Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

A fine-tuned video diffusion model becomes a fast, differentiable surrogate for urban wind CFD, generating full rollouts in under a second and enabling gradient-based building layout optimization for safety and comfort.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 20:57 UTC pith:4SUIERWF

load-bearing objection Abstract-only read of a solid-looking video-diffusion CFD surrogate; full text is the wrong paper, so claims stay unverified. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2603.21210 v3 pith:4SUIERWF submitted 2026-03-22 cs.LG cs.CE

Pretrained Video Models as Differentiable Physics Simulators for Urban Wind Flows

Janne Perini , Rafael Bischof , Moab Arar , Ay\c{c}a Duran , Michael A. Kraus , Siddhartha Mishra , Bernd Bickel This is my paper
classification cs.LG cs.CE
keywords video diffusion modelsurban wind flowCFD surrogatedifferentiable physicsbuilding layout optimizationpedestrian wind comfortlatent video transformerphysics-informed decoder
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Designing cities for pedestrian wind comfort and safety needs time-resolved fluid simulations, but traditional CFD is too slow for broad design search. This paper shows that a large pretrained video diffusion model can be fine-tuned on thousands of 2D incompressible wind simulations over synthetic building layouts and then used as a surrogate that produces full multi-frame wind fields almost instantly. Because the surrogate is end-to-end differentiable, architects can push building positions with ordinary backpropagation to improve both safety and comfort metrics. The resulting layouts are re-checked with real CFD and still show the predicted gains, even on multi-inlet and multi-objective problems. The practical claim is that modern video models can stand in for physics simulators in urban design loops that were previously too expensive to run.

Core claim

WinDiNet, obtained by fine-tuning a 2B-parameter latent video transformer on 10,000 procedurally generated 2D urban CFD simulations and adapting the decoder with a physics-informed loss, generates accurate 112-frame wind rollouts in under a second, beats purpose-built neural PDE solvers, and, being fully differentiable, supports direct gradient-based optimization of building positions that measurably improve wind safety and pedestrian comfort when verified by ground-truth CFD.

What carries the argument

WinDiNet: a fine-tuned latent video diffusion transformer (starting from LTX-Video) whose conditioning, training regime, and physics-informed VAE decoder together turn a generative video model into a fast, end-to-end differentiable surrogate for time-resolved 2D urban wind flow.

Load-bearing premise

That training only on 2D incompressible CFD over synthetic building footprints, with the chosen conditioning and physics-informed decoder, is faithful enough for the surrogate to stay accurate when the optimizer later rearranges multi-inlet layouts that are then checked by real CFD.

What would settle it

Take a multi-objective, multi-inlet layout produced by the gradient optimizer, re-simulate it with high-fidelity CFD, and check whether the predicted improvements in safety and pedestrian-comfort metrics disappear or reverse; if they systematically fail to hold, the surrogate claim collapses.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Urban designers can explore hundreds of building footprints in the time once required for a single CFD run.
  • Gradient-based inverse design becomes practical for multi-objective wind criteria without hand-crafted adjoint solvers.
  • Pretrained video models can serve as drop-in differentiable physics engines for other time-resolved flow problems once fine-tuned on domain data.
  • Layout optimizations found by the surrogate can be trusted enough to be confirmed, rather than discovered, by expensive CFD.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same fine-tuning recipe might transfer to 3D urban wind or indoor ventilation if suitable CFD corpora become available.
  • Because the model is a generative video prior, it may also support uncertainty quantification or ensemble forecasts of wind extremes without extra architecture.
  • Coupling the differentiable surrogate to structural or energy objectives could yield joint optimization of wind comfort and building performance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The submission claims to introduce WinDiNet, a 2B-parameter latent video diffusion model (fine-tuned from LTX-Video on 10,000 2D incompressible CFD simulations of procedural building layouts) that acts as a fast, end-to-end differentiable surrogate for time-resolved urban wind flow. The abstract asserts sub-second 112-frame rollouts, outperformance of purpose-built neural PDE solvers after a study of training regimes, conditioning, and a physics-informed decoder loss, and gradient-based inverse optimization of building positions for wind safety and pedestrian comfort, with gains confirmed by ground-truth CFD on single- and multi-inlet layouts. The body of the provided manuscript, however, is an unrelated survey on security and privacy in O-RAN for 6G (arXiv-style content on threats, STRIDE, SAGIN, standardization, etc.), so none of the WinDiNet methods, experiments, or results are present for review.

Significance. If the abstract claims were substantiated, the work would be significant: repurposing a large pretrained video diffusion model as a differentiable CFD surrogate for urban wind, with demonstrated inverse design confirmed by CFD, would be a strong contribution at the intersection of generative models, neural PDE solvers, and computational design. The combination of long-horizon rollouts, systematic ablation of conditioning/VAE strategies, and multi-objective layout optimization is of clear interest. Those strengths cannot be credited on the present manuscript because the scientific content of WinDiNet is missing.

major comments (3)
  1. Manuscript mismatch: the title, abstract, and paper_id (2603.21210) describe WinDiNet (video diffusion as urban wind CFD surrogate), but the full text is a different paper—a comprehensive survey of O-RAN security and privacy for 6G. No methods, architecture details, training protocol, baselines, tables, figures, or CFD validation for WinDiNet appear. The central claims cannot be evaluated.
  2. Abstract-only quantitative claims are uncheckable. Assertions that the model 'outperforms purpose-built neural PDE solvers,' generates 112-frame rollouts 'in under a second,' and that optimized layouts yield CFD-confirmed improvements lack error metrics, baseline names/numbers, objective definitions, and multi-inlet validation details. Without the actual experimental sections, these load-bearing claims cannot be verified or stress-tested.
  3. The weakest scientific assumption visible from the abstract—that 2D incompressible CFD on procedurally generated footprints (plus the chosen conditioning and physics-informed decoder loss) is faithful enough for multi-inlet, multi-objective optimization later re-validated by CFD—cannot be assessed. There is no evidence in the supplied text of held-out layout distributions, 3D or real-city transfer, or failure modes of the surrogate under optimization.
minor comments (2)
  1. Even the abstract would benefit from naming the neural PDE baselines, reporting at least one primary error metric (e.g., relative L2 or comfort-index error), and stating the optimization objectives quantitatively.
  2. The O-RAN body text (wrong paper) is itself a long survey with many tables and acronyms; it is irrelevant to the WinDiNet submission and should not be part of this manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical fine-tuning of a video diffusion model on CFD data, with held-out evaluation and independent CFD re-validation of optimized layouts; no derivation reduces to its inputs by construction.

full rationale

The provided abstract describes a standard empirical ML pipeline: start from a pretrained latent video transformer (LTX-Video), fine-tune on 10 000 procedurally generated 2D incompressible CFD simulations, ablate training/conditioning/VAE choices (including a physics-informed decoder loss), report outperformance versus purpose-built neural PDE solvers, generate 112-frame rollouts, and use end-to-end differentiability for gradient-based building-layout optimization whose improvements are re-confirmed by ground-truth CFD. None of these steps is self-definitional, a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, a load-bearing self-citation of an unverified uniqueness theorem, an ansatz smuggled via prior author work, or a renaming of a known result. The full manuscript text supplied in the cache is an unrelated O-RAN security survey (arXiv 2603.21211), so no equations or derivation chain from the claimed WinDiNet paper can be inspected; on the abstract alone the work is self-contained against external CFD benchmarks and exhibits no circular reduction. Ordinary train/test design (procedural generator for both training and later optimization cases) is not definitional circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract-only; free parameters and training choices are only sketched. The central claim rests on the assumption that a video diffusion prior plus fine-tuning on 2D incompressible CFD is an adequate surrogate, and that gradient-based optimization through that surrogate yields layouts that remain good under classical CFD.

free parameters (2)
  • fine-tuning hyperparameters and VAE adaptation choices
    Abstract mentions a systematic study of training regimes, conditioning, and VAE strategies including a physics-informed decoder loss; exact values and selection criteria are not given.
  • procedural building-layout generator parameters
    10,000 layouts are procedurally generated; the distribution of footprints, spacing, and inlet conditions is not specified and directly shapes both training and optimization domains.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption 2D incompressible Navier–Stokes CFD on the chosen mesh and Reynolds regime is a valid proxy for the urban pedestrian-wind phenomena of interest
    All training and claimed validation are 2D; real urban wind is 3D and often compressible/turbulent at relevant scales.
  • ad hoc to paper A latent video diffusion model pretrained on natural video can be adapted into a stable long-horizon fluid rollout via the described fine-tuning
    Core methodological bet of the work; success is empirical and not derived from first principles.
invented entities (1)
  • WinDiNet no independent evidence
    purpose: Named fine-tuned video diffusion surrogate for urban wind and differentiable inverse design
    New model instance; independent evidence would be public weights, code, and external CFD benchmarks, none of which appear in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 49985 in / 2386 out tokens · 26426 ms · 2026-07-13T20:57:13.199959+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Designing urban spaces that provide pedestrian wind comfort and safety requires time-resolved Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations, but their current computational cost makes extensive design exploration impractical. We introduce WinDiNet (Wind Diffusion Network), a pretrained video diffusion model that is repurposed as a fast, differentiable surrogate for this task. Starting from LTX-Video, a 2B-parameter latent video transformer, we fine-tune on 10,000 2D incompressible CFD simulations over procedurally generated building layouts. A systematic study of training regimes, conditioning mechanisms, and VAE adaptation strategies, including a physics-informed decoder loss, identifies a configuration that outperforms purpose-built neural PDE solvers. The resulting model generates full 112-frame rollouts in under a second. As the surrogate is end-to-end differentiable, it doubles as a physics simulator for gradient-based inverse optimization: given an urban footprint layout, we optimize building positions directly through backpropagation to improve wind safety as well as pedestrian wind comfort. Experiments on single- and multi-inlet layouts show that the optimizer discovers effective layouts even under challenging multi-objective configurations, with all improvements confirmed by ground-truth CFD simulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.21210 by Ay\c{c}a Duran, Bernd Bickel, Janne Perini, Michael A. Kraus, Moab Arar, Rafael Bischof, Siddhartha Mishra.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of the proposed framework. (a) Procedurally generated urban layouts are simulated with a 2D incompressible Euler solver to produce training data. (b) A latent diffusion model with a physics-informed VAE is trained to generate wind field sequences conditioned on building footprint, inlet speed uin, and domain size L. (c) At inference, the model generates horizontal and vertical velocity fields (u, … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Channel decomposition of a single simulation frame. From left to right: encoded RGB [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Representative samples from the training dataset. Each tile shows the RGB-encoded [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Wind speed magnitude predicted by Dec. FT Physics for a procedurally generated urban [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Learned channel transformation by the color adapter. VAE adaptation is performed as a separate stage before diffusion model training. To eval￾uate its effect in isolation, we encode ground￾truth velocity fields into the latent space and decode them back without involving the dif￾fusion model ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: VAE reconstruction quality at t=90 for a sample from the test set. all VAE variants, the gap between the Scalar Base and Scalar Dec. FT Physics (15.6% reduction in VRMSE) can be attributed to decoder adaptation. 4.5 Inference Configuration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Grid search over CFG scale and number of denoising steps on the validation set (Scalar con￾ditioning, Dec. FT Physics). Cyan outline shows the best configuration. We select the number of denoising steps and the classifier-free guidance (CFG) scale via grid search on the validation set ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Inverse optimization pipeline, zoomed in for visibility. (a) Movable buildings (red) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: shows results for a single inlet boundary condition (left-to-right wind at 15 m/s) in rigid mode. The buildings translate to form a windbreak upstream of the objective region, deflecting the incoming flow and reducing through flow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Single-inlet morph optimization (15 m/s, left to right). Buildings are subdivided into independently movable sub-blocks that can deform the overall shape, targeting the 1–5 m/s band. Urban areas often experience wind from various directions throughout the year, and comfort re￾quirements may differ between seasons and climate zones. In winter, shelter from cold wind is desirable (low target speeds), wherea… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Multi-inlet rigid optimization with left inlet (15, 0) m/s (target comfort band 1–3 m/s) and top inlet (0, 15) m/s (target comfort band 3–5 m/s). A single layout is co-optimized for both inlets and evaluated under each direction separately. Acknowledgments and Disclosure of Funding We thank Cornelia Kalender for her guidance on selecting appropriate evaluation metrics for the CFD comparisons. We thank Kai… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: shows the marginal speed distributions for both velocity components across the full training set. The horizontal component u is approximately uniform between 0 and 20 m/s, which is expected since the inlet flow is always aligned with the u-axis. The vertical component v is roughly normally distributed around zero, with most values confined to ±10 m/s. Both distributions exhibit a sharp peak at zero, likel… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Multi-inlet layout optimization: left (15, 0) m/s (comfort band 1–3 m/s) and top (0, 15) m/s (comfort band 3–5 m/s). Rigid mode (a–f) translates buildings, morph mode (g–l) additionally deforms them. E.9 Surrogate Comparison: WinDiNet vs. OFormer To assess how surrogate quality affects inverse optimization, we repeat the single-inlet rigid ex￾periment using OFormer—a competitive baseline in our forward-pr… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Inverse optimization using OFormer as surrogate (single inlet, rigid mode, Fig. 9). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Surrogate vs. ground-truth comfort loss over optimization steps for all five inverse design [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Predicted velocity fields at frame 56 for four real-world urban configurations (left to right): [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Temporal extrapolation beyond the T=112-frame training horizon. Rows show predictions at rollout lengths T, 2T, and 4T. The bottom row is ground-truth CFD. All predictions use a single forward pass with no autoregressive chaining [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Per-timestep VRMSE for rollout lengths 1× (T=112), 2× (2T=224), and 4× (4T=448) the training horizon. Shaded regions indicate frames beyond each model’s generation length. 26 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: VRMSE and spectral divergence as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Wind speed magnitude at t = 24 for inlet speeds from 5 to 29 m/s (left to right). Top row: ground truth; bottom row: model prediction. Out-of-distribution inlet speeds (uin > 20 m/s) are highlighted with a cyan border. F.4 Domain Size Generalization The training set covers L ∈ [900, 1400] m. We vary L from 700 to 1600 m in 100 m increments, with uin fixed at 18 m/s (the speed with lowest spectral divergen… view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: VRMSE and spectral divergence as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_21.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Image Editing Models are Numerical Solvers

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A FLUX image editor, adapted per task, maps rendered inputs to rendered solutions across ten numerical problems, but several encodings leak the target's scale and the model cannot track chaotic Kuramoto-Sivashinsky dynamics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

193 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Vehicular intelligence in 6g: Networking, communications, and computing,

    H. Guo, X. Zhou, J. Liu, and Y . Zhang, “Vehicular intelligence in 6g: Networking, communications, and computing,”Vehicular Communica- tions, vol. 33, p. 100399, 2022

    2022

  2. [2]

    Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications,

    P. K. R. Maddikunta, V . Q. Pham, B. Prabadevi, N. Deepa, K. Dev, T. Gadekallu, R. Ruby, and M. Liyanage, “Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications,”J. Ind. Inf. Integr., vol. 26, p. 100257, 2021

    2021

  3. [3]

    High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence,

    E. Topol, “High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence,”Nature Medicine, vol. 25, pp. 44 – 56, 2019

    2019

  4. [4]

    The role of 5g technologies in a smart city: The case for intelligent transportation system,

    A. Gohar and G. Nencioni, “The role of 5g technologies in a smart city: The case for intelligent transportation system,”Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 9, p. 5188, 2021

    2021

  5. [5]

    Future (post-covid) digital, smart and sustainable cities in the wake of 6g: Digital twins, immersive realities and new urban economies,

    Z. Allam and D. S. Jones, “Future (post-covid) digital, smart and sustainable cities in the wake of 6g: Digital twins, immersive realities and new urban economies,”Land use policy, vol. 101, p. 105201, 2021

    2021

  6. [6]

    M.2160-0, Nov

    ITU-R,Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2030 and beyond, International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Std. M.2160-0, Nov. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-M.2160-0-202311-I

    2030

  7. [7]

    Mobility management in third-generation all-ip networks,

    F. Chiussi, D. A. Khotimsky, and S. Krishnan, “Mobility management in third-generation all-ip networks,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 40, pp. 124–135, 2002

    2002

  8. [8]

    An introduction to orthogonal frequency division multi- plexing,

    M. Oltean, “An introduction to orthogonal frequency division multi- plexing,” 2004

    2004

  9. [9]

    Future wireless spectrum below 6 ghz: A uk perspective,

    M. M. Kassem and M. K. Marina, “Future wireless spectrum below 6 ghz: A uk perspective,” in2015 IEEE international symposium on dynamic spectrum access networks (DySPAN). IEEE, 2015, pp. 59–70

    2015

  10. [10]

    A survey on low latency towards 5g: Ran, core network and caching solutions,

    I. Parvez, A. Rahmati, I. Guvenc, A. I. Sarwat, and H. Dai, “A survey on low latency towards 5g: Ran, core network and caching solutions,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 3098– 3130, 2018

    2018

  11. [11]

    Cloud ran for mobile networks—a technology overview,

    A. Checko, H. L. Christiansen, Y . Yan, L. Scolari, G. Kardaras, M. S. Berger, and L. Dittmann, “Cloud ran for mobile networks—a technology overview,”IEEE Communications surveys & tutorials, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 405–426, 2014

    2014

  12. [12]

    Intelligent O-RAN for Beyond 5G and 6G Wireless Networks,

    S. Niknam, A. Roy, H. S. Dhillon, S. Singh, R. Banerji, J. H. Reed, N. Saxena, and S. Yoon, “Intelligent O-RAN for Beyond 5G and 6G Wireless Networks,” in2022 IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops, GC Wkshps 2022 - Proceedings, 2022. 34

    2022

  13. [13]

    (2023) Open ran update

    5G Americas. (2023) Open ran update. Accessed: 2024-03-11. [Online]. Available: https://www.5gamericas.org/open-ran-update/

    2023

  14. [14]

    A survey of continuous integration, continuous delivery and continuos deployment

    S. Bobrovskis and A. Jurenoks, “A survey of continuous integration, continuous delivery and continuos deployment.” inBIR workshops, 2018, pp. 314–322

    2018

  15. [15]

    In- telligence and Learning in O-RAN for Data-Driven NextG Cellular Networks,

    L. Bonati, S. D’Oro, M. Polese, S. Basagni, and T. Melodia, “In- telligence and Learning in O-RAN for Data-Driven NextG Cellular Networks,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 59, no. 10, 2021

    2021

  16. [16]

    Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI),

    A. Adadi and M. Berrada, “Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI),”IEEE Access, vol. 6, 2018

    2018

  17. [17]

    A survey and taxonomy of dos attacks in cloud computing,

    M. Masdari and M. Jalali, “A survey and taxonomy of dos attacks in cloud computing,”Security and Communication Networks, vol. 9, no. 16, pp. 3724–3751, 2016

    2016

  18. [18]

    Classification of spoofing attack types,

    J. R. Van Der Merwe, X. Zubizarreta, I. Luk ˇcin, A. R ¨ugamer, and W. Felber, “Classification of spoofing attack types,” in2018 European Navigation Conference (ENC). IEEE, 2018, pp. 91–99

    2018

  19. [19]

    Detecting malicious data injections in wireless sensor networks: A survey,

    V . P. Illiano and E. C. Lupu, “Detecting malicious data injections in wireless sensor networks: A survey,”ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 1–33, 2015

    2015

  20. [20]

    Evaluating the Security of Open Radio Access Networks,

    D. Mimran, R. Bitton, Y . Kfir, E. Klevansky, O. Brodt, H. Lehmann, Y . Elovici, and A. Shabtai, “Evaluating the Security of Open Radio Access Networks,”arXiv, 2022

    2022

  21. [21]

    5g ran risk analysis,

    Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), “5g ran risk analysis,” Federal Office for Information Security, Tech. Rep., 2023, accessed: 2024-01-07. [Online]. Available: https://www.bsi.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/BSI/Publications/ Studies/5G/5GRAN-Risk-Analysis.pdf? blob=publicationFile&v=5

    2023

  22. [22]

    Report on the cybersecurity of open ran,

    N. C. Group, “Report on the cybersecurity of open ran,” https://d110erj175o600.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/ 05/11160610/OPEN.pdf, NIS Cooperation Group, Tech. Rep., 2022, accessed: 2024-01-07

    2022

  23. [23]

    Open radio access network security considerations,

    Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), “Open radio access network security considerations,” Cybersecurity and Infrastruc- ture Security Agency, Tech. Rep., 2022, accessed: 2024-01-07. [On- line]. Available: https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/ open-radio-access-network-security-considerations 508.pdf

    2022

  24. [24]

    “open” telecom networks (open ran),

    F. I. of International Relations (IFRI), ““open” telecom networks (open ran),” French Institute of International Relations (IFRI), Tech. Rep., 2022, accessed: 2024-01-07. [Online]. Available: https://www. ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/velliet open ran 2022 us.pdf

    2022

  25. [25]

    5g open ran white paper,

    NTT DOCOMO, “5g open ran white paper,” NTT DOCOMO, Tech. Rep., 2023, accessed: 2024-01-07. [Online]. Available: https://www.docomo.ne.jp/english/binary/pdf/corporate/technology/ whitepaper 5g open ran/OREC WP 20230517095959.pdf

    2023

  26. [26]

    Open ran security report,

    National Telecommunications and Information Administration, “Open ran security report,” National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Tech. Rep., 2023, accessed: 2024- 01-07. [Online]. Available: https://www.ntia.gov/sites/default/files/ publications/open ran security report full report 0.pdf

    2023

  27. [27]

    Open RAN security: Challenges and opportunities,

    M. Liyanage, A. Braeken, S. Shahabuddin, and P. Ranaweera, “Open RAN security: Challenges and opportunities,” 2023

    2023

  28. [28]

    A brief survey of open radio access network (o-ran) security,

    Y .-Z. Chen, T. Y .-H. Chen, P.-J. Su, and C.-T. Liu, “A brief survey of open radio access network (o-ran) security,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.02311

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    O-RAN: Disrupting the Virtualized RAN Ecosystem,

    A. Garcia-Saavedra and X. Costa-Perez, “O-RAN: Disrupting the Virtualized RAN Ecosystem,”IEEE Communications Standards Mag- azine, vol. 5, no. 4, 2021

    2021

  30. [30]

    xRAN Forum Merges With C-RAN Alliance to Form ORAN Alliance,

    xRAN Forum, “xRAN Forum Merges With C-RAN Alliance to Form ORAN Alliance,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.businesswire. com/news/home/20180227005673/en/

    arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    Under- standing O-RAN: Architecture, Interfaces, Algorithms, Security, and Research Challenges,

    M. Polese, L. Bonati, S. D’Oro, S. Basagni, and T. Melodia, “Under- standing O-RAN: Architecture, Interfaces, Algorithms, Security, and Research Challenges,”IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, vol. 25, no. 2, 2023

    2023

  32. [32]

    A survey of the functional splits proposed for 5g mobile crosshaul networks,

    L. M. P. Larsen, A. Checko, and H. Christiansen, “A survey of the functional splits proposed for 5g mobile crosshaul networks,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 21, pp. 146–172, 2019

    2019

  33. [33]

    Nuberu: Reliable ran virtualization in shared platforms,

    G. Garcia-Aviles, A. Garcia-Saavedra, M. Gramaglia, X. Costa-Perez, P. Serrano, and A. Banchs, “Nuberu: Reliable ran virtualization in shared platforms,” inProceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, 2021, pp. 749–761

    2021

  34. [34]

    Energy efficiency benefits of ran-as-a-service concept for a cloud-based 5g mobile network infrastructure,

    D. Sabella, A. De Domenico, E. Katranaras, M. A. Imran, M. Di Giro- lamo, U. Salim, M. Lalam, K. Samdanis, and A. Maeder, “Energy efficiency benefits of ran-as-a-service concept for a cloud-based 5g mobile network infrastructure,”IEEE Access, vol. 2, pp. 1586–1597, 2014

    2014

  35. [35]

    IAFI 5D44 IMT2030 Framework input Final,

    International Telecommunication Union Radiocommunication Sector, “IAFI 5D44 IMT2030 Framework input Final,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://itu-apt.org/system/static/uploads/contribution/IAFI% 205D44%20IMT2030%20Framework%20input%20Final.pdf

    2023

  36. [36]

    M.2083-0, Sep

    ITU-R,Future development of IMT for 2020 and beyond, International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Std. M.2083-0, Sep. 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-M.2083-0-201509-I

    2020

  37. [37]

    From 4g to 5g: Self-organized network management meets machine learning,

    J. Moysen and L. Giupponi, “From 4g to 5g: Self-organized network management meets machine learning,”Computer Communications, vol. 129, pp. 248–268, 2018

    2018

  38. [38]

    6g wireless networks: Vision, requirements, archi- tecture, and key technologies,

    Z. Zhang, Y . Xiao, Z. Ma, M. Xiao, Z. Ding, X. Lei, G. K. Karagian- nidis, and P. Fan, “6g wireless networks: Vision, requirements, archi- tecture, and key technologies,”IEEE vehicular technology magazine, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 28–41, 2019

    2019

  39. [39]

    Space-air-ground inte- grated network: A survey,

    J. Liu, Y . Shi, Z. M. Fadlullah, and N. Kato, “Space-air-ground inte- grated network: A survey,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2714–2741, 2018

    2018

  40. [40]

    A vision of 6g wireless systems: Applications, trends, technologies, and open research problems,

    W. Saad, M. Bennis, and M. Chen, “A vision of 6g wireless systems: Applications, trends, technologies, and open research problems,”IEEE network, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 134–142, 2019

    2019

  41. [41]

    Release 15 Description; Summary of Rel-15 Work Items,

    3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), “Release 15 Description; Summary of Rel-15 Work Items,” https://www.3gpp.org/specifications/ releases/release-15, 2019, accessed: 2025-11-22

    2019

  42. [42]

    Release 16 Description; Summary of Rel-16 Work Items,

    ——, “Release 16 Description; Summary of Rel-16 Work Items,” https://www.3gpp.org/specifications/releases/release-16, 2020, accessed: 2025-11-22

    2020

  43. [43]

    The architecture of ai and communication integration towards 6g: An o-ran evolution,

    Z. Li, Q. Wang, Y . Wang, and T. Chen, “The architecture of ai and communication integration towards 6g: An o-ran evolution,” in Proceedings of the 30th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, 2024, pp. 2329–2334

    2024

  44. [44]

    Edgeric: Empowering realtime intelligent optimization and control in nextg networks,

    W.-H. Ko, U. Dinesha, U. Ghosh, S. Shakkottai, D. Bharadia, and R. Wu, “Edgeric: Empowering realtime intelligent optimization and control in nextg networks,”arXivorg, no. 2304.11199., 2023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    O-ran based non- terrestrial networks: Trends and challenges,

    R. Campana, C. Amatetti, and A. Vanelli-Coralli, “O-ran based non- terrestrial networks: Trends and challenges,” in2023 Joint European Conference on Networks and Communications & 6G Summit (Eu- CNC/6G Summit), 2023, pp. 264–269

    2023

  46. [46]

    Handover challenges in disaggregated open ran for leo satellites: tradeoff between handover delay and onboard processing,

    S. S. S. G. Seeram, L. Feltrin, M. Ozger, S. Zhang, and C. Cavdar, “Handover challenges in disaggregated open ran for leo satellites: tradeoff between handover delay and onboard processing,”Frontiers in Space Technologies, vol. 6, p. 1580005, 2025

    2025

  47. [47]

    Accelerating vran and o- ran with simd: Architectural perspectives and performance evaluation,

    J. Park, C.-B. Chae, and R. W. Heath Jr, “Accelerating vran and o- ran with simd: Architectural perspectives and performance evaluation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.07843, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Cloudric: Open radio access network (o-ran) virtualization with shared heterogeneous computing,

    L. L. Schiavo, G. Garcia-Aviles, A. Garcia-Saavedra, M. Gramaglia, M. Fiore, A. Banchs, and X. Costa-Perez, “Cloudric: Open radio access network (o-ran) virtualization with shared heterogeneous computing,” inProceedings of the 30th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, 2024, pp. 558–572

    2024

  49. [49]

    ngrg introduction,

    O.-R. Alliance, “ngrg introduction,” Nov. 2023, accessed: 2025- 03-26. [Online]. Available: https://public.o-ran.org/display/NGRG/ Introduction

    2023

  50. [50]

    Toward Next Generation Open Radio Access Networks: What O-RAN Can and Cannot Do!

    A. S. Abdalla, P. S. Upadhyaya, V . K. Shah, and V . Marojevic, “Toward Next Generation Open Radio Access Networks: What O-RAN Can and Cannot Do!”IEEE Network, vol. 36, no. 6, 2022

    2022

  51. [51]

    Evolution Toward the Next Generation Radio Access Network,

    W. Diego, “Evolution Toward the Next Generation Radio Access Network,” inIFIP Networking 2020 Conference and Workshops, Net- working 2020, 2020

    2020

  52. [52]

    The Evolution of Radio Access Network Towards Open-RAN: Challenges and Opportunities,

    S. K. Singh, R. Singh, and B. Kumbhani, “The Evolution of Radio Access Network Towards Open-RAN: Challenges and Opportunities,” in2020 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops, WCNCW 2020 - Proceedings, 2020

    2020

  53. [53]

    AutoMEC: LSTM- based User Mobility Prediction for Service Management in Distributed MEC Resources,

    U. Fattore, M. Liebsch, B. Brik, and A. Ksentini, “AutoMEC: LSTM- based User Mobility Prediction for Service Management in Distributed MEC Resources,” inMSWiM 2020 - Proceedings of the 23rd Inter- national ACM Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems, 2020

    2020

  54. [54]

    Service-Oriented MEC Applications Placement in a Federated Edge Cloud Architecture,

    B. Brik, P. A. Frangoudis, and A. Ksentini, “Service-Oriented MEC Applications Placement in a Federated Edge Cloud Architecture,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications, vol. 2020-June, 2020

    2020

  55. [55]

    A perspective of O-RAN integration with MEC, SON, and network slicing in the 5G era,

    Chih-Lin, S. Kuklinski, T. C. Chen, and L. L. Ladid, “A perspective of O-RAN integration with MEC, SON, and network slicing in the 5G era,” 2020

    2020

  56. [56]

    Toward Optimal MEC Resource Dimen- sioning for a Vehicle Collision Avoidance System: A Deep Learning Approach,

    B. Brik and A. Ksentini, “Toward Optimal MEC Resource Dimen- sioning for a Vehicle Collision Avoidance System: A Deep Learning Approach,”IEEE Network, vol. 35, no. 3, 2021. 35

    2021

  57. [57]

    (2024) O-ran specifications

    O-RAN Alliance. (2024) O-ran specifications. Accessed: 2025-07-

    2024

  58. [58]

    Available: https://orandownloadsweb.azurewebsites.net/ specifications

    [Online]. Available: https://orandownloadsweb.azurewebsites.net/ specifications

  59. [59]

    Security require- ments and challenges of 6g technologies and applications,

    S. A. Abdel Hakeem, H. H. Hussein, and H. Kim, “Security require- ments and challenges of 6g technologies and applications,”Sensors, vol. 22, no. 5, p. 1969, 2022

    1969

  60. [60]

    A comprehensive survey on 6g-security: Physical connection and service layers,

    M. M. Saeed, R. A. Saeed, M. K. Hasan, E. S. Ali, T. Mazha, T. Shahzad, S. Khan, and H. Hamam, “A comprehensive survey on 6g-security: Physical connection and service layers,”Discover Internet of Things, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 28, 2025

    2025

  61. [61]

    Security of Open Radio Access Networks,

    D. Mimran, R. Bitton, Y . Kfir, E. Klevansky, O. Brodt, H. Lehmann, Y . Elovici, and A. Shabtai, “Security of Open Radio Access Networks,” Computers and Security, vol. 122, 2022

    2022

  62. [62]

    Security architecture and procedures for the 5G System,

    3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), “Security architecture and procedures for the 5G System,” 3GPP, Technical Specification (TS) 33.501, Sep. 2024, version 18.7.0, Release 18. [Online]. Available: https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/33 series/33.501/

    2024

  63. [63]

    Security analysis of critical 5g interfaces,

    M. Mahyoub, A. AbdulGhaffar, E. Alalade, E. Ndubisi, and A. Ma- trawy, “Security analysis of critical 5g interfaces,”IEEE Communica- tions Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2382–2410, 2024

    2024

  64. [64]

    The threats to our products,

    L. Kohnfelder and P. Garg, “The threats to our products,”Microsoft Security Development Blog, 1999

    1999

  65. [65]

    SMDFbs: Specification-Based Misbehavior Detection for False Base Stations,

    H. Park, P. V . B. Astillo, Y . Ko, Y . Park, T. Kim, and I. You, “SMDFbs: Specification-Based Misbehavior Detection for False Base Stations,”Sensors, vol. 23, no. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/23/9504

    2023

  66. [66]

    Open-ran security in 5g,

    O.-R. P. Coalition, “Open-ran security in 5g,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.openranpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/ Open-RAN-Security-in-5G-4.29.21.pdf

    2021

  67. [67]

    Transport Security Considerations for the Open-RAN Fronthaul,

    D. Dik and M. S. Berger, “Transport Security Considerations for the Open-RAN Fronthaul,” inProceedings - 2021 IEEE 4th 5G World Forum, 5GWF 2021, 2021

    2021

  68. [68]

    The o-ran alliance security task group tackles security challenges on all o-ran interfaces and components,

    O. Alliance, “The o-ran alliance security task group tackles security challenges on all o-ran interfaces and components,” 2021

    2021

  69. [69]

    Open ran security,

    Ericsson, “Open ran security,” 2023. [Online]. Avail- able: https://www.ericsson.com/4ae256/assets/local/reports-papers/ further-insights/doc/open-ran-security.pdf

    2023

  70. [70]

    Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Survey,

    H. Hu, Z. Salcic, L. Sun, G. Dobbie, P. S. Yu, and X. Zhang, “Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Survey,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 54, no. 11s, 2022

    2022

  71. [71]

    Adversarial Machine Learning for Flooding Attacks on 5G Radio Access Network Slicing,

    Y . Shi and Y . E. Sagduyu, “Adversarial Machine Learning for Flooding Attacks on 5G Radio Access Network Slicing,” in2021 IEEE Inter- national Conference on Communications Workshops, ICC Workshops 2021 - Proceedings, 2021

    2021

  72. [72]

    Multi-Agent Team Learning in Virtualized Open Radio Access Networks (O-RAN),

    P. E. Iturria-Rivera, H. Zhang, H. Zhou, S. Mollahasani, and M. Erol- Kantarci, “Multi-Agent Team Learning in Virtualized Open Radio Access Networks (O-RAN),”Sensors, vol. 22, no. 14, 2022

    2022

  73. [73]

    Analysis of security at the near-real-time ric xapps based on o-ran-defined use cases,

    Z. SHAHBAZI, “Analysis of security at the near-real-time ric xapps based on o-ran-defined use cases,” 2022

    2022

  74. [74]

    General data protection regulation (gdpr),

    G. D. P. Regulation, “General data protection regulation (gdpr),” Intersoft Consulting, Accessed in October, vol. 24, no. 1, 2018

    2018

  75. [75]

    Open or not open: Are conventional radio access networks more secure and trustworthy than open-ran?

    F. Klement, S. Katzenbeisser, V . Ulitzsch, J. Kr ¨amer, S. Stanczak, Z. Utkovski, I. Bjelakovic, and G. Wunder, “Open or not open: Are conventional radio access networks more secure and trustworthy than open-ran?”arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.12227, 2022

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  76. [76]

    Towards a 5g security architecture: Articulating software- defined security and security as a service,

    G. Blanc, N. Kheir, D. Ayed, V . Lefebvre, E. M. de Oca, and P. Bisson, “Towards a 5g security architecture: Articulating software- defined security and security as a service,” inProceedings of the 13th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, 2018, pp. 1–8

    2018

  77. [77]

    Survey on Multi-Access Edge Computing Security and Privacy,

    P. Ranaweera, A. D. Jurcut, and M. Liyanage, “Survey on Multi-Access Edge Computing Security and Privacy,” 2021

    2021

  78. [78]

    A misuse pattern for nfv based on privilege escalation,

    A. K. Alnaim, A. M. Alwakeel, and E. B. Fernandez, “A misuse pattern for nfv based on privilege escalation,” inProceedings of the 8th Asian Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, 2019

    2019

  79. [79]

    PrivGuard: Protecting Sensitive Kernel Data from Privilege Escalation Attacks,

    W. Qiang, J. Yang, H. Jin, and X. Shi, “PrivGuard: Protecting Sensitive Kernel Data from Privilege Escalation Attacks,”IEEE Access, vol. 6, 2018

    2018

  80. [80]

    A survey on security in network functions vir- tualization,

    W. Yang and C. Fung, “A survey on security in network functions vir- tualization,” inIEEE NETSOFT 2016 - 2016 IEEE NetSoft Conference and Workshops: Software-Defined Infrastructure for Networks, Clouds, IoT and Services, 2016

    2016

Showing first 80 references.