the angular velocity Ω_CO=sqrt(f'(r)/(2r)) carry the Aschenbach-signature analysis, while D(r)=2f(r)-r f'(r)/2≥0 delimits the allowed circular-orbit regions.

Load-bearing premise

The entire argument rests on the numerical solutions of equation (2.4) truly having a local minimum of f(r) with f''>0 inside the physically allowed region for the stated boundary conditions; the paper reports this feature from finite-element integration without convergence tests, error bars, or independent verification, so a wrong numerical branch or an under-resolved mesh would erase the SSTCO-ISCO identification and the Aschenbach profile along with it.

What would settle it

Recompute the boundary-value problem of Eq. (2.4) with boundary conditions (2.5)-(2.6) using an independent method (e.g., a high-accuracy spectral solver with error control) for a representative case such as f0=0.9, λ=10 (Branch 1). If the metric does not develop a local minimum at r≈4.065 with f''>0 and f(r)>0 — or if a direct integration of the geodesic equations starting at that radius with Ω=0 does not remain bounded — the central claim fails. Alternatively, locate the minimum of the effective potential Veff(r) for L=0 and check whether it coincides with the zero of f'(r); if the two disag

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the static stable orbits form part of an accretion disk, the disk will contain a ring that is unaffected by Doppler shifts, offering a clean observational signature distinguishing ECG horizonless objects from Schwarzschild black holes.
  • The Aschenbach effect in these spacetimes makes the ZAMO-measured orbital velocity decrease inward near the center, which could excite 3:1 epicyclic resonances and, if observed, constrain the ECG coupling λ.
  • The identification r_ISCO = r_SSCO means that any measured ISCO radius in an accretion disk directly probes the minimum of f(r) and hence the cubic-gravity corrections.
  • In Branch 2 for large λ, the allowed circular-orbit region becomes discontinuous, so accretion structures may exhibit gaps or double rings rather than a single continuous disk.
  • Because stable near-center orbits can have E > 1, a particle falling inward can release energy exceeding its rest mass, which could drive bright thermal or non-thermal emission as matter accretes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct extension would be to compute the emitted spectrum of an accretion disk in these spacetimes; if a static ring contributes an emission line free of Doppler broadening, it could mimic or be confused with a black hole photon ring, suggesting a clean way to distinguish horizonless ECG objects from Schwarzschild black holes.
  • The paper leaves implicit that the double stable region and the E>1 near-center orbits imply an energy-release mechanism that could power high-energy phenomena such as jets or flares around horizonless objects; this could be tested by building a disk model and forward-simulating its photon flux.
  • The same reasoning — an SSTCO at a minimum of gtt — should apply to any horizonless higher-curvature gravity solution whose metric function develops an extremum, so the result is likely a generic feature of quasi-topological or cubic gravities rather than a special property of this one coupling.
  • The non-monotonic v^(phi) profile suggests that quasi-periodic oscillations in the 3:1 resonance band, originally proposed for rapidly rotating Kerr black holes, might also be searched for around these horizonless objects; a testable prediction is the frequency ratio connected to the double stable region.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper studies timelike circular orbits in static, spherically symmetric, horizonless solutions of Einsteinian cubic gravity (ECG). The authors derive the geodesic equations and the effective potential for circular orbits, obtain the conditions for static stable timelike circular orbits (SSTCOs) as f>0, f'=0, f''≥0, and then use numerical solutions of the ECG field equations (computed with FEniCSx and taken partly from prior work of the second author) to locate these orbits in two solution branches. They identify the SSTCO radius with the ISCO radius, report a non-monotonic ZAMO-measured orbital velocity profile (the Aschenbach effect), and claim that the specific energy of stable orbits near the center can be larger than 1, so that a transition to the inner edge can release more energy than the particle's rest mass. The analytic part of the geodesic derivation is straightforward and, given f(r), the stability conditions are correct. The main weaknesses are the lack of numerical verification of the background solutions and an error in the ZAMO velocity formula that affects the quantitative support for the Aschenbach-effect claim.

Significance. If the numerical background solutions are reliable, the paper reports a clean, purely gravitational example of static stable timelike circular orbits in horizonless compact objects, with a plausible association to the ISCO and to the Aschenbach effect. The analytic derivation of the SSTCO conditions is transparent and useful, and the distinction between Branch 1 and Branch 2 behaviors is potentially interesting for accretion-disk phenomenology. The paper does not provide machine-checkable proofs or downloadable code, and no independent numerical verification is presented for the central input f(r). The claimed observable signatures—Doppler-free rings and non-monotonic orbital velocities—are falsifiable in principle, which adds to the interest. However, the quantitative claims are currently undermined by the velocity-formula error and by the absence of convergence/tests for the BVP solutions.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4 (ZAMO velocity formula)] The displayed formula v(φ) = √(−r g_{tt,r}/(2 g_tt²)) = √(r f'/2)/f(r) is incorrect. For the metric (2.3), the local orbital velocity measured by a static/ZAMO observer is v(φ) = √(r f'/(2 f)), not divided by f. Indeed, for Schwarzschild at r=3M the printed formula gives √3 > 1 (superluminal), while the correct expression gives 1. Since Figure 7 is the quantitative basis for the Aschenbach-effect claim, all v(φ) profiles and the associated discussion must be recalculated with the corrected formula. The qualitative non-monotonicity may survive, but that must be demonstrated after the correction.
  2. [§2, Eq. (2.4)–(2.6) and Fig. 1] The central claims—SSTCO existence, r_ISCO = r_SSCO, and the non-monotonic velocity profiles—all inherit the input metric function f(r) from numerical solutions of the singular BVP (2.4)–(2.6). The paper provides no mesh-refinement study, residual check, comparison against an independent ODE solver, or explicit error estimate for r(f_min) or f''(r_SSCO). Since the ODE is singular at r=0 and is solved on a compactified domain, an unresolved boundary layer or an inconsistent enforcement of f'(∞)=0 could shift or remove the local minimum that defines the SSTCO. Please add: (i) a convergence table as the finite-element mesh is refined, (ii) a residual check of Eq. (2.4) for the reported solutions, (iii) verification of the boundary conditions f(0)=f0, f(∞)=1, f'(∞)=0, and (iv) a description of how the two branches are defined, distinguished, and continued in λ.
  3. [§4, final paragraph; Abstract] The ΔE>1 result is presented as a key finding but is not supported by an explicit calculation. In Branch 2, E diverges at D=0, so the 'outer edge' of the inner stable region appears to be a photon-sphere boundary rather than a stable circular orbit; in Branch 1, E is finite and it is unclear from the figures whether the drop from the outer to the inner edge actually exceeds 1. The authors should specify the orbital radii, the values E_outer, E_ISCO, and ΔE for at least one representative solution, and confirm that the transition is between stable circular orbits. In addition, since E is the conserved specific energy normalized to rest mass, E>1 corresponds to an unbound orbit at infinity; the statement that particles can 'smoothly transition' inward from such an orbit should be qualified.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§3, after Eq. (3.4)] Typo: 'particlens motion' should be 'particle's motion'.
  2. [§5] Typo: 'ifirst increasing' should be 'first increasing'.
  3. [Introduction, first paragraph] The phrase 'static stable timelike circular circular orbits' contains a duplicated 'circular'.
  4. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption text refers to '(a) f0 = 0.9 and (b) f0 = 0.5' but the figure contains four panels (a)–(d); update the caption to describe all panels.
  5. [§3, Eq. (3.6)–(3.7)] The notation V(r) in Eq. (3.6) and V_eff(r) in Eq. (3.7) is confusing: V is defined via (1/2)ṙ² + V = 0, whereas V_eff is used for the stability analysis. The relation dV/dr = dV_eff/dr should be stated explicitly so that condition (3.11) is seen to apply to V_eff.
  6. [§3, Eq. (3.14)] The term 'SSTCO' is used in the abstract but not defined in the body; define the abbreviation when the condition is introduced.
  7. [References] Ref. [20] is an arXiv preprint that supplies the central background solutions; if the work has been published or accepted, the published version should be cited, otherwise the numerical data should be made available as supplementary material for reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the geodesic derivation is self-contained; reliance on a co-author's prior numerical solutions and an apparent formula typo are reproducibility/correctness concerns, not circular reasoning.

full rationale

The paper's main derivation chain is not circular. The metric functions f(r) are obtained by solving the field-equation BVP (2.4)-(2.6) with FEniCSx, and the SSTCO condition (3.14) (f>0, f'=0, f''>=0) is derived from the effective potential (3.7)-(3.13) by substituting L_CO=0; it is not an imposed input. The identification r_ISCO=r_SSCO follows from the numerical observation that f'<0 for all r<r_SSCO, so no circular orbits exist inside; this is a derived consequence rather than a definitional identity. The Aschenbach velocity and specific-energy profiles are evaluated from formulas (3.8)-(3.10) and the photon-sphere condition D=0; in particular the Delta E>1 claim follows from E=-g_tt/sqrt(D) diverging at D=0, so it is not a fitted parameter. The only self-citation is ref. [20] by co-author Y.-Q. Wang for the existence of horizonless ECG solutions and the numerical method, but the present paper recomputes the solutions and the cited work is not, in the quoted text, already asserting the SSTCO/ISCO/Aschenbach conclusions. Lack of convergence tests/code and an apparent typo in the displayed ZAMO-velocity formula are correctness risks, not circularity. Hence no load-bearing circular step is found; score 2 reflects the minor self-citation/reproducibility caveat only.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. The analysis uses the existing ECG theory and horizonless solutions from prior work. The free parameters λ and f0 are scanned by hand, not fitted to data.

free parameters (2)
  • λ (ECG coupling) = Scanned values: 0.62, 0.7, 1, 10, 100, 1000 (dimensionless after scaling)
    Chosen by hand to explore the solution space; the existence and properties of SSTCO, the double stable region, and the Aschenbach profile depend on this parameter.
  • f0 (metric function at the center) = 0.9 and 0.5 (examples)
    Chosen by hand; positive value ensures a regular, horizonless center. The value of f0 affects the location of the static orbit and the particle energies.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The ECG action (2.1) with P (2.2) reduces, for a static spherically symmetric metric (2.3), to the ODE (2.4).
    Carried over from the cited ECG literature (refs. 21–23); not re-derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption The boundary conditions f(∞)=1, f'(∞)=0, and f(0)=f0>0 define a unique, asymptotically flat, horizonless solution for given λ and f0, with the two branches as described.
    Assumed in Section 2; no existence/uniqueness proof is given beyond the numerical construction.
  • domain assumption The FEniCSx finite-element solver yields an accurate solution of the boundary-value problem.
    No convergence study or error estimate is provided; all subsequent results depend on the numerical f(r).
  • standard math Standard timelike geodesic equations and the effective-potential method apply.
    Eqs. (3.1)–(3.6) are textbook material; no issues.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 10753 in / 20982 out tokens · 189099 ms · 2026-08-03T08:05:34.505111+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In modified gravity theories, horizonless compact objects serve as a compelling alternative to black holes for testing strong-field gravity. Einsteinian cubic gravity (ECG) provides a gravitational framework for constructing these viable astrophysical models. We investigate the existence, stability, and observable signatures of static stable timelike circular orbits (SSTCOs) in static spherically symmetric ECG horizonless spacetimes. We derive timelike geodesic equations, construct the effective potential for circular orbits, and perform a numerical integration to verify orbital stability. We confirm that SSTCOs exist in both solution branches of ECG horizonless objects and that their radii coincide with the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO). The Aschenbach effect manifests as a non-monotonic radial dependence of a zero angular momentum observer (ZAMO) measured velocity. Furthermore, we find that the stability of circular orbits exhibits a 'double stable region' structure. As the specific energy $E$ of a test particle transitions from the outer edge to the inner edge (i.e., the ISCO) of the inner stable region, its variation can exceed $1$ (i.e., $\Delta E > 1$), implying that during this process, the gravitational system can release an amount of energy exceeding the rest mass of the particle itself.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Static spheres in black hole spacetimes: pairing, energy conditions, and an upper bound on the innermost radius

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Static spheres around black holes come in unstable/stable pairs, need negative radial pressure, and their innermost radius obeys a new upper bound tied to strong-energy-condition violation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 39 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Abbott, R

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, B. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott et al., Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116 (2016) 061102 [1602.03837]. – 12 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    Akiyama, A

    Event Horizon Telescope collaboration, K. Akiyama, A. Alberdi, W. Alef et al., First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.875 (2019) L1 [1906.11238]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    Akiyama, A

    Event Horizon Telescope collaboration, K. Akiyama, A. Alberdi, W. Alef et al., First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way, Astrophys. J. Lett.930 (2022) L12 [2311.08680]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    L. G. Collodel, B. Kleihaus and J. Kunz, Static Orbits in Rotating Spacetimes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 201103 [1711.05191]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    M. C. Teodoro, L. G. Collodel and J. Kunz, Retrograde Polish Doughnuts around Boson Stars, JCAP 03 (2021) 063 [2011.10288]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    M. C. Teodoro, L. G. Collodel, D. Doneva, J. Kunz, P. Nedkova and S. Yazadjiev, Thick toroidal configurations around scalarized Kerr black holes, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 124047 [2108.08640]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Wei, Y.-P

    S.-W. Wei, Y.-P. Zhang, Y.-X. Liu and R. B. Mann, Static spheres around spherically symmetric black hole spacetime, Phys. Rev. Res.5 (2023) 043050 [2303.06814]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    P. K. Yerra, S. Mukherji and C. Bhamidipati, Static spheres and Aschenbach effect for black holes in massive gravity, Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 124018 [2411.01261]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Wei and Y.-X

    S.-W. Wei and Y.-X. Liu, Aschenbach effect and circular orbits in static and spherically symmetric black hole backgrounds, Phys. Dark Univ.43 (2023) 101409 [2308.11883]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    M. A. S. Afshar and J. Sadeghi, Mechanisms behind the aschenbach effect in non-rotating black hole spacetime, Ann. Phys, 474 (2025) 169953 [2412.06357]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Aschenbach, Measuring mass and angular momentum of black holes with high-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations, Astron

    B. Aschenbach, Measuring mass and angular momentum of black holes with high-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations, Astron. Astrophys.425 (2004) 1075 [astro-ph/0406545]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  12. [12]

    Aschenbach, Mass and angular momentum of Sgr A*, in Conference on Growing Black Holes: Accretion in a Cosmological Context, Oct., 2004, astro-ph/0410328, DOI

    B. Aschenbach, Mass and angular momentum of Sgr A*, in Conference on Growing Black Holes: Accretion in a Cosmological Context, Oct., 2004, astro-ph/0410328, DOI

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  13. [13]

    Aschenbach, Mass and Angular Momentum of Black Holes: An Overlooked Effect of General Relativity Applied to the Galactic Center Black Hole Sgr A*, Chin

    B. Aschenbach, Mass and Angular Momentum of Black Holes: An Overlooked Effect of General Relativity Applied to the Galactic Center Black Hole Sgr A*, Chin. J. Astron. Astrophys. 6 (2006) 1221 [astro-ph/0603193]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  14. [14]

    Stuchlík, P

    Z. Stuchlík, P. Slaný, G. Török and M. A. Abramowicz, Aschenbach effect: Unexpected topology changes in the motion of particles and fluids orbiting rapidly rotating kerr black holes, Phys. Rev. D71 (2005) 24037 [gr-qc/0411091]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  15. [15]

    Mueller and B

    A. Mueller and B. Aschenbach, Non-monotonic orbital velocity profiles around rapidly rotating kerr-(anti-)de sitter black holes, Cl., Quant, Grav,24 (2007) 2637 [0704.3963]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  16. [16]

    Stuchlik, M

    Z. Stuchlik, M. Blaschke and P. Slany, Non-monotonic keplerian velocity profiles around near-extreme braneworld kerr black holes, Cl., Quant, Grav,28 (2011) 175002 [1108.0191]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  17. [17]

    Tursunov, Z

    A. Tursunov, Z. Stuchlík and M. Kološ, Circular orbits and related quasiharmonic oscillatory motion of charged particles around weakly magnetized rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 084012 [1603.07264]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    Khodagholizadeh, V

    J. Khodagholizadeh, V. Perlick and A. Vahedi, Aschenbach effect for spinning particles in kerr spacetime, Phys, Rev, D102 (2020) 24021 [2002.04701]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    Vahedi, J

    A. Vahedi, J. Khodagholizadeh and A. Tursunov, Aschenbach effect for spinning particles in kerr-(a)dS spacetime, Eur, Phys, J. C81 (2021) 280 [2103.14912]. – 13 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    Wang, Frozen gravitational stars in Einsteinian cubic gravity, arXiv:2410.04575 [gr-qc] (2024) [ 2410.04575]

    Y.-Q. Wang, Frozen gravitational stars in Einsteinian cubic gravity, arXiv:2410.04575 [gr-qc] (2024) [ 2410.04575]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Bueno and P

    P. Bueno and P. A. Cano, Einsteinian cubic gravity, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 104005 [1607.06463]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  22. [22]

    Bueno and P

    P. Bueno and P. A. Cano, Four-dimensional black holes in Einsteinian cubic gravity, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 124051 [1610.08019]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    R. A. Hennigar and R. B. Mann, Black holes in Einsteinian cubic gravity, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 064055 [1610.06675]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  24. [24]

    D. J. Burger, W. T. Emond and N. Moynihan, Rotating black holes in cubic gravity, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 084009 [1910.11618]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Adair, P

    C. Adair, P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar and R. B. Mann, Slowly rotating black holes in Einsteinian cubic gravity, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 084001 [2004.09598]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    P. A. Cano and D. Pereñiguez, Extremal rotating black holes in einsteinian cubic gravity, Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) 044016 [1910.10721]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    A. M. Frassino and J. V. Rocha, Charged black holes in einsteinian cubic gravity and nonuniqueness, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 024035 [2002.04071]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    Kord Zangeneh and A

    M. Kord Zangeneh and A. Kazemi, Topological born–infeld charged black holes in einsteinian cubic gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C80 (2020) 794 [2003.04458]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    S. N. Sajadi and S. H. Hendi, Analytically approximation solution to einstein-cubic gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C82 (2022) 675 [2207.13435]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    L. A. Lessa and J. E. G. Silva, Regular black holes in einstein cubic gravity, arXiv:2305.18254 [gr-qc] (2023) [ 2305.18254]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    H. R. Bakhtiarizadeh, Charged rotating black strings in einsteinian cubic gravity, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 064037 [2111.02663]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    H. R. Bakhtiarizadeh and H. Golchin, Rotating black strings in einsteinian cubic gravity with born-infeld electrodynamics, Iran. J. Phys. Res.22 (2022) 663

    2022

  33. [33]

    Bueno, P

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, J. Moreno and Á. Murcia, All higher-curvature gravities as Generalized quasi-topological gravities, JHEP 11 (2019) 062 [1906.00987]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    Cisterna, N

    A. Cisterna, N. Grandi and J. Oliva, On four-dimensional Einsteinian gravity, quasitopological gravity, cosmology and black holes, Phys. Lett. B805 (2020) 135435 [1811.06523]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Erices, E

    C. Erices, E. Papantonopoulos and E. N. Saridakis, Cosmology in cubic and f(P) gravity, Phys, Rev, D99 (2019) 123527 [1903.11128]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    Quiros, R

    I. Quiros, R. García-Salcedo, T. Gonzalez, J. L. M. Martínez and U. Nucamendi, Global asymptotic dynamics of cosmological einsteinian cubic gravity, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 044018 [2003.10516]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    Dengiz, Cosmological weyl-einsteinian-cubic gravity as a gauge theory of gravity, Eur

    S. Dengiz, Cosmological weyl-einsteinian-cubic gravity as a gauge theory of gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (2025) 928 [2408.04282]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    M. R. Mehdizadeh and A. H. Ziaie, Traversable wormholes in einsteinian cubic gravity, Mod. Phys. Lett. A35 (2019) 2050017 [1903.10907]. – 14 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  39. [39]

    Hussain and G

    I. Hussain and G. Mustafa, Traversable wormholes in einsteinian-cubic-gravity with hybrid shape functions, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.19 (2022) 2250074

    2022

  40. [40]

    Mustafa, T.-C

    G. Mustafa, T.-C. Xia, I. Hussain and M. F. Shamir, Spherically symmetric static wormhole models in the einsteinian cubic gravity, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.17 (2020) 2050214

    2020

  41. [41]

    Mustafa, F

    G. Mustafa, F. Atamurotov and S. G. Ghosh, Structural properties of generalized embedded wormhole solutions via dark matter halos in einsteinian-cubic-gravity with quasi-periodic oscillations, Phys. Dark Univ.40 (2023) 101214

    2023

  42. [42]

    M. Lu, J. Yang and R. B. Mann, Existence of vacuum wormholes in Einsteinian cubic gravity, JHEP 3 (2025) 73 [2410.13996]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    M. S. Alnaes, A. Logg, K. B. Ølgaard, M. E. Rognes and G. N. Wells, Unified Form Language: A domain-specific language for weak formulations of partial differential equations, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software40 (2014)

    2014

  44. [44]

    M. W. Scroggs, I. A. Baratta, C. N. Richardson and G. N. Wells, Basix: A runtime finite element basis evaluation library, Journal of Open Source Software7 (2022) 3982

    2022

  45. [45]

    I. A. Baratta, J. P. Dean, J. S. Dokken, M. Habera, J. S. Hale, C. N. Richardson et al., DOLFINx: The next generation FEniCS problem solving environment, Dec., 2023. 10.5281/zenodo.10447666

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.10447666 2023

  46. [46]

    Mueller and M

    A. Mueller and M. Camenzind, Relativistic emission lines from accreting black holes - The effect of disk truncation on line profiles, Astron. Astrophys.413 (2004) 861 [astro-ph/0309832]. – 15 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004