pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.06412 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · ✦ hep-ph · nucl-th

GTMDs, orbital angular momentum, and pretzelosity

Brean Maynard , Peter Schweitzer This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 08:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph nucl-th
keywords GTMDsorbital angular momentumpretzelositybag modelTMDsJi sum ruleparton distributions
0
0 comments X

The pith

The bag model establishes a direct link between quark orbital angular momentum and pretzelosity via leading GTMDs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines the leading generalized transverse momentum dependent parton distributions in the bag model of the nucleon. It shows the model description is theoretically consistent and supplies analytical proofs for sum rules that connect orbital angular momentum to the GTMD F_{1,4}^q through Ji's sum rule. The central advance is a deeper relationship, within this model, between orbital angular momentum and the pretzelosity TMD. A sympathetic reader would care because these relations tie parton-level angular momentum to observable transverse distributions that affect nucleon spin structure.

Core claim

In the bag model the leading GTMDs are shown to be theoretically consistent. Orbital angular momentum is expressed through the GTMD F_{1,4}^q and satisfies Ji's sum rule, with analytical proofs supplied for the associated relations. This framework establishes a deeper connection between orbital angular momentum and the pretzelosity TMD.

What carries the argument

The bag model applied to the leading GTMDs, with the GTMD F_{1,4}^q serving as the carrier of orbital angular momentum information.

If this is right

  • The sum rules for orbital angular momentum receive analytical confirmation inside the model.
  • Pretzelosity acquires an explicit tie to orbital angular momentum through the GTMD description.
  • Ji's sum rule holds exactly when the GTMD F_{1,4}^q is used to compute orbital angular momentum.
  • The model remains a viable framework for computing these distributions at leading order.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar relations might be checked in other quark models to test how model-dependent the link is.
  • Experimental access to pretzelosity could offer an indirect route to orbital angular momentum if the model relation generalizes.
  • The result suggests that GTMD studies can systematically connect spin decomposition to transverse-momentum observables.

Load-bearing premise

The bag model supplies a theoretically consistent description of the leading GTMDs.

What would settle it

A direct calculation of the pretzelosity TMD or orbital angular momentum in the bag model that violates the proven sum rules or the stated relationship would disprove the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.06412 by Brean Maynard, Peter Schweitzer.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Orbital angular momentum distributions in the bag model: 2 view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The leading Generalized Transverse Momentum Dependent parton distributions (GTMDs) are studied in the bag model. The model description is shown to be theoretically consistent. The orbital angular momentum is studied in terms of the GTMD $F_{1,4}^q$ and Ji sum rule. Analytical proofs of the associated sum rules are given. A deeper relationship between orbital angular momentum and the pretzelosity TMD is established in this model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the leading Generalized Transverse Momentum Dependent parton distributions (GTMDs) in the bag model. It demonstrates the theoretical consistency of the model description, examines orbital angular momentum in terms of the GTMD F_{1,4}^q and the Ji sum rule, supplies analytical proofs of the associated sum rules, and derives a specific algebraic relation linking orbital angular momentum to the pretzelosity TMD within the same framework.

Significance. If the results hold, the work supplies a concrete, internally consistent example of how GTMDs encode orbital angular momentum and pretzelosity in a simple quark model, with the analytical proofs of sum rules (including Ji's relation) constituting a clear strength. This can serve as a useful benchmark for more advanced calculations, though the significance remains model-specific rather than a general QCD result.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the model description is 'theoretically consistent' but does not indicate which specific consistency conditions (e.g., support properties or positivity bounds) are verified; a brief enumeration in the introduction would improve clarity.
  2. Notation for the GTMDs (particularly the indices on F_{1,4}^q) should be cross-referenced to a standard convention table or earlier literature to avoid ambiguity for readers unfamiliar with the bag-model implementation.
  3. [Discussion or Conclusions] A short paragraph comparing the obtained OAM-pretzelosity relation to results from other models (e.g., light-front or spectator) would help readers assess the model dependence without altering the central claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and for accurately summarizing its main contributions. The referee correctly identifies our focus on the leading GTMDs in the bag model, the demonstration of theoretical consistency, the analysis of orbital angular momentum via the GTMD F_{1,4}^q and the Ji sum rule (with analytical proofs), and the derived algebraic relation to the pretzelosity TMD. We appreciate the recognition that this provides a concrete, internally consistent example in a simple quark model that can serve as a benchmark, while noting the model-specific nature of the results as already stated in the manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in model-based derivation

full rationale

The paper performs explicit calculations of leading GTMDs in the bag model, supplies analytical proofs that sum rules hold (including the Ji relation for OAM via F_{1,4}^q), and derives a model-specific algebraic relation between OAM and pretzelosity. These steps follow from the model's wave functions and operator definitions rather than reducing to fitted parameters by construction or self-citation chains. The bag model is treated as a consistent framework for obtaining relations, not as a source of data-driven predictions relabeled as first-principles results. This is a standard, self-contained model study with no load-bearing steps that collapse to inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete. The bag model is an effective theory whose parameters are conventionally fitted to static nucleon properties.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The bag model is a valid effective description for nucleon structure and GTMDs.
    Invoked to compute leading GTMDs and prove sum rules.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5355 in / 1214 out tokens · 90905 ms · 2026-05-08T08:16:42.984219+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Gluon GTMD at strong coupling: fixed-spin saddle factorization and Reggeization

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The paper derives factorization of fixed-spin conformal moments of unpolarized gluon GTMDs into a universal staple-worldsheet soft factor and a target-dependent Witten amplitude, with UV/IR reductions and Reggeization...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 93 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Generalized parton correlation functions for a spin-0 hadron

    S. Meissner, A. Metz, M. Schlegel and K. Goeke, JHEP08, 038 (2008) [arXiv:0805.3165]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  2. [2]

    Generalized parton correlation functions for a spin-1/2 hadron

    S. Meissner, A. Metz and M. Schlegel, JHEP08, 056 (2009) [arXiv:0906.5323]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  3. [3]

    TMD Handbook,

    R. Boussarie, M. Burkardt, M. Constantinou, W. Detmold, M. Ebert, M. Engelhardt, S. Fleming, L. Gamberg, X. Ji and Z. B. Kang,et al.“TMD Handbook,” [arXiv:2304.03302]

    work page arXiv

  4. [4]

    A. V. Belitsky and A. V. Radyushkin, Phys. Rept.418, 1-387 (2005) [arXiv:hep-ph/0504030]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  5. [5]

    Viewing the Proton Through "Color"-Filters

    X. Ji, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 062001 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0304037]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  6. [6]

    A. V. Belitsky, X. Ji and F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D69, 074014 (2004) [arXiv:hep-ph/0307383]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2004

  7. [7]

    Quark Wigner Distributions and Orbital Angular Momentum

    C. Lorc´ e and B. Pasquini, Phys. Rev. D84, 014015 (2011) [arXiv:1106.0139]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  8. [8]

    Lorc´ e, A

    C. Lorc´ e, A. Metz, B. Pasquini and P. Schweitzer, “Parton Distribution Functions and their Generalizations,” article commissioned for the Encyclopedia of Particle Physics (in press) [arXiv:2507.12664]

    work page arXiv

  9. [9]

    J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper and G. F. Sterman, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys.5, 1-91 (1989) [arXiv:hep- ph/0409313]

    work page arXiv 1989

  10. [10]

    M¨ uller, D

    D. M¨ uller, D. Robaschik, B. Geyer, F. M. Dittes and J. Hoˇ rejˇ si, Fortsch. Phys.42, 101-141 (1994) [arXiv:hep- ph/9812448]

    work page arXiv 1994

  11. [11]

    X. D. Ji, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 610-613 (1997) [arXiv:hep-ph/9603249]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  12. [12]

    A. V. Radyushkin, Phys. Lett. B380, 417-425 (1996) [arXiv:hep-ph/9604317]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  13. [13]

    A. V. Radyushkin, Phys. Lett. B385, 333-342 (1996) [arXiv:hep-ph/9605431]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  14. [14]

    X. D. Ji, Phys. Rev. D55, 7114-7125 (1997) [arXiv:hep-ph/9609381]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  15. [15]

    J. C. Collins, L. Frankfurt, M. Strikman, Phys. Rev. D56, 2982-3006 (1997) [arXiv:hep-ph/9611433]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  16. [16]

    J. C. Collins and A. Freund, Phys. Rev. D59, 074009 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9801262]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1999

  17. [17]

    Foundations of Perturbative QCD,

    J. Collins, “Foundations of Perturbative QCD,” Camb. Monogr. Part. Phys. Nucl. Phys. Cosmol.32, 1 (2011)

    work page 2011

  18. [18]

    M. G. Echevarria, I. Scimemi and A. Vladimirov, JHEP09, 004 (2016) [arXiv:1604.07869]

    work page arXiv 2016

  19. [19]

    Y. Guo, F. P. Aslan, X. Ji and M. G. Santiago, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 261903 (2025) [arXiv:2509.08037]

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Bo¨ er, A

    M. Bo¨ er, A. Camsonne, M. Constantinou, H. S. Jo, K. Joo, K. Semenov-Tian-Shansky, H. D. Son, P. Sznajder, C. Van Hulse and J. Wagner,et al.[arXiv:2512.15064]

    work page arXiv

  21. [21]

    Liuti, D

    S. Liuti, D. Adams, M. Bo¨ er, G. W. Chern, M. Cuic, M. Engelhardt, G. R. Goldstein, B. Kriesten, Y. Li and H. W. Lin,et al.JINST20, C08011 (2025) [arXiv:2408.00163]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Bacchetta, V

    A. Bacchettaet al.JHEP08, 232 (2024) [arXiv:2405.13833]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Aslan, M

    F. Aslan, M. Boglione, J. O. Gonzalez-Hernandez, T. Rainaldi, T. C. Rogers and A. Simonelli, Phys. Rev. D 110, 074016 (2024) [arXiv:2401.14266]

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    ˇCui´c, G

    M. ˇCui´ c, G. Duplanˇ ci´ c, K. Kumeriˇ cki and K. Passek-K., JHEP12, 192 (2023) [erratum: JHEP02, 225 (2024)] [arXiv:2310.13837]

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    V. Moos, I. Scimemi, A. Vladimirov and P. Zurita, JHEP05, 036 (2024) [arXiv:2305.07473]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Dutrieux, C

    H. Dutrieux, C. Lorc´ e, H. Moutarde, P. Sznajder, A. Trawi´ nski and J. Wagner, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 300 (2021) [arXiv:2101.03855]

    work page arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    T. J. Hou, J. Gao, T. J. Hobbs, K. Xie, S. Dulat, M. Guzzi, J. Huston, P. Nadolsky, J. Pumplin and C. Schmidt, et al.Phys. Rev. D103, 014013 (2021) [arXiv:1912.10053]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Unbiased determination of DVCS Compton Form Factors

    H. Moutarde, P. Sznajder and J. Wagner, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 614 (2019) [arXiv:1905.02089]. 11

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  29. [29]

    X. Ji, F. Yuan and Y. Zhao, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 192004 (2017) [arXiv:1612.02438]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  30. [30]

    Gluon orbital angular momentum at small-$x$

    Y. Hatta, Y. Nakagawa, F. Yuan, Y. Zhao, B. Xiao, Phys. Rev. D95, 114032 (2017) [arXiv:1612.02445]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    Bhattacharya, A

    S. Bhattacharya, A. Metz and J. Zhou, Phys. Lett. B771, 396-400 (2017) [erratum: Phys. Lett. B810, 135866 (2020)] [arXiv:1702.04387]

    work page arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    Exclusive double quarkonium production and generalized TMDs of gluons

    S. Bhattacharya, A. Metz, V. K. Ojha, J. Y. Tsai and J. Zhou, Phys. Lett. B833, 137383 (2022) [arXiv:1802.10550]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Y. V. Kovchegov and B. Manley, Phys. Rev. D111, 054017 (2025) [arXiv:2410.21260]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Bhattacharya, D

    S. Bhattacharya, D. DeAngelo, L. Yang, D. Zheng and J. Zhou, [arXiv:2601.17506]

    work page arXiv

  35. [35]

    Avakian, A

    H. Avakian, A. V. Efremov, P. Schweitzer and F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D78, 114024 (2008) [arXiv:0805.3355]

    work page arXiv 2008

  36. [36]

    B. Q. Ma and I. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. D58, 096008 (1998) [arXiv:hep-ph/9808202]

    work page arXiv 1998

  37. [37]

    J. She, J. Zhu and B. Q. Ma, Phys. Rev. D79, 054008 (2009) [arXiv:0902.3718]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  38. [38]

    The transverse momentum dependent distribution functions in the bag model

    H. Avakian, A. V. Efremov, P. Schweitzer and F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D81, 074035 (2010) [arXiv:1001.5467]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  39. [39]

    Avakian, A

    H. Avakian, A. V. Efremov, P. Schweitzer, O. V. Teryaev and P. Zavada, [arXiv:1008.1921]

    work page arXiv 1921

  40. [40]

    A. V. Efremov, P. Schweitzer, O. V. Teryaev, P. Zavada, PoSDIS2010, 253 (2010) [arXiv:1008.3827]

    work page arXiv 2010

  41. [41]

    Lorc´ e and B

    C. Lorc´ e and B. Pasquini, in Sec. III of Ref. [7]

    work page

  42. [42]

    Lorc´ e and B

    C. Lorc´ e and B. Pasquini, Phys. Lett. B710, 486-488 (2012) [arXiv:1111.6069]

    work page arXiv 2012

  43. [43]

    Liu and B

    T. Liu and B. Q. Ma, Phys. Lett. B741, 256-261 (2015) [arXiv:1501.00062]. T. Gutsche, V. E. Lyubovitskij and I. Schmidt, Eur. Phys. J. C77, 86 (2017) [arXiv:1610.03526]

    work page arXiv 2015

  44. [44]

    Wigner distributions and orbital angular momentum of a proton

    D. Chakrabarti, T. Maji, C. Mondal, A. Mukherjee, Eur. Phys. J. C76, 409 (2016) [arXiv:1601.03217]. B. Gurjaret al.Phys. Rev. D104, 076028 (2021) [arXiv:2107.02216]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  45. [45]

    Chodos, R

    A. Chodos, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, C. B. Thorn and V. F. Weisskopf, Phys. Rev. D9, 3471-3495 (1974)

    work page 1974

  46. [46]

    Chodos, R

    A. Chodos, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson and C. B. Thorn, Phys. Rev. D10, 2599 (1974)

    work page 1974

  47. [47]

    Johnson, Acta Phys

    K. Johnson, Acta Phys. Polon. B6, 865 (1975)

    work page 1975

  48. [48]

    P. V. Pobylitsa, [arXiv:hep-ph/0212027]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  49. [49]

    L. S. Celenza and C. M. Shakin Phys. Rev. C27, 1561 (1983) Erratum: [Phys. Rev. C39, 2477 (1989)]

    work page 1983

  50. [50]

    R. L. Jaffe, Phys. Rev. D11, 1953 (1975)

    work page 1953

  51. [51]

    R. L. Jaffe and X. D. Ji, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 552 (1991); Nucl. Phys. B375, 527 (1992)

    work page 1991

  52. [52]

    X. D. Ji, W. Melnitchouk and X. Song, Phys. Rev. D56, 5511-5523 (1997) [arXiv:hep-ph/9702379]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  53. [53]

    Scopetta, Phys

    S. Scopetta, Phys. Rev. D72, 117502 (2005) [arXiv:hep-ph/0509287]

    work page arXiv 2005

  54. [54]

    Tezgin, B

    K. Tezgin, B. Maynard and P. Schweitzer, Phys. Rev. D110, 5 (2024) [arXiv:2404.11563]

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    Courtoy, F

    A. Courtoy, F. Fratini, S. Scopetta and V. Vento, Phys. Rev. D78, 034002 (2008) [arXiv:0801.4347]

    work page arXiv 2008

  56. [56]

    H. M. Chang, A. V. Manohar and W. J. Waalewijn, Phys. Rev. D87, 034009 (2013) [arXiv:1211.3132]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  57. [57]

    Double parton correlations in constituent quark models

    M. Rinaldi, S. Scopetta and V. Vento, Phys. Rev. D87, 114021 (2013) [arXiv:1302.6462]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  58. [58]

    Burkardt and A

    M. Burkardt and A. Jarrah, [arXiv:1011.1041]

    work page arXiv

  59. [59]

    Courtoy and A

    A. Courtoy and A. S. Miramontes, Phys. Rev. D95, 014027 (2017) [arXiv:1611.03375]

    work page arXiv 2017

  60. [60]

    Unified framework for generalized and transverse-momentum dependent parton distributions within a 3Q light-cone picture of the nucleon

    C. Lorc´ e, B. Pasquini and M. Vanderhaeghen, JHEP05, 041 (2011) [arXiv:1102.4704]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  61. [61]

    The quark orbital angular momentum from Wigner distributions and light-cone wave functions

    C. Lorc´ e, B. Pasquini, X. Xiong and F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D85, 114006 (2012) [arXiv:1111.4827]. 12

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  62. [62]

    Courtoy, G

    A. Courtoy, G. R. Goldstein, J. O. Gonzalez Hernandez, S. Liuti and A. Rajan, Phys. Lett. B731, 141-147 (2014) [arXiv:1310.5157]

    work page arXiv 2014

  63. [63]

    Twist-2 Generalized TMDs and the Spin/Orbital Structure of the Nucleon

    K. Kanazawa, C. Lorc´ e, A. Metz, B. Pasquini, M. Schlegel, Phys. Rev. D90, 014028 (2014) [arXiv:1403.5226]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  64. [64]

    Wigner Distributions for Gluons in Light-front Dressed Quark Model

    A. Mukherjee, S. Nair and V. K. Ojha, Phys. Rev. D91, 054018 (2015) [arXiv:1501.03728]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  65. [65]

    Quark Wigner distributions in a light-cone spectator model

    T. Liu and B. Q. Ma, Phys. Rev. D91, 034019 (2015) [arXiv:1501.07690]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  66. [66]

    Hagiwara, Y

    Y. Hagiwara, Y. Hatta and T. Ueda, [arXiv:1609.05773]

    work page arXiv

  67. [67]

    The elliptic gluon GTMD inside a large nucleus

    J. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D94, 114017 (2016) [arXiv:1611.02397]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  68. [68]

    J. More, A. Mukherjee and S. Nair, Phys. Rev. D95, 074039 (2017) [arXiv:1701.00339]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  69. [69]

    Chakrabarti, N

    D. Chakrabarti, N. Kumar, T. Maji and A. Mukherjee, Eur. Phys. J. Plus135, 496 (2020) [arXiv:1902.07051]

    work page arXiv 2020

  70. [70]

    Luo and H

    X. Luo and H. Sun, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 828 (2020) [arXiv:2005.09832 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  71. [71]

    Gurjar, D

    B. Gurjar, D. Chakrabarti, P. Choudhary, A. Mukherjee and P. Talukdar, Phys. Rev. D104, 076028 (2021) [arXiv:2107.02216]

    work page arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    T. Maji, C. Mondal and D. Kang, Phys. Rev. D105, 074024 (2022) [arXiv:2202.08635]

    work page arXiv 2022

  73. [73]

    Chakrabarti, P

    D. Chakrabarti, P. Choudhary, B. Gurjar, T. Maji, C. Mondal and A. Mukherjee, Phys. Rev. D109, 114040 (2024) [arXiv:2402.16503]

    work page arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    Tan and Z

    C. Tan and Z. Lu, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 637 (2024) [arXiv:2402.17162 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    Sharma and H

    S. Sharma and H. Dahiya, Eur. Phys. J. A59, 235 (2023) [arXiv:2310.03592]

    work page arXiv 2023

  76. [76]

    M. J. Neubelt, A. Sampino, J. Hudson, K. Tezgin and P. Schweitzer, Phys. Rev. D101, 034013 (2020) [arXiv:1911.08906]

    work page arXiv 2020

  77. [77]

    Bacchetta, M

    A. Bacchetta, M. Diehl, K. Goeke, A. Metz, P. J. Mulders, M. Schlegel, JHEP02, 093 (2007) [arXiv:hep- ph/0611265]

    work page arXiv 2007

  78. [78]

    R. L. Jaffe and A. Manohar, Nucl. Phys. B337, 509-546 (1990)

    work page 1990

  79. [79]

    Maynard, E

    M. Maynard, E. Sohail, P. Schweitzeret al.work in preparation (2026)

    work page 2026

  80. [80]

    Karl and J

    G. Karl and J. E. Paton, Phys. Rev. D30, 238 (1984)

    work page 1984

Showing first 80 references.