pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.22807 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · 🧮 math.OC · cs.LG· cs.SY· eess.SY· stat.ML

Sliced Wasserstein Steering between Gaussian Measures

Kaito Ito , Anqi Dong This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC cs.LGcs.SYeess.SYstat.ML
keywords sliced Wasserstein distancedistribution steeringfeedback controlGaussian measuresoptimal transportBenamou-Brenier formulationprojection methods
0
0 comments X

The pith

Averaging one-dimensional optimal velocities from random projections produces a feedback controller that steers any Gaussian measure exactly to a target Gaussian.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a sliced feedback controller that projects the evolving distribution onto random one-dimensional lines, solves the elementary one-dimensional steering problem on each line, and averages the resulting velocities to obtain a control law in the full space. This construction is invariant under rotations, reduces each subproblem to the classical Benamou-Brenier formulation, and remains well-posed on the space of measures with finite second moments. In the special case of Gaussian measures the averaged controller reaches the prescribed target distribution exactly, and the total energy expended by the controller equals the sliced Wasserstein distance between the initial and target laws. Because the one-dimensional subproblems are independent and cheap to solve, the method scales to high dimensions and aligns with settings where only linear projections of the state are observable.

Core claim

In the Gaussian setting, the developed sliced controller steers the law to the prescribed target. Furthermore, we derive an identity relating the energy consumption incurred by the controller to the sliced Wasserstein distance.

What carries the argument

The sliced feedback controller formed by averaging the optimal one-dimensional velocities obtained from projections onto random directions on the sphere.

If this is right

  • The controller is invariant under orthogonal transformations of the ambient space.
  • The controller is nonexpansive when the distribution is further projected onto any lower-dimensional subspace.
  • The controller is well-posed on the entire space of probability measures with finite second moment.
  • Numerical implementation reduces to sampling directions on the sphere and solving independent scalar optimal-transport problems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same averaging construction might furnish a practical approximation to full optimal transport steering for non-Gaussian laws when only finitely many projections are used.
  • Because each slice depends only on linear observations, the controller could be realized in sensor-limited settings such as tomographic imaging or LiDAR-based swarm control.
  • The exact energy identity for Gaussians suggests that sliced Wasserstein distance itself may serve as a natural Lyapunov function for distribution steering tasks.

Load-bearing premise

Averaging the one-dimensional optimal velocities obtained from random projections produces a well-posed feedback control in ambient space that achieves exact steering for Gaussians and satisfies the Benamou-Brenier formulation in each slice.

What would settle it

For any pair of distinct Gaussian measures, numerically integrate the closed-loop dynamics generated by the averaged sliced velocity field and check whether the final law fails to coincide with the target Gaussian or whether the integrated energy differs from the sliced Wasserstein distance computed directly from the two covariances.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.22807 by Anqi Dong, Kaito Ito.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: shows sample paths of x(t) under the iterative sliced controller (10) with different numbers of discrete time steps Td = T /h = 100, 1000, 100000. Slicing directions are sampled uniformly on S n−1 . Note that Td equals the number of slices over time horizon T . Even for small Td, the state density ρ is steered close to the target ρf , and as Td increases, the terminal density ρ(T, ·) becomes closer to the … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Evolution of the 3σ ellipse of the covariance Σ(t) under the iterative sliced controller (10) with Td = 100000 (black, dashed), the ideal sliced controller (14) (blue), and the minimum energy controller (7) (red). The magenta dashed ellipse shows the 3σ ellipse of Σf . (b) 30 samples of x1(t) under the ideal sliced controller (in blue) and the minimum energy controller (in red). sensing/actuation space… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Optimal transport with quadratic cost provides a geometric framework for steering an ensemble, modeled by a probability law, with minimal effort. Yet ambient-space formulations become unwieldy in high dimensions, and sensing or actuation in practice often reveals only linear views of the state -- camera silhouettes, LiDAR beams, tomographic slices. We develop a sliced feedback controller for distribution steering: the evolving law is projected onto one-dimensional directions on the sphere, the optimal one-dimensional velocity is synthesized in each projection, and these velocities are averaged to produce a feedback control in the ambient space. The construction reduces to the Benamou--Brenier problem in one dimension. In addition, it is invariant under orthogonal transforms, nonexpansive under projections, and well posed on $\mathcal{P}_2(\mathbb{R}^n)$. Computation proceeds by sampling directions on the sphere and solving independent one-dimensional subproblems, yielding a scalable method aligned with partial observations. In the Gaussian setting, we show that the developed sliced controller steers the law to the prescribed target. Furthermore, we derive an identity relating the energy consumption incurred by the controller to the sliced Wasserstein distance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a sliced feedback controller for steering probability measures between initial and target distributions. It projects the evolving law onto random one-dimensional directions on the sphere, solves the one-dimensional Benamou-Brenier problem in each projection to obtain optimal velocities, and averages these velocities (weighted by the direction vectors) to construct an ambient-space feedback law. The approach is claimed to be invariant under orthogonal transformations, nonexpansive under projections, and well-posed on P2(R^n). In the Gaussian case, the paper asserts that this controller exactly steers the law to the target and derives an energy identity relating the incurred control energy to the sliced Wasserstein distance.

Significance. If the steering claim and energy identity hold, the work provides a scalable, projection-based method for distribution control that aligns with partial observations (e.g., tomographic or linear measurements) and reduces high-dimensional problems to independent one-dimensional subproblems. The Gaussian guarantees and energy relation would offer concrete theoretical value in optimal transport and control, with potential for reproducible numerical implementation via sphere sampling.

major comments (2)
  1. [Controller construction and Gaussian steering claim] The construction of the ambient velocity field v(x) = ∫ v_θ(<x, θ>) θ dμ(θ) (as described in the controller definition) does not in general induce closed one-dimensional dynamics on each projection. For a fixed θ0, the projected velocity <v(x), θ0> expands to an integral involving (θ · θ0) and depends on the full vector x, not solely on y = <x, θ0>. When v_θ are affine (as for Gaussian marginals), this yields an affine function of the entire state, so the orthogonal components of x contribute to dy/dt. Consequently, the marginal on each line does not evolve according to its own independent 1D continuity equation with velocity v_θ(y), undermining the claim that the slices evolve independently under their Benamou-Brenier solutions.
  2. [Gaussian case analysis and energy identity] The covariance ODE dC/dt = M C + C M^T with M = ∫ b(θ; C) θ θ^T dθ (derived from the averaged controller) is asserted to reach C(1) = C_target for arbitrary initial and target covariances. However, because the effective projected velocities are not exactly the 1D optimal ones (due to cross terms from orthogonal coordinates), it is not immediate that the integrated flow satisfies the exact steering property without additional verification or error bounds. The manuscript should provide an explicit derivation or numerical confirmation that the ODE indeed converges to the target covariance for general positive-definite matrices.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Well-posedness on P2] Clarify the precise measure μ on the sphere used for averaging (e.g., uniform or data-dependent) and its impact on the nonexpansiveness property.
  2. [Energy identity derivation] The energy identity is stated to relate controller energy to sliced Wasserstein distance; include the explicit constant or scaling factor in the statement for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and valuable comments on the controller construction and Gaussian steering analysis. We address each major comment below with clarifications and commit to revisions that strengthen the exposition without altering the core claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The construction of the ambient velocity field v(x) = ∫ v_θ(<x, θ>) θ dμ(θ) (as described in the controller definition) does not in general induce closed one-dimensional dynamics on each projection. For a fixed θ0, the projected velocity <v(x), θ0> expands to an integral involving (θ · θ0) and depends on the full vector x, not solely on y = <x, θ0>. When v_θ are affine (as for Gaussian marginals), this yields an affine function of the entire state, so the orthogonal components of x contribute to dy/dt. Consequently, the marginal on each line does not evolve according to its own independent 1D continuity equation with velocity v_θ(y), undermining the claim that the slices evolve independently under their Benamou-Brenier solutions.

    Authors: We agree that the averaged velocity field does not decouple the one-dimensional projections exactly: the effective projected velocity in direction θ0 depends on the full state x via inner products with other directions. This precludes strictly independent evolution of each marginal according to its isolated 1D Benamou-Brenier velocity. In the Gaussian setting, however, each v_θ is affine, so the composite v(x) remains affine; the flow therefore stays within the Gaussian family and the covariance evolves according to a closed ODE. The per-slice independence is thus an idealization used to motivate the controller design, while exact steering to the target Gaussian is established globally via the covariance dynamics rather than marginal-by-marginal closure. We will revise the manuscript to clarify this distinction and remove any phrasing that could suggest strict independence of the slices. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The covariance ODE dC/dt = M C + C M^T with M = ∫ b(θ; C) θ θ^T dθ (derived from the averaged controller) is asserted to reach C(1) = C_target for arbitrary initial and target covariances. However, because the effective projected velocities are not exactly the 1D optimal ones (due to cross terms from orthogonal coordinates), it is not immediate that the integrated flow satisfies the exact steering property without additional verification or error bounds. The manuscript should provide an explicit derivation or numerical confirmation that the ODE indeed converges to the target covariance for general positive-definite matrices.

    Authors: We appreciate the call for explicit verification. Although cross terms appear in the projected velocities, the linearity of v(x) ensures that the covariance ODE is well-defined and closed. The matrix M is constructed precisely so that the instantaneous velocity matches the sliced-Wasserstein-optimal projection velocities at each covariance C; integrating the resulting linear ODE from t=0 to t=1 drives C(0) to C_target for any pair of positive-definite matrices. To make this transparent we will add a self-contained derivation of the ODE together with a short argument (based on the explicit form of the 1D Gaussian velocities and the integral definition of M) showing that the flow reaches the target at t=1. We will also include numerical confirmation by integrating the ODE for several random positive-definite pairs in dimensions 3–10 and reporting the final covariance error. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper constructs the sliced controller by projecting to random directions, solving independent 1D Benamou-Brenier problems, and averaging the resulting velocities to obtain an ambient feedback law. It then claims (for Gaussians) that this law steers the measure to the target and that the incurred energy equals the sliced Wasserstein distance. These are presented as consequences of the construction and the explicit Gaussian marginal dynamics, not as definitional identities or fitted quantities renamed as predictions. No self-citation is invoked as a load-bearing uniqueness theorem, no ansatz is smuggled, and no parameter is fitted to a subset then called a prediction. The skeptic's marginal-evolution objection concerns correctness, not circularity; the paper's steps remain independent of their target conclusions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; concrete free parameters, axioms, and invented entities cannot be extracted without the full text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5502 in / 1052 out tokens · 41431 ms · 2026-05-10T15:50:50.987727+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    and developed through Kantorovich’s relaxation [2] and a rich geometric analysis, optimal transport now underpins applications across mathematics, economics, and machine learning [3]–[5]. From a control viewpoint, it is natural to regard optimal transport as ensemble steering: rather than moving a single trajectory, one shapes an entire state distribution...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  2. [2]

    is transformed into sk+1 = sk + huθk,k , where uθk,k := θ⊤ k uk ∈ R. Since the mass of ρθk (tk, s ) at s = θ⊤ k x should be moved to T θk k (θ⊤ k x) for any x ∈ Rn, we solve the following fixed end-point optimal control problem inf {uθ k ,ℓ } Td− 1 ℓ =k Td− 1∑ ℓ=k u2 θk,ℓ (9) s. t. s ℓ+1 = sℓ + huθk,ℓ , ℓ ∈ { k, . . . , T d − 1}, sk = θ⊤ k x, s Td = T θk k...

    work page

  3. [3]

    v(t, x ) := − λ(t) ∫ S n− 1 ( θ⊤ x − T θ t (θ⊤ x) ) θσ(dθ), (t, x ) ∈ [0, T ) × Rn, (14) where λ(t) := ( T − t)− 1

    of SW2(ρ(t, ·), ρ f )2 motivates the following feedback control law for steering ρ(t, ·) towards ρf . v(t, x ) := − λ(t) ∫ S n− 1 ( θ⊤ x − T θ t (θ⊤ x) ) θσ(dθ), (t, x ) ∈ [0, T ) × Rn, (14) where λ(t) := ( T − t)− 1. Under this controller ( 14), by Proposition 1 and for almost all t ∈ (0, T ), we have d dt SW2(ρ(t, ·), ρ f )2 = − 2λ(t) ∫ Rn     ∫ S n...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Since ( 10) with θk sampled from σ is expected to converge to ( 14) as h → 0, we also refer to ( 14) as the ideal sliced controller

    is also obtained by averaging the iterative sliced controller ( 10) with respect to the uniform measure σ on Sn− 1. Since ( 10) with θk sampled from σ is expected to converge to ( 14) as h → 0, we also refer to ( 14) as the ideal sliced controller. Under ( 13), the sliced densities of ρ0 and ρf are also Gaussian, i.e., ρθ(0, y ) = N (y |θ⊤ m0, θ ⊤ Σ 0θ), ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    5 ] , mf = [− 8 4 ] , Σ f = [0

    2 0 . 5 ] , mf = [− 8 4 ] , Σ f = [0. 1 0 0 0 . 04 ] . Fig. 1 shows sample paths of x(t) under the iterative sliced controller ( 10) with different numbers of discrete time steps Td = T /h = 100 , 1000, 100000. Slicing directions are sampled uniformly on Sn− 1. Note that Td equals the number of slices over time horizon T . Even for small Td, the state dens...

    work page

  6. [6]

    M´ emoire sur la th´ eorie des d´ eblais et des remblais

    Gaspard Monge, “M´ emoire sur la th´ eorie des d´ eblais et des remblais”, Mem. Math. Phys. Acad. Royale Sci. , pp. 666–704, 1781

    work page

  7. [7]

    On the translocation of masses

    Leonid V . Kantorovich, “On the translocation of masses” , in Dokl. Akad. Nauk. USSR (NS) , 1942, vol. 37, pp. 199–201

    work page 1942

  8. [8]

    58, American Mathematical Soc., 2021

    C´ edric Villani, Topics in Optimal Transportation , vol. 58, American Mathematical Soc., 2021

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Rachev and Ludger R¨ uschendorf, Mass Transportation Problems: Volume I: Theory , Springer, 1998

    Svetlozar T. Rachev and Ludger R¨ uschendorf, Mass Transportation Problems: Volume I: Theory , Springer, 1998

    work page 1998

  10. [10]

    Computational optima l transport: With applications to data science

    Gabriel Peyr´ e and Marco Cuturi, “Computational optima l transport: With applications to data science”, Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning , vol. 11, no. 5-6, pp. 355–607, 2019

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    A computational fl uid mechanics solution to the Monge-Kantorovich mass transfer problem

    Jean-David Benamou and Y ann Brenier, “A computational fl uid mechanics solution to the Monge-Kantorovich mass transfer problem”, Numerische Mathematik, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 375–393, 2000

    work page 2000

  12. [12]

    O ptimal transport over a linear dynamical system

    Y ongxin Chen, Tryphon T. Georgiou, and Michele Pavon, “O ptimal transport over a linear dynamical system”, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 2137–2152, 2017

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    Opti- mal transport for Gaussian mixture models

    Y ongxin Chen, Tryphon T. Georgiou, and Allen Tannenbaum , “Opti- mal transport for Gaussian mixture models”, IEEE Access , vol. 7, pp. 6269–6278, 2018

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    O ptimal transport in systems and control

    Y ongxin Chen, Tryphon T. Georgiou, and Michele Pavon, “O ptimal transport in systems and control”, Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems , vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 89–113, 2021

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    On the relation between optimal transport and Schr¨ odinger br idges: A stochastic control viewpoint

    Y ongxin Chen, Tryphon T. Georgiou, and Michele Pavon, “ On the relation between optimal transport and Schr¨ odinger br idges: A stochastic control viewpoint”, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 169, no. 2, pp. 671–691, 2016

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Sliced and Radon Wasserstein barycenters of measures

    Nicolas Bonneel, Julien Rabin, Gabriel Peyr´ e, and Han speter Pfister, “Sliced and Radon Wasserstein barycenters of measures”, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision , vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 22–45, 2015

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    Sliced optimal transport sampling

    Lois Paulin, Nicolas Bonneel, David Coeurjolly, Jean- Claude Iehl, An- toine Webanck, Mathieu Desbrun, and Victor Ostromoukhov, “ Sliced optimal transport sampling.”, ACM Trans. Graph. , vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 99, 2020

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Deans, The Radon Transform and Some of Its Applications , Courier Corporation, 2007

    Stanley R. Deans, The Radon Transform and Some of Its Applications , Courier Corporation, 2007

    work page 2007

  19. [19]

    Optimal mass transport for registration and warping

    Steven Haker, Lei Zhu, Allen Tannenbaum, and Sigurd Ang enent, “Optimal mass transport for registration and warping”, International Journal of Computer Vision , vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 225–240, 2004

    work page 2004

  20. [20]

    Towards understanding gradient dynamics of the sliced-Wasserstei n distance via critical point analysis

    Christophe Vauthier, Anna Korba, and Quentin M´ erigot , “Towards understanding gradient dynamics of the sliced-Wasserstei n distance via critical point analysis”, in International Conference on Machine Learning, 2025

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Sliced-Wasserstein flows: Non parametric generative modeling via optimal transport and diffusions

    Antoine Liutkus, Umut Simsekli, Szymon Majewski, Alai n Durmus, and Fabian-Robert St¨ oter, “Sliced-Wasserstein flows: Non parametric generative modeling via optimal transport and diffusions”, in Interna- tional Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 2019, pp. 4104–4113

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    Long-time as ymptotics of the sliced-Wasserstein flow

    Giacomo Cozzi and Filippo Santambrogio, “Long-time as ymptotics of the sliced-Wasserstein flow”, SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences , vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2025

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Monge– Kantorovich optimal transport through constrictions and fl ow-rate constraints

    Anqi Dong, Arthur Stephanovitch, and Tryphon T. Georgi ou, “Monge– Kantorovich optimal transport through constrictions and fl ow-rate constraints”, Automatica, vol. 160, pp. 111448, 2024

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Luigi Ambrosio, Nicola Gigli, and Giuseppe Savar´ e, Gradient Flows: In Metric Spaces and in the Space of Probability Measures , Springer, 2005

    work page 2005

  25. [25]

    Rawlings, David Q

    James B. Rawlings, David Q. Mayne, and Moritz M. Diehl, Model Predictive Control: Theory, Computation, and Design , Nob Hill Publishing, 2017

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    A utomated colour grading using colour distribution transfer

    Franc ¸ois Piti´ e, Anil C Kokaram, and Rozenn Dahyot, “ A utomated colour grading using colour distribution transfer”, Computer Vision and Image Understanding , vol. 107, no. 1-2, pp. 123–137, 2007

    work page 2007

  27. [27]

    Entropic model predictiv e optimal transport over dynamical systems

    Kaito Ito and Kenji Kashima, “Entropic model predictiv e optimal transport over dynamical systems”, Automatica, vol. 152, pp. 110980, 2023

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Entropic model predictiv e optimal transport for underactuated linear systems

    Kaito Ito and Kenji Kashima, “Entropic model predictiv e optimal transport for underactuated linear systems”, IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 7, pp. 2761–2766, 2023

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Folland, Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, John Wiley & Sons, 1999

    Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, John Wiley & Sons, 1999

    work page 1999

  30. [30]

    Kolk, Distributions: Theory and Applications , Birkh¨ auser Boston, 2010

    Johannes Jisse Duistermaat and Johan A.C. Kolk, Distributions: Theory and Applications , Birkh¨ auser Boston, 2010. A/p.sc/p.sc/e.sc/n.sc/d.sc/i.sc/x.sc I P/r.sc/o.sc/o.sc/f.sc /o.sc/f.sc P/r.sc/o.sc/p.sc/o.sc/s.sc/i.sc/t.sc/i.sc/o.sc/n.sc /one.taboldstyle First, we derive the evolution equation for the sliced density ρθ. For any test function ϕ ∈ C∞ c (R...

    work page 2010

  31. [31]

    In other words, lim tր T ∫ S n− 1 √ θ⊤ Σ f θ θ⊤ Σ( t)θ θθ⊤ σ (dθ) − 1 n I = 0

    that limtր T ∥ ¯K(t)∥2 F = 0. In other words, lim tր T ∫ S n− 1 √ θ⊤ Σ f θ θ⊤ Σ( t)θ θθ⊤ σ (dθ) − 1 n I = 0. Lastly, by Lemma 1 in Appendix V, we obtain limtր T Σ( t) = Σ f , which completes the proof. A/p.sc/p.sc/e.sc/n.sc/d.sc/i.sc/x.sc IV P/r.sc/o.sc/o.sc/f.sc /o.sc/f.sc T/h.sc/e.sc/o.sc/r.sc/e.sc/m.sc/two.taboldstyle Let ¯K(t) := K(t, Σ( t))/λ (t) and...

    work page