Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Collins asymmetries in polarized lepton-proton collisions offer clearer access to the transversity distribution at the EIC.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-30 23:59 UTC pith:H7RDSEGR

load-bearing objection Straightforward extension of TMD Collins asymmetry calculations from pp to EIC lp collisions that highlights quark dominance but adds no new functions or independent constraints. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2605.02890 v3 pith:H7RDSEGR submitted 2026-05-04 hep-ph

Collins asymmetries for pion-in-jet production in polarized ell p collisions at the EIC

Umberto D'Alesio , Carlo Flore , Marco Zaccheddu This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords Collins asymmetrypion-in-jet productiontransversity distributionTMD factorizationEIClepton-proton collisionsCollins function universalityWeizsacker-Williams approximation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes Collins azimuthal asymmetries for pion-in-jet production in polarized lepton-proton collisions at the Electron-Ion Collider using a simplified TMD approach. It takes transversity and Collins fragmentation functions extracted from semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering and electron-positron annihilation and applies them to EIC kinematics. Calculations cover both leading-order quark channels and the Weizsacker-Williams quasireal photon contribution. The results show that quark-initiated processes dominate, giving much clearer access to the transversity distribution including its sea-quark component than in proton-proton scattering. Future comparison with EIC data would test whether the Collins function remains universal and whether TMD factorization applies to this process class.

Core claim

In lepton-proton collisions the Collins asymmetries for pion-in-jet production are carried by quark-initiated channels that directly couple the transversity distribution to the Collins fragmentation function, with the Weizsacker-Williams photon exchange remaining relevant yet not spoiling quark dominance; this yields a cleaner probe of transversity, including sea quarks, than proton-proton scattering and supplies a test of Collins-function universality together with TMD factorization for the process.

What carries the argument

The Collins azimuthal asymmetry generated by the product of the transversity distribution and the Collins fragmentation function inside a simplified TMD framework applied to pion-in-jet production.

Load-bearing premise

The transversity and Collins functions extracted from SIDIS and e+e- annihilation can be transferred without change to pion-in-jet production in polarized lepton-proton collisions, provided TMD factorization and Collins universality hold for these kinematics.

What would settle it

Measured Collins asymmetries at the EIC that deviate substantially from the numerical predictions obtained with SIDIS-extracted functions would indicate that universality or TMD factorization fails for this process.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Quark-initiated channels dominate the asymmetry over gluon channels across the explored kinematics.
  • The Weizsacker-Williams photon exchange contributes throughout the range but leaves quark dominance intact.
  • Sea-quark transversity becomes directly accessible without the gluon dilution present in proton-proton scattering.
  • Comparison with EIC data supplies an independent test of Collins-function universality and TMD factorization.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Global TMD fits could incorporate these lp predictions as a complementary dataset to SIDIS and e+e- data.
  • If the asymmetries match, the same functions could be applied to other lepton-hadron processes with greater .
  • Experimental design at the EIC might prioritize polarized lepton-proton runs to isolate sea-quark transversity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript calculates Collins azimuthal asymmetries for pion-in-jet production in polarized lepton-proton collisions at EIC kinematics. It uses a simplified TMD approach with collinear initial state and transversity and Collins functions extracted from SIDIS and e+e- processes. Asymmetries are computed at leading order and with Weizsäcker-Williams photon exchange, concluding that quark channels dominate allowing clearer access to transversity (including sea) and that EIC data can test Collins universality and TMD factorization.

Significance. If the calculations are accurate, this provides a theoretically simpler complement to pp studies for accessing transversity distributions. The explicit framing as a test of the universality hypothesis is a strength, as it avoids overclaiming and positions the work as a useful benchmark for future EIC measurements.

major comments (1)
  1. The central claim of quark dominance relies on the adopted approximations (collinear initial state, LO + WW); a quantitative comparison of the gluon contribution magnitude across the kinematic range would strengthen the 'much clearer access' statement.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the specific kinematic cuts or ranges used for the EIC predictions to allow reproducibility.
  2. The abstract mentions 'extending previous analyses of polarized pp scattering'; a brief reference to those works in the introduction would help contextualize the extension.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our manuscript and the recommendation for minor revision. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim of quark dominance relies on the adopted approximations (collinear initial state, LO + WW); a quantitative comparison of the gluon contribution magnitude across the kinematic range would strengthen the 'much clearer access' statement.

    Authors: We appreciate this observation. Our calculations already indicate that the Weizsäcker-Williams contribution, while relevant across the kinematic range, does not alter the dominance of quark-initiated channels, leaving gluon counterparts with only a marginal role. To strengthen the claim as suggested, we will add in the revised manuscript a quantitative comparison of the gluon and quark contributions (e.g., via ratios or separate curves) across the explored EIC kinematics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper adopts transversity and Collins fragmentation functions extracted from independent SIDIS and e+e- processes, applies a simplified TMD framework with collinear initial state and LO + WW approximations to compute pion-in-jet Collins asymmetries for EIC kinematics, and frames future data comparison as a test of universality/factorization rather than asserting prior proof. No step reduces by the paper's own equations to a quantity fitted inside this work, nor relies on self-citation chains or ansatze imported from overlapping-author prior work as load-bearing justification. The quark-channel dominance result follows directly from the adopted external inputs and stated approximations without self-referential closure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the transferability of fitted transversity and Collins functions and on the validity of TMD factorization in the new process; no new free parameters are introduced in the abstract, but the entire prediction inherits the fitting uncertainties and modeling assumptions of the input functions.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption TMD factorization holds for pion-in-jet production in polarized lp collisions at EIC kinematics
    Invoked when the authors adopt the simplified TMD approach and transfer functions extracted from other processes.
  • domain assumption The Collins fragmentation function is universal across SIDIS, e+e-, and lp processes
    Stated as a hypothesis to be tested by future EIC data but required for the numerical predictions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5745 in / 1551 out tokens · 23781 ms · 2026-06-30T23:59:18.230860+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study Collins azimuthal asymmetries for pion-in-jet production in polarized lepton-proton collisions, extending previous analyses of polarized $pp$ scattering to a complementary and theoretically simpler process. We keep adopting a simplified transverse momentum dependent (TMD) approach, with a collinear configuration for the initial state, and employ the transversity and Collins fragmentation functions as extracted from semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering and $e^+ e^-$ annihilation processes. We then compute azimuthal asymmetries for the Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) kinematics, both within a leading order (LO) approach and by including quasireal photon exchange in the Weizs\"acker-Williams approximation. Although this contribution is relevant in the whole kinematical range explored, it does not spoil the dominance of quark-initiated channels, leaving only a marginal role to their gluon counterparts. In this respect, Collins asymmetries in lepton-proton processes allow for a much clearer access to the transversity distribution, including its sea-quark component. As we will argue, a comparison with future EIC data could represent a further step in testing the hypothesis of the universality of the Collins function as well as of the TMD factorization for this class of processes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.02890 by Carlo Flore, Marco Zaccheddu, Umberto D'Alesio.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Unpolarized cross sections for ℓp → jet π ± X as a function of ηj at three different values of √ s, with the corresponding pjT ranges, see legend. Upper panels: LO and (LO+WW) results; middle panels: ratio of full (LO+WW) contribution to the LO piece; lower panels: relative contribution of quark- and gluon￾induced channels to the total cross section. precisely, we consider three different center-of-mass en… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Collins asymmetries for ℓp ↑ → jet π ± X as a function of ηj ; LO (dashed lines and gray bands) and LO+WW (solid lines and colored bands). Left to right: √ s = 45, 105, 141 GeV, with the corresponding pjT ranges, see legend. Uncertainty bands at 2σ CL. π + production the asymmetries are relatively small, around 1%, the corresponding ones for π − tend to grow at forward rapid￾ity, ranging from 2 to 4-8%, de… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Collins asymmetries for ℓp ↑ → jet π ± X as a function of xT : LO (dashed lines and gray bands) and LO+WW (solid lines and colored bands). Left to right: √ s = 45, 105, 141 GeV. Upper panels: forward rapidities; lower panels: backward rapidities. Uncertainty bands at 2σ CL. (see view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Collins asymmetries for for ℓp ↑ → jet π ± X as a function of z: LO (dashed lines and gray bands) and LO+WW (solid lines and colored bands). Left to right: 45, 105, 141 GeV, with the corresponding pjT ranges, see legend. Upper panels: forward rapidities; lower panels: backward rapidities. Uncertainty bands at 2σ CL. computed new predictions for the EIC kinematics, still employ￾ing the transversity and Coll… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Collins asymmetries for ℓp ↑ → jet π ± X as a function of jT for different z bins, only central values. Left to right: √ s = 45, 105, 141 GeV, with the corresponding pjT ranges, see legend. Upper panels: forward rapidities; lower panels: backward rapidities. References [1] A. Kotzinian, New quark distributions and semiinclusive electroproduction on the polarized nucleons, Nucl. Phys. B 441 (1995) 234–248. … view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Collins effect in pion-in-jet production in polarized $pp$ and $ep$ collisions

    hep-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 4.5

    Collins asymmetries for pion-in-jet production match STAR pp data and yield large, clean predictions at EIC kinematics that probe transversity including its sea component.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 46 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    New Quark Distributions and Semi-Inclusive Electroproduction on Polarized Nucleons

    A. Kotzinian, New quark distributions and semiinclusive electroproduction on the polarized nucleons, Nucl. Phys. B 441 (1995) 234–248.arXiv:hep-ph/9412283,doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(95)00098-D

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00098-d 1995

  2. [2]

    R. D. Tangerman, P. J. Mulders, Intrinsic transverse momentum and the polarized Drell-Yan process, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 3357–3372.arXiv:hep-ph/9403227, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.3357

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.51.3357 1995

  3. [3]

    R. D. Tangerman, P. J. Mulders, Probing transverse quark polarization in deep inelastic leptoproduction, Phys. Lett. B 352 (1995) 129–133.arXiv:hep-ph/9501202,doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(95)00485-4

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0370-2693(95)00485-4 1995

  4. [4]

    D. Boer, P. J. Mulders, Time reversal odd distribution functions in leptoproduction, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 5780–5786.arXiv:hep-ph/9711485,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.57.5780

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  5. [5]

    D. Boer, R. Jakob, P. J. Mulders, Asymmetries in polarized hadron production ine +e− annihila- tion up to order 1/Q, Nucl. Phys. B 504 (1997) 345–380.arXiv:hep-ph/9702281,doi:10.1016/ S0550-3213(97)00456-2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  6. [6]

    Semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering at small transverse momentum

    A. Bacchetta, M. Diehl, K. Goeke, A. Metz, P. J. Mul- ders, M. Schlegel, Semi-inclusive deep inelastic scatter- ing at small transverse momentum, JHEP 02 (2007) 093. arXiv:hep-ph/0611265,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/ 2007/02/093

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/ 2007

  7. [7]

    Dilepton production from polarized hadron hadron collisions

    S. Arnold, A. Metz, M. Schlegel, Dilepton production from polarized hadron hadron collisions, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 034005.arXiv:0809.2262,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.79.034005

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  8. [8]

    Polarized hadron pair production from electron-positron annihilation

    D. Pitonyak, M. Schlegel, A. Metz, Polarized hadron pair production from electron-positron annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 89 (5) (2014) 054032.arXiv:1310.6240,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.054032

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.054032 2014

  9. [9]

    J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, Back-To-Back Jets in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 193 (1981) 381, [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 213, 545 (1983)].doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81) 90339-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81 1981

  10. [10]

    J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, G. F. Sterman, Transverse Momentum Distribution in Drell-Yan Pair and W and Z Boson Production, Nucl. Phys. B 250 (1985) 199–224. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90479-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90479-1 1985

  11. [11]

    QCD Factorization for Semi-Inclusive Deep-Inelastic Scattering at Low Transverse Momentum

    X.-d. Ji, J.-p. Ma, F. Yuan, QCD factoriza- tion for semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scatter- ing at low transverse momentum, Phys. Rev. D 9 71 (2005) 034005.arXiv:hep-ph/0404183, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.034005

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.034005 2005

  12. [12]

    Collins, Foundations of perturbative QCD, Cambridge University Press, 2013

    J. Collins, Foundations of perturbative QCD, Cambridge University Press, 2013

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    M. G. Echevarría, A. Idilbi, I. Scimemi, Soft and Collinear Factorization and Transverse Momentum Dependent Par- ton Distribution Functions, Phys. Lett. B 726 (2013) 795. arXiv:1211.1947,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013. 09.003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013 2013

  14. [14]

    Seidl, et al., Measurement of Azimuthal Asymmetries in Inclusive Production of Hadron Pairs ine +e− Annihila- tion at √s=10.58 GeV, Phys

    R. Seidl, et al., Measurement of Azimuthal Asymmetries in Inclusive Production of Hadron Pairs ine +e− Annihila- tion at √s=10.58 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 032011, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 86, 039905 (2012)].arXiv:0805. 2975,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.032011

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.032011 2008

  15. [16]

    Observation of the Naive-T-odd Sivers Effect in Deep-Inelastic Scattering

    A. Airapetian, et al., Observation of the Naive-T-odd Sivers Effect in Deep-Inelastic Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 152002.arXiv:0906.3918,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.103.152002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  16. [17]

    Single Spin Asymmetries in Charged Pion Production from Semi-Inclusive Deep Inelastic Scattering on a Transversely Polarized $^3$He Target

    X. Qian, et al., Single Spin Asymmetries in Charged Pion Production from Semi-Inclusive Deep Inelastic Scattering on a Transversely Polarized 3He Target, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 072003.arXiv:1106.0363,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.107.072003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  17. [18]

    Accardi, et al., Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier, Eur

    A. Accardi, et al., Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier, Eur. Phys. J. A 52 (2016) 268.arXiv:1212. 1701,doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16268-9

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16268-9 2016

  18. [19]

    Experimental investigation of transverse spin asymmetries in muon-p SIDIS processes: Sivers asymmetries

    C. Adolph, et al., II – Experimental investigation of transverse spin asymmetries inµ-p SIDIS processes: Sivers asymmetries, Phys. Lett. B 717 (2012) 383–389. arXiv:1205.5122,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012. 09.056

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012 2012

  19. [22]

    The RHIC SPIN Program: Achievements and Future Opportunities

    E.-C. Aschenauer, et al., The RHIC SPIN Program: Achievements and Future Opportunities (1 2015).arXiv: 1501.01220

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  20. [23]

    Measurement of azimuthal asymmetries in inclusive charged dipion production in $e^+e^-$ annihilations at $\sqrt{s}$ = 3.65 GeV

    M. Ablikim, et al., Measurement of azimuthal asymme- tries in inclusive charged dipion production ine +e− an- nihilations at √s=3.65 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (4) (2016) 042001.arXiv:1507.06824,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.116.042001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  21. [24]

    Letter of Intent: A New QCD facility at the M2 beam line of the CERN SPS (COMPASS++/AMBER)

    B. Adams, et al., Letter of Intent: A New QCD fa- cility at the M2 beam line of the CERN SPS (COM- PASS++/AMBER) (8 2018).arXiv:1808.00848

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  22. [25]

    Probing nucleon's spin structures with polarized Drell-Yan in the Fermilab SpinQuest experiment

    A. Chen, et al., Probing nucleon’s spin structures with polarized Drell-Yan in the Fermilab SpinQuest experi- ment, PoS SPIN2018 (2019) 164.arXiv:1901.09994, doi:10.22323/1.346.0164

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.22323/1.346.0164 2019

  23. [26]

    C. A. Aidala, et al., The LHCSpin Project (1 2019). arXiv:1901.08002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  24. [27]

    Accardi, et al., LHCspin: a Polarized Gas Target for LHC (4 2025).arXiv:2504.16034

    A. Accardi, et al., LHCspin: a Polarized Gas Target for LHC (4 2025).arXiv:2504.16034

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [28]

    Accardi, et al., Strong interaction physics at the lumi- nosity frontier with 22 GeV electrons at Jefferson Lab, Eur

    A. Accardi, et al., Strong interaction physics at the lumi- nosity frontier with 22 GeV electrons at Jefferson Lab, Eur. Phys. J. A 60 (9) (2024) 173.arXiv:2306.09360, doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01282-x

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01282-x 2024

  26. [29]

    Extracting the Sivers function from polarized SIDIS data and making predictions

    M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, A. Kotzinian, F. Murgia, A. Prokudin, Extracting the Sivers function from polarized SIDIS data and making predictions, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 094007, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 72, 099903 (2005)].arXiv:hep-ph/0507181,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.72.094007

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  27. [30]

    Transversity and Collins functions from SIDIS and e+e- data

    M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, A. Kotzinian, F. Murgia, A. Prokudin, C. Türk, Transversity and Collins functions from SIDIS ande +e− data, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 054032.arXiv:hep-ph/0701006,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.75.054032

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  28. [31]

    Sivers Effect for Pion and Kaon Production in Semi-Inclusive Deep Inelastic Scattering

    M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, A. Kotzinian, S. Melis, F. Murgia, A. Prokudin, C. Türk, Sivers Ef- fect for Pion and Kaon Production in Semi-Inclusive Deep Inelastic Scattering, Eur. Phys. J. A 39 (2009) 89–100.arXiv:0805.2677,doi:10.1140/epja/ i2008-10697-y

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epja/ 2009

  29. [32]

    Simultaneous extraction of transversity and Collins functions from new SIDIS and e+e- data

    M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, S. Melis, F. Murgia, A. Prokudin, Simultaneous extraction of transversity and Collins functions from new SIDIS and e+e− data, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 094019.arXiv: 1303.3822,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.094019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.094019 2013

  30. [33]

    Collins functions for pions from SIDIS and new e+e- data: a first glance at their transverse momentum dependence

    M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, J. O. Gonza- lez Hernandez, S. Melis, F. Murgia, A. Prokudin, Collins functions for pions from SIDIS and newe +e− data: a first glance at their transverse momentum dependence, Phys. Rev. D 92 (11) (2015) 114023.arXiv:1510.05389, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.114023. 10

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.114023 2015

  31. [34]

    Assessing signals of TMD physics in SIDIS azimuthal asymmetries and in the extraction of the Sivers function

    M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, C. Flore, J. Gonzalez- Hernandez, Assessing signals of TMD physics in SIDIS azimuthal asymmetries and in the extraction of the Sivers function, JHEP 07 (2018) 148.arXiv:1806.10645, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2018)148

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2018)148 2018

  32. [35]

    D’Alesio, C

    U. D’Alesio, C. Flore, A. Prokudin, Role of the Sof- fer bound in determination of transversity and the tensor charge, Phys. Lett. B 803 (2020) 135347.arXiv:2001. 01573,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135347

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135347 2020

  33. [36]

    M. G. Echevarria, Z.-B. Kang, J. Terry, Global analysis of the Sivers functions at NLO+NNLL in QCD, JHEP 01 (2021) 126.arXiv:2009.10710,doi:10.1007/ JHEP01(2021)126

    work page arXiv 2021

  34. [37]

    M. Bury, A. Prokudin, A. Vladimirov, Extraction of the Sivers function from SIDIS, Drell-Yan, andW ±/Z boson production data with TMD evolution, JHEP 05 (2021) 151.arXiv:2103.03270,doi:10.1007/ JHEP05(2021)151

    work page arXiv 2021

  35. [38]

    Bacchetta, V

    A. Bacchetta, V . Bertone, C. Bissolotti, G. Bozzi, M. Cerutti, F. Piacenza, M. Radici, A. Signori, Unpo- larized transverse momentum distributions from a global fit of Drell-Yan and semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scat- tering data, JHEP 10 (2022) 127.arXiv:2206.07598, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2022)127

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2022)127 2022

  36. [39]

    Bacchetta, V

    A. Bacchetta, V . Bertone, C. Bissolotti, G. Bozzi, M. Cerutti, F. Delcarro, M. Radici, L. Rossi, A. Sig- nori, Flavor dependence of unpolarized quark trans- verse momentum distributions from a global fit, JHEP 08 (2024) 232.arXiv:2405.13833,doi:10.1007/ JHEP08(2024)232

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [40]

    Bacchetta, V

    A. Bacchetta, V . Bertone, C. Bissolotti, M. Cerutti, M. Radici, S. Rodini, L. Rossi, Neural-Network Extrac- tion of Unpolarized Transverse-Momentum-Dependent Distributions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135 (2) (2025) 021904. arXiv:2502.04166,doi:10.1103/csc2-bj91

    work page doi:10.1103/csc2-bj91 2025

  38. [41]

    V . Moos, I. Scimemi, A. Vladimirov, P. Zurita, De- termination of unpolarized TMD distributions from the fit of Drell-Yan and SIDIS data at N 4LL, JHEP 11 (2025) 134.arXiv:2503.11201,doi:10.1007/ JHEP11(2025)134

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [42]

    Boglione, U

    M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, C. Flore, J. O. Gonzalez- Hernandez, F. Murgia, A. Prokudin, Simultaneous reweighting of Transverse Momentum Dependent distri- butions, Phys. Lett. B 854 (2024) 138712.arXiv:2402. 12322,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138712

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138712 2024

  40. [43]

    P. C. Barry, et al., First simultaneous analysis of transverse momentum dependent and collinear parton distributions in the proton (10 2025).arXiv:2510.13771

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [44]

    Z.-B. Kang, L. Sellers, C. Zhang, C. Zhou, AI-assisted modeling and Bayesian inference of unpolarized quark transverse momentum distributions from Drell-Yan data (4 2026).arXiv:2604.14133

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  42. [45]

    Azimuthal Asymmetric Distribution of Hadrons Inside a Jet at Hadron Collider

    F. Yuan, Azimuthal asymmetric distribution of hadrons inside a jet at hadron collider, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 032003.arXiv:0709.3272,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.100.032003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  43. [46]

    D’Alesio, F

    U. D’Alesio, F. Murgia, C. Pisano, Azimuthal asymme- tries for hadron distributions inside a jet in hadronic col- lisions, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 034021.arXiv:1011. 2692,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.034021

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.034021 2011

  44. [47]

    Testing the universality of the Collins function in pion-jet production at RHIC

    U. D’Alesio, F. Murgia, C. Pisano, Testing the universality of the Collins function in pion-jet production at RHIC, Phys. Lett. B 773 (2017) 300–306.arXiv:1707.00914, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.08.023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.08.023 2017

  45. [48]

    Z.-B. Kang, A. Prokudin, F. Ringer, F. Yuan, Collins azimuthal asymmetries of hadron production inside jets, Phys. Lett. B 774 (2017) 635.arXiv:1707.00913,doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.10.031

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.10.031 2017

  46. [49]

    Z.-B. Kang, X. Liu, F. Ringer, H. Xing, The transverse momentum distribution of hadrons within jets, JHEP 11 (2017) 068.arXiv:1705.08443,doi:10.1007/ JHEP11(2017)068

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  47. [50]

    Lipiecki, K

    U. D’Alesio, C. Flore, M. Zaccheddu, Collins function for pion-in-jet production in polarizedppcollisions: a test of universality and factorization, Phys. Lett. B 871 (2025) 140024.arXiv:2506.21959,doi:10.1016/j. physletb.2025.140024

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2025

  48. [51]

    Bacchetta, M

    A. Bacchetta, M. Radici, L. Rossi, Analogies between hadron-in-jet and dihadron fragmentation, Phys. Rev. D 108 (1) (2023) 014005.arXiv:2303.04314,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.108.014005

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [52]

    J. C. Collins, Fragmentation of transversely polarized quarks probed in transverse momentum distributions, Nucl. Phys. B 396 (1993) 161.arXiv:hep-ph/9208213, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90262-N

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90262-n 1993

  50. [53]

    Metz, Gluon-exchange in spin-dependent fragmenta- tion, Phys

    A. Metz, Gluon-exchange in spin-dependent fragmenta- tion, Phys. Lett. B 549 (2002) 139–145.arXiv:hep-ph/ 0209054,doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02899-X

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(02)02899-x 2002

  51. [54]

    D. Boer, P. Mulders, F. Pijlman, Universality of T odd effects in single spin and azimuthal asymmetries, Nucl. Phys. B 667 (2003) 201.arXiv:hep-ph/0303034, doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(03)00527-3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(03)00527-3 2003

  52. [55]

    J. C. Collins, A. Metz, Universality of soft and collinear factors in hard-scattering factorization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 252001.arXiv:hep-ph/0408249,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevLett.93.252001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  53. [56]

    F. Yuan, J. Zhou, Collins Fragmentation and the Sin- gle Transverse Spin Asymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 052001.arXiv:0903.4680,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.103.052001. 11

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  54. [57]

    Test of the Universality of Naive-time-reversal-odd Fragmentation Functions

    D. Boer, Z.-B. Kang, W. V ogelsang, F. Yuan, Test of the Universality of Naive-time-reversal-odd Fragmenta- tion Functions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 202001. arXiv:1008.3543,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105. 202001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105 2010

  55. [58]

    D. W. Sivers, Single Spin Production Asymmetries from the Hard Scattering of Point-Like Constituents, Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 83.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 41.83

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd 1990

  56. [59]

    D. W. Sivers, Hard scattering scaling laws for single spin production asymmetries, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 261. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.43.261

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.43.261 1991

  57. [60]

    J. C. Collins, Leading twist single transverse-spin asymmetries: Drell-Yan and deep inelastic scattering, Phys. Lett. B 536 (2002) 43.arXiv:hep-ph/0204004, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)01819-1

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(02)01819-1 2002

  58. [61]

    S. J. Brodsky, D. S. Hwang, I. Schmidt, Initial state in- teractions and single spin asymmetries in Drell-Yan pro- cesses, Nucl. Phys. B 642 (2002) 344.arXiv:hep-ph/ 0206259,doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00617-X

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(02)00617-x 2002

  59. [62]

    Abdallah, et al., Azimuthal transverse single-spin asymmetries of inclusive jets and identified hadrons within jets from polarizedppcollisions at √s=200 GeV, Phys

    M. Abdallah, et al., Azimuthal transverse single-spin asymmetries of inclusive jets and identified hadrons within jets from polarizedppcollisions at √s=200 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 106 (7) (2022) 072010.arXiv: 2205.11800,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.072010

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.072010 2022

  60. [63]

    Y . Zhang, Azimuthal transverse single-spin asymmetries of inclusive jets and hadrons within jets from polarized ppcollisions at √s=510 GeV, PoS SPIN2023 (2024) 059.doi:10.22323/1.456.0059

    work page doi:10.22323/1.456.0059 2024

  61. [64]

    Aboona, et al., Energy Independence of the Collins Asymmetry inp ↑ pCollisions, Phys

    B. Aboona, et al., Energy Independence of the Collins Asymmetry inp ↑ pCollisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135 (26) (2025) 261902.arXiv:2507.16355,doi:10.1103/ jgsw-zhny

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [65]

    D’Alesio, L

    U. D’Alesio, L. Gamberg, F. Murgia, M. Zaccheddu, TransverseΛpolarization in unpolarizedpp→jetΛ ↑X, Phys. Lett. B 851 (2024) 138552.arXiv:2402.01612, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138552

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138552 2024

  63. [66]

    Arratia, Z.-B

    M. Arratia, Z.-B. Kang, A. Prokudin, F. Ringer, Jet- based measurements of Sivers and Collins asymmetries at the future electron-ion collider, Phys. Rev. D 102 (7) (2020) 074015.arXiv:2007.07281,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.102.074015

    work page arXiv 2020

  64. [67]

    C. F. von Weizsacker, Radiation emitted in collisions of very fast electrons, Z. Phys. 88 (1934) 612–625.doi: 10.1007/BF01333110

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01333110 1934

  65. [68]

    E. J. Williams, Nature of the high-energy particles of penetrating radiation and status of ionization and radi- ation formulae, Phys. Rev. 45 (1934) 729–730.doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.45.729

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.45.729 1934

  66. [69]

    S. J. Brodsky, T. Kinoshita, H. Terazawa, Two Photon Mechanism of Particle Production by High-Energy Col- liding Beams, Phys. Rev. D 4 (1971) 1532–1557.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.4.1532

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.4.1532 1971

  67. [70]

    Terazawa, Two photon processes for particle produc- tion at high-energies, Rev

    H. Terazawa, Two photon processes for particle produc- tion at high-energies, Rev. Mod. Phys. 45 (1973) 615–662. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.45.615

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.45.615 1973

  68. [71]

    B. A. Kniehl, Elasticepscattering and the Weizsacker- Williams approximation, Phys. Lett. B 254 (1991) 267– 273.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)90432-P

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)90432-p 1991

  69. [72]

    Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report

    R. Abdul Khalek, et al., Science Require- ments and Detector Concepts for the Electron- Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report, Nucl. Phys. A 1026 (2022) 122447.arXiv:2103.05419, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122447

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122447 2022

  70. [73]

    Single spin asymmetries in l p --> h X processes: a test of factorization

    M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, S. Melis, F. Murgia, A. Prokudin, Single spin asymmetries inℓp→ hXprocesses: A Test of factorization, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 034007.arXiv:0911.1744,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.81.034007

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  71. [74]

    B. A. Kniehl, G. Kramer, M. Spira, Largep T photo- production ofD ∗± mesons inepcollisions, Z. Phys. C 76 (1997) 689–700.arXiv:hep-ph/9610267,doi: 10.1007/s002880050591

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s002880050591 1997

  72. [75]

    Transverse single-spin asymmetries in $\ell \,p^\uparrow \to h \,X$ within a TMD approach: Role of quasireal photon exchange

    U. D’Alesio, C. Flore, F. Murgia, Transverse single-spin asymmetries inℓp ↑ →h Xwithin a TMD approach: role of quasi-real photon exchange, Phys. Rev. D 95 (9) (2017) 094002.arXiv:1701.01148,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.95.094002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  73. [76]

    Single-spin asymmetries: the Trento conventions

    A. Bacchetta, U. D’Alesio, M. Diehl, C. Miller, Single- spin asymmetries: The Trento conventions, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 117504.arXiv:hep-ph/0410050,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.70.117504

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  74. [77]

    Unpolarised Transverse Momentum Dependent Distribution and Fragmentation Functions from SIDIS Multiplicities

    M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, J. Gonzalez Hernandez, S. Melis, A. Prokudin, Unpolarised Transverse Momen- tum Dependent Distribution and Fragmentation Functions from SIDIS Multiplicities, JHEP 04 (2014) 005.arXiv: 1312.6261,doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2014)005

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2014)005 2014

  75. [78]

    Parton distributions from LHC, HERA, Tevatron and fixed target data: MSHT20 PDFs

    S. Bailey, T. Cridge, L. A. Harland-Lang, A. D. Mar- tin, R. S. Thorne, Parton distributions from LHC, HERA, Tevatron and fixed target data: MSHT20 PDFs, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (4) (2021) 341.arXiv:2012.04684,doi:10. 1140/epjc/s10052-021-09057-0

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  76. [79]

    Parton-to-Pion Fragmentation Reloaded

    D. de Florian, R. Sassot, M. Epele, R. J. Hernández-Pinto, M. Stratmann, Parton-to-Pion Fragmentation Reloaded, Phys. Rev. D 91 (1) (2015) 014035.arXiv:1410.6027, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.014035

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.014035 2015

  77. [80]

    Parton-to-Kaon Fragmentation Revisited

    D. de Florian, M. Epele, R. J. Hernandez-Pinto, R. Sassot, M. Stratmann, Parton-to-Kaon Fragmentation Revisited, Phys. Rev. D 95 (9) (2017) 094019.arXiv:1702.06353, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.094019. 12

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.094019 2017

  78. [81]

    G. P. Salam, J. Rojo, A Higher Order Perturbative Par- ton Evolution Toolkit (HOPPET), Comput. Phys. Com- mun. 180 (2009) 120–156.arXiv:0804.3755,doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2008.08.010

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2008.08.010 2009

  79. [82]

    Bacchetta, private communication (2015)

    A. Bacchetta, private communication (2015)

    work page 2015

  80. [83]

    Z.-B. Kang, K. Lee, F. Zhao, Polarized jet fragmen- tation functions, Phys. Lett. B 809 (2020) 135756. arXiv:2005.02398,doi:10.1016/j.physletb. 2020.135756

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb 2020

Showing first 80 references.