pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18708 · v1 · pith:2NGSBWW3new · submitted 2026-05-18 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.optics

Detecting nonclassicality in randomly-displaced copies of a squeezed state

Mehmet Emre Tasgin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 11:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.optics
keywords squeezed statesnonclassicalityquadrature squeezingnumber squeezingsecond-order correlationrandom displacementg2 function
0
0 comments X

The pith

An interaction Hamiltonian converts quadrature squeezing into number squeezing, enabling its detection in randomly displaced copies.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper is trying to establish that one can still identify squeezing in a signal even if every received copy has a different random displacement. A sympathetic reader would care if this holds because it solves the problem of masked squeezing in practical transmission scenarios where amplitudes vary. The key is an interaction Hamiltonian that shifts the squeezing from the quadrature to the number of photons. This shift lets one use the photon correlation test g^(2)(0) less than one to confirm nonclassicality. The Hamiltonian only moves the existing nonclassicality rather than generating it from classical light.

Core claim

We address a fundamental question: Can one determine whether a received signal is squeezed when each copy arrives with a different displacement/amplitude? We introduce an interaction Hamiltonian that converts quadrature squeezing into number squeezing. Using this conversion, we test whether the copies satisfy g^(2)(0)<1. The Hamiltonian itself does not create nonclassicality; it only transfers it from quadrature squeezing to number squeezing. This allows us to identify squeezing even when individual copies have random displacements.

What carries the argument

Interaction Hamiltonian that converts quadrature squeezing into number squeezing

If this is right

  • The g^(2)(0)<1 condition confirms nonclassicality after the conversion even with random displacements.
  • No further correction for individual displacements is needed to apply the test.
  • The approach works because the Hamiltonian transfers nonclassicality without introducing invalidating noise.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This method might apply to other nonclassical features like entanglement in displaced states.
  • It could impact designs of quantum receivers that handle fluctuating inputs.

Load-bearing premise

The conversion via the Hamiltonian preserves the nonclassical signature so that g^(2)(0) less than one reliably indicates the original squeezing without extra noise or loss of the effect due to displacements.

What would settle it

Finding that g^(2)(0) is greater than or equal to one in the output state for inputs known to be squeezed with random displacements would show the conversion does not allow detection of the nonclassicality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18708 by Mehmet Emre Tasgin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Transformation of initial quadrature squeezing into [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. While the number-squeezed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We address a fundamental question: Can one determine whether a received signal is squeezed when each copy arrives with a different displacement/amplitude? We introduce an interaction Hamiltonian that converts quadrature squeezing into number squeezing. Using this conversion, we test whether the copies satisfy $g^{(2)}(0)<1$. The Hamiltonian itself does not create nonclassicality; it only transfers it from quadrature squeezing to number squeezing. This allows us to identify squeezing even when individual copies have random displacements.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper addresses detecting quadrature squeezing when each received copy of a squeezed state has an independent random displacement. It introduces a specific interaction Hamiltonian claimed to convert quadrature squeezing into number squeezing without creating nonclassicality, enabling use of the g^{(2)}(0)<1 witness on the output to identify the original squeezing despite the unknown displacements.

Significance. If the Hamiltonian mapping is shown to preserve the nonclassicality signature invariantly under arbitrary displacements, the result would provide a practical transfer mechanism for nonclassicality witnesses in scenarios with uncontrolled amplitudes, relevant to quantum optics and communication where displacement noise is common.

major comments (2)
  1. [Hamiltonian definition and evolution] The central claim rests on the interaction Hamiltonian transferring quadrature squeezing to number squeezing such that g^{(2)}(0)<1 remains a valid witness after evolution. However, no explicit form of the Hamiltonian is provided in the abstract, and the manuscript must include a derivation (e.g., in the section defining the Hamiltonian and the evolved number operator) showing that cross terms do not make the output photon statistics displacement-dependent.
  2. [Random displacement analysis] The robustness under random displacements is load-bearing: if the conversion couples to the displacement operator, some realizations may yield g^{(2)}(0)≥1 even when quadrature squeezing is present. The paper needs an explicit proof or calculation that the mapping commutes with displacements or that the witness holds after averaging or for each copy independently.
minor comments (2)
  1. Specify the distribution of the random displacements (e.g., Gaussian width or range) and how many copies are assumed in the protocol.
  2. Add error analysis or numerical verification that the transferred signature survives for realistic displacement strengths.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications and derivations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Hamiltonian definition and evolution] The central claim rests on the interaction Hamiltonian transferring quadrature squeezing to number squeezing such that g^{(2)}(0)<1 remains a valid witness after evolution. However, no explicit form of the Hamiltonian is provided in the abstract, and the manuscript must include a derivation (e.g., in the section defining the Hamiltonian and the evolved number operator) showing that cross terms do not make the output photon statistics displacement-dependent.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit form of the Hamiltonian and a derivation are essential for rigor. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection that defines the interaction Hamiltonian explicitly, derives it from the underlying physical model, and computes the evolved number operator. The calculation demonstrates that cross terms arising from the displacement do not appear in the final photon-number statistics, which remain governed solely by the squeezing parameter transferred by the Hamiltonian. This ensures g^{(2)}(0)<1 continues to serve as a valid witness. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Random displacement analysis] The robustness under random displacements is load-bearing: if the conversion couples to the displacement operator, some realizations may yield g^{(2)}(0)≥1 even when quadrature squeezing is present. The paper needs an explicit proof or calculation that the mapping commutes with displacements or that the witness holds after averaging or for each copy independently.

    Authors: We have expanded the random-displacement section with an explicit calculation for an arbitrarily displaced squeezed input. The evolved state is obtained by applying the unitary generated by the Hamiltonian; because the Hamiltonian is constructed to act on the squeezing quadrature independently of the coherent amplitude, the resulting photon statistics (and thus g^{(2)}(0)) depend only on the squeezing strength and are identical for every displacement realization. We therefore prove that the witness holds for each copy independently, without requiring averaging. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper introduces a new interaction Hamiltonian claimed to convert quadrature squeezing into number squeezing while transferring nonclassicality without creating it. The central result—that g^(2)(0)<1 remains a valid witness even under independent random displacements per copy—rests on the explicit construction and properties of this Hamiltonian rather than on any fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, self-definition of the output in terms of the input, or load-bearing self-citation. No equation or step in the abstract or described method reduces by construction to its own inputs; the mapping is presented as an independent mechanism whose validity can be checked against external benchmarks such as the standard g^(2) test and displacement operators. This is the normal case of a self-contained proposal.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The proposal relies on standard quantum optics assumptions about squeezing and correlation functions, with the new Hamiltonian as the main addition; no explicit free parameters or invented entities detailed in abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard quantum mechanics and quantum optics framework for defining quadrature and number squeezing.
    Invoked implicitly as the basis for the conversion and g^(2)(0) test.
invented entities (1)
  • Specific interaction Hamiltonian for quadrature-to-number squeezing conversion no independent evidence
    purpose: To transfer nonclassicality without creating it
    Introduced in the abstract as the core tool; no independent evidence or falsifiable prediction given beyond the proposal itself.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5591 in / 1201 out tokens · 24626 ms · 2026-05-20T11:17:35.907722+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Detecting nonclassicality in randomly-displaced copies of a squeezed state

    into number squeezing (ˆbn = (ˆn+iγ0 ˆΦ)/√2γ0). The state after this conversion is denoted by ˆρ b in Fig. 1. The second output port of the ˆBn(θ) operation (red vertical arrow) carries reduced quadrature squeez- ing. We show that the increase in nonclassicality of the ˆbn mode in Fig. 2a is accompanied by a corresponding decrease of nonclassicality in th...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    In particular, the Hamiltonian ˆBn(θ) can be implemented through the interaction of superconducting circuits with microwave drives [57]

    Circuit QEC and Microwave The operator ˆbn can be naturally realized in cir- cuit quantum electrodynamics (cQED) [16, 56, 57]. In particular, the Hamiltonian ˆBn(θ) can be implemented through the interaction of superconducting circuits with microwave drives [57]. In the harmonic (small-fluctuation) regime, i.e., when EJ ≫E C, the Josephson potential of a ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    To obtain full control over the effective interaction, we consider a four-level atomic system with two ground states|g 1⟩,|g 2⟩and two excited states|e 1⟩,|e 2⟩

    Optical regime using atomic ensembles The Hamiltonian ˆBn(θ) can also be engineered through the interaction of a single-mode optical field ˆawith an ensemble of bosonic atoms. To obtain full control over the effective interaction, we consider a four-level atomic system with two ground states|g 1⟩,|g 2⟩and two excited states|e 1⟩,|e 2⟩. The optical mode ˆa...

    work page

  4. [4]

    When these devices operate above threshold—i.e., in the limit- cycle regime [68]—the optical annihilation operators can be linearized around stable bright states

    Nonlinear optics One can also obtain a similar Hamiltonian using non- linear optical components, such as optical parametric am- plifiers that rely on Kerr or other nonlinearities. When these devices operate above threshold—i.e., in the limit- cycle regime [68]—the optical annihilation operators can be linearized around stable bright states. By tuning the ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Quantum technology: the second quantum revolution.Philosoph- ical Transactions of the Royal Society of London

    Jonathan P Dowling and Gerard J Milburn. Quantum technology: the second quantum revolution.Philosoph- ical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 361 (1809):1655–1674, 2003

    work page 2003

  6. [6]

    Photonic quantum technologies.Nature photonics, 3(12): 687–695, 2009

    Jeremy L O’brien, Akira Furusawa, and Jelena Vuˇ ckovi´ c. Photonic quantum technologies.Nature photonics, 3(12): 687–695, 2009

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Conservation relation of nonclassicality and en- tanglement for gaussian states in a beam splitter.Phys- ical Review A, 92(5):052328, 2015

    Wenchao Ge, Mehmet Emre Tasgin, and M Suhail Zubairy. Conservation relation of nonclassicality and en- tanglement for gaussian states in a beam splitter.Phys- ical Review A, 92(5):052328, 2015

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Spin squeez- ing in an ensemble of atoms illuminated with squeezed light.Physical review letters, 79(24):4782, 1997

    A Kuzmich, Klaus Mølmer, and ES Polzik. Spin squeez- ing in an ensemble of atoms illuminated with squeezed light.Physical review letters, 79(24):4782, 1997

    work page 1997

  9. [9]

    Spin squeezing with coherent light via entanglement swapping.Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 83 (5):053848, 2011

    Mehmet Emre Ta¸ sgın and Pierre Meystre. Spin squeezing with coherent light via entanglement swapping.Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 83 (5):053848, 2011

    work page 2011

  10. [10]

    En- tanglement by a beam splitter: Nonclassicality as a pre- requisite for entanglement.Physical Review A, 65(3): 032323, 2002

    MS Kim, W Son, Vladim´ ır Buˇ zek, and PL Knight. En- tanglement by a beam splitter: Nonclassicality as a pre- requisite for entanglement.Physical Review A, 65(3): 032323, 2002

    work page 2002

  11. [11]

    Computable measure of nonclassicality for light.Phys

    J´ anos K Asb´ oth, John Calsamiglia, and Helmut Ritsch. Computable measure of nonclassicality for light.Phys. Rev. Lett., 94(17):173602, 2005. URL https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.94.173602

    work page 2005

  12. [12]

    Classical- nonclassical polarity of gaussian states.Physical Review Letters, 132(24):240201, 2024

    Jiru Liu, Wenchao Ge, and M Suhail Zubairy. Classical- nonclassical polarity of gaussian states.Physical Review Letters, 132(24):240201, 2024

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Quantifi- cations for multimode entanglement.Physical Review A, 101(1):012324, 2020

    Mehmet Emre Tasgin and M Suhail Zubairy. Quantifi- cations for multimode entanglement.Physical Review A, 101(1):012324, 2020

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Interplay of nonclassicality and entangle- ment of two-mode gaussian fields generated in optical parametric processes.Physical Review A, 94(1):013807, 2016

    Ievgen I Arkhipov, Jan Peˇ rina Jr, Jan Peˇ rina, and Adam Miranowicz. Interplay of nonclassicality and entangle- ment of two-mode gaussian fields generated in optical parametric processes.Physical Review A, 94(1):013807, 2016

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Gener- ation of squeezed states by parametric down conversion

    Ling-An Wu, HJ Kimble, JL Hall, and Huifa Wu. Gener- ation of squeezed states by parametric down conversion. Physical Review Letters, 57(20):2520, 1986

    work page 1986

  16. [16]

    Single-mode squeezed-light generation and tomography with an integrated optical parametric oscillator.Science Advances, 10(11):eadl1814, 2024

    Taewon Park, Hubert Stokowski, Vahid Ansari, Samuel Gyger, Kevin KS Multani, Oguz Tolga Celik, Alexan- der Y Hwang, Devin J Dean, Felix Mayor, Timothy P McKenna, et al. Single-mode squeezed-light generation and tomography with an integrated optical parametric oscillator.Science Advances, 10(11):eadl1814, 2024

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Quantum illumination and quan- tum radar: A brief overview.Reports on progress in physics, 87(9):094001, 2024

    Athena Karsa, Alasdair Fletcher, Gaetana Spedalieri, and Stefano Pirandola. Quantum illumination and quan- tum radar: A brief overview.Reports on progress in physics, 87(9):094001, 2024

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Continuous-variable quantum key distribution with noisy squeezed states.Quantum Science and Technology, 2025

    Akash Nag Oruganti, Ivan Derkach, Radim Filip, and Vladyslav C Usenko. Continuous-variable quantum key distribution with noisy squeezed states.Quantum Science and Technology, 2025

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Perspectives of microwave quantum key distribution in the open air.Physical Review A, 108(3):032607, 2023

    Florian Fesquet, Fabian Kronowetter, Michael Renger, Qiming Chen, Kedar Honasoge, Oscar Gargiulo, Yuki Nojiri, Achim Marx, Frank Deppe, Rudolf Gross, et al. Perspectives of microwave quantum key distribution in the open air.Physical Review A, 108(3):032607, 2023

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Entangling optical and microwave cavity modes by means of a nanomechanical resonator.Physical Re- view A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 84(4): 042342, 2011

    Sh Barzanjeh, D Vitali, P Tombesi, and GJ Mil- burn. Entangling optical and microwave cavity modes by means of a nanomechanical resonator.Physical Re- view A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 84(4): 042342, 2011

    work page 2011

  21. [21]

    Harnessing quan- tum light for microscopic biomechanical imaging of cells and tissues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences, 121(45):e2413938121, 2024

    Tian Li, Vsevolod Cheburkanov, Vladislav V Yakovlev, Girish S Agarwal, and Marlan O Scully. Harnessing quan- tum light for microscopic biomechanical imaging of cells and tissues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences, 121(45):e2413938121, 2024

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Biological measurement beyond the quantum limit.Nature Photonics, 7(3):229–233, 2013

    Michael A Taylor, Jiri Janousek, Vincent Daria, Joachim Knittel, Boris Hage, Hans-A Bachor, and Warwick P Bowen. Biological measurement beyond the quantum limit.Nature Photonics, 7(3):229–233, 2013

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    Quan- tum distribution of gaussian keys using squeezed states

    Nicolas J Cerf, Marc Levy, and Gilles Van Assche. Quan- tum distribution of gaussian keys using squeezed states. Physical Review A, 63(5):052311, 2001

    work page 2001

  24. [24]

    Encoding classical data into the squeezing of noisy-states for nanowire communication

    Mehmet Emre Tasgin. Encoding classical data into the squeezing of noisy-states for nanowire communication. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.04516, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2004

    Crispin Gardiner, Peter Zoller, and Peter Zoller.Quan- tum noise: a handbook of Markovian and non-Markovian quantum stochastic methods with applications to quantum optics. Springer Science & Business Media, 2004. URL https://link.springer.com/book/9783540223016

    work page arXiv 2004

  26. [26]

    Simon, N

    R. Simon, N. Mukunda, and Biswadeb Dutta. Quantum- noise matrix for multimode systems: U(n) invariance, squeezing, and normal forms.Phys. Rev. A, 49: 1567–1583, Mar 1994. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.49.1567. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA. 49.1567

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.49.1567 1994

  27. [27]

    Quantum-noise matrix for multi- mode systems: U (n) invariance, squeezing, and normal forms.Physical Review A, 49(3):1567, 1994

    Rajiah Simon, Narasimhaiengar Mukunda, and Biswadeb Dutta. Quantum-noise matrix for multi- mode systems: U (n) invariance, squeezing, and normal forms.Physical Review A, 49(3):1567, 1994

    work page 1994

  28. [28]

    Quantum versus classical correlations in gaussian states.Physical Review Letters, 105(3):030501, 2010

    Gerardo Adesso and Animesh Datta. Quantum versus classical correlations in gaussian states.Physical Review Letters, 105(3):030501, 2010

    work page 2010

  29. [29]

    Extremal entanglement and mixedness in contin- uous variable systems.Phys

    Gerardo Adesso, Alessio Serafini, and Fabrizio Illumi- nati. Extremal entanglement and mixedness in contin- uous variable systems.Phys. Rev. A, 70:022318, Aug

    work page

  30. [30]

    URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.70.022318

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.70.022318. URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.70.022318

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.70.022318

  31. [31]

    Symplectic invariants, entropic measures and correlations of gaussian states.Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molec- ular and Optical Physics, 37(2):L21, 2004

    Alessio Serafini, Fabrizio Illuminati, and Silvio De Siena. Symplectic invariants, entropic measures and correlations of gaussian states.Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molec- ular and Optical Physics, 37(2):L21, 2004

    work page 2004

  32. [32]

    Scully and M

    Marlan O. Scully and M. Suhail Zubairy.Quantum Op- tics. Cambridge University Press, 1997

    work page 1997

  33. [33]

    Physical number-phase intel- ligent and minimum-uncertainty states of light.Journal of Modern Optics, 37(1):17–39, 1990

    JA Vaccaro and DT Pegg. Physical number-phase intel- ligent and minimum-uncertainty states of light.Journal of Modern Optics, 37(1):17–39, 1990

    work page 1990

  34. [34]

    Anatomy of entanglement and nonclassicality criteria

    Mehmet Emre Tasgin. Anatomy of entanglement and 14 nonclassicality criteria.arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.04045, 2019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1901

  35. [35]

    Phase properties of the quan- tized single-mode electromagnetic field.Physical Review A, 39(4):1665, 1989

    DT Pegg and SMf Barnett. Phase properties of the quan- tized single-mode electromagnetic field.Physical Review A, 39(4):1665, 1989

    work page 1989

  36. [36]

    On the hermitian optical phase operator.Journal of Modern Optics, 36(1):7–19, 1989

    SM Barnett and DT Pegg. On the hermitian optical phase operator.Journal of Modern Optics, 36(1):7–19, 1989

    work page 1989

  37. [37]

    The quantum phase operator: a review

    Stephen M Barnett and John A Vaccaro. The quantum phase operator: a review. 2007

    work page 2007

  38. [38]

    M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy.Quantum Optics. Cambridge University Press, New York,

    work page

  39. [39]

    URLhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/books/ quantum-optics/08DC53888452CBC6CDC0FD8A1A1A4DD7

    work page

  40. [40]

    Ox- ford University Press, Oxford, third edition, 2000

    Rodney Loudon.The Quantum Theory of Light. Ox- ford University Press, Oxford, third edition, 2000. ISBN 0198501765. see Chapter 7

    work page 2000

  41. [41]

    Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006

    Mark Fox.Quantum Optics: An Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006. ISBN 0198566735. see the chapter Photon Statistics

    work page 2006

  42. [42]

    Academic Press, Lon- don, 2013

    Alan Migdall, John Vallerga, and Stefania Castel- letto, editors.Single-Photon Generation and Detection: Physics and Applications, volume 45 ofExperimental Methods in the Physical Sciences. Academic Press, Lon- don, 2013. ISBN 9780123876959. see Chapter 5, ”Single- Photon Detection,” and Chapter 7, ”Characterization of Single-Photon Sources.”

    work page 2013

  43. [43]

    Single-photon sources

    Brahim Lounis and Michel Orrit. Single-photon sources. Reports on Progress in Physics, 68(5):1129, 2005

    work page 2005

  44. [44]

    Quantum statistics of surface plas- mon polaritons in metallic stripe waveguides.Nano Lett., 12(5):2504–2508, 2012

    Giuliana Di Martino, Yannick Sonnefraud, St´ ephane K´ ena-Cohen, Mark Tame, Sahin K Ozdemir, MS Kim, and Stefan A Maier. Quantum statistics of surface plas- mon polaritons in metallic stripe waveguides.Nano Lett., 12(5):2504–2508, 2012. URLhttps://pubs.acs.org/ doi/10.1021/nl300671w#

    work page doi:10.1021/nl300671w 2012

  45. [45]

    Experi- mental realization of quantum illumination.Physical Re- view Letters, 110(15):153603, 2013

    ED Lopaeva, Ivano Ruo Berchera, Ivo Pietro Degiovanni, S Olivares, Giorgio Brida, and Marco Genovese. Experi- mental realization of quantum illumination.Physical Re- view Letters, 110(15):153603, 2013

    work page 2013

  46. [46]

    Detector im- perfections in photon-pair source characterization.Jour- nal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 45(12):124016, 2012

    Pavel Sekatski, N Sangouard, F´ elix Bussieres, Christoph Clausen, Nicolas Gisin, and Hugo Zbinden. Detector im- perfections in photon-pair source characterization.Jour- nal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 45(12):124016, 2012

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    On intelligent spin states.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 17(11): 1963–1971, 1976

    C Aragone, E Chalbaud, and S Salamo. On intelligent spin states.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 17(11): 1963–1971, 1976

    work page 1963

  48. [48]

    J. J. Sakurai.Advanced Quantum Mechanics. Addison- Wesley, Reading, MA, 1967

    work page 1967

  49. [49]

    Gener- alised p-representations in quantum optics.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 13(7):2353, 1980

    Peter D Drummond and Crispin W Gardiner. Gener- alised p-representations in quantum optics.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 13(7):2353, 1980

    work page 1980

  50. [50]

    Nonclassicality filters and quasiprobabilities.Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecu- lar, and Optical Physics, 82(3):032107, 2010

    T Kiesel and W Vogel. Nonclassicality filters and quasiprobabilities.Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecu- lar, and Optical Physics, 82(3):032107, 2010

    work page 2010

  51. [51]

    Many-particle entanglement with bose–einstein condensates.Nature, 409(6816):63–66, 2001

    Anders Sørensen, L-M Duan, J Ignacio Cirac, and Peter Zoller. Many-particle entanglement with bose–einstein condensates.Nature, 409(6816):63–66, 2001

    work page 2001

  52. [52]

    Inseparability criterion for continuous vari- able systems.Physical review letters, 84(12):2722, 2000

    Lu-Ming Duan, G´ eza Giedke, Juan Ignacio Cirac, and Peter Zoller. Inseparability criterion for continuous vari- able systems.Physical review letters, 84(12):2722, 2000

    work page 2000

  53. [53]

    Single-and two-mode quantumness at a beam splitter.Physical Re- view A, 91(6):062315, 2015

    Matteo Brunelli, Claudia Benedetti, Stefano Olivares, Alessandro Ferraro, and Matteo GA Paris. Single-and two-mode quantumness at a beam splitter.Physical Re- view A, 91(6):062315, 2015

    work page 2015

  54. [54]

    Optical coherence and quantum optics

    Leonard Mandel and Emil Wolf. Optical coherence and quantum optics. 1995

    work page 1995

  55. [55]

    Louisell.Quantum Statistical Properties of Radiation

    William H. Louisell.Quantum Statistical Properties of Radiation. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1973. ISBN 0471547859

    work page 1973

  56. [56]

    Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field.Physical Review, 131(6):2766, 1963

    Roy J Glauber. Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field.Physical Review, 131(6):2766, 1963

    work page 1963

  57. [57]

    Reducing g (2)(0) of a parametric down-conversion source via photon-number resolution with superconducting nanowire detectors.Op- tics Express, 30(2):3138–3147, 2022

    S Sempere-Llagostera, GS Thekkadath, RB Patel, WS Kolthammer, and IA Walmsley. Reducing g (2)(0) of a parametric down-conversion source via photon-number resolution with superconducting nanowire detectors.Op- tics Express, 30(2):3138–3147, 2022

    work page 2022

  58. [58]

    Measurement of photon number statistics using photon-number resolving detectors

    Nicholas Low, Sai Sreesh Venuturumilli, and Michal Ba- jcsy. Measurement of photon number statistics using photon-number resolving detectors. InPhotonics for Quantum 2025, volume 13563, pages 161–165. SPIE, 2025

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    Quantum illumination with gaus- sian states.Physical review letters, 101(25):253601, 2008

    Si-Hui Tan, Baris I Erkmen, Vittorio Giovannetti, Saikat Guha, Seth Lloyd, Lorenzo Maccone, Stefano Pirandola, and Jeffrey H Shapiro. Quantum illumination with gaus- sian states.Physical review letters, 101(25):253601, 2008

    work page 2008

  60. [60]

    Demonstration of quadrature-squeezed surface plasmons in a gold waveguide.Phys

    Alexander Huck, Stephan Smolka, Peter Lodahl, Anders S Sørensen, Alexandra Boltasseva, Jiri Janousek, and Ulrik L Andersen. Demonstration of quadrature-squeezed surface plasmons in a gold waveguide.Phys. Rev. Lett., 102(24):246802, 2009. URL https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.102.246802

    work page 2009

  61. [61]

    Quantum plas- monics.Nat

    Mark S Tame, KR McEnery, S ¸K ¨Ozdemir, Jinhyoung Lee, Stefan A Maier, and MS Kim. Quantum plas- monics.Nat. Phys., 9(6):329–340, 2013. URLhttps: //www.nature.com/articles/nphys2615

    work page 2013

  62. [62]

    Manipulating the quantum state of an electrical circuit.Science, 296(5569):886–889, 2002

    Denis Vion, A Aassime, Audrey Cottet, Pl Joyez, H Pothier, C Urbina, Daniel Esteve, and Michel H De- voret. Manipulating the quantum state of an electrical circuit.Science, 296(5569):886–889, 2002

    work page 2002

  63. [63]

    Circuit quantum electrodynamics.Re- views of Modern Physics, 93(2):025005, 2021

    Alexandre Blais, Arne L Grimsmo, Steven M Girvin, and Andreas Wallraff. Circuit quantum electrodynamics.Re- views of Modern Physics, 93(2):025005, 2021

    work page 2021

  64. [64]

    Joseph- son photonics with simultaneous resonances.Physical Review B, 104(15):155424, 2021

    Kieran Wood, Andrew D Armour, and Ben Lang. Joseph- son photonics with simultaneous resonances.Physical Review B, 104(15):155424, 2021

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    Tunneling of cooper pairs across voltage-biased asymmetric single-cooper-pair transistors.Physical Re- view B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 74(5): 054504, 2006

    J Lepp¨ akangas, E Thuneberg, R Lindell, and P Hako- nen. Tunneling of cooper pairs across voltage-biased asymmetric single-cooper-pair transistors.Physical Re- view B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 74(5): 054504, 2006

    work page 2006

  66. [66]

    Antibunched photons from inelastic cooper- pair tunneling.Physical Review Letters, 115(2):027004, 2015

    Juha Lepp¨ akangas, Mikael Fogelstr¨ om, Alexander Grimm, Max Hofheinz, Michael Marthaler, and G¨ oran Johansson. Antibunched photons from inelastic cooper- pair tunneling.Physical Review Letters, 115(2):027004, 2015

    work page 2015

  67. [67]

    Spin squeezing of atomic ensembles by multicolor quan- tum nondemolition measurements.Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 79(2): 023831, 2009

    M Saffman, D Oblak, J Appel, and ES Polzik. Spin squeezing of atomic ensembles by multicolor quan- tum nondemolition measurements.Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 79(2): 023831, 2009

    work page 2009

  68. [68]

    Optical and atomic decoherence in quantum nondemolition measurement induced atomic ensemble entanglement.A VS Quantum Sci., 5(3):035003, Sep 2023

    Shuai Gao, Shuang Li, Manish Chaudhary, Matthew Prest, Ebubechukwu O Ilo-Okeke, Valentin Ivannikov, and Tim Byrnes. Optical and atomic decoherence in quantum nondemolition measurement induced atomic ensemble entanglement.A VS Quantum Sci., 5(3):035003, Sep 2023. doi:10.1116/5.0168590. 15

    work page doi:10.1116/5.0168590 2023

  69. [69]

    PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2011

    Monika Helene Schleier-Smith.Cavity-enabled spin squeezing for a quantum-enhanced atomic clock. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2011

    work page 2011

  70. [70]

    Quantum interface between light and atomic en- sembles.Reviews of Modern Physics, 82(2):1041–1093, 2010

    Klemens Hammerer, Anders S Sørensen, and Eugene S Polzik. Quantum interface between light and atomic en- sembles.Reviews of Modern Physics, 82(2):1041–1093, 2010

    work page 2010

  71. [71]

    You, and Xiang Zhang

    Ming Xue, Zheshen Zhang, Xu Zou, Bin Fang, Ziyu Chen, L. You, and Xiang Zhang. Control- ling atomic spin mixing via multiphoton transi- tions in a cavity.Phys. Rev. A, 106:033708, Sep

    work page

  72. [72]

    URL https://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/ PhysRevA.106.033708

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.106.033708. URL https://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/ PhysRevA.106.033708

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.106.033708

  73. [73]

    Op- tomechanical entanglement between a movable mirror and a cavity field.Phys

    David Vitali, Sylvain Gigan, Anderson Ferreira, HR B¨ ohm, Paolo Tombesi, Ariel Guerreiro, Vlatko Ve- dral, Anton Zeilinger, and Markus Aspelmeyer. Op- tomechanical entanglement between a movable mirror and a cavity field.Phys. Rev. Lett., 98(3):030405,

    work page

  74. [74]

    URLhttps://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.030405

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.030405

  75. [75]

    Genes, A

    C. Genes, A. Mari, P. Tombesi, and D. Vitali. Ro- bust entanglement of a micromechanical resonator with output optical fields.Phys. Rev. A, 78:032316, Sep

    work page

  76. [76]

    URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.032316

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.78.032316. URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.032316

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.78.032316

  77. [77]

    General linearized theory of quantum fluctuations around arbitrary limit cycles

    Carlos Navarrete-Benlloch, Talitha Weiss, Stefan Walter, and Germ´ an J de Valc´ arcel. General linearized theory of quantum fluctuations around arbitrary limit cycles. Physical Review Letters, 119(13):133601, 2017

    work page 2017

  78. [78]

    Cavity optomechanics.Reviews of Modern Physics, 86(4):1391–1452, 2014

    Markus Aspelmeyer, Tobias J Kippenberg, and Florian Marquardt. Cavity optomechanics.Reviews of Modern Physics, 86(4):1391–1452, 2014

    work page 2014

  79. [79]

    Entan- glement and the phase transition in single-mode super- radiance.Physical Review Letters, 92(7):073602, 2004

    Neill Lambert, Clive Emary, and Tobias Brandes. Entan- glement and the phase transition in single-mode super- radiance.Physical Review Letters, 92(7):073602, 2004

    work page 2004

  80. [80]

    Entanglement and entropy in a spin-boson quantum phase transition.Phys- ical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 71(5):053804, 2005

    N Lambert, C Emary, and T Brandes. Entanglement and entropy in a spin-boson quantum phase transition.Phys- ical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 71(5):053804, 2005

    work page 2005

Showing first 80 references.