pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.02671 · v1 · submitted 2026-03-03 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Radiative decays of hadronic molecules: From confusion to inspiration

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 17:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords radiative decayshadronic moleculesscale hierarchiesexotic hadronsdecay interpretationsmolecular stateseffective approaches
0
0 comments X

The pith

Accounting for scale hierarchies resolves confusion in radiative decays of hadronic molecules.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews different types of radiative decays involving hadronic molecules to show why interpretations in the literature often conflict. It argues that the central problem is failure to respect the natural hierarchy of energy scales in these systems, such as the small binding energy relative to other hadronic masses. When an approach properly separates and treats these scales, the decays yield consistent and interpretable results. A sympathetic reader would care because this turns decay data into a reliable tool for determining whether a given state is a loosely bound molecule or has a different internal structure. The review illustrates the point with concrete examples that demonstrate how scale-aware methods clarify previously puzzling cases.

Core claim

The authors argue that radiative decays of hadronic molecules can be understood consistently once the hierarchy of relevant scales is properly accounted for, and that the confusion in the existing literature largely arises from approaches that do not respect this hierarchy.

What carries the argument

The hierarchy of scales separating the molecular binding energy from other hadronic scales, together with theoretical methods that respect this separation when computing radiative transitions.

If this is right

  • Radiative decay rates become predictable in a controlled way for specific molecular candidates.
  • Decay data can be used to distinguish molecular states from more compact configurations with greater reliability.
  • The same scale considerations apply to other decay channels and production processes involving exotic hadrons.
  • Reanalysis of existing measurements with scale-respecting methods can remove apparent contradictions in the literature.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach could guide selection of which decay channels to measure first for newly observed states.
  • It suggests that lattice calculations of these decays should be designed to preserve the same scale separations.
  • Similar scale hierarchy logic may clarify non-radiative transitions in the same systems.

Load-bearing premise

The main source of confusion in the literature on these decays is improper handling of scale hierarchies rather than incomplete data or fundamentally different model assumptions.

What would settle it

A precise measurement of a radiative decay width for a known molecular candidate that agrees with data only when scale hierarchies are respected and disagrees when they are ignored would test the claim directly.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.02671 by Alexey Nefediev, Christoph Hanhart, Feng-Kun Guo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The two diagrams contributing to the two-photon decay of parapositronium. The black filled circle indicates the positronium disintegration vertex that can be obtained as solution of the Bethe-Salpeter bound-state equation and contains the positronium wave function as the central (but not only!) ingredient — see, for example, the derivation of Eq. (22) in Sec. 3 below. The other two vertices in the diagrams… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Contact diagram that contributes to the amplitude of the two-photon decay of a composite object composed of two charged scalar (or pseudoscalar) particles. emission vertices in the diagrams are electric ones. Then the gauge invariance of the amplitude leads to delicate cancellations between different terms coming from the above three diagrams and is only in place, if all three contributions to the amplitud… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Loop diagrams contributing to the radiative decays ϕ(1020) → γa0/ f0(980). The diagram (c) guarantees gauge invariance of the total amplitude while the diagram (d) appears only when proceeding beyond the strict point-like limit for the vertex KK¯ → a0/ f0. Adapted from Ref. [10]. scalars treated as KK¯ molecules with the radial wave function in Eq. (11), the ϕ(1020) radiative decay rates are strongly suppr… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The loop and contact diagrams contributing to the radiative decay Ds1(2460) → γD∗ s0 (2317). Adapted from [22]. 4. Radiative decays of Ds1(2460) In this section, we review the radiative decays of the Ds1(2460). We start from the two-body decay Ds1(2460) → γD∗ s0 (2317) assuming dominating molecular components in the wave functions of both Ds J mesons involved [14–21]. The effective Lagrangian describing th… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The momentum dependence of the effective loop coupling κloop(q 2 ), as an example, evaluated for the masses of D(∗)+ and K 0 . The vertical dashed-dotted line shows the position of q 2 = m2 D∗ s0 relevant for the two-body decay Ds1(2460) → γD∗ s0 (2317). The gray band shows the range of the phase space integration in the three-body decay Ds1(2460) → γD0K +, (mD0 + mK+ ) 2 ⩽ q 2 ⩽ m2 Ds1 . Adapted from Ref.… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Various contributions to the decay amplitude Ds1 → γDK. The structure of the vertex Ds1 → γD∗ s0 in diagram (b) is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The diagrams contributing to the amplitude of the decay X(3872) → γψ with ψ = J/ψ, ψ(2S). Adapted from Ref. [44]. substituting the momentum-space wave function in Eq. (14) into the vertex in Eq. (22), one concludes that the decay vertex X(3872) → DD¯ ∗ can be taken as a constant that drops out from the ratio in Eq. (31). Thus, no overlap of the deuteron-like wave function in Eq. (13) with anything else can… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Radiative decays of hadronic states provide an essential source of information that can facilitate deciphering their nature and properties. However, a lot of confusion concerning radiative decays of hadronic molecules and their interpretation can be found in the literature. In this paper, we briefly review several types of such decays and pinpoint similarities and essential differences between them. In particular, we emphasise the crucial role played by the hierarchy of the scales relevant to the studied system and the resulting necessity of employing an approach that considers them appropriately. We illustrate the situation with several instructive examples.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reviews radiative decays of hadronic molecules, classifying several types of such decays and highlighting similarities and differences among them. Its central claim is that much of the confusion in the literature arises from inadequate treatment of the hierarchy of relevant scales, and that an approach properly accounting for these scales is necessary; this is illustrated through specific instructive examples.

Significance. If the conceptual emphasis on scale hierarchies holds, the review could provide a useful organizing principle for interpreting radiative decay data on hadronic states, helping to clarify the nature of molecular candidates in hadron spectroscopy. As a focused review rather than a new calculation, its value lies in synthesis and clarification rather than novel predictions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] Introduction: The claim that improper handling of scale hierarchies is the primary source of confusion would be strengthened by citing 2-3 specific examples from the literature where neglecting a particular scale (e.g., binding momentum vs. pion mass) led to incorrect conclusions about a decay width or branching ratio.
  2. [Illustrative examples] Illustrative examples section: While examples are used to illustrate the point, the manuscript should include at least one explicit comparison (e.g., a numerical estimate or ratio) showing how results change when the scale hierarchy is properly versus improperly incorporated, to make the necessity concrete rather than purely conceptual.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'a lot of confusion' is vague; replace with a more precise statement such as 'persistent inconsistencies in interpreting branching ratios' and tie it directly to the scale-hierarchy issue.
  2. [Throughout] Throughout: Ensure consistent notation for scales (e.g., binding momentum, pion mass, photon energy) and define them at first use to aid readers unfamiliar with the specific systems.
  3. [References] References: Verify that recent experimental results on radiative decays of states like X(3872) or Zc(3900) are cited to keep the review current.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and the recommendation for minor revision. We address the major comments below and will incorporate the suggested improvements.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Introduction] Introduction: The claim that improper handling of scale hierarchies is the primary source of confusion would be strengthened by citing 2-3 specific examples from the literature where neglecting a particular scale (e.g., binding momentum vs. pion mass) led to incorrect conclusions about a decay width or branching ratio.

    Authors: We agree that citing specific examples from the literature would strengthen the motivation. In the revised manuscript we will add 2-3 concrete cases in the introduction (for instance, erroneous width estimates for the X(3872) and related states when the binding momentum is not properly separated from the pion mass), showing how the neglect of the hierarchy produced incorrect conclusions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Illustrative examples] Illustrative examples section: While examples are used to illustrate the point, the manuscript should include at least one explicit comparison (e.g., a numerical estimate or ratio) showing how results change when the scale hierarchy is properly versus improperly incorporated, to make the necessity concrete rather than purely conceptual.

    Authors: We appreciate the suggestion to make the argument quantitative. We will add, in the illustrative-examples section, an explicit numerical comparison for one decay channel: the width (or branching-ratio ratio) obtained with the proper effective-theory treatment of the scale hierarchy versus the result of a naive approach that ignores it. This will demonstrate the concrete impact. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper is a conceptual review of radiative decays of hadronic molecules that illustrates the role of scale hierarchies through selected examples from the literature. No quantitative derivations, model fits, predictions, or ansatzes are advanced whose validity reduces to the paper's own inputs or to a self-citation chain. The central claim remains an independent conceptual point supported by external references and illustrative cases rather than by construction from fitted parameters or author-specific prior results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review paper; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced beyond standard hadronic effective theory concepts referenced from prior work.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5384 in / 934 out tokens · 55195 ms · 2026-05-15T17:33:21.767493+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · 37 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Radiative decays of hadronic molecules: From confusion to inspiration

    Introduction The emission of photons is governed by Quantum Electrodynamics (QED), which is the simplest and most studied field theory within the Standard Model (SM). For this reason, radiative decays of hadronic states are considered a promising tool to investigate the hadrons in the initial and final states of the reaction and shed light on their nature...

  2. [2]

    positronium

    Positronium versus a point-like molecule We start from two-photon decays of parapositronium as the most prominent example of the radiative decay of a compound state. Parapositronium is a bound state of the electron-positron pair with the quantum numbers 1S0. In what follows we also refer to it as Ps(1S0) or simply “positronium”. Given its positive C-parit...

  3. [3]

    They are studied in Refs

    Radiative decays ofϕ(1020) The processes ϕ(1020)→γa 0/f 0(980) constitute yet another example of radiative decays involv- ing the scalar mesons a0/f 0(980). They are studied in Refs. [7,8] and a conclusion is made that, for the 6 of 15 /A1 /AD Ꜷ /C3 /A0 /C3 /B7 /CP /BC /BP/CU /BC /A1 /C3 /A0 /AD Ꜷ /C3 /B7 /CP /BC /BP/CU /BC /A1 /AD Ꜷ /C3 /B7 /C3 /A0 /CP /...

  4. [4]

    We start from the two-body decay Ds1(2460)→γD ∗ s0(2317) assuming dominating molecular components in the wave functions of both DsJ mesons involved [14–21]

    Radiative decays ofD s1(2460) In this section, we review the radiative decays of the Ds1(2460). We start from the two-body decay Ds1(2460)→γD ∗ s0(2317) assuming dominating molecular components in the wave functions of both DsJ mesons involved [14–21]. The effective Lagrangian describing this decay takes the form Leff =κε µναβ Fµν vβDs1α D∗† s0 +h.c., (23...

  5. [5]

    molecular

    Radiative decays of theX(3872) In this section, we discuss the radiative decays X(3872)→γψ( 2S) and X(3872)→γJ/ψ that, in recent years, attracted a lot of attention of both experimentalists and theorists. An interest to these decays was recently catalysed by the improved analysis performed by the LHCb Collaboration. In particular, it provided the most pre...

  6. [6]

    Conclusions In this paper, we reviewed various radiative decays involving hadronic molecules and stressed that information on such decays can provide valuable insight into their nature. However, one has to bear in mind that (i) the hierarchy of the scales relevant to the studied hadron plays a crucial role — sticking to a wrong hierarchy will result in a ...

  7. [7]

    Hadronic molecules

    Guo, F.K.; Hanhart, C.; Meißner, U.G.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, Q.; Zou, B.S. Hadronic molecules.Rev. Mod. Phys.2018,90, 015004, [arXiv:hep-ph/1705.00141]. [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 94, 029901 (2022)], https: //doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015004

  8. [8]

    Two Photon Decays Support the (K anti-K) Molecule Picture of the S* (975) and Delta (980).Phys

    Barnes, T. Two Photon Decays Support the (K anti-K) Molecule Picture of the S* (975) and Delta (980).Phys. Lett. B1985,165, 434–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(85)91261-4

  9. [9]

    Lifetime of Kaonium

    Krewald, S.; Lemmer, R.H.; Sassen, F.P . Lifetime of kaonium.Phys. Rev. D2004,69, 016003, [hep-ph/0307288]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.69.016003

  10. [10]

    Two-photon decays of hadronic molecules

    Hanhart, C.; Kalashnikova, Y.S.; Kudryavtsev, A.E.; Nefediev, A.V . Two-photon decays of hadronic molecules. Phys. Rev. D2007,75, 074015, [hep-ph/0701214]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.75.074015

  11. [11]

    Can one extract the pi-neutron scattering length from pi-deuteron scattering?

    Nogga, A.; Hanhart, C. Can one extract the pi-neutron scattering length from pi-deuteron scattering?Phys. Lett. B2006,634, 210–213, [nucl-th/0511011]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2005.12.071

  12. [12]

    High statistics study of f_0(980) resonance in gamma gamma --> pi^+ pi^- production

    Mori, T.; et al. High statistics study of f0(980) resonance in γγ→π +π− production.Phys. Rev. D2007, 75, 051101, [hep-ex/0610038]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.75.051101

  13. [13]

    Scalar Mesons in $\phi$ Radiative Decay: their implications for spectroscopy and for studies of CP-violation at $\phi$ factories

    Close, F.E.; Isgur, N.; Kumano, S. Scalar mesons in phi radiative decay: Their implications for spectroscopy and for studies of CP violation at phi factories.Nucl. Phys. B1993,389, 513–533, [hep-ph/9301253]. https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(93)90329-N

  14. [14]

    Production of scalar $K\bar K$ molecules in $\phi$ radiative decays

    Achasov, N.N.; Gubin, V .V .; Shevchenko, V .I. Production of scalar K anti-K molecules in phi radiative decays. Phys. Rev. D1997,56, 203–211, [hep-ph/9605245]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.56.203

  15. [15]

    Once more about the K\bar K molecule approach to the light scalars

    Achasov, N.N.; Kiselev, A.V . Once more about the K anti-K molecule approach to the light scalars.Phys. Rev. D2007,76, 077501, [hep-ph/0606268]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.077501

  16. [16]

    The radiative decays $\phi\to\gamma a_0/f_0$ in the molecular model for the scalar mesons

    Kalashnikova, Y.S.; Kudryavtsev, A.E.; Nefediev, A.V .; Hanhart, C.; Haidenbauer, J. The Radiative decays ϕ→γa 0/f 0 in the molecular model for the scalar mesons.Eur. Phys. J. A2005,24, 437–443, [hep-ph/0412340]. https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2005-10008-4

  17. [17]

    Comment on "Once more about the KK molecule approach to the light scalars"

    Kalashnikova, Y.S.; Kudryavtsev, A.E.; Nefediev, A.V .; Haidenbauer, J.; Hanhart, C. Comment on ‘Once more about the K ¯K molecule approach to the light scalars’.Phys. Rev. D2008,78, 058501, [arXiv:hep-ph/0711.2902]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.058501

  18. [18]

    Evidence That the Deuteron Is Not an Elementary Particle.Phys

    Weinberg, S. Evidence That the Deuteron Is Not an Elementary Particle.Phys. Rev.1965,137, B672–B678. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.137.B672. 14 of 15

  19. [19]

    On a Search for Four Quark States in Radiative Decays of phi Meson.Nucl

    Achasov, N.N.; Ivanchenko, V .N. On a Search for Four Quark States in Radiative Decays of phi Meson.Nucl. Phys. B1989,315, 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(89)90364-7

  20. [20]

    Implications of a DK Molecule at 2.32 GeV

    Barnes, T.; Close, F.E.; Lipkin, H.J. Implications of a DK molecule at 2.32-GeV.Phys. Rev. D2003,68, 054006, [hep-ph/0305025]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.68.054006

  21. [21]

    On heavy-light meson resonances and chiral symmetry

    Kolomeitsev, E.E.; Lutz, M.F.M. On Heavy light meson resonances and chiral symmetry.Phys. Lett. B2004, 582, 39–48, [hep-ph/0307133]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2003.10.118

  22. [22]

    A Comprehensive Four-Quark Interpretation of D_s(2317), D_s(2457) and D_s(2632)

    Chen, Y.Q.; Li, X.Q. A Comprehensive four-quark interpretation of Ds(2317), Ds(2457) and Ds(2632).Phys. Rev. Lett.2004,93, 232001, [hep-ph/0407062]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.232001

  23. [23]

    Dynamically generated 0^+ heavy mesons in a heavy chiral unitary approach

    Guo, F.K.; Shen, P .N.; Chiang, H.C.; Ping, R.G.; Zou, B.S. Dynamically generated 0+ heavy mesons in a heavy chiral unitary approach.Phys. Lett. B2006,641, 278–285, [hep-ph/0603072]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. physletb.2006.08.064

  24. [24]

    Dynamically generated 1^+ heavy mesons

    Guo, F.K.; Shen, P .N.; Chiang, H.C. Dynamically generated 1+ heavy mesons.Phys. Lett. B2007,647, 133–139, [hep-ph/0610008]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2007.01.050

  25. [25]

    Dynamically Generated Open and Hidden Charm Meson Systems

    Gamermann, D.; Oset, E.; Strottman, D.; Vicente Vacas, M.J. Dynamically generated open and hidden charm meson systems.Phys. Rev. D2007,76, 074016, [hep-ph/0612179]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.074 016

  26. [26]

    Radiative and isospin-violating decays of Ds mesons in the hadrogenesis conjecture

    Lutz, M.F.M.; Soyeur, M. Radiative and isospin-violating decays of Ds-mesons in the hadrogenesis conjecture. Nucl. Phys. A2008,813, 14–95, [arXiv:hep-ph/0710.1545]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.09.003

  27. [27]

    Strong and radiative decays of the Ds0*(2317) meson in the DK-molecule picture

    Faessler, A.; Gutsche, T.; Lyubovitskij, V .E.; Ma, Y.L. Strong and radiative decays of theD∗ s0(2317) meson in the DK-molecule picture.Phys. Rev. D2007,76, 014005, [arXiv:hep-ph/0705.0254]. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.76.014005

  28. [28]

    What can we learn from the radiative decays of the $D_{s1}(2460)$ meson?

    Fu, H.L.; Guo, F.K.; Hanhart, C.; Nefediev, A. What can we learn from the radiative decays of the Ds1(2460) meson?2025. [arXiv:hep-ph/2512.05476]

  29. [29]

    Update on strong and radiative decays of the D∗ s0(2317) and Ds1(2460) and their bottom cousins.Eur

    Fu, H.L.; Grießhammer, H.W.; Guo, F.K.; Hanhart, C.; Meißner, U.G. Update on strong and radiative decays of the D∗ s0(2317) and Ds1(2460) and their bottom cousins.Eur. Phys. J. A2022,58, 70, [arXiv:hep-ph/2111.09481]. https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00724-8

  30. [30]

    Chiral Multiplets of Heavy-Light Mesons

    Bardeen, W.A.; Eichten, E.J.; Hill, C.T. Chiral Multiplets of Heavy–Light Mesons.Phys. Rev. D2003,68, 054024, [hep-ph/0305049]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.68.054024

  31. [31]

    Review of particle physics.Phys

    Navas, S.; et al. Review of particle physics.Phys. Rev. D2024,110, 030001. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.110.030001

  32. [32]

    Strong and radiative decays of the $D_{s0}^*(2317)$ and $D_{s1}(2460)$

    Cleven, M.; Grießhammer, H.W.; Guo, F.K.; Hanhart, C.; Meißner, U.G. Strong and radiative decays of the D∗ s0(2317)andD s1(2460).Eur. Phys. J. A2014,50, 149, [arXiv:hep-ph/1405.2242]. https://doi.org/10.1140/ epja/i2014-14149-y

  33. [33]

    Systematic Study of Hadronic Molecules in the Heavy-Quark Sector

    Cleven, M. Systematic Study of Hadronic Molecules in the Heavy-Quark Sector. PhD thesis, Bonn U., 2013, [arXiv:hep-ph/1405.4195]

  34. [34]

    Probing the nature of the χc1(3872) state using radiative decays.JHEP2024,11, 121, [arXiv:hep-ex/2406.17006]

    Aaij, R.; et al. Probing the nature of the χc1(3872) state using radiative decays.JHEP2024,11, 121, [arXiv:hep-ex/2406.17006]. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2024)121

  35. [35]

    Evidence for the decay $X(3872)\rightarrow\psi(2S)\gamma$

    Aaij, R.; et al. Evidence for the decay X(3872)→ψ( 2S)γ.Nucl. Phys. B2014,886, 665–680, [arXiv:hep- ex/1404.0275]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.06.011

  36. [36]

    Evidence for X(3872) --> psi(2S) gamma in B+/- --> X(3872) K+/- decays, and a study of B --> ccbar gamma K

    Aubert, B.; et al. Evidence for X(3872)→ψ 2Sγ in B± →X 3872K± decays, and a study of B→c ¯cγK.Phys. Rev. Lett.2009,102, 132001, [arXiv:hep-ex/0809.0042]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.132001

  37. [37]

    Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusive B+ -> K+ pi+pi- J/psi decays

    Choi, S.K.; et al. Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusive B± →K ±π+π− J/ψ decays. Phys. Rev. Lett.2003,91, 262001, [hep-ex/0309032]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.262001

  38. [38]

    Diagnostic Decays of the X(3872)

    Swanson, E.S. Diagnostic decays of the X(3872).Phys. Lett. B2004,598, 197–202, [hep-ph/0406080]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2004.07.059

  39. [39]

    Grinstein, L

    Grinstein, B.; Maiani, L.; Polosa, A.D. Radiative decays of X(3872) discriminate between the molecular and compact interpretations.Phys. Rev. D2024,109, 074009, [arXiv:hep-ph/2401.11623]. https://doi.org/10.110 3/PhysRevD.109.074009

  40. [40]

    Observation of $X(3872)\to J/\psi \gamma$ and search for $X(3872)\to\psi'\gamma$ in B decays

    Bhardwaj, V .; et al. Observation ofX(3872)→J/ψγ and search for X(3872)→ψ ′γ in B decays.Phys. Rev. Lett.2011,107, 091803, [arXiv:hep-ex/1105.0177]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.091803

  41. [41]

    Study of Open-Charm Decays and Radiative Transitions of the X(3872).Phys

    Ablikim, M.; et al. Study of Open-Charm Decays and Radiative Transitions of the X(3872).Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020,124, 242001, [arXiv:hep-ex/2001.01156]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.242001

  42. [42]

    Determination of the X(3872) meson quantum numbers

    Aaij, R.; et al. Determination of the X(3872) meson quantum numbers.Phys. Rev. Lett.2013,110, 222001, [arXiv:hep-ex/1302.6269]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.222001. 15 of 15

  43. [43]

    Quantum numbers of the $X(3872)$ state and orbital angular momentum in its $\rho^0 J\psi$ decay

    Aaij, R.; et al. Quantum numbers of the X(3872) state and orbital angular momentum in its ρ0 Jψ decay.Phys. Rev. D2015,92, 011102, [arXiv:hep-ex/1504.06339]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.011102

  44. [44]

    Precise determination of the properties ofX(3872) and of its isovector partnerW c1 2025

    Ji, T.; Dong, X.K.; Guo, F.K.; Hanhart, C.; Meißner, U.G. Precise determination of the properties ofX(3872) and of its isovector partnerW c1 2025. [arXiv:hep-ph/2502.04458]

  45. [45]

    Three-body $D\bar{D}\pi$ dynamics for the X(3872)

    Baru, V .; Filin, A.A.; Hanhart, C.; Kalashnikova, Y.S.; Kudryavtsev, A.E.; Nefediev, A.V . Three-bodyD ¯Dπ dynamics for the X(3872).Phys. Rev. D2011,84, 074029, [arXiv:hep-ph/1108.5644]. https://doi.org/10.110 3/PhysRevD.84.074029

  46. [46]

    From the Deuteron to Deusons, an Analysis of Deuteronlike Meson-Meson Bound States

    Tornqvist, N.A. From the deuteron to deusons, an analysis of deuteron-like meson meson bound states.Z. Phys. C1994,61, 525–537, [hep-ph/9310247]. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01413192

  47. [47]

    Short Range Structure in the X(3872)

    Swanson, E.S. Short range structure in the X(3872).Phys. Lett. B2004,588, 189–195, [hep-ph/0311229]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2004.03.033

  48. [48]

    The X(3872) boson: Molecule or charmonium

    Suzuki, M. The X(3872) boson: Molecule or charmonium.Phys. Rev. D2005,72, 114013, [hep-ph/0508258]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.72.114013

  49. [49]

    Remarks on the study of the X(3872) from Effective Field Theory with Pion-Exchange Interaction

    Baru, V .; Epelbaum, E.; Filin, A.A.; Guo, F.K.; Hammer, H.W.; Hanhart, C.; Meißner, U.G.; Nefediev, A.V . Remarks on study of X(3872) from effective field theory with pion-exchange interaction.Phys. Rev. D2015, 91, 034002, [arXiv:hep-ph/1501.02924]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.034002

  50. [50]

    What can radiative decays of the X(3872) teach us about its nature?

    Guo, F.K.; Hanhart, C.; Kalashnikova, Y.S.; Meißner, U.G.; Nefediev, A.V . What can radiative decays of the X(3872) teach us about its nature?Phys. Lett. B2015,742, 394–398, [arXiv:hep-ph/1410.6712]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.02.013

  51. [51]

    Radiative decays of the spin-2 partner ofX(3872).Phys

    Shi, P .P .; Dias, J.M.; Guo, F.K. Radiative decays of the spin-2 partner ofX(3872).Phys. Lett. B2023,843, 137987, [arXiv:hep-ph/2302.13017]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137987

  52. [52]

    Short-distance RG-analysis of $X(3872)$ radiative decays

    Molnar, D.A.S.; Luiz, R.F.; Higa, R. Short-distance RG-analysis of X(3872) radiative decays2016. [arXiv:hep- ph/1601.03366]

  53. [53]

    Nature of χc1(3872) and T+cc (3875).Phys

    Brambilla, N.; Mohapatra, A.; Scirpa, T.; Vairo, A. Nature of χc1(3872) and T+cc (3875).Phys. Rev. Lett.2025, 135, 131902, [arXiv:hep-ph/2411.14306]. https://doi.org/10.1103/pdy7-hvg7

  54. [54]

    Production of the X(3872) in charmonia radiative decays

    Guo, F.K.; Hanhart, C.; Meißner, U.G.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, Q. Production of the X(3872) in charmonia radiative decays.Phys. Lett. B2013,725, 127–133, [arXiv:hep-ph/1306.3096]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2013 .06.053