Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 1 cited by

A tunable partial-SWAP lets users directly adjust the memory dissipation rate in quantum reservoir networks on gate-based hardware.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-30 22:04 UTC pith:CBBGAAHJ

load-bearing objection The paper adds a tunable partial-SWAP for direct memory control in recurrent QRC but the NISQ implementation claim rests on shaky ground because noise may not stay orthogonal to the tuning parameter. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2605.12713 v3 pith:CBBGAAHJ submitted 2026-05-12 quant-ph cs.AI

Controllable Quantum Memory Capacity in Quantum Reservoir Networks with Tunable partial-SWAPs

Erik L. Connerty , Ethan N. Evans This is my paper
classification quant-ph cs.AI
keywords quantum reservoir computingpartial-SWAPmemory capacityNISQ hardwareamplitude-damping channelrecurrent architecturesfading memoryNARMA-5
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper advances recurrent quantum reservoir models that use separate memory and readout registers to create fading memory. It introduces a tunable partial-SWAP operation, realized as a controlled amplitude-damping channel, that sets the rate at which stored information leaks away. By varying one parameter in this operation, the network's memory lifetime can be matched to the requirements of a given task. Validation uses a randomized short-term memory capacity benchmark in simulation and the NARMA-5 task on IBM quantum processors. The result supplies a hardware knob that previous recurrent architectures lacked.

Core claim

The central claim is that inserting a tunable partial-SWAP between memory and readout registers in a two-register quantum reservoir network implements a controlled amplitude-damping channel whose strength directly sets the dissipation rate of the fading memory, and that this control is realizable and measurable on existing gate-based NISQ hardware.

What carries the argument

The tunable partial-SWAP, implemented as a controlled amplitude-damping channel that transfers amplitude from the memory register to the readout register at a user-chosen rate.

Load-bearing premise

The partial-SWAP can be executed on NISQ hardware without introducing extra uncontrolled noise that would erase the intended control over dissipation.

What would settle it

Measuring the short-term memory capacity benchmark while sweeping the tunable parameter and finding that capacity remains unchanged across the sweep on actual quantum hardware.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Memory lifetime in recurrent quantum reservoirs becomes a tunable design parameter rather than a fixed property of the circuit.
  • Task performance on sequential data such as NARMA-5 can be improved by selecting the dissipation rate that best matches the data's temporal scale.
  • The same mechanism can be added to any two-register recurrent layout without requiring feedback from classical measurements.
  • Hardware users gain a concrete way to trade off memory retention against noise accumulation on current QPUs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same partial-swap construction could be applied to multi-register or deeper reservoir layouts to control memory at multiple timescales.
  • Tuning dissipation might offer a route to regularize quantum reservoir models against hardware noise by deliberately shortening memory when decoherence is high.
  • The approach suggests that other controlled damping or leakage operations could be used to shape dynamical properties beyond memory in quantum circuits.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript advances recurrent quantum reservoir computing (QRC) architectures by introducing a hardware-realizable 'tunable partial-SWAP' mechanism, modeled as a controlled amplitude-damping channel, that directly controls the rate of memory dissipation in quantum reservoir networks (QRNs) on gate-based QPUs. It augments existing two-register recurrent models, provides theoretical discussion of the mechanism, and reports validation via randomized short-term memory capacity (STMC) benchmarks and NARMA-5 tasks on simulations and IBM QPUs.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work would supply a concrete, controllable handle on fading memory in recurrent QRNs, addressing a noted gap in understanding and control within NISQ-compatible QRC. This could enable more systematic architecture tuning beyond existing recurrent approaches.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the tunable partial-SWAP 'allows for the direct control of the rate of memory dissipation' and is 'hardware-realizable' on gate-based QPUs rests on the assumption that its implementation as a controlled amplitude-damping channel does not couple to uncontrolled native noise (T1/T2, crosstalk) in a way that invalidates attribution of STMC/NARMA-5 performance to the tunable parameter. No circuit decomposition, explicit noise model, or error budget is referenced in the abstract, leaving the mapping from ideal channel to physical device unverified.
  2. [Abstract] Validation description: The abstract states that 'validation experiments ... are conducted using simulation and IBM QPUs, respectively,' yet supplies no quantitative results, error bars, baseline comparisons, or analysis showing that observed performance differences arise from the controlled damping rate rather than device-specific decoherence correlated with the tunable parameter.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'randomized short-term memory capacity (STMC) recall benchmark' without defining the randomization procedure or the precise capacity metric used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on the abstract. We agree that additional clarity on the implementation and validation can be provided within the abstract's constraints and will revise it in the resubmission. The full manuscript already contains the supporting details on the circuit, noise model, and quantitative results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the tunable partial-SWAP 'allows for the direct control of the rate of memory dissipation' and is 'hardware-realizable' on gate-based QPUs rests on the assumption that its implementation as a controlled amplitude-damping channel does not couple to uncontrolled native noise (T1/T2, crosstalk) in a way that invalidates attribution of STMC/NARMA-5 performance to the tunable parameter. No circuit decomposition, explicit noise model, or error budget is referenced in the abstract, leaving the mapping from ideal channel to physical device unverified.

    Authors: The abstract is a concise summary; the manuscript body (implementation and theory sections) provides the explicit circuit decomposition realizing the tunable partial-SWAP as a controlled amplitude-damping channel, along with the noise model discussion. On real QPUs, native noise is always present, but the tunable parameter supplies an additional controllable handle, as evidenced by systematic variation of the parameter yielding corresponding changes in STMC and NARMA-5 performance that exceed what would be expected from fixed device decoherence alone. We will revise the abstract to reference the controlled amplitude-damping modeling and note that attribution is supported by the controlled experiments in the results. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Validation description: The abstract states that 'validation experiments ... are conducted using simulation and IBM QPUs, respectively,' yet supplies no quantitative results, error bars, baseline comparisons, or analysis showing that observed performance differences arise from the controlled damping rate rather than device-specific decoherence correlated with the tunable parameter.

    Authors: Abstract length limits preclude inclusion of quantitative results, error bars, or detailed analysis; these appear in the results section with baselines, error bars, and comparisons across tunable parameter values. Simulations explicitly contrast ideal and noisy models to isolate the tunable damping effect, while IBM QPU runs vary the partial-SWAP parameter and demonstrate performance shifts consistent with controlled memory dissipation rather than solely device-specific effects. We will revise the abstract to add a brief clause summarizing the observed performance trends under parameter tuning. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation of tunable partial-SWAP is independent of its inputs

full rationale

The paper introduces a tunable partial-SWAP mechanism modeled as a controlled amplitude-damping channel to control memory dissipation rate in recurrent QRN architectures. It then validates the approach via simulation using randomized STMC benchmarks and hardware experiments on IBM QPUs with the NARMA-5 dataset. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs: there are no self-definitional claims where X is defined in terms of Y, no fitted parameters presented as predictions, and no self-citation chains or uniqueness theorems that force the central result. The modeling and experimental validation steps remain independent of the claimed mechanism.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified from the abstract alone.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5760 in / 932 out tokens · 21142 ms · 2026-06-30T22:04:55.815521+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In the field of quantum reservoir computing (QRC), many different computational models and architectures have been proposed. From these models, we identify feedback-based models -- which use a feedback mechanism to re-embed classical measurements from the QRC -- and recurrent models -- which use a multi-register approach with memory and readout qubits -- as the two major competing architectures that have been discussed and validated on hardware. In this paper, we advance upon the recurrent architectures, which employ a two register approach to endow the QRC with a fading memory. While these approaches have been validated on hardware and have demonstrated great real-world performance on noisy-intermediate-scale-quantum (NISQ) quantum processing units (QPUs), the exact mechanism through which the memory capacity arises is not completely understood or fully controllable. With this, we augment the recurrent approaches and present a hardware-realizable mechanism, which we call a tunable partial-SWAP, that allows for the direct control of the rate of memory dissipation from a QRN implemented on a gate-based QPU. The theory behind this mechanism is discussed in terms of a controlled amplitude-damping channel and validation experiments using a randomized short-term memory capacity (STMC) recall benchmark and the NARMA-5 dataset are conducted using simulation and IBM QPUs, respectively.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.12713 by Erik L. Connerty, Ethan N. Evans.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The partial-SWAP circuit. A single parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Proposed recurrent partial-SWAP QRN. The circuit is composed of two registers: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The partial-SWAP circuit. A single parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: STMC Best R2 Comparison for two Configurations of the QRN. Plots depicting the coefficient of determination (R2 ) values for differing nqubits values. Higher is better. A context length of c = 1 is used in this experiment, giving a worst-case demonstration of memory-recall. The best partial-SWAP strength γ was chosen from each nrepeats configuration for the nqubits = 16 circuit in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: STMC partial-SWAP Strength Comparison. An ablation study over various parameters of partial-SWAP strength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: NARMA-5 Comparison for Various Configurations of partial-SWAP QRN. An ablation study over various parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: NARMA-5 Results for both the Aer Simulator and IBM QPU using the partial-SWAP QRN. The NARMA-5 task test [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: partial-SWAP QRN vs Classical ESN on NARMA-5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: STMC partial-SWAP Strength Comparison for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: STMC partial-SWAP Strength Comparison for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: NARMA-5 partial-SWAP Strength Comparison for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: NARMA-5 partial-SWAP Strength Comparison for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗

Review history (3 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. General theory of monitored Quantum Reservoir Computing

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Monitored quantum reservoirs can be made viable by measurement back-action, with projective, weak, partial, and dissipative monitoring described by one unified framework.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Sori- ano, and Roberta Zambrini

    Pere Mujal, Rodrigo Martínez-Peña, Johannes Nokkala, Jorge García-Beni, Gian Luca Giorgi, Miguel C. Sori- ano, and Roberta Zambrini. Opportunities in Quantum Reservoir Computing and Extreme Learning Machines. Advanced Quantum Technologies, 4(8):2100027, August

    work page

  2. [2]

    doi: 10.1002/qute

    ISSN 2511-9044, 2511-9044. doi: 10.1002/qute. 7 Name Parameter Value Total # of Qubits nqubits {2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16} partial-SW AP Strength γ{.05, .1, .15, . . . ,1.0} # of Shots nshots 30,000 # of Re-uploading Blocks nrepeats {1,3} # of Total Data Points ntotal 1000 # of Training Data Points ntrain 700 # of Test Data Points ntrain 275 # of Washout Points...

    work page doi:10.1002/qute

  3. [3]

    Experimental demonstra- tion of enhanced quantum tomography via quantum reser- voir processing.Quantum Science and Technology, 10 (3):035041, June 2025

    Tanjung Krisnanda, Pengtao Song, Adrian Copetudo, Clara Yun Fontaine, Tomasz Paterek, Timothy C H Liew, and Yvonne Y Gao. Experimental demonstra- tion of enhanced quantum tomography via quantum reser- voir processing.Quantum Science and Technology, 10 (3):035041, June 2025. ISSN 2058-9565. doi: 10. 1088/2058-9565/addffe. URL https://doi.org/10. 1088/2058-...

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Large-scale quantum reservoir learning with an analog quantum computer

    Milan Kornjaˇca, Hong-Ye Hu, Chen Zhao, Jonathan Wurtz, Phillip Weinberg, Majd Hamdan, Andrii Zhdanov, Ser- gio H Cantu, Hengyun Zhou, Rodrigo Araiza Bravo, et al. Large-scale quantum reservoir learning with an analog quantum computer.arXiv:2407.02553, 2024

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Khan, Nicholas T

    Fangjun Hu, Saeed A. Khan, Nicholas T. Bronn, Gerasimos Angelatos, Graham E. Rowlands, Guilhem J. Ribeill, and Hakan E. Türeci. Overcoming the coherence time barrier in quantum machine learning on temporal data.Nature Communications, 15(1):7491, Aug 2024. ISSN 2041-1723. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51162-7. URL https://doi. org/10.1038/s41467-024-51162-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51162-7 2024

  6. [6]

    Osama Ahmed, Felix Tennie, and Luca Magri. Robust quantum reservoir computers for forecasting chaotic dy- namics: generalized synchronization and stability.Pro- ceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 481(2324):20250550, 10 2025. ISSN 1364-5021. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2025.0550. URL https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2025.0550

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2025.0550 2025

  7. [7]

    Feedback connections in quan- tum reservoir computing with mid-circuit measurements

    Jakob Murauer, Rajiv Krishnakumar, Sabine Tornow, and Michaela Geierhos. Feedback connections in quan- tum reservoir computing with mid-circuit measurements. In2025 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), page 1646–1652. IEEE, August 2025. doi: 10.1109/qce65121.2025.00182. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/QCE65121. 2025.00182

    work page doi:10.1109/qce65121.2025.00182 2025

  8. [8]

    Feedback-driven quantum reservoir com- puting for time-series analysis.PRX Quantum, 5: 040325, Nov 2024

    Kaito Kobayashi, Keisuke Fujii, and Naoki Ya- mamoto. Feedback-driven quantum reservoir com- puting for time-series analysis.PRX Quantum, 5: 040325, Nov 2024. doi: 10.1103/PRXQuantum.5. 040325. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PRXQuantum.5.040325

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5 2024

  9. [9]

    Enhancing the performance of quantum reser- voir computing and solving the time-complexity prob- lem by artificial memory restriction.Phys

    Saud ˇCindrak, Brecht Donvil, Kathy Lüdge, and Lina Jaurigue. Enhancing the performance of quantum reser- voir computing and solving the time-complexity prob- lem by artificial memory restriction.Phys. Rev. Res., 6:013051, Jan 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6. 013051. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevResearch.6.013051

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6 2024

  10. [10]

    Packet switching in quantum networks: A path to the quantum internet,

    Philipp Pfeffer, Florian Heyder, and Jörg Schu- macher. Hybrid quantum-classical reservoir comput- ing of thermal convection flow.Phys. Rev. Res., 4: 033176, Sep 2022. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4. 033176. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevResearch.4.033176

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4 2022

  11. [11]

    Connerty, Ethan N

    Erik L. Connerty, Ethan N. Evans, Gerasimos Ange- latos, and Vignesh Narayanan. Predicting chaotic dy- namics on nisq hardware with quantum reservoir net- works.Communications Physics, May 2026. ISSN 2399-

    work page 2026

  12. [12]

    URL https: //doi.org/10.1038/s42005-026-02652-1

    doi: 10.1038/s42005-026-02652-1. URL https: //doi.org/10.1038/s42005-026-02652-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-026-02652-1

  13. [13]

    Soriano, and Roberta Zambrini

    Pere Mujal, Rodrigo Martínez-Peña, Gian Luca Giorgi, Miguel C. Soriano, and Roberta Zambrini. Time- series quantum reservoir computing with weak and pro- jective measurements.npj Quantum Information, 9 (1):16, Feb 2023. ISSN 2056-6387. doi: 10.1038/ s41534-023-00682-z. URL https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41534-023-00682-z. 8

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Quantum reservoir computing with repeated measurements on superconducting devices

    Toshiki Yasuda, Yudai Suzuki, Tomoyuki Kubota, Kohei Nakajima, Qi Gao, Wenlong Zhang, Satoshi Shimono, Hen- dra I. Nurdin, and Naoki Yamamoto. Quantum reservoir computing with repeated measurements on superconduct- ing devices, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2310.06706

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Feedback-enhanced quantum reservoir computing with weak measurements

    Tomoya Monomi, Wataru Setoyama, and Yoshihiko Hasegawa. Feedback-enhanced quantum reservoir com- puting with weak measurements, 2025. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2503.17939

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Ehlers, Hendra I

    Chuanzhou Zhu, Peter J. Ehlers, Hendra I. Nurdin, and Daniel Soh. Minimalistic and scalable quantum reser- voir computing enhanced with feedback.npj Quantum Information, 11(1):195, Nov 2025. ISSN 2056-6387. doi: 10.1038/s41534-025-01144-4. URL https://doi. org/10.1038/s41534-025-01144-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41534-025-01144-4 2025

  17. [17]

    Experimen- tal memory control in continuous-variable optical quan- tum reservoir computing.Nat

    Iris Paparelle, Johan Henaff, Jorge García-Beni, Émilie Gillet, Daniel Montesinos, Gian Luca Giorgi, Miguel C So- riano, Roberta Zambrini, and Valentina Parigi. Experimen- tal memory control in continuous-variable optical quan- tum reservoir computing.Nat. Photonics, 20(4):413–420, March 2026

    work page 2026

  18. [18]

    Feedback-driven recurrent quantum neural network universality, 2026

    Lukas Gonon, Rodrigo Martínez-Peña, and Juan-Pablo Ortega. Feedback-driven recurrent quantum neural network universality, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2506.16332

    work page arXiv 2026

  19. [19]

    W. D. Kalfus, G. J. Ribeill, G. E. Rowlands, H. K. Krovi, T. A. Ohki, and L. C. G. Govia. Hilbert space as a com- putational resource in reservoir computing.Phys. Rev. Res., 4:033007, Jul 2022. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch. 4.033007. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevResearch.4.033007

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch 2022

  20. [20]

    Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methods

    Maria Schuld. Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methods, January 2021. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2101.11020v2

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Sanjib Ghosh, Andrzej Opala, Michal Matuszewski, Tomasz Paterek, and Timothy C. H. Liew. Reconstructing quantum states with quantum reservoir networks.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 32(7):3148–3155, July 2021. ISSN 2162-2388. doi: 10.1109/tnnls.2020.3009716. URL http://dx.doi. org/10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3009716

    work page doi:10.1109/tnnls.2020.3009716 2021

  22. [22]

    Khan, and Hakan E

    Gerasimos Angelatos, Saeed A. Khan, and Hakan E. Türeci. Reservoir computing approach to quantum state measurement.Phys. Rev. X, 11:041062, Dec 2021. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.041062. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.041062

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.041062 2021

  23. [23]

    Khan, Marti Vives, Esin Türeci, Leon Bello, Graham E

    Fangjun Hu, Gerasimos Angelatos, Saeed A. Khan, Marti Vives, Esin Türeci, Leon Bello, Graham E. Rowlands, Guilhem J. Ribeill, and Hakan E. Türeci. Tackling sam- pling noise in physical systems for machine learning appli- cations: Fundamental limits and eigentasks.Phys. Rev. X, 13:041020, Oct 2023. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.13. 041020. URL https://link.aps.org...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.13 2023

  24. [24]

    Nielsen and Isaac L

    Michael A. Nielsen and Isaac L. Chuang.Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniver- sary Edition. Cambridge University Press, 2011. ISBN 9781107002173

    work page 2011

  25. [25]

    Decoherence free subspaces for quantum communication in amplitude damping channels, 04 2020

    Nimish Mishra, Bikash Behera, and Prasanta Panigrahi. Decoherence free subspaces for quantum communication in amplitude damping channels, 04 2020

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    So- riano, Gian Luca Giorgi, and Roberta Zambrini

    Antonio Sannia, Rodrigo Martínez-Peña, Miguel C. So- riano, Gian Luca Giorgi, and Roberta Zambrini. Dis- sipation as a resource for Quantum Reservoir Comput- ing.Quantum, 8:1291, March 2024. ISSN 2521-327X. doi: 10.22331/q-2024-03-20-1291. URL https://doi. org/10.22331/q-2024-03-20-1291

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2024-03-20-1291 2024

  27. [27]

    Hamiltonian-driven architectures for non-markovian quantum reservoir comput- ing, 2025

    Daiki Sasaki, Ryosuke Koga, Taihei Kuroiwa, Yuya Ito, Chih-Chieh Chen, and Tomah Sogabe. Hamiltonian-driven architectures for non-markovian quantum reservoir comput- ing, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2505. 14450

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Sannia, R

    Antonio Sannia, Ricard Ravell Rodríguez, Gian Luca Giorgi, and Roberta Zambrini. Non-markovianity and memory enhancement in quantum reservoir computing. npj Quantum Information, May 2026. ISSN 2056-6387. doi: 10.1038/s41534-026-01257-4. URL https://doi. org/10.1038/s41534-026-01257-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41534-026-01257-4 2026

  29. [29]

    ‘the ‘echo state’ approach to analysing and train- ing recurrent neural networks,”german nat.Res

    H Jaeger. ‘the ‘echo state’ approach to analysing and train- ing recurrent neural networks,”german nat.Res. Center Inf. Technol., GMD Rep, 148:43, 2001

    work page 2001

  30. [30]

    Adrián Pérez-Salinas, Alba Cervera-Lierta, Elies Gil- Fuster, and José I. Latorre. Data re-uploading for a universal quantum classifier.Quantum, 4:226, February 2020. ISSN 2521-327X. doi: 10.22331/ q-2020-02-06-226. URL http://dx.doi.org/10. 22331/q-2020-02-06-226

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Qmlp: An error-tolerant nonlinear quantum mlp architecture using parameterized two-qubit gates, 2022

    Cheng Chu, Nai-Hui Chia, Lei Jiang, and Fan Chen. Qmlp: An error-tolerant nonlinear quantum mlp architecture using parameterized two-qubit gates, 2022. URL https:// arxiv.org/abs/2206.01345

    work page arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    Nonlinear input transformations are ubiquitous in quantum reservoir computing.Neuromorphic Com- puting and Engineering, 2(1):014008, feb 2022

    L C G Govia, G J Ribeill, G E Rowlands, and T A Ohki. Nonlinear input transformations are ubiquitous in quantum reservoir computing.Neuromorphic Com- puting and Engineering, 2(1):014008, feb 2022. doi: 10.1088/2634-4386/ac4fcd. URL https://dx.doi. org/10.1088/2634-4386/ac4fcd

    work page doi:10.1088/2634-4386/ac4fcd 2022

  33. [33]

    On fundamental aspects of quantum extreme learning machines.Quantum Machine Intelligence, 7 (1):20, Feb 2025

    Weijie Xiong, Giorgio Facelli, Mehrad Sahebi, Owen Agnel, Thiparat Chotibut, Supanut Thanasilp, and Zoë Holmes. On fundamental aspects of quantum extreme learning machines.Quantum Machine Intelligence, 7 (1):20, Feb 2025. ISSN 2524-4914. doi: 10.1007/ s42484-025-00239-7. URL https://doi.org/10. 1007/s42484-025-00239-7. 9

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Expressivity of Quantum Reservoir Computers

    Nils-Erik Schütte, Niclas Götting, Hauke Müntinga, Meike List, Daniel Brunner, and Christopher Gies. Expressiv- ity limits of quantum reservoir computing, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.15528

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Wood, Jake Lishman, Julien Gacon, Simon Martiel, Paul D

    Ali Javadi-Abhari, Matthew Treinish, Kevin Krsulich, Christopher J. Wood, Jake Lishman, Julien Gacon, Simon Martiel, Paul D. Nation, Lev S. Bishop, Andrew W. Cross, Blake R. Johnson, and Jay M. Gambetta. Quantum com- puting with Qiskit, 2024

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems.Technomet- rics, 12(1):55–67, 1970

    Arthur E Hoerl and Robert W Kennard. Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems.Technomet- rics, 12(1):55–67, 1970. 10 A Supplementary Note 1: Amplitude Damping Channel with partial-SW AP Here we show that the partial-SWAP with measure-and-reset creates an amplitude damping channel. This important property is what allows the partial-SW...

    work page 1970