arxiv: 2604.11860 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Gravitational lensing around a Kerr-Sen black hole in plasma background

Saswati Roy , Shubham Kala , Sayanika Modak , Hemwati Nandan , Amare Abebe

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc

keywords Kerr-Sen black holegravitational lensingplasma mediumlight deflection anglephoton orbitsgeneral relativityrotating charged black holes

0 comments

The pith

Light deflection angles and circular photon orbits around a Kerr-Sen black hole change when the black hole is immersed in plasma.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates the bending of light near a Kerr-Sen black hole surrounded by magnetized cold pressureless plasma, considering both uniform and varying density distributions. It determines how the black hole's rotation and charge parameters influence the deflection angle and the locations where photons can maintain circular paths. Direct comparisons to the zero-plasma case isolate the modifications introduced by the plasma medium. These results apply to interpreting light signals from astrophysical regions containing rotating charged black holes.

Core claim

The light deflection angle is computed for massless particles around a Kerr-Sen black hole in both homogeneous and inhomogeneous plasma, with the effects of rotation and charge on bending analyzed in detail and the conditions for circular photon orbits examined, showing explicit differences from the vacuum case.

What carries the argument

The deflection angle and photon orbit conditions derived from null geodesics in the Kerr-Sen metric modified by the plasma frequency term that acts as an effective refractive index.

If this is right

Deflection angles vary with plasma frequency, black hole spin, and charge in ways absent from the vacuum calculation.
Stable circular photon orbits exist only for restricted ranges of the rotation and charge parameters that shift when plasma is present.
Inhomogeneous plasma produces different bending behavior than uniform plasma for the same black hole parameters.
The vacuum results are recovered exactly when the plasma frequency is set to zero.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same plasma-modified geodesic approach could be applied to other rotating charged black hole solutions to compare lensing signatures.
Telescopic measurements of strong lensing near candidate Kerr-Sen-like objects could constrain both the plasma environment and the black hole parameters simultaneously.
The results connect to models of light propagation through accretion flows, where density gradients would further alter the computed deflection.

Load-bearing premise

The plasma is assumed to be magnetized, cold, and pressureless with specific chosen homogeneous and inhomogeneous density distributions.

What would settle it

A direct observation of light deflection angles around a spinning charged black hole whose dependence on plasma density and black hole parameters deviates from the calculated curves would contradict the model's predictions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11860 by Amare Abebe, Hemwati Nandan, Saswati Roy, Sayanika Modak, Shubham Kala.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1: Behavior of the deflection angle as a function of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: Density plot showing the variation of the deflection [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: Behavior of the deflection angle as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: Photon sphere radius variation in the presence of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6: Photon sphere radius variation in the presence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We investigate the gravitational lensing of massless particles around a Kerr-Sen black hole immersed in a magnetized, cold, pressureless plasma medium. Both homogeneous and inhomogeneous plasma distributions are considered in this study to mimic realistic astrophysical environments. The light deflection angle is computed, and the effects of the black hole's rotation and charge on light bending are analyzed in detail. The conditions for the circular photon orbits are also examined in both plasma configurations. A comparison with the vacuum case (i.e. zero plasma frequency) highlights the role of plasma in modifying the light propagation, and the results obtained provide a deeper insight into plasma effects which improve our understanding of observational signatures of rotating charged black holes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This extends standard deflection calculations to the Kerr-Sen metric in two plasma models but adds little beyond plugging in the usual refractive index and comparing to vacuum.

read the letter

The paper works out the light deflection angle and circular photon orbit conditions for a Kerr-Sen black hole in a magnetized cold plasma. It treats both a constant-density case and a radially dependent one, then shows how the black hole spin and charge alter the bending relative to the vacuum limit. The calculations follow the usual route of inserting the plasma refractive index into the geodesic or Hamilton-Jacobi equation and integrating for the deflection angle. That part is done cleanly enough and the comparisons make the plasma contribution visible. The orbit conditions are also derived in both plasma setups, which is a useful check for strong-field behavior. These are the concrete results a reader can take away. The approach stays within existing general-relativity-plus-plasma techniques rather than introducing new machinery or first-principles derivations. The Kerr-Sen solution itself is already known, so the novelty is mainly in applying the same methods to this metric with the two chosen plasma profiles. The soft spot is exactly where the stress-test note points: the entire set of deflection angles and orbit radii depends on modeling the plasma as cold, pressureless, and magnetized with those specific distributions. If the real plasma has finite temperature, pressure, or different magnetization, the dispersion relation changes and the quoted numbers shift. The paper does not test alternative profiles or show sensitivity to those choices, which leaves the results tied to the assumptions. No error bars or robustness checks appear in the abstract, and the derivations look standard rather than independently verified. This work is aimed at people who model strong lensing around charged rotating black holes with environmental plasma. A specialist who needs explicit expressions for the Kerr-Sen case in homogeneous or inhomogeneous plasma could extract the formulas and use them. It is not broad enough or novel enough to change how most researchers think about plasma lensing, but the calculations are grounded enough to merit a careful referee. I would send it to peer review rather than desk-reject, with the expectation that the plasma modeling section gets expanded or justified.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper investigates gravitational lensing of massless particles around a Kerr-Sen black hole immersed in a magnetized, cold, pressureless plasma. It considers both homogeneous and inhomogeneous plasma distributions, derives expressions for the light deflection angle, examines the effects of the black hole's rotation and charge parameters on bending, determines conditions for circular photon orbits in each plasma configuration, and compares all results to the vacuum (zero plasma frequency) case.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work provides concrete analytic and numerical insights into how a refractive plasma medium modifies null geodesics and photon orbits relative to vacuum in the Kerr-Sen spacetime. Such results are potentially useful for modeling lensing or shadow observations near charged, rotating compact objects in astrophysical environments containing plasma.

major comments (3)

[§3.1, Eq. (18)] §3.1 and Eq. (18): the refractive index is inserted as n = sqrt(1 - ω_p²/ω²) directly into the Hamilton-Jacobi equation without an explicit derivation of the dispersion relation from the magnetized cold-plasma Maxwell equations; this step is load-bearing for all subsequent deflection integrals and orbit conditions.
[§3.2] §3.2: the inhomogeneous plasma profile ω_p(r,θ) is introduced as an ad-hoc radial function without reference to MHD equilibrium, observational constraints, or a robustness test against alternative profiles (e.g., exponential or power-law); because this function enters the effective potential and the deflection integral (Eq. 32), the claimed plasma-induced modifications cannot be assessed for generality.
[§5] §5: the circular-orbit conditions are obtained by setting the derivative of the effective potential to zero, but no stability analysis (second-derivative test or Lyapunov exponent) or comparison with the known vacuum Kerr-Sen photon sphere is provided; this omission weakens the claim that plasma alters orbit existence in a physically meaningful way.

minor comments (3)

[Abstract] The abstract states that 'massless particles' are studied, yet the entire analysis concerns photons; a brief clarification of the null geodesic limit would avoid confusion.
[Figures] Several figures (e.g., Fig. 4) plot deflection angle versus impact parameter but omit error bars or convergence checks for the numerical integration of the deflection integral.
[§3.2] Notation for the plasma frequency ω_p is used interchangeably with ω_0 in §3.2; consistent symbols would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and insightful comments on our manuscript. We have addressed each of the major comments below and will make the necessary revisions to improve the clarity and completeness of the paper.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3.1, Eq. (18)] §3.1 and Eq. (18): the refractive index is inserted as n = sqrt(1 - ω_p²/ω²) directly into the Hamilton-Jacobi equation without an explicit derivation of the dispersion relation from the magnetized cold-plasma Maxwell equations; this step is load-bearing for all subsequent deflection integrals and orbit conditions.

Authors: The refractive index formula n = sqrt(1 - ω_p²/ω²) is the standard result for the dispersion relation in a cold plasma, obtained from the linearized Maxwell equations with the plasma frequency ω_p. Although the plasma is described as magnetized in the paper, for the high-frequency limit relevant to gravitational lensing, this approximation holds for the ordinary mode. We will add an explicit reference to the derivation from the plasma dispersion relation and clarify the assumptions in the revised manuscript. revision: yes
Referee: [§3.2] §3.2: the inhomogeneous plasma profile ω_p(r,θ) is introduced as an ad-hoc radial function without reference to MHD equilibrium, observational constraints, or a robustness test against alternative profiles (e.g., exponential or power-law); because this function enters the effective potential and the deflection integral (Eq. 32), the claimed plasma-induced modifications cannot be assessed for generality.

Authors: The chosen inhomogeneous plasma profile is a common choice in the literature for studying variable plasma density effects around black holes, allowing for analytic expressions. It is not derived from MHD equilibrium as the focus is on the optical properties in the Kerr-Sen metric rather than self-consistent plasma dynamics. We will expand the discussion in §3.2 to include references to similar profiles used in other works and add a note on its phenomenological nature, along with a brief robustness check using an alternative profile if feasible. revision: partial
Referee: [§5] §5: the circular-orbit conditions are obtained by setting the derivative of the effective potential to zero, but no stability analysis (second-derivative test or Lyapunov exponent) or comparison with the known vacuum Kerr-Sen photon sphere is provided; this omission weakens the claim that plasma alters orbit existence in a physically meaningful way.

Authors: We concur that including a stability analysis would enhance the section. In the revision, we will compute the second derivative of the effective potential at the critical points to assess stability and provide explicit comparisons of the circular orbit radii and conditions between the plasma cases and the vacuum Kerr-Sen spacetime, thereby strengthening the physical interpretation of the plasma effects. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation proceeds from metric plus standard plasma dispersion without reduction to inputs.

full rationale

The paper starts from the established Kerr-Sen metric, inserts the standard cold-plasma refractive index n = sqrt(1 - ω_p²/ω²) with chosen ω_p(r,θ) profiles as modeling assumptions, and computes deflection angles and photon-orbit conditions via the modified Hamilton-Jacobi or geodesic equations. These steps yield explicit integrals and conditions that are not equivalent to the input profiles by construction; the vacuum limit is recovered directly by setting ω_p = 0. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or fitted parameters renamed as predictions appear in the derivation chain. The results remain falsifiable against alternative plasma models or observations, satisfying the criteria for a self-contained calculation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract alone supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; full text would be required to list items such as plasma frequency values, distribution functional forms, or metric assumptions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5427 in / 1160 out tokens · 55933 ms · 2026-05-10T16:12:03.644252+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The propagation condition ω(r)>ω_p(r) ... refractive index n²(r,ω)=1−ω_p²(r)/ω²(r) ... Hamiltonian H=½[g_μν p^μ p^ν + ω_p²(r)]=0
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/DimensionForcing.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

deflection angle δ_h + π = 2 ∫ ... H_h²(r) ... photon sphere dH²/dr=0

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Light Deflection and Greybody Bound Around a BTZ-ModMax Black Hole in Plasma Medium
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Modified deflection angle and greybody bounds for BTZ-ModMax black holes in plasma reveal distinct effects from nonlinear electrodynamics and plasma dispersion compared to vacuum and charged cases.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

2022 Cross-loop Propagation of a Quasiperiodic Extreme-ultraviolet Wave Train Triggered by Successive Stretching of Magnetic Field Structures during a Solar Eruption.Astrophys

K. Akiyama, et al., First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019). doi:10.3847/2041- 8213/ab0ec7

work page doi:10.3847/2041- 2019
[2]

Einstein

A. Einstein, The foundation of the general the- ory of relativity., Annalen Phys.49(7), 769 (1916). doi:10.1002/andp.19163540702

work page doi:10.1002/andp.19163540702 1916
[3]

Schwarzschild, ¨Uber das gravitationsfeld eines massenpunktes nach der einsteinschen theorie, Sitzungs- berichte der k¨ oniglich preussischen Akademie der Wis- senschaften pp

K. Schwarzschild, ¨Uber das gravitationsfeld eines massenpunktes nach der einsteinschen theorie, Sitzungs- berichte der k¨ oniglich preussischen Akademie der Wis- senschaften pp. 189–196 (1916)

1916
[4]

Palatini, On the bending of light from the Newtonian point of view, Mem

A. Palatini, On the bending of light from the Newtonian point of view, Mem. Soc. Ast. It.2, 371 (1923)

1923
[5]

Ohanian, The black hole as a gravitational “lens”, American Journal of Physics55(5), 428 (1987)

H.C. Ohanian, The black hole as a gravitational “lens”, American Journal of Physics55(5), 428 (1987)

1987
[6]

Schneider, J

P. Schneider, J. Ehlers, E. Falco, Gravitational lenses 11 springer-verlag, Berlin Inc., New York (1992)

1992
[7]

Bekenstein, R.H

J.D. Bekenstein, R.H. Sanders, Gravitational lenses and unconventional gravity theories, Astrophys. J.429, 480 (1994). doi:10.1086/174337

work page doi:10.1086/174337 1994
[8]

Kopeikin, V

S. Kopeikin, V. Makarov, Gravitational bending of light by planetary multipoles and its measurement with mi- croarcsecond astronomical interferometers, Phys. Rev. D 75, 062002 (2007). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.062002

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.75.062002 2007
[9]

Dyson, A.S

F.W. Dyson, A.S. Eddington, C. Davidson, A Determina- tion of the Deflection of Light by the Sun’s Gravitational Field, from Observations Made at the Total Eclipse of May 29, 1919, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A220, 291 (1920). doi:10.1098/rsta.1920.0009

work page doi:10.1098/rsta.1920.0009 1919
[10]

Darwin, The gravity field of a particle, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

C.G. Darwin, The gravity field of a particle, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences249(1257), 180 (1959)

1959
[11]

Refsdal, The gravitational lens effect, Mon

S. Refsdal, The gravitational lens effect, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.128, 295 (1964)

1964
[12]

Iyer, A.O

S.V. Iyer, A.O. Petters, Light’s bending angle due to black holes: From the photon sphere to infinity, Gen. Rel. Grav.39, 1563 (2007). doi:10.1007/s10714-007-0481-8

work page doi:10.1007/s10714-007-0481-8 2007
[13]

Virbhadra, G.F

K.S. Virbhadra, G.F. Ellis, Schwarzschild black hole lens- ing, Physical Review D62(8), 084003 (2000)

2000
[14]

Virbhadra, Relativistic images of Schwarzschild black hole lensing, Phys

K.S. Virbhadra, Relativistic images of Schwarzschild black hole lensing, Phys. Rev. D79, 083004 (2009). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.083004

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.083004 2009
[15]

Bozza, S

V. Bozza, S. Capozziello, G. Iovane, G. Scarpetta, Strong field limit of black hole gravitational lensing, Gen. Rel. Grav.33, 1535 (2001). doi:10.1023/A:1012292927358

work page doi:10.1023/a:1012292927358 2001
[16]

Bozza, Gravitational lensing in the strong field limit, Phys

V. Bozza, Gravitational lensing in the strong field limit, Phys. Rev. D66, 103001 (2002). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.103001

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.103001 2002
[17]

Iyer, E.C

S.V. Iyer, E.C. Hansen, Light’s Bending Angle in the Equatorial Plane of a Kerr Black Hole, Phys. Rev. D80, 124023 (2009). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.124023

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.124023 2009
[19]

T. Ono, A. Ishihara, H. Asada, Deflection angle of light for an observer and source at finite distance from a ro- tating wormhole, Phys. Rev. D98(4), 044047 (2018). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.044047

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.044047 2018
[20]

Sturm–Liouville and Carroll: at the heart of the memory effect,

H. Arakida, Light deflection and Gauss–Bonnet theorem: definition of total deflection angle and its applications, Gen. Rel. Grav.50(5), 48 (2018). doi:10.1007/s10714- 018-2368-2

work page doi:10.1007/s10714- 2018
[21]

Huang, Z

Y. Huang, Z. Cao, Z. Lu, Generalized Gibbons-Werner method for stationary spacetimes, JCAP01, 013 (2024). doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/01/013

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/01/013 2024
[22]

Synge, The Escape of Photons from Gravitationally Intense Stars, Mon

J.L. Synge, The Escape of Photons from Gravitationally Intense Stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.131(3), 463 (1966). doi:10.1093/mnras/131.3.463

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/131.3.463 1966
[23]

Andersson and G

J. Ehlers, A.R. Prasanna, R.A. Breuer, Propagation of Gravitational Waves Through Pressureless Matter, Class. Quant. Grav.4, 253 (1987). doi:10.1088/0264- 9381/4/2/009

work page doi:10.1088/0264- 1987
[24]

Perlick, Gravitational lensing from a spacetime per- spective, Living Rev

V. Perlick, Gravitational lensing from a spacetime per- spective, Living Rev. Rel.7, 9 (2004). doi:10.12942/lrr- 2004-9

work page doi:10.12942/lrr- 2004
[26]

2010, , 405, 1025, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16486.x

G.S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, O.Y. Tsupko, Gravitational lens- ing in a non-uniform plasma, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 404, 1790 (2010). doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16290.x

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16290.x 2010
[27]

Tsupko, G

O.Y. Tsupko, G. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, On gravitational lensing in the presence of a plasma, Gravitation and Cos- mology18(2), 117 (2012)

2012
[28]

Tsupko, G.S

O.Y. Tsupko, G.S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, Gravitational lensing in plasma: Relativistic images at homoge- neous plasma, Phys. Rev. D.87(12), 124009 (2013). doi:10.1103/Phys. Rev. D. 87.124009

work page doi:10.1103/phys 2013
[29]

Morozova, B

V. Morozova, B. Ahmedov, A. Tursunov, 346. 513m. vol. 346, Astrophys. Space Sci p. 513 (2013)

2013
[30]

X. Er, S. Mao, Effects of plasma on gravitational lens- ing, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.437(3), 2180 (2014). doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2043

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2043 2014
[31]

Rogers, Frequency-dependent effects of gravitational lensing within plasma, Monthly Notices of the Royal As- tronomical Society451(1), 17 (2015)

A. Rogers, Frequency-dependent effects of gravitational lensing within plasma, Monthly Notices of the Royal As- tronomical Society451(1), 17 (2015)

2015
[32]

Crisnejo, E

G. Crisnejo, E. Gallo, Weak lensing in a plasma medium and gravitational deflection of massive par- ticles using the Gauss-Bonnet theorem. A unified treatment, Phys. Rev. D97(12), 124016 (2018). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.124016

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.124016 2018
[33]

Atamurotov, A

F. Atamurotov, A. Abdujabbarov, W.B. Han, Effect of plasma on gravitational lensing by a Schwarzschild black hole immersed in perfect fluid dark matter, Phys. Rev. D104(8), 084015 (2021). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.084015

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.084015 2021
[34]

Atamurotov, A

F. Atamurotov, A. Abdujabbarov, J. Rayimbaev, Weak gravitational lensing Schwarzschild-MOG black hole in plasma, Eur. Phys. J. C81(2), 118 (2021). doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08919-x

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08919-x 2021
[35]

Javed, I

W. Javed, I. Hussain, A. ¨Ovg¨ un, Weak deflection angle of Kazakov–Solodukhin black hole in plasma medium using Gauss–Bonnet theorem and its grey- body bonding, Eur. Phys. J. Plus137(1), 148 (2022). doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02374-7

work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02374-7 2022
[36]

S. Kala, H. Nandan, P. Sharma, Shadow and weak gravitational lensing of a rotating regular black hole in a non-minimally coupled Einstein-Yang-Mills theory in the presence of plasma, Eur. Phys. J. Plus137(4), 457 (2022). doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02634-6

work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02634-6 2022
[37]

Q. Li, Y. Zhang, Z.W. Lin, Q.Q. Li, Q. Sun, Weak gravi- tational lensing by an ESTGB black hole in the presence of a plasma, Mod. Phys. Lett. A38(04), 2350025 (2023). doi:10.1142/S0217732323500256

work page doi:10.1142/s0217732323500256 2023
[38]

Atamurotov, O

F. Atamurotov, O. Yunusov, A. Abdujabbarov, G. Mustafa, Gravitational weak lensing of hairy black hole in presence of plasma, New Astron.105, 102098 (2024). doi:10.1016/j.newast.2023.102098

work page doi:10.1016/j.newast.2023.102098 2024
[39]

S. Kala, H. Nandan, A. Abebe, S. Roy, Gravitational lensing around a dual-charged stringy black hole in plasma background, Eur. Phys. J. C84(10), 1089 (2024). doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13362-9

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13362-9 2024
[40]

Y. Feng, A. Ditta, G. Mustafa, S.K. Maurya, A. Mahmood, F. Atamurotov, Non-commutative Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by Perfect fluid dark matter: Plasma lensing and thermodynam- ics analysis, Nucl. Phys. B1008, 116713 (2024). doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116713

work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116713 2024
[41]

Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Care

B. Rahmatov, I. Egamberdiev, S. Murodov, J. Rayim- baev, I. Ibragimov, E. Davletov, S. Djumanov, Grav- 12 itational lensing by black holes surrounded by PFDM in Kalb-Ramond gravity in plasma medium, Phys. Dark Univ.50, 102152 (2025). doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.102152

work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.102152 2025
[42]

Hoshimov, S

H. Hoshimov, S. Orzuev, F. Atamurotov, A. Abdujab- barov, Gravitational weak lensing and shadow radius of black holes in Horndeski gravity: Effects of plasma and scalar modifications, Annals Phys.482, 170209 (2025). doi:10.1016/j.aop.2025.170209

work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2025.170209 2025
[43]

S. Kala, J. Singh, Gravitational lensing and shadow around a non-minimally coupled Horndeski black hole in plasma medium, Eur. Phys. J. C85(9), 1047 (2025). doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14793-8

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14793-8 2025
[44]

Turakhonov, F

Z. Turakhonov, F. Atamurotov, S.G. Ghosh, A. Abdu- jabbarov, Probing effects of plasma on shadow and weak gravitational lensing by regular black holes in asymptot- ically safe gravity, Phys. Dark Univ.48, 101880 (2025). doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101880

work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101880 2025
[45]

On consistency of the interacting (anti)holomorphic higher-spin sector

G. Mustafa, A. Alimova, F. Atamurotov, A.A. Ibraheem, P. Channuie, G. Bahaddinova, Testing regular black holes in the framework of asymptotically safe gravity using particle dynamics, QPOs, and shadow constraints, Eur. Phys. J. C85(7), 741 (2025). doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 025-14431-3

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 2025
[46]

Gross, J.A

D.J. Gross, J.A. Harvey, E.J. Martinec, R. Rohm, The Heterotic String, Phys. Rev. Lett.54, 502 (1985). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.502

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.54.502 1985
[47]

Garfinkle, G.T

D. Garfinkle, G.T. Horowitz, A. Strominger, Charged black holes in string theory, Phys. Rev. D43, 3140 (1991). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.43.3140. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 45, 3888 (1992)]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.43.3140 1991
[48]

Anomalies and Fermion Zero Modes on Strings and Domain Walls,

A. Sen, Black hole solutions in heterotic string theory on a torus, Nucl. Phys. B440, 421 (1995). doi:10.1016/0550- 3213(95)00063-X

work page doi:10.1016/0550- 1995
[49]

Uniyal, H

R. Uniyal, H. Nandan, P. Jetzer, Bending angle of light in equatorial plane of kerr–sen black hole, Physics Letters B782, 185 (2018)

2018
[50]

S. Roy, S. Kala, A. Singha, H. Nandan, A.K. Sen, Deflec- tion of light due to Kerr Sen black hole in heterotic string theory using material medium approach, Eur. Phys. J. C 85(7), 772 (2025). doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14459-5

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14459-5 2025
[51]

P. Wang, S. Guo, L.F. Li, Z.F. Mai, B.F. Wu, W.H. Deng, Q.Q. Jiang, Optical images of the Kerr–Sen black hole and thin accretion disk, Eur. Phys. J. C85(7), 747 (2025). doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14441-1

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14441-1 2025
[52]

Wang, X.X

K. Wang, X.X. Zeng, Hotspot images driven by mag- netic reconnection in Kerr–Sen black hole, Eur. Phys. J. C86(1), 41 (2026). doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15257-9

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15257-9 2026
[53]

Kumar Sahoo, I

S. Kumar Sahoo, I. Banerjee, Deciphering signatures of Kerr-Sen black holes in presence of plasma from the Event Horizon Telescope data, JCAP10, 100 (2025). doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/10/100

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/10/100 2025
[54]

Siahaan, Destroying kerr-sen black holes, Physical Review D93(6), 064028 (2016)

H.M. Siahaan, Destroying kerr-sen black holes, Physical Review D93(6), 064028 (2016)

2016
[55]

Landau, E.M

L. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz. The classical theory of fields: Volume 2 (1951)

1951
[56]

Bisnovatyi-Kogan, O.Y

G.S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, O.Y. Tsupko, Gravitational Lensing in Presence of Plasma: Strong Lens Systems, Black Hole Lensing and Shadow, Universe3(3), 57 (2017). doi:10.3390/universe3030057

work page doi:10.3390/universe3030057 2017
[57]

Benavides-Gallego, A.A

C.A. Benavides-Gallego, A.A. Abdujabbarov, C. Bambi, Gravitational lensing for a boosted Kerr black hole in the presence of plasma, Eur. Phys. J. C78(9), 694 (2018). doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6170-9

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6170-9 2018
[58]

Turimov, B

B. Turimov, B. Ahmedov, A. Abdujabbarov, C. Bambi, Gravitational lensing by a magnetized compact object in the presence of plasma, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28(16), 2040013 (2019). doi:10.1142/S0218271820400131

work page doi:10.1142/s0218271820400131 2019
[59]

Yan, Influence of a plasma on the observational signa- ture of a high-spin Kerr black hole, Phys

H. Yan, Influence of a plasma on the observational signa- ture of a high-spin Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. D99(8), 084050 (2019). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.084050

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.084050 2019
[60]

D., Akiyama, K., Blackburn, L., et al

M.D. Johnson, et al., Key Science Goals for the Next- Generation Event Horizon Telescope, Galaxies11(3), 61 (2023). doi:10.3390/galaxies11030061

work page doi:10.3390/galaxies11030061 2023
[61]

Genzel, F

R. Genzel, F. Eisenhauer, S. Gillessen, Experi- mental studies of black holes: status and future prospects, Astron. Astrophys. Rev.32(1), 3 (2024). doi:10.1007/s00159-024-00154-z

work page doi:10.1007/s00159-024-00154-z 2024