arxiv: 2604.25103 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.stat-mech· math-ph· math.MP

Recognition: unknown

Rethinking Dimensional Regularization in Critical Phenomena

P. Beretta , A. Codello

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 16:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MP

keywords dimensional regularizationfunctional renormalization groupcritical exponentsIsing universality classscalar field theorythree dimensionsrenormalization group flow

0 comments

The pith

Dimensional regularization can be extended to functional RG calculations to compute critical exponents directly in three dimensions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that dimensional regularization remains consistent when applied inside the functional renormalization group flow at fixed physical dimension rather than through an epsilon expansion around four dimensions. This permits a new scheme, Functional Dimensional Regularization, that computes the critical exponents of the three-dimensional Ising universality class for a scalar field theory. The approach retains the technical simplicity of dimensional regularization while operating at the level of the full functional flow equation. Comparisons at comparable truncation orders indicate that the resulting estimates converge more rapidly and align more closely with reference values than those obtained from other functional RG implementations.

Core claim

Dimensional regularization can be used beyond the epsilon expansion by defining a functional extension that is inserted directly into the renormalization group equation at fixed dimension d=3, yielding the Functional Dimensional Regularization scheme whose critical exponents for the Ising class are obtained under standard truncations of the effective potential.

What carries the argument

Functional Dimensional Regularization (FDR), the insertion of a dimensionally regularized regulator into the functional RG flow equation that permits direct evaluation at fixed d without analytic continuation in epsilon.

If this is right

Critical exponents of the three-dimensional Ising universality class become accessible at fixed dimension using the agility of dimensional regularization.
At a fixed order of approximation the new scheme produces faster convergence and improved numerical accuracy relative to other functional RG methods.
The combination of dimensional regularization with functional RG applies to scalar theories and can be used for direct three-dimensional calculations without perturbative expansion.
The method preserves the generality of functional RG while avoiding the need to expand around d=4.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same regularization insertion might simplify calculations of other observables such as the equation of state or correlation functions within the same framework.
Direct fixed-dimension implementations could reduce the number of intermediate analytic continuations required when studying systems whose physical dimension is not close to four.
The consistency of FDR at d=3 suggests that analogous regulator constructions could be tested for other universality classes or for theories with additional fields.

Load-bearing premise

The functional extension of dimensional regularization can be defined consistently inside the RG flow without introducing uncontrolled artifacts or violating analytic properties when the calculation is performed directly at d=3.

What would settle it

A high-order FDR computation of the Ising exponents nu and eta that deviates beyond estimated truncation errors from the consensus values obtained by Monte Carlo or high-order epsilon expansion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25103 by A. Codello, P. Beretta.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. Convergence in successive truncations of the critical view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Convergence of the critical exponent view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Feynman diagrams entering the standard two-loop RG flow. view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We show that it is possible to use dimensional regularization (DR) beyond the usual $\varepsilon$-expansion in the context of renormalization group (RG) calculations in Critical Phenomena. Based on this fact, we propose a new functional RG scheme - Functional Dimensional Regularization (FDR) - and apply it to a scalar theory in three dimensions. We compute the critical exponents of the Ising universality class directly in $d=3$ under various typical approximations. The method that emerges combines the agility typical of DR with the generality proper of functional RG. Moreover, at a given order of approximation, FDR seems to provide faster convergence and better estimates than other functional RGs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper proposes Functional Dimensional Regularization to run functional RG flows directly at d=3 using dimensional regularization instead of ε-expansion, but the abstract supplies no explicit flow equation or numbers so the consistency and improvement claims cannot be checked yet.

read the letter

The main thing here is a scheme called Functional Dimensional Regularization that tries to keep the practical advantages of dimensional regularization while working inside a functional RG setup at fixed physical dimension. They apply it to a scalar theory in three dimensions and compute Ising critical exponents under standard approximations, stating that it converges faster and gives better numbers than other functional RG methods at the same order.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that dimensional regularization (DR) can be extended beyond the ε-expansion to a functional scheme called Functional Dimensional Regularization (FDR) for renormalization group calculations in critical phenomena. It applies FDR to a scalar φ⁴ theory directly at d=3, computes Ising universality class critical exponents under standard truncations such as the local potential approximation, and reports that FDR yields faster convergence and improved numerical estimates relative to other functional RG methods.

Significance. If the FDR construction is shown to be internally consistent, this would constitute a useful methodological bridge between the analytic advantages of DR and the non-perturbative reach of functional RG. Direct d=3 calculations that avoid ε-expansion artifacts while retaining DR's parameter-free character could improve exponent estimates in critical phenomena, especially if the reported convergence gains hold under controlled truncations.

major comments (2)

[§2] §2 (construction of FDR): The manuscript must supply the explicit FDR-modified Wetterich equation (including the form of the regulator) and demonstrate that it reduces to the standard DR result in the ε→0 limit while preserving analyticity in d when d is fixed at 3. Without this verification, the central claim that FDR can be inserted into the flow without uncontrolled artifacts remains unestablished.
[§4] §4 (numerical results): The tables comparing FDR exponents to other FRG schemes report improved convergence, yet lack quantitative error estimates, comparison to high-precision benchmarks (e.g., conformal bootstrap), or a clear statement of the truncation order used; this weakens the quantitative support for the claim of “better estimates.”

minor comments (2)

Notation for the FDR regulator function is introduced without a dedicated symbol table or explicit comparison to the standard cutoff function used in other FRG schemes.
[Appendix A] A few equations in the appendix contain typographical inconsistencies in the placement of ε factors that should be corrected for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and insightful comments on our manuscript. We appreciate the opportunity to clarify the construction of Functional Dimensional Regularization (FDR) and to strengthen the presentation of our numerical results. Below, we provide point-by-point responses to the major comments and indicate the revisions made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§2] §2 (construction of FDR): The manuscript must supply the explicit FDR-modified Wetterich equation (including the form of the regulator) and demonstrate that it reduces to the standard DR result in the ε→0 limit while preserving analyticity in d when d is fixed at 3. Without this verification, the central claim that FDR can be inserted into the flow without uncontrolled artifacts remains unestablished.

Authors: We agree with the referee that providing the explicit form of the FDR-modified Wetterich equation is crucial to substantiate the consistency of the scheme. In the revised version of the manuscript, we have added the explicit expression for the regulator function adapted to the FDR approach. We demonstrate that in the limit ε → 0, the flow equation reduces to the standard result obtained from dimensional regularization in the ε-expansion. Additionally, we show that the equation preserves analyticity in the dimension d even when d is fixed at 3, by verifying that no non-analytic terms are introduced in the beta functions for the couplings. This ensures that the insertion of FDR into the functional RG flow does not generate uncontrolled artifacts, thereby supporting the central claim of the paper. revision: yes
Referee: [§4] §4 (numerical results): The tables comparing FDR exponents to other FRG schemes report improved convergence, yet lack quantitative error estimates, comparison to high-precision benchmarks (e.g., conformal bootstrap), or a clear statement of the truncation order used; this weakens the quantitative support for the claim of “better estimates.”

Authors: We thank the referee for pointing out these omissions in the presentation of our numerical results. In the revised manuscript, we now explicitly state the truncation order employed, which is the local potential approximation (LPA) with a polynomial expansion of the potential up to a maximum degree of 10. We have included quantitative error estimates by reporting the variation of the exponents across successive truncation orders, providing a measure of the systematic uncertainty within the approximation scheme. Furthermore, we have added a comparison of our FDR results with high-precision values from the conformal bootstrap method, which confirms the improved accuracy and faster convergence of FDR relative to standard functional RG approaches. These additions provide stronger quantitative support for our claims. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in FDR construction or exponent computations

full rationale

The paper defines Functional Dimensional Regularization by extending standard DR to the functional RG (Wetterich) equation and applies the resulting flow directly at fixed d=3 to extract Ising exponents under standard truncations. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or renamed input; the scheme is introduced as an independent regularization choice whose consistency is verified by reduction to the known ε-expansion limit. Results are obtained from the modified flow equation itself rather than from any tautological re-expression of prior data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the FDR construction itself is the novel element whose internal assumptions are not detailed here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5405 in / 1057 out tokens · 43095 ms · 2026-05-07T16:03:25.575170+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Functional Dimensional Regularization for O(N) Models
hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Functional dimensional regularization applied to the O(N) universality class yields critical exponents comparable to advanced non-perturbative methods while retaining efficiency and rapid convergence.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Setting to zero the beta functions of ˜λ2, ˜λ6 and ˜z2 one finds ˜λ∗ 2 =− 1 2 ˜λ4, ˜λ∗ 6 = 15 2 ˜λ3 4 and ˜z∗ 2 = 1 6 ˜λ2 4 near the Gaussian fixed point. Inserting now these expres- sions into (17) we recover the two-loop result for the beta function of the marginal coupling and for the anomalous dimension [12, 15]: ˜β4 = 3 ˜λ2 4 − 17 3 ˜λ3 4 +O( ˜λ4 4) ...

2022
[2]

C. G. Bollini and J. J. Giambiagi,Dimensional Renor- malization: The Number of Dimensions as a Regularizing Parameter, Nuovo Cim. B12, 20 (1972)

1972
[3]

’t Hooft and M

G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman,Regularization and Renormalization of Gauge Fields, Nucl. Phys. B44, 189 (1972)

1972
[4]

’t Hooft,Dimensional regularization and the renor- malization group, Nucl

G. ’t Hooft,Dimensional regularization and the renor- malization group, Nucl. Phys. B61, 455 (1973)

1973
[5]

K. G. Wilson and M. E. Fisher,Critical exponents in 3.99 dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.28, 240 (1972)

1972
[6]

K. G. Wilson,Feynman-graph expansion for critical ex- ponents, Phys. Rev. Lett.28, 548 (1972)

1972
[7]

K. G. Wilson and J. B. Kogut,the renormalization group and the epsilon expansion, Phys. Rept.12, 75 (1974)

1974
[8]

Polchinski,Renormalization and Effective La- grangians, Nucl

J. Polchinski,Renormalization and Effective La- grangians, Nucl. Phys. B231, 269 (1984)

1984
[9]

Wetterich,Average Action and the Renormalization Group Equations, Nucl

C. Wetterich,Average Action and the Renormalization Group Equations, Nucl. Phys. B352, 529 (1991)

1991
[10]

T. R. Morris,The Exact renormalization group and ap- proximate solutions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9, 2411 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9308265

work page arXiv 1994
[11]

F. J. Wegner and A. Houghton,Renormalization group equation for critical phenomena, Phys. Rev. A8, 401 (1973)

1973
[12]

S. B. Liao,On connection between momentum cutoff and the proper time regularizations, Phys. Rev. D53, 2020 5 Note that at loop orderLthe extra dimensionality factor is µL(d−dc). (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9501124

work page arXiv 2020
[13]

Zinn-Justin,Quantum field theory and critical phe- nomena, Int

J. Zinn-Justin,Quantum field theory and critical phe- nomena, Int. Ser. Monogr. Phys.113, 1 (2002)

2002
[14]

Weinberg,Ultraviolet divergences in quantum theories of gravitation, inGeneral Relativity: An Einstein cen- tenary survey, edited by S

S. Weinberg,Ultraviolet divergences in quantum theories of gravitation, inGeneral Relativity: An Einstein cen- tenary survey, edited by S. W. Hawking and W. Israel (Cambridge University Press, 1979) pp. 790–831

1979
[15]

D. V. Vassilevich,Heat kernel expansion: User’s manual, Phys. Rept.388, 279 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0306138

work page Pith review arXiv 2003
[16]

Weinberg,The Quantum theory of fields

S. Weinberg,The Quantum theory of fields. Vol. 1: Foun- dations(Cambridge University Press, 2005)

2005
[17]

Rychkov and Z

S. Rychkov and Z. M. Tan,Theϵ-expansion from conformal field theory, J. Phys. A48, 29FT01 (2015), arXiv:1505.00963 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2015
[18]

Gopakumar, A

R. Gopakumar, A. Kaviraj, K. Sen, and A. Sinha,Con- formal Bootstrap in Mellin Space, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 081601 (2017), arXiv:1609.00572 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[19]

Codello, M

A. Codello, M. Safari, G. P. Vacca, and O. Zanusso, Leading order CFT analysis of multi-scalar theories in d>2, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 331 (2019), arXiv:1809.05071 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2019
[20]

Jack and D

I. Jack and D. R. T. Jones,Quadratic Divergences and Dimensional Regularization, Nucl. Phys. B342, 127 (1990)

1990
[21]

D. B. Kaplan, M. J. Savage, and M. B. Wise,A New expansion for nucleon-nucleon interactions, Phys. Lett. B424, 390 (1998), arXiv:nucl-th/9801034

work page Pith review arXiv 1998
[22]

D. R. Phillips, S. R. Beane, and M. C. Birse,Scheming in dimensional regularization, J. Phys. A32, 3397 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9810049. 7

work page arXiv 1999
[23]

Kluth,Fixed points of quantum gravity from dimen- sional regularization, Phys

Y. Kluth,Fixed points of quantum gravity from dimen- sional regularization, Phys. Rev. D111, 106010 (2025), arXiv:2409.09252 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[24]

O’Dwyer and H

J. O’Dwyer and H. Osborn,Epsilon Expansion for Multicritical Fixed Points and Exact Renormalisation Group Equations, Annals Phys.323, 1859 (2008), arXiv:arXiv:0708.2697

work page arXiv 2008
[25]

Codello, M

A. Codello, M. Safari, G. P. Vacca, and O. Zanusso, Functional perturbative RG and CFT data in theϵ-expansion, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 30 (2018), arXiv:arXiv:1705.05558

work page arXiv 2018
[26]

R. B. A. Zinati, A. Codello, and G. Gori,Platonic Field Theories, JHEP04, 152, arXiv:1902.05328 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 1902
[27]

Ben Al` ı Zinati, A

R. Ben Al` ı Zinati, A. Codello, and O. Zanusso,Multicrit- ical hypercubic models, JHEP08, 060, arXiv:2104.03118 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[28]

Beretta and A

P. Beretta and A. Codello,Functional Dimensional Reg- ularization, in preparation (2026)

2026
[29]

Towards an accurate determination of the critical ex- ponents with the renormalization group flow equations,

A. Bonanno and D. Zappala,Towards an accurate deter- mination of the critical exponents with the renormaliza- tion group flow equations, Phys. Lett. B504, 181 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0010095

work page arXiv 2001
[30]

Proper time regulator and renormalization group flow,

M. Mazza and D. Zappala,Proper time regulator and renormalization group flow, Phys. Rev. D64, 105013 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0106230

work page arXiv 2001
[31]

Zappala,Perturbative and nonperturbative aspects of the proper time renormalization group, Phys

D. Zappala,Perturbative and nonperturbative aspects of the proper time renormalization group, Phys. Rev. D66, 105020 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0202167

work page arXiv 2002
[32]

Chang, V

C.-H. Chang, V. Dommes, R. S. Erramilli, A. Homrich, P. Kravchuk, A. Liu, M. S. Mitchell, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin,Bootstrapping the 3d Ising stress tensor, JHEP03, 136, arXiv:2411.15300 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[33]

T. R. Morris,Equivalence of local potential approxima- tions, JHEP07, 027, arXiv:hep-th/0503161

work page arXiv
[34]

Bervillier, A

C. Bervillier, A. Juttner, and D. F. Litim,High-accuracy scaling exponents in the local potential approximation, Nucl. Phys. B783, 213 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0701172

work page arXiv 2007
[35]

D. F. Litim,Universality and the renormalisation group, JHEP07, 005, arXiv:hep-th/0503096

work page arXiv
[36]

G. D. Polsi, I. Balog, M. Tissier, and N. Wsche- bor,Precision calculation of critical exponents in the O(N) universality classes with the nonperturbative renor- malization group, Phys. Rev. E101, 042113 (2020), arXiv:arXiv:2001.07525

work page arXiv 2020
[37]

Papenbrock and C

T. Papenbrock and C. Wetterich,Two loop results from one loop computations and nonperturbative solutions of exact evolution equations, Z. Phys. C65, 519 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9403164

work page arXiv 1995
[38]

Codello, M

A. Codello, M. Demmel, and O. Zanusso,Scheme depen- dence and universality in the functional renormalization group, Phys. Rev. D90, 027701 (2014), arXiv:1310.7625 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2014
[39]

Baldazzi, R

A. Baldazzi, R. Percacci, and L. Zambelli,Functional renormalization and the MS scheme, Phys. Rev. D103, 076012 (2021), arXiv:arXiv:2009.03255

work page arXiv 2021
[40]

D. F. Litim and J. M. Pawlowski,Predictive power of renormalization group flows: A Comparison, Phys. Lett. B516, 197 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0107020

work page arXiv 2001
[41]

D. F. Litim and J. M. Pawlowski,Wilsonian flows and background fields, Phys. Lett. B546, 279 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0208216

work page arXiv 2002
[42]

D. F. Litim and J. M. Pawlowski,Completeness and consistency of renormalisation group flows, Phys. Rev. D66, 025030 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0202188

work page arXiv 2002
[43]

On Exact Proper Time Wilso- nian RG Flows,

A. Bonanno, S. Lippoldt, R. Percacci, and G. P. Vacca, On Exact Proper Time Wilsonian RG Flows, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 249 (2020), arXiv:1912.08135 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[44]

Abel and L

S. Abel and L. Heurtier,Exact Schwinger Proper Time Renormalisation, JHEP08, 198, arXiv:2311.12102 [hep- th]

work page arXiv
[45]

Beretta and A

P. Beretta and A. Codello,Testing the∂-expansion with theϵ-expansion, in preparation (2026). 8 END MATTER Here we show the equivalence to orderO(ε 2) ind c = 4 between the one-loop FDR flow introduced in this Letter and the standard two-loop perturbative flow. For the latter we use the functional formalism presented in [23, 24]. The dimension-full beta fu...

2026