LFV decays in a 3-4-1 model with minimal inverse seesaw neutrinos

L.T. Hue; L.T.T. Phuong; N.H.T. Nha; T.T. Hong

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

A 3-4-1 model with a new charged Higgs and inverse seesaw fits (g-2) and LFV rates and predicts a tight link between them.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 23:51 UTC pith:OFZH7ZF4

load-bearing objection Abstract-only 3-4-1 + inverse-seesaw extension with a claimed Br(τ→μγ)–(g-2)μ link; modest novelty, cannot audit the correlation without the full text. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2604.08444 v2 pith:OFZH7ZF4 submitted 2026-04-09 hep-ph

LFV decays in a 3-4-1 model with minimal inverse seesaw neutrinos

N.H.T. Nha , L.T. Hue , L.T.T. Phuong , T.T. Hong This is my paper

classification hep-ph

keywords 3-4-1 modelinverse seesawlepton flavor violationanomalous magnetic momentsingly charged Higgstau to mu gamma(g-2)mu

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper constructs an extended 3-4-1 gauge model that adds a new singly charged Higgs boson and implements a minimal inverse-seesaw mechanism for neutrinos. The authors show that the same field content can simultaneously satisfy present experimental limits on the electron and muon anomalous magnetic moments and on lepton-flavor-violating decays of charged leptons, the Standard-Model-like Higgs, and the Z boson. Unlike earlier 3-4-1 realizations, the present setup generates strong, testable correlations among these observables. In particular, the existing upper bound on the branching ratio of τ oμγ forces the model’s contribution to (g-2)μ to lie near 10^{-9}, a value still allowed by the 1σ experimental range, while future improvements on that branching ratio will shrink the allowed deviation to roughly 5×10^{-10}. The work therefore supplies a concrete, correlated prediction that can be checked by the next generation of rare-decay and precision-magnetic-moment experiments.

Core claim

An extended 3-4-1 model containing a new singly charged Higgs and minimal inverse-seesaw neutrinos accounts for current (g-2)e,μ constraints and for LFV decay rates of charged leptons, the SM-like Higgs, and the Z boson that remain consistent with data, while predicting strong correlations among these observables; specifically, the present Br(τ oμγ) bound forces a (g-2)μ deviation of order 10^{-9} from the Standard Model, still compatible with the 1σ experimental interval.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the simultaneous presence of a new singly charged Higgs boson and the minimal inverse-seesaw neutrino sector inside a 3-4-1 gauge framework; together they generate the one-loop contributions that link the magnetic-moment deviations to the LFV branching ratios.

Load-bearing premise

That this particular combination of a new singly charged Higgs and minimal inverse-seesaw neutrinos inside the 3-4-1 model can satisfy all the listed experimental bounds at once without extra tuning or additional sectors.

What would settle it

A future measurement of Br(τ oμγ) that falls below the sensitivity corresponding to a (g-2)μ deviation of 5×10^{-10}, or a confirmed (g-2)μ deviation lying well outside the 10^{-9} window still allowed by the present Br(τ oμγ) bound, would rule out the claimed correlation.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

Existing Br(τ oμγ) data already restrict the model’s (g-2)μ contribution to order 10^{-9}, still inside the 1σ experimental band.
Improved future sensitivity on Br(τ oμγ) will compress the allowed (g-2)μ deviation to about 5×10^{-10}.
The same parameter space that fits (g-2)e,μ also keeps LFV rates of the SM-like Higgs and the Z boson inside current experimental limits.
Strong correlations among the magnetic-moment and LFV observables become direct, testable predictions for forthcoming experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the predicted correlation is confirmed, it would favor 3-4-1 constructions with inverse seesaw over other seesaw realizations that do not generate the same tight link.
The requirement that a single new charged scalar mediate both the magnetic-moment and LFV loops suggests that direct collider searches for that scalar could independently test the same parameter region.
A null result for (g-2)μ at the 10^{-9} level would force the model either into a fine-tuned corner or into an extension with additional fields.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

Abstract-only 3-4-1 + inverse-seesaw extension with a claimed Br(τ→μγ)–(g-2)μ link; modest novelty, cannot audit the correlation without the full text.

read the letter

This is an abstract-only look at a 3-4-1 model-building paper, so everything below is provisional. The punchline is that they add a singly charged Higgs and a minimal inverse-seesaw sector to a 3-4-1 setup and claim this produces joint fits to (g-2)e,μ plus several LFV channels, with a concrete numerical link: the present Br(τ→μγ) bound forces Δaμ of order 10^{-9}, still inside the 1σ experimental window, and future sensitivity would push that to 5×10^{-10}.

What is new is the specific field content relative to an earlier 3-4-1 realization they cite. That is a legitimate incremental step inside an established program (3-4-1 models + inverse seesaw + charged-lepton flavor violation). If the full calculation really does produce a structural correlation rather than a fitted coincidence, it would be a useful benchmark for people who already work on these models and on τ→μγ projections.

The soft spot is exactly the one the stress-test flags, and it is load-bearing: without the Lagrangian, mass matrices, free-parameter count, and scan ranges we cannot tell whether the Br(τ→μγ)–Δaμ link is forced by the model or is just the region they chose to plot. Free Yukawas, VEVs, and new-particle masses almost always exist in this literature; the abstract’s language of “accounts for” and “imposes a stringent constraint” is consistent with either a genuine prediction or a post-hoc fit. Soundness therefore cannot be scored higher than “plausible but unchecked.” Circularity risk is real but not proven.

Who it is for: specialists already following 3-4-1 or inverse-seesaw phenomenology who want another concrete benchmark with joint LFV/(g-2) numbers. It is not foundational and does not open a new direction. I would not bring the abstract alone to reading group, but the finished paper deserves a serious referee rather than a desk reject—provided the authors supply the full parameter scan, the relevant loop formulas, and a clear statement of which quantities are free versus predicted. If those checks hold, the correlation claim is worth citing in the next year; if they do not, it is just another tuned point. Send it to review.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies an extended 3-4-1 gauge model that adds a new singly charged Higgs boson and implements a minimal inverse-seesaw neutrino sector. From the abstract, the authors claim that this field content simultaneously accommodates the current (g-2)_{e,μ} constraints, lepton-flavor-violating (LFV) decay rates of charged leptons, and SM-like Higgs and Z-boson observables, all consistent with existing data. Unlike a previously studied 3-4-1 realization, the model is said to predict strong, experimentally testable correlations among these observables. In particular, the present upper bound on Br(τ→μγ) is claimed to force a (g-2)_μ deviation of order 10^{-9} from the SM prediction (compatible with the 1σ experimental range), while forthcoming Br(τ→μγ) sensitivity would tighten that deviation to 5×10^{-10}.

Significance. If the reported Br(τ→μγ)–(g-2)_μ link is a genuine structural prediction of the extended 3-4-1 + minimal inverse-seesaw content rather than a fitted coincidence, the work would supply a concrete, falsifiable target for near-future LFV and muon g-2 programs and would clarify how a singly charged Higgs can reconcile electron and muon anomalies without spoiling Higgs and Z constraints. That would be a useful addition to the 3-4-1 and inverse-seesaw literature. The abstract alone, however, does not allow one to confirm that the correlations survive after all free parameters are fixed by the full set of observables.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The central numerical claim—that the current Br(τ→μγ) bound forces a (g-2)_μ deviation of order 10^{-9} that is compatible with the 1σ experimental range, and that future Br(τ→μγ) sensitivity will reduce it to 5×10^{-10}—cannot be audited from the abstract. No Lagrangian, mass matrices, one-loop dipole formulas, free-parameter count, or scan ranges are supplied. Without those ingredients it is impossible to decide whether the quoted correlation is a structural prediction of the new singly charged Higgs plus minimal inverse seesaw or a consequence of free Yukawas and masses being adjusted to the same data. This is load-bearing for the paper’s strongest claim.
[Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that the model “accounts for” simultaneous consistency with (g-2)_{e,μ}, multiple LFV channels, the SM-like Higgs, and the Z boson rests on the unstated premise that the new singly charged Higgs and inverse-seesaw sector suffice without additional tuning or hidden sectors. The abstract gives no indication of how many free parameters enter both the dipole operators and the neutrino mass matrix, nor of any residual fine-tuning after all listed bounds are imposed. A demonstration that the same parameter region satisfies every constraint without further adjustment is required for the multi-observable claim to stand.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The phrase “Unlike the previously studied 3-4-1 realization” is left unspecified; a brief citation or label of the earlier model would help the reader locate the claimed improvement.
[Abstract] Abstract: The statement that forthcoming Br(τ→μγ) sensitivity “will reduce this deviation to 5×10^{-10}” should indicate which projected experimental bound is assumed, so that the numerical factor can be reproduced.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity identifiable from abstract alone; claimed Br(τ→μγ)–(g-2)μ correlation cannot be reduced to inputs without equations or scan details.

full rationale

Only the abstract is available. It states that an extended 3-4-1 model with a new singly charged Higgs and minimal inverse seesaw accounts for (g-2)e,μ and LFV rates consistent with data, and that the Br(τ→μγ) bound forces a Δaμ of order 10^{-9} (future sensitivity 5×10^{-10}). Under the analyzer rules, circularity may be claimed only when a specific reduction can be quoted and exhibited (self-definition, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, load-bearing self-citation of an unverified uniqueness claim, etc.). The abstract supplies no Lagrangian, mass matrices, free-parameter count, scan ranges, or equations that would allow such a reduction to be demonstrated. Language such as “accounts for,” “predicts strong correlations,” and “imposes a stringent constraint compatible with” is standard model-building phrasing and does not by itself constitute circularity. Self-reference to a “previously studied 3-4-1 realization” is ordinary and not shown to be load-bearing for a uniqueness theorem. Therefore no circular steps are recorded and the score is 0. Any suspicion that free Yukawas/VEVs/masses are fitted remains speculation outside the available text and is excluded by the hard rules.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 3 axioms · 2 invented entities

Abstract-only ledger. The claim rests on the 3-4-1 gauge structure, a new singly charged Higgs, and a minimal inverse-seesaw neutrino sector, plus the usual BSM assumption that new particles and couplings can be chosen to fit precision and flavor data. Free parameters (Yukawas, VEVs, new masses) are not enumerated in the abstract but are expected to be numerous and fitted; no independent collider mass prediction is stated.

free parameters (2)

new-particle masses and mixings (Higgs, heavy neutrinos, gauge bosons)
Abstract does not list values; in this class of models these are scanned or fitted to (g-2) and LFV bounds and are load-bearing for the quoted numerical windows.
Yukawa and scalar potential couplings of the extended 3-4-1 + inverse-seesaw sector
Required to generate LFV rates and magnetic-moment contributions; not fixed by first principles in the abstract.

axioms (3)

domain assumption 3-4-1 gauge symmetry and its spontaneous breaking pattern are a valid UV completion for the electroweak sector
Standard assumption of the 3-4-1 model class; invoked as the framework of the paper.
domain assumption Minimal inverse seesaw generates the observed light neutrino spectrum without spoiling the LFV/(g-2) fits
Core mechanism stated in the abstract for neutrino masses.
ad hoc to paper A single new singly charged Higgs plus the inverse-seesaw sector suffice to reconcile (g-2)e,μ with all listed LFV bounds
Specific to this realization; the abstract’s central consistency claim depends on it.

invented entities (2)

new singly charged Higgs boson in the extended 3-4-1 model no independent evidence
purpose: Provide additional contributions to (g-2) and LFV amplitudes that allow simultaneous fits
Introduced as the distinguishing ingredient relative to a prior 3-4-1 realization; no independent mass or production prediction is given in the abstract.
minimal inverse-seesaw neutrino sector embedded in 3-4-1 no independent evidence
purpose: Generate light neutrino masses while controlling LFV rates
Standard mechanism adapted to this gauge group; abstract does not report a unique falsifiable mass scale beyond existing neutrino data.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 6090 in / 2907 out tokens · 29208 ms · 2026-07-12T23:51:09.446017+00:00 · methodology

0 comments

read the original abstract

We investigate an extended 3-4-1 model consisting of a new singly charged Higgs boson, implementing the minimal inverse seesaw mechanism to account for the current $(g-2)_{e,\mu}$ constraints as well as the lepton-flavor-violating decay rates of charged leptons, the Standard Model-like Higgs boson, and the $Z$ boson, all consistent with current experimental data. Unlike the previously studied 3-4-1 realization, the model considered here predicts strong correlations among these observables that can be tested in future experiments. In particular, the current upper bound on Br$(\tau \to \mu \gamma)$ imposes a stringent constraint compatible with the $1\sigma$ experimental range of $(g-2)_{\mu}$, corresponding to an allowed deviation of order $10^{-9}$ from the SM prediction. The forthcoming experimental sensitivity to Br$(\tau \to \mu\gamma)$ will reduce this deviation to $5\times 10^{-10}$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.08444 by L.T. Hue, L.T.T. Phuong, N.H.T. Nha, T.T. Hong.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2: One-loop Feynman diagrams contributing to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: Feynman diagrams for one-loop contributions to the decay amplitudes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: The correlations between ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: The correlations between ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6: The relationship between decay rates of cLFV, LFV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

LFV decays in a 3-3-1 model with singlet leptoquarks
hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

In the 3-3-1 model with a singlet leptoquark, Higgs and Z lepton-flavor-violating decays are nearly proportional to radiative charged-lepton decays, and the model cannot produce large electron and muon magnetic anomal...