Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 minor 2 cited by

Topological Susceptibility and QCD at Finite Theta Angle

T0 review · 0 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-05-07 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read QCD theta dependence follows from chiral effective theories, large-N arguments, semiclassical methods, and lattice simulations.

desk verdict This is a standard pedagogical review that compiles known analytic predictions and lattice results on theta dependence in QCD without adding new calculations or data. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.28035 v2 submitted 2026-04-30 hep-lat hep-phhep-th

Claudio Bonanno , Claudio Bonati , Massimo D'Elia This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-lathep-phhep-th
keywords QCDthetadependencetopologicalsusceptibilitylatticestrongCPproblemaxionchiraleffectivetheorylarge-N
topics The Strong CP Problem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This chapter introduces the theta term in the QCD action as the source of topological effects that explicitly violate CP symmetry except at specific values. It connects these effects to observable phenomena including the eta prime meson mass, the neutron electric dipole moment, the strong CP problem, and the axion mechanism proposed to solve it. Analytic predictions for the vacuum energy and topological susceptibility are surveyed from chiral perturbation theory at small quark masses, large-N expansions, and instanton-based semiclassical calculations, each with stated ranges of validity. Recent Monte Carlo results from lattice discretizations of QCD are presented to provide non-perturbative benchmarks, especially for the susceptibility at small theta. A reader cares because these quantities determine whether theta must be unnaturally small and shape experimental searches for axions.

What carries the argument

The topological susceptibility, obtained as the curvature of the vacuum free energy with respect to the theta angle at theta equals zero, which quantifies how the QCD vacuum responds to the topological charge term.

What would settle it

A new lattice calculation of the topological susceptibility and its leading theta corrections at small but nonzero theta that deviates from the quadratic or quartic behavior predicted by chiral effective theory in the overlapping regime of validity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The theta dependence of the QCD vacuum energy is described by a set of analytic approaches whose regimes of validity are known, while lattice Monte Carlo simulations of the discretized theory supply direct numerical access to the topological susceptibility and its theta dependence.

Load-bearing premise

The selected analytic predictions and numerical results are representative of the current literature and accurately reflect the state of the field without significant selection bias or omission of key recent developments.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The neutron electric dipole moment is directly proportional to theta, yielding the experimental upper bound of order 10 to the minus 10.
  • The eta prime mass arises from the topological susceptibility via the Witten-Veneziano relation in the large-N limit.
  • Axion potentials are fixed by the shape of the QCD vacuum energy as a function of theta, controlling axion mass and couplings.
  • Finite-temperature lattice studies of theta dependence can map changes across the QCD deconfinement transition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Lattice computations performed directly at finite theta could expose higher-order terms in the vacuum energy that are invisible at theta equals zero.
  • Precise values of the susceptibility and its derivatives supply input for axion dark-matter calculations that go beyond the simplest cosine potential.
  • Systematic comparison of lattice and analytic results may quantify the size of finite-volume and discretization effects still present in current simulations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. This review chapter provides a pedagogical introduction to topology and θ-dependence in QCD. It covers the strong-CP problem and axion physics, derives leading θ-dependence from chiral effective theories (including the explicit form of the topological susceptibility χ(θ) at small θ), discusses large-N scaling arguments and semiclassical/instanton methods with their regimes of validity, and surveys recent lattice Monte Carlo results on QCD topology from both quenched and dynamical simulations.

Significance. If the selected analytic expressions and lattice results accurately reflect the literature without distortion or major omissions, the chapter would provide a compact, accessible entry point for researchers working on axion phenomenology or lattice QCD topology. It reproduces standard results such as the chiral-limit topological susceptibility χ = Σ m_u m_d / (m_u + m_d) and compiles independent lattice determinations, which is useful for cross-checking regimes of validity across methods.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the chapter provides 'a selection of the most recent numerical results'; adding a brief statement in the introduction or lattice section on the cutoff date for included references (e.g., up to 2023 or 2024) would help readers assess completeness.
  2. [Chiral effective theories] In the chiral EFT section, the derivation of χ(θ) should explicitly reference the equation number when stating the small-θ expansion or the leading-order result in the two-flavor case to improve traceability.
  3. [Lattice results] Figure captions for lattice results should include the specific action, fermion discretization, and number of flavors for each data set shown, rather than relying solely on the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our pedagogical review and for the recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Review chapter: no original derivations or predictions present

full rationale

The manuscript is explicitly a pedagogical overview and survey of prior literature on θ-dependence in QCD. It summarizes known analytic results from chiral effective theories (e.g., standard χ = Σ m_u m_d / (m_u + m_d) in the chiral limit), large-N scaling, semiclassical instanton estimates, and lattice results from multiple independent collaborations. No new derivation chain, first-principles calculation, or prediction is claimed or performed; all expressions reproduce well-known external results. The central claim is to deliver an organized selection of existing work, with no internal steps that reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes introduced within the paper itself. This is the standard honest outcome for a review chapter.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review rests on the standard axioms of QCD and lattice regularization; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the authors themselves.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption QCD is the fundamental theory of the strong interaction
    Invoked throughout the discussion of theta-dependence and topology.
  • domain assumption Lattice discretization provides a valid non-perturbative regularization of QCD
    Basis for the Monte Carlo results reviewed in the chapter.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological Susceptibility and QCD at Finite Theta Angle." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2604.28035

@misc{pith2026260428035,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological Susceptibility and QCD at Finite Theta Angle},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2604.28035}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.28035}
}
abstract

In this chapter we provide a pedagogical introduction to the main theoretical aspects related to topology and $\theta$-dependence in Quantum Chromo-Dynamics (QCD), and to their phenomenological relevance in the Standard Model ($\eta^\prime$ physics, neutron electric dipole moment) and beyond (strong CP problem and the axion solution). We then provide an overview of the main analytic predictions for $\theta$-dependence obtained using several different approaches (chiral effective theories, large-$N$ arguments, semiclassical methods) and their regimes of validity, as well as a selection of the most recent numerical results about QCD topology obtained via Monte Carlo simulations of the lattice-discretized theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.28035 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: extrapolation towards N → ∞ of χ/σ2 , with σ the string tension [87, 153, 157]. Best fit yields χ/σ2 = 0.02088(39) + 0.044(12)/N 2 + 0.293(83)/N 4 (source: Ref. [153]). Right: Extrapolation toward N → ∞ of b2 [147, 148] (source: Ref. [148]). Best fit according to b2 = b¯ 2/N 2 yields b2 = −0.193(10)/N 2 fixing the exponent c = 2 (dashed line). This result is stable within errors if the exponent is left as a fr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: extrapolation towards the continuum limit of χ in 2 + 1 QCD with physical quark masses with gluonic and fermionic discretization of the topological charge (source: Ref. [164]). Right: chiral extrapolation of the continuum extrapolations of χ in 2 + 1 QCD obtained from a fermionic discretization (source: Ref. [165]). The x-axis reports the ratio of the degenerate light quark mass mℓ = mu = md with respect to th… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Summary of neutron EDM determinations from 2 + 1 lattice QCD [214–217] (square points), compared with the χPT result [21] (triangle point). The EDM is reported in units of 10−3 · θ e fm, with e the elementary electric charge. in turn requires very fine lattice spacings to keep T large. This exacerbates the topological freezing problem, and explains why most studies are limited to T ≲ 4Tc, while axion phenomenology w… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison among the non-perturbative pure-glue and 2+1 QCD determinations of the sphaleron rate of [225, 226] with the new method [225] that addresses the resolution of the inverse problem, the non-perturbative pure-glue determination of [67] that avoided the reso￾lut…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Topological properties around the Roberge-Weiss transition in $N_f = 2 + 1 + 1$ QCD

    hep-lat 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Along the Roberge-Weiss line in 2+1+1 flavor QCD, the topological charge cumulant b2 becomes compatible with the dilute instanton gas value as soon as T exceeds T_RW, like in pure gauge theory.

  2. SU(2) gauge theory with fermions on a semi-simple cubic lattice

    hep-lat 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Introduces the semi-simple cubic (ssc) lattice for 3D SU(2) gauge theory with staggered fermions, reducing qubit count and streamlining Gauss's law for quantum hardware.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

290 extracted references · 290 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Vicari, H

    E. Vicari, H. Panagopoulos,θdependence of SU(N)gauge theories in the presence of a topological term, Phys. Rept. 470 (2009) 93–150. arXiv:0803.1593,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.10.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.10.001 2009

  2. [2]

    Bonanno, C

    C. Bonanno, C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, Strong CP problem, Theta term and QCD topological properties, in: Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering (to appear in the Encyclopedia of Particle Physics), Elsevier, 2026.arXiv:2510.03059,doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-26598-3.00082-1

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-26598-3.00082-1 2026

  3. [3]

    A. A. Belavin, A. Polyakov, A. S. Schwartz, Y . S. Tyupkin, Pseudoparticle solutions of the Y ang-Mills equations, Phys. Lett. B 59 (1975) 85–87.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(75)90163-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(75)90163-x 1975

  4. [4]

    Classical solutions of

    A. Actor, Classical solutions ofSU(2)yang–mills theories, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51 (1979) 461–525.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.51.461

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.51.461 1979

  5. [5]

    C. Vafa, E. Witten, Parity Conservation in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 (1984) 535.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.535

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.53.535 1984

  6. [6]

    S. L. Adler, Axial vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2426–2438.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.177.2426

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.177.2426 1969

  7. [7]

    J. S. Bell, R. Jackiw, A PCAC puzzle:π 0 →γγin theσmodel, Nuovo Cim. A 60 (1969) 47–61.doi:10.1007/BF02823296

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02823296 1969

  8. [8]

    title Symmetry Breaking Through Bell-Jackiw Anomalies

    G. ’t Hooft, Symmetry Breaking Through Bell–Jackiw Anomalies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 (1976) 8–11.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.37.8

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.37.8 1976

Show all 290 references
  1. [9]

    Weinberg, The U(1) Problem, Phys

    S. Weinberg, The U(1) Problem, Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 3583–3593.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.11.3583

    1975 doi

  2. [10]

    ’t Hooft, A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions, Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions, Nucl. Phys. B 72 (1974) 461.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(74)90154-0

    1974 doi

  3. [11]

    Veneziano,U(1)Without Instantons, Nucl

    G. Veneziano,U(1)Without Instantons, Nucl. Phys. B 159 (1979) 213–224.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90332-8

    1979 doi

  4. [12]

    Witten, LargeNChiral Dynamics, Annals Phys

    E. Witten, LargeNChiral Dynamics, Annals Phys. 128 (1980) 363.doi:10.1016/0003-4916(80)90325-5

    1980 doi

  5. [13]

    Di Vecchia, G

    P . Di Vecchia, G. Veneziano, Chiral Dynamics in the Large N Limit, Nucl. Phys. B 171 (1980) 253–272.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(80) 90370-3

    1980 doi

  6. [14]

    A. Pich, E. de Rafael, Strong CP violation in an effective chiral Lagrangian approach, Nucl. Phys. B 367 (1991) 313–333.doi:10.1016/ 0550-3213(91)90019-T

    1991

  7. [15]

    Borasoy, The Electric dipole moment of the neutron in chiral perturbation theory, Phys

    B. Borasoy, The Electric dipole moment of the neutron in chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 114017.arXiv:hep-ph/ 0004011,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.61.114017

    2000 doi

  8. [16]

    W. H. Hockings, U. van Kolck, The Electric dipole form factor of the nucleon, Phys. Lett. B 605 (2005) 273–278.arXiv:nucl-th/0508012, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.11.043

    2005 doi

  9. [17]

    Narison, A Fresh Look into the Neutron EDM and Magnetic Susceptibility, Phys

    S. Narison, A Fresh Look into the Neutron EDM and Magnetic Susceptibility, Phys. Lett. B 666 (2008) 455–461.arXiv:0806.2618, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.07.083

    2008 doi

  10. [18]

    Ottnad, B

    K. Ottnad, B. Kubis, U. G. Meissner, F . K. Guo, New insights into the neutron electric dipole moment, Phys. Lett. B 687 (2010) 42–47. arXiv:0911.3981,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.03.005

    2010 doi

  11. [19]

    de Vries, R

    J. de Vries, R. G. E. Timmermans, E. Mereghetti, U. van Kolck, The Nucleon Electric Dipole Form Factor From Dimension-Six Time- Reversal Violation, Phys. Lett. B 695 (2011) 268–274.arXiv:1006.2304,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.11.042

    2011 doi

  12. [20]

    Mereghetti, J

    E. Mereghetti, J. de Vries, W. H. Hockings, C. M. Maekawa, U. van Kolck, The Electric Dipole Form Factor of the Nucleon in Chiral Perturbation Theory to Sub-leading Order, Phys. Lett. B 696 (2011) 97–102.arXiv:1010.4078,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.12.018

    2011 doi

  13. [21]

    Guo, U.-G

    F .-K. Guo, U.-G. Meissner, Baryon electric dipole moments from strong CP violation, JHEP 12 (2012) 097.arXiv:1210.5887,doi: 10.1007/JHEP12(2012)097

    2012 doi

  14. [22]

    Bartolini, F

    L. Bartolini, F . Bigazzi, S. Bolognesi, A. L. Cotrone, A. Manenti,θdependence in Holographic QCD, JHEP 02 (2017) 029.arXiv: 1611.00048,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2017)029

    2017 doi

  15. [23]

    Abel, et al., Measurement of the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron, Phys

    C. Abel, et al., Measurement of the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (8) (2020) 081803.arXiv: 2001.11966,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.081803

    2020 doi

  16. [24]

    W.-Y . Ai, J. S. Cruz, B. Garbrecht, C. Tamarit, Consequences of the order of the limit of infinite spacetime volume and the sum over topological sectors for CP violation in the strong interactions, Phys. Lett. B 822 (2021) 136616.arXiv:2001.07152,doi:10.1016/j. physletb.2021.136616

    2021 doi

  17. [25]

    W.-Y . Ai, B. Garbrecht, C. Tamarit, CP Conservation in the Strong Interactions, Universe 10 (5) (2024) 189.arXiv:2404.16026,doi: 10.3390/universe10050189

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    Nakamura, G

    Y . Nakamura, G. Schierholz, The strong CP problem solved by itself due to long-distance vacuum effects, Nucl. Phys. B 986 (2023) 116063.arXiv:2106.11369,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2022.116063

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    Schierholz, Repercussions of the Peccei-Quinn axion on QCD, Mod

    G. Schierholz, Repercussions of the Peccei-Quinn axion on QCD, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 40 (04) (2025) 2430009.arXiv:2307.08310, doi:10.1142/S021773232430009X

    2025 doi

  20. [28]

    Schierholz, Absence of strong CP violation, J

    G. Schierholz, Absence of strong CP violation, J. Phys. G 52 (4) (2025) 04LT01.arXiv:2403.13508,doi:10.1088/1361-6471/adc31d

    2025 doi

  21. [29]

    Albandea, G

    D. Albandea, G. Catumba, A. Ramos, Strong CP problem in the quantum rotor, Phys. Rev. D 110 (9) (2024) 094512.arXiv:2402.17518, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.094512

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    D. E. Kaplan, T. Melia, S. Rajendran, What can solve the strong CP problem?, JHEP 08 (2025) 050.arXiv:2505.08358,doi:10.1007/ JHEP08(2025)050

    2025

  23. [31]

    J. N. Benabou, A. Hook, C. A. Manzari, H. Murayama, B. R. Safdi, Clearing up the Strong CP problem,preprint(2025).arXiv:2510.18951

    2025

  24. [32]

    V. V. Khoze, A note on instantons,θ-dependence and strong CP,preprint(2025).arXiv:2512.06827

    2025

  25. [33]

    Gamboa, N

    J. Gamboa, N. A. T. Arellano, Strong CP as an Infrared Holonomy: TheθVacuum and Dressing in Y ang-Mills Theory,preprint(2025). arXiv:2512.24480

    2025

  26. [34]

    Bhattacharya, Comment on the claim of physical irrelevance of the topological term,preprint(2025).arXiv:2512.10127

    T. Bhattacharya, Comment on the claim of physical irrelevance of the topological term,preprint(2025).arXiv:2512.10127

    2025

  27. [35]

    A. G. Williams, Perspectives on QCD, Topology and the Strong CP Problem,preprint(2026).arXiv:2601.07165

    2026

  28. [36]

    Aghaie, R

    M. Aghaie, R. Sato, A particle on a ring or: how I learned to stop worrying and loveθ-vacua,preprint(2026).arXiv:2601.18248

    2026

  29. [37]

    Ringwald, CP , or not CP , that is the question

    A. Ringwald, CP , or not CP , that is the question. . ., PoS COSMICWISPers2025 (2026) 001.arXiv:2601.04718

    2026

  30. [38]

    Sannino, Strong CP and the QCD Axion: Lecture Notes via Effective Field Theory,preprint(2026).arXiv:2601.19735

    F . Sannino, Strong CP and the QCD Axion: Lecture Notes via Effective Field Theory,preprint(2026).arXiv:2601.19735

    2026

  31. [39]

    Strocchi, The strong CP problem revisited and solved by the gauge group topology,preprint(2024).arXiv:2404.19400

    F . Strocchi, The strong CP problem revisited and solved by the gauge group topology,preprint(2024).arXiv:2404.19400

    2024

  32. [40]

    D. B. Kaplan, Chiral Gauge Theory at the Boundary between Topological Phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (14) (2024) 141603.arXiv: 2312.01494,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.141603

    2024 doi

  33. [41]

    D. B. Kaplan, S. Sen, Weyl Fermions on a Finite Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (14) (2024) 141604.arXiv:2312.04012,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.132.141604

    2024

  34. [42]

    D. B. Kaplan, A. V. Manohar, Current Mass Ratios of the Light Quarks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986) 2004.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.56. 2004

    1986 doi

  35. [43]

    K. Choi, C. W. Kim, W. K. Sze, Mass Renormalization by Instantons and the Strong CP Problem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988) 794. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.794. 20Topological Susceptibility and QCD at Finite Theta Angle

    1988 doi

  36. [44]

    Banks, Y

    T. Banks, Y . Nir, N. Seiberg, Missing (up) mass, accidental anomalous symmetries, and the strong CP problem, in: 2nd IFT Workshop on Yukawa Couplings and the Origins of Mass, 1994, pp. 26–41.arXiv:hep-ph/9403203

    1994

  37. [45]

    Alexandrou, J

    C. Alexandrou, J. Finkenrath, L. Funcke, K. Jansen, B. Kostrzewa, F . Pittler, C. Urbach, Ruling Out the Massless Up-Quark Solution to the StrongCPCPCPProblem by Computing the Topological Mass Contribution with Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (23) (2020) 232001. arXiv:2002.0...

    2020 doi

  38. [46]

    Aoki, et al., FLAG Review 2021, Eur

    Y . Aoki, et al., FLAG Review 2021, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (10) (2022) 869.arXiv:2111.09849,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10536-1

    2021 doi

  39. [47]

    R. D. Peccei, H. R. Quinn, CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440–1443.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.38.1440

    1977

  40. [48]

    R. D. Peccei, H. R. Quinn, Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1791–1797. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.16.1791

    1977 doi

  41. [49]

    Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys

    F . Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 279–282.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.40.279

    1978

  42. [50]

    Weinberg, A New Light Boson?, Phys

    S. Weinberg, A New Light Boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 223–226.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.223

    1978 doi

  43. [52]

    L. F . Abbott, P . Sikivie, A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion, Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 133–136.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83) 90638-X

    1983 doi

  44. [53]

    M. Dine, W. Fischler, The Not So Harmless Axion, Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 137–141.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90639-1

    1983 doi

  45. [54]

    Wantz, E

    O. Wantz, E. P . S. Shellard, Axion Cosmology Revisited, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 123508.arXiv:0910.1066,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82. 123508

    2010 doi

  46. [55]

    Berkowitz, M

    E. Berkowitz, M. I. Buchoff, E. Rinaldi, Lattice QCD input for axion cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 92 (3) (2015) 034507.arXiv:1505.07455, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.034507

    2015 doi

  47. [56]

    Di Luzio, M

    L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi, L. Visinelli, The landscape of QCD axion models, Phys. Rept. 870 (2020) 1–117.arXiv:2003.01100, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.06.002

    2020 doi

  48. [57]

    N. H. Christ, Conservation Law Violation at High-Energy by Anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 21 (1980) 1591.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.21.1591

    1980 doi

  49. [58]

    F . R. Klinkhamer, N. S. Manton, A Saddle Point Solution in the Weinberg-Salam Theory, Phys. Rev. D 30 (1984) 2212.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.30.2212

    1984

  50. [59]

    F . R. Klinkhamer, P . Nagel, SU(3) sphaleron: Numerical solution, Phys. Rev. D 96 (1) (2017) 016006.arXiv:1704.07756,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.96.016006

    2017

  51. [60]

    ’t Hooft, Computation of the Quantum Effects Due to a Four-Dimensional Pseudoparticle, Phys

    G. ’t Hooft, Computation of the Quantum Effects Due to a Four-Dimensional Pseudoparticle, Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 3432–3450, [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D 18, 2199 (1978)].doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.14.3432

    1976 doi

  52. [61]

    Busza, K

    W. Busza, K. Rajagopal, W. van der Schee, Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68 (2018) 339–376.arXiv:1802.04801,doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-020852

    2018 doi

  53. [62]

    D. E. Kharzeev, L. D. McLerran, H. J. Warringa, The Effects of topological charge change in heavy ion collisions: ’Event by event P and CP violation’, Nucl. Phys. A 803 (2008) 227–253.arXiv:0711.0950,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.02.298

    2008 doi

  54. [63]

    Fukushima, D

    K. Fukushima, D. E. Kharzeev, H. J. Warringa, The Chiral Magnetic Effect, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 074033.arXiv:0808.3382,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.074033

    2008 doi

  55. [64]

    Fukushima, D

    K. Fukushima, D. E. Kharzeev, H. J. Warringa, Real-time dynamics of the Chiral Magnetic Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 212001. arXiv:1002.2495,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.212001

    2010 doi

  56. [65]

    D. E. Kharzeev, The Chiral Magnetic Effect and Anomaly-Induced Transport, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 75 (2014) 133–151.arXiv:1312. 3348,doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2014.01.002

    2014 doi

  57. [66]

    G. D. Moore, M. Tassler, The Sphaleron Rate in SU(N) Gauge Theory, JHEP 02 (2011) 105.arXiv:1011.1167,doi:10.1007/ JHEP02(2011)105

    2011

  58. [67]

    Barroso Mancha, G

    M. Barroso Mancha, G. D. Moore, The sphaleron rate from 4D Euclidean lattices, JHEP 01 (2023) 155.arXiv:2210.05507,doi: 10.1007/JHEP01(2023)155

    2023 doi

  59. [68]

    Y . Feng, S. A. Voloshin, F . Wang, Experimental search for the chiral magnetic effect in relativistic heavy-ion collisions: A perspective, Phys. Rev. Res. 7 (3) (2025) 031001.arXiv:2502.09742,doi:10.1103/xk4f-wm9s

    2025 doi

  60. [69]

    D. E. Kharzeev, J. Liao, P . Tribedy, Chiral magnetic effect in heavy ion collisions: The present and future, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 33 (09) (2024) 2430007.arXiv:2405.05427,doi:10.1142/9789811294679_0006

    2024 doi

  61. [70]

    Notari, F

    A. Notari, F . Rompineve, G. Villadoro, Improved Hot Dark Matter Bound on the QCD Axion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (1) (2023) 011004. arXiv:2211.03799,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.011004

    2023 doi

  62. [71]

    Bianchini, G

    F . Bianchini, G. G. di Cortona, M. Valli, QCD axion: Some like it hot, Phys. Rev. D 110 (12) (2024) 123527.arXiv:2310.08169,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123527

    2024 doi

  63. [72]

    C. A. J. O’Hare, Cosmology of axion dark matter, PoS COSMICWISPers (2024) 040.arXiv:2403.17697,doi:10.22323/1.454.0040

    2024 doi

  64. [73]

    Bouzoud, J

    K. Bouzoud, J. Ghiglieri, M. Laine, G. S. S. Sakoda, Energy and momentum dependence of the soft-axion interaction rate,preprint(2026). arXiv:2601.08221

    2026

  65. [74]

    D. J. Gross, R. D. Pisarski, L. G. Y affe, QCD and Instantons at Finite Temperature, Rev. Mod. Phys. 53 (1981) 43.doi:10.1103/ RevModPhys.53.43

    1981

  66. [75]

    R. D. Pisarski, L. G. Y affe, The density of instantons at finite temperature, Phys. Lett. B 97 (1980) 110–112.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80) 90559-6

    1980 doi

  67. [76]

    Boccaletti, D

    A. Boccaletti, D. Nogradi, The semi-classical approximation at high temperature revisited, JHEP 03 (2020) 045.arXiv:2001.03383, doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2020)045

    2020 doi

  68. [77]

    Witten,θ-dependence in the large-Nlimit of four-dimensional gauge theories, Phys

    E. Witten,θ-dependence in the large-Nlimit of four-dimensional gauge theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 2862–2865.arXiv:hep-th/ 9807109,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2862

    1998 doi

  69. [78]

    Vonk, F .-K

    T. Vonk, F .-K. Guo, U.-G. Meißner, Aspects of the QCDθ-vacuum, JHEP 06 (2019) 106, [Erratum: JHEP 028 (2019) 028].arXiv: 1905.06141,doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2019)106

    2019 doi

  70. [79]

    G ´omez Nicola, J

    A. G ´omez Nicola, J. Ruiz De Elvira, A. Vioque-Rodr ´ıguez, The QCD topological charge and its thermal dependence: the role of theη ′, JHEP 11 (2019) 086.arXiv:1907.11734,doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2019)086

    2019 doi

  71. [80]

    D’Adda, M

    A. D’Adda, M. L ¨uscher, P . Di Vecchia, A1/NExpandable Series of Nonlinear Sigma Models with Instantons, Nucl. Phys. B 146 (1978) 63–76.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(78)90432-7

    1978 doi

  72. [81]

    L ¨uscher, The Secret Long Range Force in Quantum Field Theories With Instantons, Phys

    M. L ¨uscher, The Secret Long Range Force in Quantum Field Theories With Instantons, Phys. Lett. B 78 (1978) 465–467.doi:10.1016/ 0370-2693(78)90487-2. Topological Susceptibility and QCD at Finite Theta Angle21

    1978

  73. [82]

    Witten, Instantons, the Quark Model, and the1/NExpansion, Nucl

    E. Witten, Instantons, the Quark Model, and the1/NExpansion, Nucl. Phys. B 149 (1979) 285–320.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79) 90243-8

    1979 doi

  74. [83]

    Campostrini, P

    M. Campostrini, P . Rossi,1/Nexpansion of the topological susceptibility in theCP N−1 models, Phys. Lett. B 272 (1991) 305–312.doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(91)91835-J

    1991 doi

  75. [84]

    Campostrini, P

    M. Campostrini, P . Rossi,CP N−1 models in the1/Nexpansion, Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 618, [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D 46, 2741 (1992)]. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.45.618

    1992 doi

  76. [85]

    Del Debbio, G

    L. Del Debbio, G. M. Manca, H. Panagopoulos, A. Skouroupathis, E. Vicari,θ-dependence of the spectrum of SU(N) gauge theories, JHEP 06 (2006) 005.arXiv:hep-th/0603041,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/06/005

    2006 doi

  77. [86]

    Rossi, Effective Lagrangian ofCP N−1 models in the largeNlimit, Phys

    P . Rossi, Effective Lagrangian ofCP N−1 models in the largeNlimit, Phys. Rev. D 94 (4) (2016) 045013.arXiv:1606.07252,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.045013

    2016 doi

  78. [87]

    Bonati, M

    C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, P . Rossi, E. Vicari,θdependence of4DSU(N)gauge theories in the large-Nlimit, Phys. Rev. D 94 (8) (2016) 085017. arXiv:1607.06360,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.085017

    2016 doi

  79. [88]

    Sugeno, T

    T. Sugeno, T. Y okokura, K. Y onekura, Largeθangle in two-dimensional largeNCP N−1 model, JHEP 05 (2025) 232.arXiv:2503.07012, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2025)232

    2025 doi

  80. [89]

    Grilli di Cortona, E

    G. Grilli di Cortona, E. Hardy, J. Pardo Vega, G. Villadoro, The QCD axion, precisely, JHEP 01 (2016) 034.arXiv:1511.02867,doi: 10.1007/JHEP01(2016)034

    2016 doi

  81. [90]

    Luciano, E

    F . Luciano, E. Meggiolaro, Study of theθdependence of the vacuum energy density in chiral effective Lagrangian models at zero temper- ature, Phys. Rev. D 98 (7) (2018) 074001.arXiv:1806.00835,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.074001

    2018 doi

  82. [91]

    Guo, U.-G

    F .-K. Guo, U.-G. Meißner, Cumulants of the QCD topological charge distribution, Phys. Lett. B 749 (2015) 278–282.arXiv:1506.05487, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.07.076

    2015 doi

  83. [92]

    Bonati, M

    C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, M. Mariti, G. Martinelli, M. Mesiti, F . Negro, F . Sanfilippo, G. Villadoro, Axion phenomenology andθ-dependence from Nf =2+1lattice QCD, JHEP 03 (2016) 155.arXiv:1512.06746,doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2016)155

    2016 doi

  84. [93]

    Z.-Y . Lu, Q. Tang, S.-P . Wang, Y . Huang, Z. Zhang, B. Zhang, Topological observables and domain wall tension from finite temperature chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 113 (5) (2026) 054042.arXiv:2603.04116,doi:10.1103/knjl-w486

    2026 doi

  85. [94]

    Lu, M.-L

    Z.-Y . Lu, M.-L. Du, F .-K. Guo, U.-G. Meißner, T. Vonk, QCDθ-vacuum energy and axion properties, JHEP 05 (2020) 001.arXiv: 2003.01625,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2020)001

    2020 doi

  86. [95]

    Gorghetto, G

    M. Gorghetto, G. Villadoro, Topological Susceptibility and QCD Axion Mass: QED and NNLO corrections, JHEP 03 (2019) 033.arXiv: 1812.01008,doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2019)033

    2019 doi

  87. [96]

    P . H. Ginsparg, K. G. Wilson, A Remnant of Chiral Symmetry on the Lattice, Phys. Rev. D 25 (1982) 2649.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.25. 2649

    1982 doi

  88. [97]

    D. B. Kaplan, A Method for simulating chiral fermions on the lattice, Phys. Lett. B 288 (1992) 342–347.arXiv:hep-lat/9206013,doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(92)91112-M

    1992 doi

  89. [98]

    Shamir, Chiral fermions from lattice boundaries, Nucl

    Y . Shamir, Chiral fermions from lattice boundaries, Nucl. Phys. B 406 (1993) 90–106.arXiv:hep-lat/9303005,doi:10.1016/ 0550-3213(93)90162-I

    1993

  90. [99]

    Furman, Y

    V. Furman, Y . Shamir, Axial symmetries in lattice QCD with Kaplan fermions, Nucl. Phys. B 439 (1995) 54–78.arXiv:hep-lat/9405004, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00031-M

    1995 doi

  91. [100]

    Neuberger, Exactly massless quarks on the lattice, Phys

    H. Neuberger, Exactly massless quarks on the lattice, Phys. Lett. B 417 (1998) 141–144.arXiv:hep-lat/9707022,doi:10.1016/ S0370-2693(97)01368-3

    1998

  92. [101]

    Neuberger, More about exactly massless quarks on the lattice, Phys

    H. Neuberger, More about exactly massless quarks on the lattice, Phys. Lett. B 427 (1998) 353–355.arXiv:hep-lat/9801031,doi: 10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00355-4

    1998 doi

  93. [102]

    L ¨uscher, Exact chiral symmetry on the lattice and the Ginsparg-Wilson relation, Phys

    M. L ¨uscher, Exact chiral symmetry on the lattice and the Ginsparg-Wilson relation, Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 342–345.arXiv:hep-lat/ 9802011,doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00423-7

    1998 doi

  94. [103]

    Campostrini, A

    M. Campostrini, A. Di Giacomo, H. Panagopoulos, The Topological Susceptibility on the Lattice, Phys. Lett. B 212 (1988) 206–210. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)90526-6

    1988 doi

  95. [104]

    Campostrini, A

    M. Campostrini, A. Di Giacomo, H. Panagopoulos, E. Vicari, Topological Charge, Renormalization and Cooling on the Lattice, Nucl. Phys. B 329 (1990) 683–697.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90077-Q

    1990 doi

  96. [105]

    Di Vecchia, K

    P . Di Vecchia, K. Fabricius, G. C. Rossi, G. Veneziano, Preliminary Evidence forU(1) A Breaking in QCD from Lattice Calculations, Nucl. Phys. B 192 (1981) 392, [,426(1981)].doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90432-6

    1981 doi

  97. [106]

    Di Vecchia, K

    P . Di Vecchia, K. Fabricius, G. Rossi, G. Veneziano, Numerical Checks of the Lattice Definition Independence of Topological Charge Fluctuations, Phys. Lett. B 108 (4) (1982) 323–326.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)91203-5

    1982 doi

  98. [107]

    D’Elia, Field theoretical approach to the study ofθdependence in Y ang-Mills theories on the lattice, Nucl

    M. D’Elia, Field theoretical approach to the study ofθdependence in Y ang-Mills theories on the lattice, Nucl. Phys. B 661 (2003) 139–152. arXiv:hep-lat/0302007,doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(03)00311-0

    2003 doi

  99. [108]

    B. Berg, M. L ¨uscher, Definition and Statistical Distributions of a Topological Number in the Lattice O(3) Sigma Model, Nucl. Phys. B 190 (1981) 412–424.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90568-X

    1981 doi

  100. [109]

    L ¨uscher, Topology of Lattice Gauge Fields, Commun

    M. L ¨uscher, Topology of Lattice Gauge Fields, Commun. Math. Phys. 85 (1982) 39.doi:10.1007/BF02029132

    1982 doi

  101. [110]

    Woit, Topological Charge in Lattice Gauge Theory, Phys

    P . Woit, Topological Charge in Lattice Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 638.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.638

    1983 doi

  102. [111]

    Phillips, D

    A. Phillips, D. Stone, Lattice Gauge Fields, Principal Bundles and the Calculation of Topological Charge, Commun. Math. Phys. 103 (1986) 599–636.doi:10.1007/BF01211167

    1986 doi

  103. [112]

    Berg, Dislocations and topological background in the lattice o(3)σ-model, Physics Letters B 104 (6) (1981) 475–480

    B. Berg, Dislocations and topological background in the lattice o(3)σ-model, Physics Letters B 104 (6) (1981) 475–480

    1981

  104. [113]

    L ¨uscher, Does the Topological Susceptibility in Lattice Sigma Models Scale According to the Perturbative Renormalization Group?, Nucl

    M. L ¨uscher, Does the Topological Susceptibility in Lattice Sigma Models Scale According to the Perturbative Renormalization Group?, Nucl. Phys. B 200 (1982) 61–70.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(82)90058-X

    1982 doi

  105. [114]

    Iwasaki, T

    Y . Iwasaki, T. Y oshie, Instantons and Topological Charge in Lattice Gauge Theory, Phys. Lett. B 131 (1983) 159–164.doi:10.1016/ 0370-2693(83)91111-5

    1983

  106. [115]

    Teper, Instantons in the Quantized SU(2) Vacuum: A Lattice Monte Carlo Investigation, Phys

    M. Teper, Instantons in the Quantized SU(2) Vacuum: A Lattice Monte Carlo Investigation, Phys. Lett. B 162 (1985) 357–362.doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(85)90939-6

    1985 doi

  107. [116]

    Ilgenfritz, M

    E.-M. Ilgenfritz, M. L. Laursen, G. Schierholz, M. Muller-Preussker, H. Schiller, First Evidence for the Existence of Instantons in the Quantized SU(2) Lattice Vacuum, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 693.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90265-8

    1986 doi

  108. [117]

    Narayanan, H

    R. Narayanan, H. Neuberger, InfiniteNphase transitions in continuum Wilson loop operators, JHEP 03 (2006) 064.arXiv:hep-th/ 0601210,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/03/064

    2006 doi

  109. [118]

    L ¨uscher, Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm, Commun

    M. L ¨uscher, Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm, Commun. Math. Phys. 293 (2010) 899–919.arXiv:0907.5491, doi:10.1007/s00220-009-0953-7

    2010 doi

  110. [119]

    L ¨uscher, Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD, JHEP 08 (2010) 071, [Erratum: JHEP 03 (2014) 092].arXiv: 1006.4518,doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2010)071

    M. L ¨uscher, Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD, JHEP 08 (2010) 071, [Erratum: JHEP 03 (2014) 092].arXiv: 1006.4518,doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2010)071. 22Topological Susceptibility and QCD at Finite Theta Angle

    2010 doi

  111. [120]

    L ¨uscher, P

    M. L ¨uscher, P . Weisz, Perturbative analysis of the gradient flow in non-abelian gauge theories, JHEP 02 (2011) 051.arXiv:1101.0963, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2011)051

    2011 doi

  112. [121]

    Alles, L

    B. Alles, L. Cosmai, M. D’Elia, A. Papa, Topology in2DCP N−1 models on the lattice: A Critical comparison of different cooling techniques, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 094507.arXiv:hep-lat/0001027,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.094507

    2000 doi

  113. [122]

    Bruckmann, C

    F . Bruckmann, C. Gattringer, E.-M. Ilgenfritz, M. Muller-Preussker, A. Schafer, S. Solbrig, Quantitative comparison of filtering methods in lattice QCD, Eur. Phys. J. A 33 (2007) 333–338.arXiv:hep-lat/0612024,doi:10.1140/epja/i2007-10459-5

    2007 doi

  114. [123]

    Bonati, M

    C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, Comparison of the gradient flow with cooling in SU(3) pure gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 89 (10) (2014) 105005. arXiv:1401.2441,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.105005

    2014 doi

  115. [124]

    Alexandrou, A

    C. Alexandrou, A. Athenodorou, K. Cichy, A. Dromard, E. Garcia-Ramos, K. Jansen, U. Wenger, F . Zimmermann, Comparison of topolog- ical charge definitions in Lattice QCD, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (5) (2020) 424.arXiv:1708.00696,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7984-9

    2020 doi

  116. [125]

    L ¨uscher, Topological effects in QCD and the problem of short distance singularities, Phys

    M. L ¨uscher, Topological effects in QCD and the problem of short distance singularities, Phys. Lett. B 593 (2004) 296–301.arXiv: hep-th/0404034,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.04.076

    2004 doi

  117. [126]

    Giusti, M

    L. Giusti, M. L ¨uscher, Chiral symmetry breaking and the Banks-Casher relation in lattice QCD with Wilson quarks, JHEP 03 (2009) 013. arXiv:0812.3638,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/03/013

    2009 doi

  118. [127]

    L ¨uscher, F

    M. L ¨uscher, F . Palombi, Universality of the topological susceptibility in the SU(3) gauge theory, JHEP 09 (2010) 110.arXiv:1008.0732, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2010)110

    2010 doi

  119. [128]

    Bonanno, G

    C. Bonanno, G. Clemente, M. D’Elia, F . Sanfilippo, Topology via spectral projectors with staggered fermions, JHEP 10 (2019) 187. arXiv:1908.11832,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2019)187

    2019 doi

  120. [129]

    Gattringer, Testing the selfduality of topological lumps in SU(3) lattice gauge theory, Phys

    C. Gattringer, Testing the selfduality of topological lumps in SU(3) lattice gauge theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 221601.arXiv: hep-lat/0202002,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.221601

    2002 doi

  121. [130]

    J. Smit, J. C. Vink, Renormalized Ward-takahashi Relations and Topological Susceptibility With Staggered Fermions, Nucl. Phys. B 298 (1988) 557–585.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90354-9

    1988 doi

  122. [131]

    J. Smit, J. C. Vink, Staggered Fermions and Topological Susceptibility in Lattice QCD at Beta = 5.7, Phys. Lett. B 194 (1987) 433–437. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91078-1

    1987 doi

  123. [132]

    Giusti, G

    L. Giusti, G. C. Rossi, M. Testa, G. Veneziano, TheU(1) A problem on the lattice with Ginsparg-Wilson fermions, Nucl. Phys. B 628 (2002) 234–252.arXiv:hep-lat/0108009,doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00093-7

    2002 doi

  124. [133]

    Giusti, G

    L. Giusti, G. C. Rossi, M. Testa, Topological susceptibility in full QCD with Ginsparg-Wilson fermions, Phys. Lett. B 587 (2004) 157–166. arXiv:hep-lat/0402027,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.03.010

    2004 doi

  125. [134]

    Del Debbio, C

    L. Del Debbio, C. Pica, Topological susceptibility from the overlap, JHEP 02 (2004) 003.arXiv:hep-lat/0309145,doi:10.1088/ 1126-6708/2004/02/003

    2004

  126. [135]

    Del Debbio, L

    L. Del Debbio, L. Giusti, C. Pica, Topological susceptibility in the SU(3) gauge theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 032003.arXiv: hep-th/0407052,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.032003

    2005 doi

  127. [136]

    All ´es, G

    B. All ´es, G. Boyd, M. D’Elia, A. Di Giacomo, E. Vicari, Hybrid Monte Carlo and topological modes of full QCD, Phys. Lett. B 389 (1996) 107–111.arXiv:hep-lat/9607049,doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(96)01247-6

    1996 doi

  128. [137]

    Del Debbio, H

    L. Del Debbio, H. Panagopoulos, E. Vicari,θdependence of SU(N)gauge theories, JHEP 08 (2002) 044.arXiv:hep-th/0204125, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/08/044

    2002 doi

  129. [138]

    Del Debbio, G

    L. Del Debbio, G. M. Manca, E. Vicari, Critical slowing down of topological modes, Phys. Lett. B 594 (2004) 315–323.arXiv:hep-lat/ 0403001,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.05.038

    2004 doi

  130. [139]

    Schaefer, R

    S. Schaefer, R. Sommer, F . Virotta, Critical slowing down and error analysis in lattice QCD simulations, Nucl. Phys. B 845 (2011) 93–119. arXiv:1009.5228,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.11.020

    2011 doi

  131. [140]

    Bonati, M

    C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, Topological critical slowing down: variations on a toy model, Phys. Rev. E 98 (1) (2018) 013308.arXiv:1709.10034, doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.98.013308

    2018 doi

  132. [141]

    Creutz, Confinement and the Critical Dimensionality of Space-Time, Phys

    M. Creutz, Confinement and the Critical Dimensionality of Space-Time, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 553–556, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 43, 890 (1979)].doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.553

    1979 doi

  133. [142]

    Creutz, Monte Carlo Study of Quantized SU(2) Gauge Theory, Phys

    M. Creutz, Monte Carlo Study of Quantized SU(2) Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. D 21 (1980) 2308–2315.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2308

    1980 doi

  134. [143]

    All ´es, M

    B. All ´es, M. D’Elia, A. Di Giacomo, Topological susceptibility at zero and finiteTin SU(3) Y ang-Mills theory, Nucl. Phys. B 494 (1997) 281–292, [Erratum: Nucl. Phys. B 679, 397–399 (2004)].arXiv:hep-lat/9605013,doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00205-8

    1997 doi

  135. [144]

    All ´es, M

    B. All ´es, M. D’Elia, A. Di Giacomo, Topology at zero and finiteTin SU(2) Y ang-Mills theory, Phys. Lett. B 412 (1997) 119–124.arXiv: hep-lat/9706016,doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(97)01059-9

    1997 doi

  136. [145]

    D ¨urr, Z

    S. D ¨urr, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling, T. Kurth, Precision study of the SU(3) topological susceptibility in the continuum, JHEP 04 (2007) 055. arXiv:hep-lat/0612021,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/04/055

    2007 doi

  137. [146]

    M. C `e, C. Consonni, G. P . Engel, L. Giusti, Non-Gaussianities in the topological charge distribution of the SU(3) Y ang–Mills theory, Phys. Rev. D 92 (7) (2015) 074502.arXiv:1506.06052,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.074502

    2015 doi

  138. [147]

    Bonati, M

    C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, A. Scapellato,θdependence in SU(3) Y ang-Mills theory from analytic continuation, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2) (2016) 025028.arXiv:1512.01544,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.025028

    2016 doi

  139. [148]

    Bonanno, C

    C. Bonanno, C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, Large-N S U(N)Y ang-Mills theories with milder topological freezing, JHEP 03 (2021) 111.arXiv: 2012.14000,doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2021)111

    2021 doi

  140. [149]

    Athenodorou, M

    A. Athenodorou, M. Teper, The glueball spectrum of SU(3) gauge theory in 3 + 1 dimensions, JHEP 11 (2020) 172.arXiv:2007.06422, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2020)172

    2020 doi

  141. [150]

    Athenodorou, M

    A. Athenodorou, M. Teper, SU(N) gauge theories in 3+1 dimensions: glueball spectrum, string tensions and topology, JHEP 12 (2021) 082.arXiv:2106.00364,doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2021)082

    2021 doi

  142. [151]

    Bonanno, The topological susceptibility slopeχ ′ of the pure-gauge SU(3) Y ang-Mills theory, JHEP 01 (2024) 116.arXiv:2311.06646, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2024)116

    C. Bonanno, The topological susceptibility slopeχ ′ of the pure-gauge SU(3) Y ang-Mills theory, JHEP 01 (2024) 116.arXiv:2311.06646, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2024)116

    2024 doi

  143. [152]

    D ¨urr, G

    S. D ¨urr, G. Fuwa, Topological susceptibility and excess kurtosis in SU(3) Y ang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. D 113 (5) (2026) 054508.arXiv: 2501.08217,doi:10.1103/dw3m-vcdm

    2026 doi arXiv

  144. [153]

    C. Bonanno, The large-Nlimit of the topological susceptibility of SU(N)Y ang-Mills theories via Parallel Tempering on Boundary Conditions, JHEP 01 (2026) 039.arXiv:2510.08006,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2026)039

    2026 doi

  145. [154]

    Cichy, E

    K. Cichy, E. Garcia-Ramos, K. Jansen, K. Ottnad, C. Urbach, Non-perturbative Test of the Witten-Veneziano Formula from Lattice QCD, JHEP 09 (2015) 020.arXiv:1504.07954,doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2015)020

    2015 doi

  146. [155]

    L ¨uscher, S

    M. L ¨uscher, S. Schaefer, Lattice QCD without topology barriers, JHEP 07 (2011) 036.arXiv:1105.4749,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2011)036

    2011 doi

  147. [156]

    Hasenbusch, Fighting topological freezing in the two-dimensionalCP N−1 model, Phys

    M. Hasenbusch, Fighting topological freezing in the two-dimensionalCP N−1 model, Phys. Rev. D 96 (5) (2017) 054504.arXiv:1706.04443, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.054504. Topological Susceptibility and QCD at Finite Theta Angle23

    2017 doi

  148. [157]

    M. C `e, M. Garc´ıa Vera, L. Giusti, S. Schaefer, The topological susceptibility in the large-Nlimit of SU(N) Y ang-Mills theory, Phys. Lett. B 762 (2016) 232–236.arXiv:1607.05939,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.09.029

    2016 doi

  149. [158]

    Giusti, S

    L. Giusti, S. Petrarca, B. Taglienti, Theta dependence of the vacuum energy in the SU(3) gauge theory from the lattice, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 094510.arXiv:0705.2352,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.094510

    2007 doi

  150. [159]

    Panagopoulos, E

    H. Panagopoulos, E. Vicari, The 4D SU(3) gauge theory with an imaginaryθterm, JHEP 11 (2011) 119.arXiv:1109.6815,doi: 10.1007/JHEP11(2011)119

    2011 doi

  151. [160]

    D. W. H. A. Milchev, K. Binder, Fluctuations and lack of self-averaging in the kinetics of domain growth, Z. Phys. B 63 (1986) 521. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01726202

    1986 doi

  152. [161]

    Bonanno, C

    C. Bonanno, C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, Topological properties ofCP N−1 models in the large-Nlimit, JHEP 01 (2019) 003.arXiv:1807.11357, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2019)003

    2019 doi

  153. [162]

    Borsanyi, et al., Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics, Nature 539 (7627) (2016) 69–71.arXiv:1606.07494,doi:10.1038/nature20115

    S. Borsanyi, et al., Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics, Nature 539 (7627) (2016) 69–71.arXiv:1606.07494,doi:10.1038/nature20115

    2016 doi

  154. [163]

    Alexandrou, A

    C. Alexandrou, A. Athenodorou, K. Cichy, M. Constantinou, D. P . Horkel, K. Jansen, G. Koutsou, C. Larkin, Topological susceptibility from twisted mass fermions using spectral projectors and the gradient flow, Phys. Rev. D 97 (7) (2018) 074503.arXiv:1709.06596, doi:10.1103/Phy...

    2018 doi

  155. [164]

    Athenodorou, C

    A. Athenodorou, C. Bonanno, C. Bonati, G. Clemente, F . D’Angelo, M. D’Elia, L. Maio, G. Martinelli, F . Sanfilippo, A. Todaro, Topological susceptibility ofN f = 2 + 1 QCD from staggered fermions spectral projectors at high temperatures, JHEP 10 (2022) 197.arXiv:2208. 08921,d...

    2022 doi

  156. [165]

    Bonanno, F

    C. Bonanno, F . D’Angelo, M. D’Elia, The chiral condensate of Nf = 2 + 1 QCD from the spectrum of the staggered Dirac operator, JHEP 11 (2023) 013.arXiv:2308.01303,doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2023)013

    2023 doi

  157. [166]

    Teper, Axial Anomaly Suppression (and Axial U(1) Symmetry Restoration) at High Temperatures: A Lattice Monte Carlo Study, Phys

    M. Teper, Axial Anomaly Suppression (and Axial U(1) Symmetry Restoration) at High Temperatures: A Lattice Monte Carlo Study, Phys. Lett. B 171 (1986) 81–85.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91003-8

    1986 doi

  158. [167]

    Teper, The Topological Susceptibility in SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory: An Exploratory Study, Phys

    M. Teper, The Topological Susceptibility in SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory: An Exploratory Study, Phys. Lett. B 171 (1986) 86–94.doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(86)91004-X

    1986 doi

  159. [168]

    Borsanyi, Z

    S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, D. A. Godzieba, R. Kara, P . Parotto, D. Sexty, R. Vig, Topological features of the deconfinement transition, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) (2023) 054514.arXiv:2212.08684,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054514

    2023 doi

  160. [169]

    Bonanno, M

    C. Bonanno, M. D’Elia, L. Verzichelli, Theθ-dependence of the SU(N) critical temperature at largeN, JHEP 02 (2024) 156.arXiv: 2312.12202,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2024)156

    2024 doi

  161. [170]

    Borsanyi, M

    S. Borsanyi, M. Dierigl, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, S. W. Mages, D. Nogradi, J. Redondo, A. Ringwald, K. K. Szabo, Axion cosmology, lattice QCD and the dilute instanton gas, Phys. Lett. B 752 (2016) 175–181.arXiv:1508.06917,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.11.020

    2016 doi

  162. [171]

    Frison, R

    J. Frison, R. Kitano, H. Matsufuru, S. Mori, N. Y amada, Topological susceptibility at high temperature on the lattice, JHEP 09 (2016) 021. arXiv:1606.07175,doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2016)021

    2016 doi

  163. [172]

    Kitano, N

    R. Kitano, N. Y amada, Topology in QCD and the axion abundance, JHEP 10 (2015) 136.arXiv:1506.00370,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2015) 136

    2015 doi

  164. [173]

    Borsanyi, D

    S. Borsanyi, D. Sexty, Topological susceptibility of pure gauge theory using Density of States, Phys. Lett. B 815 (2021) 136148.arXiv: 2101.03383,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136148

    2021 doi

  165. [174]

    Bonati, M

    C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, H. Panagopoulos, E. Vicari, Change ofθDependence in4DSU(N) Gauge Theories Across the Deconfinement Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (25) (2013) 252003.arXiv:1301.7640,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.252003

    2013 doi

  166. [175]

    R. A. Vig, T. G. Kovacs, Ideal topological gas in the high temperature phase of SU(3) gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 103 (11) (2021) 114510. arXiv:2101.01498,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.114510

    2021 doi

  167. [176]

    T. G. Kovacs, Fate of Chiral Symmetries in the Quark-Gluon Plasma from an Instanton-Based Random Matrix Model of QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (13) (2024) 131902.arXiv:2311.04208,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.131902

    2024 doi

  168. [177]

    Y amada, M

    N. Y amada, M. Y amazaki, R. Kitano, Subvolume method for SU(2) Y ang-Mills theory at finite temperature: topological charge distributions, JHEP 07 (2024) 198.arXiv:2403.10767,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2024)198

    2024 doi

  169. [178]

    Bonati, Topology andθdependence in finite temperature G 2 lattice gauge theory, JHEP 03 (2015) 006.arXiv:1501.01172,doi: 10.1007/JHEP03(2015)006

    C. Bonati, Topology andθdependence in finite temperature G 2 lattice gauge theory, JHEP 03 (2015) 006.arXiv:1501.01172,doi: 10.1007/JHEP03(2015)006

    2015 doi

  170. [179]

    Alles, M

    B. Alles, M. D’Elia, A. Di Giacomo, Topological susceptibility in full QCD at zero and finite temperature, Phys. Lett. B 483 (2000) 139–143. arXiv:hep-lat/0004020,doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00556-6

    2000 doi

  171. [180]

    Petreczky, H.-P

    P . Petreczky, H.-P . Schadler, S. Sharma, The topological susceptibility in finite temperature QCD and axion cosmology, Phys. Lett. B 762 (2016) 498–505.arXiv:1606.03145,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.09.063

    2016 doi

  172. [181]

    Bonati, M

    C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, G. Martinelli, F . Negro, F . Sanfilippo, A. Todaro, Topology in full QCD at high temperature: a multicanonical approach, JHEP 11 (2018) 170.arXiv:1807.07954,doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2018)170

    2018 doi

  173. [182]

    Burger, E.-M

    F . Burger, E.-M. Ilgenfritz, M. P . Lombardo, M. M ¨uller-Preussker, A. Trunin, Topology (and axion’s properties) from lattice QCD with a dynamical charm, Nucl. Phys. A 967 (2017) 880–883.arXiv:1705.01847,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.07.006

    2017 doi

  174. [183]

    Chen, T.-W

    Y .-C. Chen, T.-W. Chiu, T.-H. Hsieh, Topological susceptibility in finite temperature QCD with physical (u/d,s,c) domain-wall quarks, Phys. Rev. D 106 (7) (2022) 074501.arXiv:2204.01556,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074501

    2022 doi

  175. [184]

    A. Y . Kotov, M. P . Lombardo, A. Trunin, Topological observables andθdependence in high temperature QCD from lattice simulations, JHEP 09 (2025) 045.arXiv:2502.15407,doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2025)045

    2025 doi

  176. [185]

    B. B. Brandt, G. Endr ˝odi, J. J. H. Hern ´andez, G. Mark ´o, Impact of extreme magnetic fields on the QCD topological susceptibility in the vicinity of the crossover region, JHEP 12 (2025) 228, [Erratum: JHEP 03 (2025) 034].arXiv:2409.00796,doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024) 228

    2025 doi

  177. [186]

    Alles, M

    B. Alles, M. D’Elia, M. P . Lombardo, Behaviour of the topological susceptibility in two colour QCD across the finite density transition, Nucl. Phys. B 752 (2006) 124–139.arXiv:hep-lat/0602022,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.06.023

    2006 doi

  178. [187]

    Hands, P

    S. Hands, P . Kenny, Topological Fluctuations in Dense Matter with Two Colors, Phys. Lett. B 701 (2011) 373–377.arXiv:1104.0522, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.05.065

    2011 doi

  179. [188]

    K. Iida, E. Itou, T.-G. Lee, Two-colour QCD phases and the topology at low temperature and high density, JHEP 01 (2020) 181.arXiv: 1910.07872,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2020)181

    2020 doi

  180. [189]

    M. P . Lombardo, Topological Aspects of Dense Matter: Lattice Studies, Universe 7 (9) (2021) 336.doi:10.3390/universe7090336

    2021 doi

  181. [190]

    Kawaguchi, D

    M. Kawaguchi, D. Suenaga, Fate of the topological susceptibility in two-color dense QCD, JHEP 08 (2023) 189.arXiv:2305.18682, doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2023)189

    2023 doi

  182. [191]

    K. Iida, E. Itou, K. Murakami, D. Suenaga, Lattice study on finite density QC 2D towards zero temperature, JHEP 10 (2024) 022.arXiv: 2405.20566,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2024)022. 24Topological Susceptibility and QCD at Finite Theta Angle

    2024 doi

  183. [192]

    Itou, Lattice Results for the Equation of State in Dense QCD-like Theories, Universe 11 (11) (2025) 380.arXiv:2508.03090,doi: 10.3390/universe11110380

    E. Itou, Lattice Results for the Equation of State in Dense QCD-like Theories, Universe 11 (11) (2025) 380.arXiv:2508.03090,doi: 10.3390/universe11110380

    2025 doi

  184. [193]

    P . T. Jahn, G. D. Moore, D. Robaina,χ top(T≫T c)in pure-glue QCD through reweighting, Phys. Rev. D 98 (5) (2018) 054512.arXiv: 1806.01162,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.054512

    2018 doi

  185. [194]

    R. C. Brower, et al., Maximum-Likelihood Approach to Topological Charge Fluctuations in Lattice Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. D 90 (1) (2014) 014503.arXiv:1403.2761,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.014503

    2014 doi

  186. [195]

    Mages, B

    S. Mages, B. C. Toth, S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, K. K. Szabo, Lattice QCD on nonorientable manifolds, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 094512.arXiv:1512.06804,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.094512

    2017 doi

  187. [196]

    Bietenholz, P

    W. Bietenholz, P . de Forcrand, U. Gerber, Topological Susceptibility from Slabs, JHEP 12 (2015) 070.arXiv:1509.06433,doi:10.1007/ JHEP12(2015)070

    2015

  188. [197]

    A. Laio, G. Martinelli, F . Sanfilippo, Metadynamics surfing on topology barriers: theCPN−1 case, JHEP 07 (2016) 089.arXiv:1508.07270, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2016)089

    2016 doi

  189. [198]

    L ¨uscher, Stochastic locality and master-field simulations of very large lattices, EPJ Web Conf

    M. L ¨uscher, Stochastic locality and master-field simulations of very large lattices, EPJ Web Conf. 175 (2018) 01002.arXiv:1707.09758, doi:10.1051/epjconf/201817501002

    2018 doi

  190. [199]

    Florio, O

    A. Florio, O. Kaczmarek, L. Mazur, Open-Boundary Conditions in the Deconfined Phase, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (12) (2019) 1039.arXiv: 1903.02894,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7564-z

    2019 doi

  191. [200]

    Funcke, K

    L. Funcke, K. Jansen, S. K ¨uhn, Topological vacuum structure of the Schwinger model with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. D 101 (5) (2020) 054507.arXiv:1908.00551,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.054507

    2020 doi

  192. [201]

    Kanwar, M

    G. Kanwar, M. S. Albergo, D. Boyda, K. Cranmer, D. C. Hackett, S. Racani `ere, D. J. Rezende, P . E. Shanahan, Equivariant flow-based sampling for lattice gauge theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (12) (2020) 121601.arXiv:2003.06413,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601

    2020 doi

  193. [202]

    K. A. Nicoli, C. J. Anders, L. Funcke, T. Hartung, K. Jansen, P . Kessel, S. Nakajima, P . Stornati, Estimation of Thermodynamic Observables in Lattice Field Theories with Deep Generative Models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (3) (2021) 032001.arXiv:2007.07115,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett....

    2021

  194. [203]

    Albandea, P

    D. Albandea, P . Hern ´andez, A. Ramos, F . Romero-L´opez, Topological sampling through windings, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (10) (2021) 873, [Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 508 (2023)].arXiv:2106.14234,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09677-6

    2021 doi

  195. [204]

    Cossu, D

    G. Cossu, D. Lancastera, B. Lucini, R. Pellegrini, A. Rago, Ergodic sampling of the topological charge using the density of states, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (4) (2021) 375.arXiv:2102.03630,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09161-1

    2021 doi

  196. [205]

    Fritzsch, J

    P . Fritzsch, J. Bulava, M. C`e, A. Francis, M. L ¨uscher, A. Rago, Master-field simulations of QCD, PoS LATTICE2021 (2022) 465.arXiv: 2111.11544,doi:10.22323/1.396.0465

    2022 doi

  197. [206]

    Abbott, et al., Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space-time dimension,preprint(2023).arXiv:2305.02402

    R. Abbott, et al., Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space-time dimension,preprint(2023).arXiv:2305.02402

    2023

  198. [207]

    Eichhorn, G

    T. Eichhorn, G. Fuwa, C. Hoelbling, L. Varnhorst, Parallel tempered metadynamics: Overcoming potential barriers without surfing or tunneling, Phys. Rev. D 109 (11) (2024) 114504.arXiv:2307.04742,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.114504

    2024 doi

  199. [208]

    Howarth, A

    D. Howarth, A. J. Peterson, Topological charge unfreezing with AMReX,preprint(2023).arXiv:2312.11599

    2023

  200. [209]

    Bonanno, A

    C. Bonanno, A. Nada, D. Vadacchino, Mitigating topological freezing using out-of-equilibrium simulations, JHEP 04 (2024) 126.arXiv: 2402.06561,doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2024)126

    2024 doi

  201. [210]

    M. Abe, O. Morikawa, H. Suzuki, Monte Carlo Simulation of theSU(2)/Z 2 Y ang–Mills Theory, PTEP 2025 (2025) 6, 063B03.arXiv: 2501.00286,doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaf075

    2025 doi

  202. [211]

    Bonanno, G

    C. Bonanno, G. Clemente, M. D’Elia, L. Maio, L. Parente, Full QCD with milder topological freezing, JHEP 08 (2024) 236.arXiv: 2404.14151,doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2024)236

    2024 doi

  203. [212]

    Bonanno, A

    C. Bonanno, A. Bulgarelli, E. Cellini, A. Nada, D. Panfalone, D. Vadacchino, L. Verzichelli, Scaling flow-based approaches for topology sampling in SU(3) gauge theory, JHEP 04 (2026) 051.arXiv:2510.25704,doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2026)051

    2026 doi arXiv

  204. [213]

    S. D. Katz, D. Nogradi, QCD on the 16-cell honeycomb,preprint(2025).arXiv:2512.10604

    2025

  205. [214]

    Dragos, T

    J. Dragos, T. Luu, A. Shindler, J. de Vries, A. Y ousif, Confirming the Existence of the strong CP Problem in Lattice QCD with the Gradient Flow, Phys. Rev. C 103 (1) (2021) 015202.arXiv:1902.03254,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.103.015202

    2021 doi

  206. [215]

    Alexandrou, A

    C. Alexandrou, A. Athenodorou, K. Hadjiyiannakou, A. Todaro, Neutron electric dipole moment using lattice QCD simulations at the physical point, Phys. Rev. D 103 (5) (2021) 054501.arXiv:2011.01084,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.054501

    2021 doi

  207. [216]

    Bhattacharya, V

    T. Bhattacharya, V. Cirigliano, R. Gupta, E. Mereghetti, B. Y oon, Contribution of the QCDΘ-term to the nucleon electric dipole moment, Phys. Rev. D 103 (11) (2021) 114507.arXiv:2101.07230,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.114507

    2021 doi

  208. [217]

    Liang, A

    J. Liang, A. Alexandru, T. Draper, K.-F . Liu, B. Wang, G. Wang, Y .-B. Y ang, Nucleon electric dipole moment from theθterm with lattice chiral fermions, Phys. Rev. D 108 (9) (2023) 094512.arXiv:2301.04331,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.094512

    2023 doi

  209. [218]

    Shintani, S

    E. Shintani, S. Aoki, N. Ishizuka, K. Kanaya, Y . Kikukawa, Y . Kuramashi, M. Okawa, Y . Tanigchi, A. Ukawa, T. Y oshie, Neutron electric dipole moment from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 014504.arXiv:hep-lat/0505022,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.014504

    2005 doi

  210. [219]

    Liu, Neutron Electric Dipole Moment at Fixed Topology, Mod

    K.-F . Liu, Neutron Electric Dipole Moment at Fixed Topology, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 24 (2009) 1971–1982.arXiv:0807.1365,doi:10.1142/ S0217732309031375

    2009

  211. [220]

    Abramczyk, S

    M. Abramczyk, S. Aoki, T. Blum, T. Izubuchi, H. Ohki, S. Syritsyn, Lattice calculation of electric dipole moments and form factors of the nucleon, Phys. Rev. D 96 (1) (2017) 014501.arXiv:1701.07792,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.014501

    2017 doi

  212. [221]

    Pospelov, A

    M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, Electric dipole moments as probes of new physics, Annals Phys. 318 (2005) 119–169.arXiv:hep-ph/0504231, doi:10.1016/j.aop.2005.04.002

    2005 doi

  213. [222]

    Liu, Lattice QCD and the Neutron Electric Dipole Moment, Ann

    K.-F . Liu, Lattice QCD and the Neutron Electric Dipole Moment, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 75 (1) (2025) 377–397.arXiv:2411.15198, doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-121423-100927

    2025 doi

  214. [223]

    H. B. Meyer, Transport Properties of the Quark-Gluon Plasma: A Lattice QCD Perspective, Eur. Phys. J. A 47 (2011) 86.arXiv:1104.3708, doi:10.1140/epja/i2011-11086-3

    2011 doi

  215. [224]

    Lowdon, Euclidean thermal correlation functions in local QFT, Phys

    P . Lowdon, Euclidean thermal correlation functions in local QFT, Phys. Rev. D 106 (4) (2022) 045028.arXiv:2201.12180,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.106.045028

    2022

  216. [225]

    Bonanno, F

    C. Bonanno, F . D’Angelo, M. D’Elia, L. Maio, M. Naviglio, Sphaleron rate from a modified Backus-Gilbert inversion method, Phys. Rev. D 108 (7) (2023) 074515.arXiv:2305.17120,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.074515

    2023 doi

  217. [226]

    Bonanno, F

    C. Bonanno, F . D’Angelo, M. D’Elia, L. Maio, M. Naviglio, Sphaleron Rate ofN f =2+1QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (5) (2024) 051903. arXiv:2308.01287,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.051903

    2024 doi

  218. [227]

    N. Y . Astrakhantsev, V. V. Braguta, A. Y . Kotov, Temperature dependence of the bulk viscosity within lattice simulation ofS U(3)gluody- namics, Phys. Rev. D 98 (5) (2018) 054515.arXiv:1804.02382,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.054515

    2018 doi

  219. [228]

    Hansen, A

    M. Hansen, A. Lupo, N. Tantalo, Extraction of spectral densities from lattice correlators, Phys. Rev. D 99 (9) (2019) 094508.arXiv: 1903.06476,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.094508. Topological Susceptibility and QCD at Finite Theta Angle25

    2019 doi

  220. [229]

    Boito, M

    D. Boito, M. Golterman, K. Maltman, S. Peris, Spectral-weight sum rules for the hadronic vacuum polarization, Phys. Rev. D 107 (3) (2023) 034512.arXiv:2210.13677,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.034512

    2023 doi

  221. [230]

    Rothkopf, Inverse problems, real-time dynamics and lattice simulations, EPJ Web Conf

    A. Rothkopf, Inverse problems, real-time dynamics and lattice simulations, EPJ Web Conf. 274 (2022) 01004.arXiv:2211.10680,doi: 10.1051/epjconf/202227401004

    2022 doi

  222. [231]

    Altenkort, O

    L. Altenkort, O. Kaczmarek, R. Larsen, S. Mukherjee, P . Petreczky, H.-T. Shu, S. Stendebach, Heavy Quark Diffusion from 2+1 Flavor Lattice QCD with 320 MeV Pion Mass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (23) (2023) 231902.arXiv:2302.08501,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130. 231902

    2023 doi

  223. [232]

    Bruno, L

    M. Bruno, L. Giusti, M. Saccardi, Spectral densities from Euclidean lattice correlators via the Mellin transform, Phys. Rev. D 111 (9) (2025) 094515.arXiv:2407.04141,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.094515

    2025 doi

  224. [233]

    Del Debbio, A

    L. Del Debbio, A. Lupo, M. Panero, N. Tantalo, Bayesian solution to the inverse problem and its relation to Backus-Gilbert methods, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (2) (2025) 185.arXiv:2409.04413,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13885-9

    2025 doi

  225. [234]

    Alexandrou, et al., Probing the Energy-SmearedRRatio Using Lattice QCD, Phys

    C. Alexandrou, et al., Probing the Energy-SmearedRRatio Using Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (24) (2023) 241901.arXiv:2212. 08467,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.241901

    2023 doi

  226. [235]

    Del Debbio, A

    L. Del Debbio, A. Lupo, M. Panero, N. Tantalo, Multi-representation dynamics of SU(4) composite Higgs models: chiral limit and spectral reconstructions, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (3) (2023) 220.arXiv:2211.09581,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11363-8

    2023 doi

  227. [236]

    Frezzotti, N

    R. Frezzotti, N. Tantalo, G. Gagliardi, F . Sanfilippo, S. Simula, V. Lubicz, Spectral-function determination of complex electroweak ampli- tudes with lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 108 (7) (2023) 074510.arXiv:2306.07228,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.074510

    2023 doi

  228. [237]

    Evangelista, R

    A. Evangelista, R. Frezzotti, N. Tantalo, G. Gagliardi, F . Sanfilippo, S. Simula, V. Lubicz, Inclusive hadronic decay rate of theτlepton from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 108 (7) (2023) 074513.arXiv:2308.03125,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.074513

    2023 doi

  229. [238]

    Alexandrou, et al., Inclusive Hadronic Decay Rate of theτLepton from Lattice QCD: The ¯usFlavor Channel and the Cabibbo Angle, Phys

    C. Alexandrou, et al., Inclusive Hadronic Decay Rate of theτLepton from Lattice QCD: The ¯usFlavor Channel and the Cabibbo Angle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (26) (2024) 261901.arXiv:2403.05404,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.261901

    2024 doi

  230. [239]

    Bennett, et al., Meson spectroscopy from spectral densities in lattice gauge theories, Phys

    E. Bennett, et al., Meson spectroscopy from spectral densities in lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 110 (7) (2024) 074509.arXiv: 2405.01388,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.074509

    2024 doi

  231. [240]

    De Santis, et al., Inclusive semileptonic decays of theD s meson: A first-principles lattice QCD calculation, Phys

    A. De Santis, et al., Inclusive semileptonic decays of theD s meson: A first-principles lattice QCD calculation, Phys. Rev. D 112 (5) (2025) 054503.arXiv:2504.06063,doi:10.1103/3cxg-k322

    2025 doi

  232. [241]

    De Santis, et al., Inclusive Semileptonic Decays of theD s Meson: Lattice QCD Confronts Experiments, Phys

    A. De Santis, et al., Inclusive Semileptonic Decays of theD s Meson: Lattice QCD Confronts Experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135 (12) (2025) 121901.arXiv:2504.06064,doi:10.1103/snc6-cpz6

    2025 doi

  233. [242]

    Frezzotti, N

    R. Frezzotti, N. Tantalo, G. Gagliardi, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, C. T. Sachrajda, F . Sanfilippo, S. Simula, L. Silvestrini, Theoretical framework for lattice QCD computations ofB→Kℓ +ℓ− and ¯Bs →ℓ +ℓ−γdecays rates, including contributions from ”Charming Penguins”, Phys. Rev....

    2026 doi

  234. [243]

    Bennett, et al., Chimera baryons and mesons on the lattice: A spectral density analysis, Phys

    E. Bennett, et al., Chimera baryons and mesons on the lattice: A spectral density analysis, Phys. Rev. D 112 (7) (2025) 074515.arXiv: 2506.19804,doi:10.1103/qkqx-xxb2

    2025 doi

  235. [244]

    Backus, F

    G. Backus, F . Gilbert, The Resolving Power of Gross Earth Data, Geophysical Journal International 16 (2) (1968) 169–205.doi:10.1111/ j.1365-246X.1968.tb00216.x

    1968

  236. [245]

    S. Guin, S. Sharma, Revisiting the sphaleron and axion production rates in QCD at high temperatures,preprint(2026).arXiv:2604.07256

    2026 arXiv

  237. [246]

    Fukugita, M

    M. Fukugita, M. Okawa, A. Ukawa, Finite Size Scaling Study of the Deconfining Phase Transition in Pure SU(3) Lattice Gauge Theory, Nucl. Phys. B 337 (1990) 181–232.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90256-D

    1990 doi

  238. [247]

    Fingberg, U

    J. Fingberg, U. M. Heller, F . Karsch, Scaling and asymptotic scaling in the SU(2) gauge theory, Nucl. Phys. B 392 (1993) 493–517. arXiv:hep-lat/9208012,doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90682-F

    1993 doi

  239. [248]

    Beinlich, F

    B. Beinlich, F . Karsch, E. Laermann, A. Peikert, String tension and thermodynamics with tree level and tadpole improved actions, Eur. Phys. J. C 6 (1999) 133–140.arXiv:hep-lat/9707023,doi:10.1007/s100520050326

    1999 doi

  240. [249]

    Campostrini, The large-Nphase transition of lattice SU(N)gauge theories, Nucl

    M. Campostrini, The large-Nphase transition of lattice SU(N)gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 73 (1999) 724–726.arXiv: hep-lat/9809072,doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(99)85185-8

    1999 doi

  241. [250]

    Lucini, M

    B. Lucini, M. Teper, SU(N)gauge theories in four-dimensions: Exploring the approach toN=∞, JHEP 06 (2001) 050.arXiv:hep-lat/ 0103027,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/06/050

    2001 doi

  242. [251]

    Lucini, M

    B. Lucini, M. Teper, U. Wenger, The Deconfinement transition in SU(N) gauge theories, Phys. Lett. B 545 (2002) 197–206.arXiv: hep-lat/0206029,doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02556-X

    2002 doi

  243. [252]

    Lucini, M

    B. Lucini, M. Teper, U. Wenger, The High temperature phase transition in SU(N) gauge theories, JHEP 01 (2004) 061.arXiv:hep-lat/ 0307017,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/01/061

    2004 doi

  244. [253]

    Lucini, M

    B. Lucini, M. Teper, U. Wenger, Topology of SU(N) gauge theories atT≃0andT≃T c, Nucl. Phys. B 715 (2005) 461–482.arXiv: hep-lat/0401028,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.02.037

    2005 doi

  245. [254]

    Lucini, M

    B. Lucini, M. Teper, U. Wenger, Properties of the deconfining phase transition in SU(N) gauge theories, JHEP 02 (2005) 033.arXiv: hep-lat/0502003,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/02/033

    2005 doi

  246. [255]

    Lucini, A

    B. Lucini, A. Rago, E. Rinaldi, SU(N c) gauge theories at deconfinement, Phys. Lett. B 712 (2012) 279–283.arXiv:1202.6684,doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.04.070

    2012 doi

  247. [256]

    Borsanyi, K

    S. Borsanyi, K. R., Z. Fodor, D. A. Godzieba, P . Parotto, D. Sexty, Precision study of the continuum SU(3) Y ang-Mills theory: How to use parallel tempering to improve on supercritical slowing down for first order phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D 105 (7) (2022) 074513. arXiv:2...

    2022 doi

  248. [257]

    Lucini, D

    B. Lucini, D. Mason, M. Piai, E. Rinaldi, D. Vadacchino, First-order phase transitions in Y ang-Mills theories and the density of state method, Phys. Rev. D 108 (7) (2023) 074517.arXiv:2305.07463,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.074517

    2023 doi

  249. [258]

    T. D. Cohen, L. Y . Glozman, LargeN c QCD phase diagram atµ B =0, Eur. Phys. J. A 60 (9) (2024) 171.arXiv:2311.07333,doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01400-9

    2024 doi

  250. [259]

    ¨Unsal,θdependence, sign problems and topological interference, Phys

    M. ¨Unsal,θdependence, sign problems and topological interference, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 105012.arXiv:1201.6426,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.86.105012

    2012

  251. [260]

    Poppitz, T

    E. Poppitz, T. Sch ¨afer, M. ¨Unsal, Universal mechanism of (semi-classical) deconfinement andθ-dependence for all simple groups, JHEP 03 (2013) 087.arXiv:1212.1238,doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2013)087

    2013 doi

  252. [261]

    M. M. Anber,Θdependence of the deconfining phase transition in pure SU(N c)Y ang-Mills theories, Phys. Rev. D 88 (8) (2013) 085003. arXiv:1302.2641,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.085003

    2013 doi

  253. [262]

    Kitano, T

    R. Kitano, T. Suyama, N. Y amada,θ=πinSU(N)/Z N gauge theories, JHEP 09 (2017) 137.arXiv:1709.04225,doi:10.1007/ JHEP09(2017)137

    2017

  254. [263]

    Aitken, A

    K. Aitken, A. Cherman, M. ¨Unsal, Vacuum structure of Y ang-Mills theory as a function ofθ, JHEP 09 (2018) 030.arXiv:1804.06848, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2018)030. 26Topological Susceptibility and QCD at Finite Theta Angle

    2018 doi

  255. [264]

    S. Chen, K. Fukushima, H. Nishimura, Y . Tanizaki, Deconfinement andCPbreaking atθ=πin Y ang-Mills theories and a novel phase for SU(2), Phys. Rev. D 102 (3) (2020) 034020.arXiv:2006.01487,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.034020

    2020 doi

  256. [265]

    D’Elia, F

    M. D’Elia, F . Negro,θdependence of the deconfinement temperature in Y ang-Mills theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 072001.arXiv: 1205.0538,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.072001

    2012 doi

  257. [266]

    D’Elia, F

    M. D’Elia, F . Negro, Phase diagram of Y ang-Mills theories in the presence of aθterm, Phys. Rev. D 88 (3) (2013) 034503.arXiv: 1306.2919,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.034503

    2013 doi

  258. [267]

    Otake, N

    N. Otake, N. Y amada,θdependence ofT c in4dSU(3) Y ang-Mills theory with histogram method and the Lee-Y ang zeros in the large-N limit, JHEP 06 (2022) 044.arXiv:2202.05605,doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2022)044

    2022 doi

  259. [268]

    Y amada, M

    N. Y amada, M. Y amazaki, R. Kitano,θdependence ofT c in SU(2) Y ang-Mills theory, JHEP 02 (2025) 211.arXiv:2411.00375,doi: 10.1007/JHEP02(2025)211

    2025 doi

  260. [269]

    Kitano, N

    R. Kitano, N. Y amada, M. Y amazaki, IsN=2Large?, JHEP 02 (2021) 073.arXiv:2010.08810,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2021)073

    2021 doi

  261. [270]

    Kitano, R

    R. Kitano, R. Matsudo, N. Y amada, M. Y amazaki, Peeking into theθvacuum, Phys. Lett. B 822 (2021) 136657.arXiv:2102.08784, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136657

    2021 doi

  262. [271]

    Bonanno, C

    C. Bonanno, C. Bonati, M. Papace, D. Vadacchino, Theθ-dependence of the Y ang-Mills spectrum from analytic continuation, JHEP 05 (2024) 163.arXiv:2402.03096,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)163

    2024 doi

  263. [272]

    A. Y . Kotov, Sphaleron Transition Rate in Lattice Gluodynamics, JETP Lett. 108 (6) (2018) 352–355.doi:10.1134/S0021364018180078

    2018 doi

  264. [273]

    Altenkort, A

    L. Altenkort, A. M. Eller, O. Kaczmarek, L. Mazur, G. D. Moore, H.-T. Shu, Sphaleron rate from Euclidean lattice correlators: An exploration, Phys. Rev. D 103 (11) (2021) 114513.arXiv:2012.08279,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.114513

    2021 doi

  265. [274]

    R. G. Edwards, U. M. Heller, J. E. Kiskis, R. Narayanan, Chiral condensate in the deconfined phase of quenched gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 074504.arXiv:hep-lat/9910041,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.61.074504

    2000 doi

  266. [275]

    V. Dick, F . Karsch, E. Laermann, S. Mukherjee, S. Sharma, Microscopic origin ofUA(1)symmetry violation in the high temperature phase of QCD, Phys. Rev. D 91 (9) (2015) 094504.arXiv:1502.06190,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.094504

    2015 doi

  267. [276]

    S. Aoki, Y . Aoki, G. Cossu, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, T. Kaneko, C. Rohrhofer, K. Suzuki, Study of the axial U(1) anomaly at high temperature with lattice chiral fermions, Phys. Rev. D 103 (7) (2021) 074506.arXiv:2011.01499,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074506

    2021 doi

  268. [277]

    H. T. Ding, S. T. Li, S. Mukherjee, A. Tomiya, X. D. Wang, Y . Zhang, Correlated Dirac Eigenvalues and Axial Anomaly in Chiral Symmetric QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (8) (2021) 082001.arXiv:2010.14836,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.082001

    2021 doi

  269. [278]

    S. Aoki, Y . Aoki, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, C. Rohrhofer, K. Suzuki, Role of the axial U(1) anomaly in the chiral susceptibility of QCD at high temperature, PTEP 2022 (2) (2022) 023B05.arXiv:2103.05954,doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac001

    2022 doi

  270. [279]

    Kaczmarek, L

    O. Kaczmarek, L. Mazur, S. Sharma, Eigenvalue spectra of QCD and the fate of U(1) A breaking towards the chiral limit, Phys. Rev. D 104 (9) (2021) 094518.arXiv:2102.06136,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094518

    2021 doi

  271. [280]

    Kaczmarek, R

    O. Kaczmarek, R. Shanker, S. Sharma, Eigenvalues of the QCD Dirac matrix with improved staggered quarks in the continuum limit, Phys. Rev. D 108 (9) (2023) 094501.arXiv:2301.11610,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.094501

    2023 doi

  272. [281]

    Azcoiti, Spectral density of the Dirac-Ginsparg-Wilson operator, chiral U(1) A anomaly, and analyticity in the high temperature phase of QCD, Phys

    V. Azcoiti, Spectral density of the Dirac-Ginsparg-Wilson operator, chiral U(1) A anomaly, and analyticity in the high temperature phase of QCD, Phys. Rev. D 107 (11) (2023) 114516.arXiv:2304.14725,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.114516

    2023 doi

  273. [282]

    Giordano, Constraints on the Dirac spectrum from chiral symmetry restoration, Phys

    M. Giordano, Constraints on the Dirac spectrum from chiral symmetry restoration, Phys. Rev. D 110 (9) (2024) L091504.arXiv:2404. 03546,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.L091504

    2024 doi

  274. [283]

    Alexandru, C

    A. Alexandru, C. Bonanno, M. D’Elia, I. Horv ´ath, Dirac spectral density inN f =2+1QCD atT=230MeV, Phys. Rev. D 110 (7) (2024) 074515.arXiv:2404.12298,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.074515

    2024 doi

  275. [284]

    Fodor, A

    Z. Fodor, A. Kotov, T. G. Kovacs, K. K. Szabo, QCD thermodynamics with dynamical chiral fermions, PoS QCHSC24 (2025) 057.arXiv: 2503.22243,doi:10.22323/1.483.0057

    2025 doi

  276. [285]

    Aarts, C

    G. Aarts, C. Allton, R. Bignell, B. J ¨ager, S. Kim, J.-I. Skullerud, A. Smecca, On the effective restoration ofU(1) A symmetry at finite temperature,preprint(2026).arXiv:2604.11916

    2026 arXiv

  277. [286]

    Hirasawa, M

    M. Hirasawa, M. Honda, A. Matsumoto, J. Nishimura, A. Y osprakob, Evidence of a CP broken deconfined phase in 4D SU(2) Y ang-Mills theory atθ=πfrom imaginaryθsimulations, JHEP 05 (2025) 009.arXiv:2412.03683,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2025)009

    2025 doi

  278. [287]

    Alles, A

    B. Alles, A. Papa, Mass gap in the2DO(3) non-linear sigma model with aθ=πterm, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 056008.arXiv:0711.1496, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.056008

    2008 doi

  279. [288]

    Alles, M

    B. Alles, M. Giordano, A. Papa, Behavior nearθ=πof the mass gap in the two-dimensional O(3) non-linear sigma model, Phys. Rev. B 90 (18) (2014) 184421.arXiv:1409.1704,doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.90.184421

    2014 doi

  280. [289]

    Sulejmanpasic, D

    T. Sulejmanpasic, D. G ¨oschl, C. Gattringer, First-Principles Simulations of 1+1D Quantum Field Theories atθ=πand Spin Chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (20) (2020) 201602.arXiv:2007.06323,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.201602

    2020 doi

  281. [290]

    Matsumoto, E

    A. Matsumoto, E. Itou, Y . Tanizaki, Computing theta-dependent mass spectrum of the 2-flavor Schwinger model in the Hamiltonian formalism, in: 41st International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, Vol. LATTICE2024, 2025, p. 466.arXiv:2501.18960,doi:10. 22323/1.466.0210

    2025

  282. [291]

    Bruno, S

    M. Bruno, S. Schaefer, R. Sommer, Topological susceptibility and the sampling of field space inN f = 2 lattice QCD simulations, JHEP 08 (2014) 150.arXiv:1406.5363,doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2014)150

    2014 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed May 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.