Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 1 cited by

Certain notions of almost i.i.d. structure allow protocols to match exact i.i.d. asymptotic rates and error exponents in three quantum tasks.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-07-01 07:18 UTC pith:DBP43JRK

load-bearing objection The paper defines three almost-i.i.d. notions and club distance, then shows some of them still let universal protocols hit the usual rates for hypothesis testing, compression, and channel coding.

arxiv 2605.18726 v2 pith:DBP43JRK submitted 2026-05-18 quant-ph math-phmath.MP

Quantum Shannon theory made robust: a tale of three protocols for almost i.i.d. sources

classification quant-ph math-phmath.MP
keywords quantum Shannon theoryalmost i.i.d. sourceshypothesis testingdata compressionquantum channelsrobust protocolsasymptotic rateserror exponents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks which definitions of nearly independent and identically distributed quantum resources still let standard information protocols work as well as they do under exact i.i.d. assumptions. It focuses on asymmetric hypothesis testing, classical and quantum data compression, and sending classical information through quantum channels. Rather than tailoring fixes to known defects, the authors look for protocols that stay optimal and work across wide families of almost i.i.d. resources even when the exact deviations remain unknown. They compare three different notions of almost i.i.d. behavior and identify which ones keep the predicted rates and exponents intact.

Core claim

For two of the three notions of almost i.i.d. structure, there exist protocols for asymmetric hypothesis testing, data compression, and classical communication over quantum channels that achieve exactly the same asymptotic rates and error exponents as the i.i.d. theory, and these protocols are universal in the sense that they do not require knowledge of the precise perturbation.

What carries the argument

Three inequivalent notions of almost i.i.d. structure together with the club distance on quantum channels, which together determine which definitions permit asymptotically optimal universal protocols.

Load-bearing premise

That there exist robust protocols that remain asymptotically optimal and universal within a broad class of almost i.i.d. resources whose precise deviations from the ideal regime are unknown.

What would settle it

An explicit almost i.i.d. source belonging to one of the three notions for which every protocol either fails to achieve the i.i.d. rate or requires knowledge of the specific deviation to reach it.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Protocols designed for the preserved notions of almost i.i.d. structure achieve the same rates without any compensation for specific defects.
  • The club distance identifies channel perturbations that leave communication rates unchanged.
  • Almost i.i.d. processes can be used to model realistic resources while retaining standard Shannon-theoretic predictions.
  • Universal protocols exist that work across entire classes of almost i.i.d. resources for the three tasks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Experimental tests could check whether real quantum sources satisfy the notions that preserve the rates.
  • The same robustness question could be asked for other quantum tasks such as entanglement distillation.
  • Protocol design might prioritize the notions of almost i.i.d. that survive the analysis rather than assuming exact independence.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper investigates robustness of asymptotic rates and error exponents in quantum Shannon theory under deviations from exact i.i.d. structure. It defines three inequivalent notions of almost i.i.d. resources, introduces the almost i.i.d. process and the club distance on channels, and determines which of these notions admit robust, universal protocols (without knowledge of the precise deviation) that recover the i.i.d. predictions for asymmetric hypothesis testing, data compression, and classical communication over quantum channels.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work meaningfully extends the practical reach of quantum information theory by identifying which almost-i.i.d. relaxations preserve the standard asymptotic results. The new notions of almost i.i.d. process and club distance are potentially reusable tools for analyzing stability under local perturbations; the explicit determination across three canonical tasks supplies concrete guidance for protocol design in non-ideal settings.

minor comments (2)
  1. A compact table or diagram early in the paper that maps each of the three notions to the three tasks (indicating which preserve rates/exponents) would improve readability and allow quick reference to the main results.
  2. The abstract states that the three notions are inequivalent but does not name or briefly characterize them; adding one sentence of clarification would help readers before they reach the technical definitions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful summary of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The referee's description of the central claims, the new notions introduced, and the scope across three tasks is accurate. No major comments appear in the report, so we have no point-by-point responses to provide.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper defines three inequivalent notions of almost i.i.d. structure, introduces the almost i.i.d. process and club distance as new mathematical objects, and then proves which of these notions allow protocols that preserve i.i.d. asymptotic rates and exponents for the listed tasks. These are standard mathematical definitions followed by proofs of their properties; the results do not reduce to self-definition, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The central claims are derived from the introduced definitions rather than being tautological by construction. The provided abstract and structure show a self-contained theoretical analysis with no exhibited circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 2 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, no free parameters are mentioned. The paper introduces two new concepts treated here as invented entities.

invented entities (2)
  • almost i.i.d. process no independent evidence
    purpose: To define a class of sources that are close to but not exactly i.i.d. for studying robust protocols
    New notion introduced to capture almost i.i.d. structure.
  • club distance no independent evidence
    purpose: New distance measure between quantum channels designed to capture stability under local perturbations
    Explicitly introduced as a new distance measure.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5845 in / 1225 out tokens · 48328 ms · 2026-07-01T07:18:53.588338+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The asymptotic rates of information-theoretic protocols - including error exponents, data-compression rates, and channel capacities - are traditionally derived under the idealised assumption that the underlying resources are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.). Somewhat surprisingly, even slight departures from the exact i.i.d. structure can drastically alter the asymptotic behaviour predicted by the i.i.d. theory. If the precise nature of the perturbation is known, for instance in the case of a pointwise defect, one can design a bespoke protocol that compensates for it, e.g. by discarding the corrupted subsystem. In realistic physical settings, however, exact i.i.d. behaviour cannot be guaranteed, and deviations from the ideal regime cannot generally be identified precisely. This raises a fundamental question: which notions of almost i.i.d. structure are sufficiently robust to preserve the asymptotic predictions of quantum Shannon theory? We investigate this question for three central information-theoretic tasks: asymmetric hypothesis testing, classical and quantum data compression, and classical communication through quantum channels. Rather than designing protocols tailored to specific defects, we seek robust protocols that remain asymptotically optimal and that are universal within a broad class of almost i.i.d. resources whose precise deviations from the ideal regime are unknown. To this end, we study three inequivalent notions of almost i.i.d. structure, and determine which of them preserve the asymptotic rates and error exponents predicted by the i.i.d. theory. Along the way, we introduce the notion of an almost i.i.d. process and a new distance measure between quantum channels - the club distance - designed to capture stability under local perturbations. These notions may be of independent interest.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18726 by Filippo Girardi, Giacomo De Palma, Ludovico Lami, Nilanjana Datta.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Three different notions of almost i.i.d. processes A pictorial representation of the hierarchical relation between the different notions of almost i.i.d.-ness. As discussed in [5], the Mazzola–Sutter–Renner notion is the strictest, the one derived from Wasserstein distance is the intermediate one, and, eventually, weak almost i.i.d.- ness is the broadest. The classical probability source (𝑝˜𝑛)𝑛 and the pur… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: From 𝑛 i.i.d. uses of a channel to an almost i.i.d. process. A common assumption when evaluating the transmission capabilities – namely, error prob￾ability and communication rate – of multiple uses of a given channel N is the possibility to access exact i.i.d. instances of the channel. As a consequence, coding theorems and strategies are intended for parallel uses of channels satisfying such idealised beha… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Almost i.i.d. hypothesis testing. The operational task of quantum hypothesis testing with almost i.i.d. states can be illustrate in two instances. Suppose either one or both the i.i.d. hypotheses 𝐻0 and 𝐻1 are replaced with almost i.i.d. hypotheses 𝐻˜ 0 and 𝐻˜ 1. The first question is the following: suppose we are aware of the nature of the defects for the individual sources 𝜌𝑛 and 𝜎𝑛; is it then possible … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Almost i.i.d. classical data compression. Let 𝑃 ∈ P(X) be a classical probability distribution. In the i.i.d. setting (a), the aim of data￾compression is to design a sequence of codes (E𝑛 , D𝑛) such that each sequence of symbols 𝑋 𝑛 = (𝑋1, . . . , 𝑋𝑛) gets compressed to a message 𝑚 ∈ [𝑀] with 𝑀 ≪ |X| 𝑛 ; then 𝑚 gets decompressed to the original sequence with vanishing error probability when 𝑋 𝑛 ∼ 𝑃 ×𝑛 . Su… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Almost i.i.d. quantum data compression. Let 𝜌 ∈ D(H𝐴) be a state. In the i.i.d. setting (a), a data compression code (E𝑛 , D𝑛) acts on the subsystem 𝐴 𝑛 of an arbitrary – possibly entangled – state Ψ𝐴𝑛𝑅 with marginal Tr𝑅 Ψ𝐴𝑛𝑅 = 𝜌 ⊗𝑛 by mapping it into a space K𝑛; then, for a good code, the decompressed state 𝜎𝐴𝑛𝑅 = [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Communicating with an almost i.i.d. channel and shared randomness. Let N be a quantum channel. The protocol constructed in the proof of Theorem 24 lever￾ages a sequence of codes (E𝑛 , D𝑛), which only depend on N and which make use of shared randomness between the sender and the receiver, in order to achieve 𝐶(N ) – i.e. the classical capacity of N – as a reliable communication rate when the sequence (N ⊗𝑛 … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Schematic interpretation of almost i.i.d. processes. Writing the definition of the club distance between an i.i.d. channel W×𝑛 and a non i.i.d. channel W˜ (𝑛) in terms of couplings as in (168), it is possible to interpret the transformation of a random input 𝑋 𝑛 to a random output 𝑌˜ induced by W˜ (𝑛) as a two step transformation of 𝑋 𝑛 : first, the i.i.d. channel W×𝑛 is applied to 𝑋 𝑛 , yielding a output … view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Robustness of Entanglement Manipulation for almost i.i.d. sources

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Robustness theorems establish that asymptotic entanglement manipulation rates for MSR almost i.i.d. sources equal those of their i.i.d. references, with universal protocols for pure states.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 91 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Security of Quantum Key Distribution

    R.Renner.Securityofquantumkeydistribution. PhDthesis,ETHZurich,2005. Preprint arXiv:quant-ph/0512258. 3, 16

  2. [2]

    F. G. S. L. Brandão and M. B. Plenio. A generalization of quantum Stein’s lemma. Commun. Math. Phys., 295(3):791–828, 2010. 3

  3. [3]

    L.Lami.AsolutionofthegeneralizedquantumStein’slemma.IEEETrans.Inf.Theory, 71(6):4454–4484, 2025. 3

  4. [4]

    Almost-iid information theory

    G. Mazzola, D. Sutter, and R. Renner. Almost-iid information theory.Preprint arXiv:2603.15792, 2026. 3, 15, 16, 27

  5. [5]

    Girardi, G

    F. Girardi, G. De Palma, and L. Lami. New approaches to almost i.i.d. information theory, 2026. 3, 14, 15, 22

  6. [6]

    H. Umegaki. Conditional expectation in an operator algebra. IV. Entropy and infor- mation.Kodai Math. Sem. Rep., 14(2):59–85, 1962. 6

  7. [7]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010

    M.A.NielsenandI.L.Chuang.QuantumComputationandQuantumInformation: 10th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010. 6

  8. [8]

    F.BuscemiandN.Datta.Thequantumcapacityofchannelswitharbitrarilycorrelated noise.IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 56(3):1447–1460, 2010. 7

  9. [9]

    Feinstein.A new basic theorem of information theory

    A. Feinstein.A new basic theorem of information theory. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Research Laboratory of Electronics, Cambridge, MA, 1954. Tech. Rep. No. 282. 7

  10. [10]

    Blackwell, L

    D. Blackwell, L. Breiman, and A. J. Thomasian. The capacity of a class of channels. Ann. Math. Statist., 30:1229–1241, 1959. 7

  11. [11]

    Verdu and T

    S. Verdu and T. S. Han. A general formula for channel capacity.IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 40(4):1147–1157, 1994. 7

  12. [12]

    Poor, and S

    Y.Polyanskiy, H.V. Poor, and S. Verdu. Channel coding rate in thefinite blocklength regime.IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 56(5):2307–2359, 2010. 7

  13. [13]

    T.OgawaandH.Nagaoka.Anewproofofthechannelcodingtheoremviahypothesis testing in quantum information theory. InProc. IEEE Int. Symp. Inf. Theory (ISIT), page 73, 2002. 7

  14. [14]

    Makinggoodcodesforclassical-quantumchannelcoding via quantum hypothesis testing.IEEE Trans

    T.OgawaandH.Nagaoka. Makinggoodcodesforclassical-quantumchannelcoding via quantum hypothesis testing.IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 53(6):2261–2266, 2007. 7

  15. [15]

    Simpleandtighterderivationofachievabilityforclassicalcommunica- tion over quantum channels

    H.-C.Cheng. Simpleandtighterderivationofachievabilityforclassicalcommunica- tion over quantum channels. 4(4):040330, 2023. 7 54

  16. [16]

    Hiai and D

    F. Hiai and D. Petz. The proper formula for relative entropy and its asymptotics in quantum probability.Comm. Math. Phys., 143(1):99–114, 1991. 7, 20, 27

  17. [17]

    T.OgawaandH.Nagaoka.StrongconverseandStein’slemmainquantumhypothesis testing.IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 46(7):2428–2433, 2000. 7, 20

  18. [18]

    C. E. Shannon. A mathematical theory of communication.The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3):379–423, 1948. 7, 8, 10

  19. [19]

    Schumacher

    B. Schumacher. Quantum coding.Phys. Rev. A, 51:2738–2747, 1995. 9

  20. [20]

    Schumacher and M

    B. Schumacher and M. D. Westmoreland. Sending classical information via noisy quantum channels.Phys. Rev. A, 56:131–138, 1997. 10

  21. [21]

    A. S. Holevo. The capacity of the quantum channel with general signal states.IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 44(1):269–273, 1998. 10

  22. [22]

    Asimplederivationofthecodingtheoremandsomeapplications.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 11(1):3–18, 1965

    R.Gallager. Asimplederivationofthecodingtheoremandsomeapplications.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 11(1):3–18, 1965. 10

  23. [23]

    Springer,

    RobertGGallager.Informationtheoryandreliablecommunication,volume588. Springer,

  24. [24]

    Lowerboundstoerrorprobability for coding on discrete memoryless channels

    C.E.Shannon,R.G.Gallager,andE.R.Berlekamp. Lowerboundstoerrorprobability for coding on discrete memoryless channels. I.Information and Control, 10(1):65–103,

  25. [25]

    Lowerboundstoerrorprobability forcodingondiscretememorylesschannels.II.InformationandControl,10(5):522–552,

    C.E.Shannon,R.G.Gallager,andE.R.Berlekamp. Lowerboundstoerrorprobability forcodingondiscretememorylesschannels.II.InformationandControl,10(5):522–552,

  26. [26]

    Villani.Optimal Transport: Old and New

    C. Villani.Optimal Transport: Old and New. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wis- senschaften. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008. 11

  27. [27]

    Imprimerieroyale,1781

    G.Monge.Mémoiresurlathéoriedesdéblaisetdesremblais. Imprimerieroyale,1781. 11

  28. [28]

    L. V. Kantorovich. On the translocation of masses.J. Math. Sci., 133(4), 2006. 11

  29. [29]

    D. S. Ornstein. An application of ergodic theory to probability theory.Ann. Probab., 1(1):43–58, 1973. 11

  30. [30]

    Gray.Entropy and Information Theory

    R.M. Gray.Entropy and Information Theory. Engineering. Springer US, 2011. 11

  31. [31]

    De Palma, M

    G. De Palma, M. Marvian, D. Trevisan, and S. Lloyd. The quantum Wasserstein distance of order 1.IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 67(10):6627–6643, 2021. 12, 13, 17, 18, 19

  32. [32]

    De Palma and D

    G. De Palma and D. Trevisan.Quantum Optimal Transport: Quantum Channels and Qubits, page 203–239. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. 12, 19 55

  33. [33]

    B. T. Kiani, G. De Palma, M. Marvian, Z.-W. Liu, and S. Lloyd. Learning quantum data with the quantum earth mover’s distance.Quantum Sci. Technol., 7(4):045002,

  34. [34]

    De Palma, M

    G. De Palma, M. Marvian, C. Rouzé, and D. Stilck França. Limitations of variational quantum algorithms: A quantum optimal transport approach.PRX Quantum, 4(1),

  35. [35]

    Quantum Differential Privacy: An Information Theory Perspective

    C. Hirche, C. Rouzé, and D. Stilck França. Quantum differential privacy: An infor- mation theory perspective.Preprint arXiv:2202.10717, 2023. 13

  36. [36]

    Quantumconcentrationinequalities.Ann.HenriPoincaré, 23(9):3391–3429, 2022

    G.DePalmaandC.Rouzé. Quantumconcentrationinequalities.Ann.HenriPoincaré, 23(9):3391–3429, 2022. 13

  37. [37]

    Quantumconcentrationinequalitiesandequivalence of the thermodynamical ensembles: An optimal mass transport approach.J

    G.DePalmaandD.Pastorello. Quantumconcentrationinequalitiesandequivalence of the thermodynamical ensembles: An optimal mass transport approach.J. Stat. Phys., 192(6), 2025. 13

  38. [38]

    De Palma, T

    G. De Palma, T. Klein, and D. Pastorello. Classical shadows meet quantum optimal mass transport.J. Math. Phys., 65(9), 2024. 13

  39. [39]

    Rouzé, D

    C. Rouzé, D. Stilck França, E. Onorati, and J. D. Watson. Efficient learning of ground and thermal states within phases of matter.Nat. Commun., 15(1), 2024. 13

  40. [40]

    Rouzé and D

    C. Rouzé and D. Stilck França. Learning quantum many-body systems from a few copies.Quantum, 8:1319, 2024. 13

  41. [41]

    Bardet, Á

    I. Bardet, Á. Capel, L. Gao, A. Lucia, D. Pérez-García, and C. Rouzé. Entropy decay for Davies semigroups of a one dimensional quantum lattice.Commun. Math. Phys., 405(2), 2024. 13

  42. [42]

    Kochanowski, Á

    J. Kochanowski, Á. M. Alhambra, Á. Capel, and C. Rouzé. Rapid thermalization of dissipativemany-bodydynamicsofcommutingHamiltonians.Commun.Math.Phys., 406(8), 2025. 13

  43. [43]

    & Tang, E.A Dobrushin condition for quantum Markov chains: Rapid mixing and conditional mutual information at high tempera- tureen

    A. Bakshi, A. Liu, A. Moitra, and E. Tang. A Dobrushin condition for quantum Markov chains: Rapid mixing and conditional mutual information at high tempera- ture.Preprint arXiv:2510.08542, 2025. 13

  44. [44]

    De Palma and D

    G. De Palma and D. Trevisan. The Wasserstein distance of order 1 for quantum spin systems on infinite lattices.Ann. Henri Poincaré, 24(12):4237–4282, 2023. 13

  45. [45]

    Symmetryoflargephysicalsystemsimpliesindependenceofsubsystems

    R.Renner. Symmetryoflargephysicalsystemsimpliesindependenceofsubsystems. Nat. Phys., 3(9):645–649, 2007. 16

  46. [46]

    Duvenhage and M

    R. Duvenhage and M. Mapaya. Quantum Wasserstein distance of order 1 between channels.Infin. Dimens. Anal. Quantum Probab. Relat. Top., 26(03), 2023. 17 56

  47. [47]

    Eric A Carlen and Jan Maas. An analog of the 2-Wasserstein metric in non- commutativeprobabilityunderwhichtheFermionicFokker–Planckequationisgra- dient flow for the entropy.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 331(3):887–926,

  48. [48]

    Gradient flow and entropy inequalities for quantum Markovsemigroupswithdetailedbalance.JournalofFunctionalAnalysis,273(5):1810– 1869, 2017

    Eric A Carlen and Jan Maas. Gradient flow and entropy inequalities for quantum Markovsemigroupswithdetailedbalance.JournalofFunctionalAnalysis,273(5):1810– 1869, 2017. 18

  49. [49]

    Non-commutative calculus, optimal transport and functional inequalities in dissipative quantum systems.Journal of Statistical Physics, 178(2):319–378, 2020

    Eric A Carlen and Jan Maas. Non-commutative calculus, optimal transport and functional inequalities in dissipative quantum systems.Journal of Statistical Physics, 178(2):319–378, 2020. 18

  50. [50]

    Concentration of quantum states from quan- tum functional and transportation cost inequalities.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 60(1):012202, 2019

    Cambyse Rouzé and Nilanjana Datta. Concentration of quantum states from quan- tum functional and transportation cost inequalities.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 60(1):012202, 2019. 18

  51. [51]

    Relating relative entropy, optimal transport andFisherinformation: AquantumHWIinequality.AnnalesHenriPoincaré,21:2115– 2150, 2020

    Nilanjana Datta and Cambyse Rouzé. Relating relative entropy, optimal transport andFisherinformation: AquantumHWIinequality.AnnalesHenriPoincaré,21:2115– 2150, 2020. 18

  52. [52]

    Geometrical Bounds of the Irreversibility in Markovian Systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.02871, 2020

    Tan Van Vu and Yoshihiko Hasegawa. Geometrical Bounds of the Irreversibility in Markovian Systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.02871, 2020. 18

  53. [53]

    The conditional Entropy Power Inequality for quantumadditivenoisechannels.JournalofMathematicalPhysics,59(12):122201,2018

    Giacomo De Palma and Stefan Huber. The conditional Entropy Power Inequality for quantumadditivenoisechannels.JournalofMathematicalPhysics,59(12):122201,2018. 18

  54. [54]

    Fisherinformationandlogarithmic sobolev inequality for matrix-valued functions.Annales Henri Poincaré, 21(11):3409– 3478, 2020

    LiGao,MariusJunge,andNicholasLaRacuente. Fisherinformationandlogarithmic sobolev inequality for matrix-valued functions.Annales Henri Poincaré, 21(11):3409– 3478, 2020. 18

  55. [55]

    Matricial Wasserstein-1 distance.IEEE control systems letters, 1(1):14–19, 2017

    YongxinChen,TryphonTGeorgiou,LipengNing,andAllenTannenbaum. Matricial Wasserstein-1 distance.IEEE control systems letters, 1(1):14–19, 2017. 19

  56. [56]

    Vector and matrix op- timal mass transport: theory, algorithm, and applications.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 40(5):A3675–A3698, 2018

    Ernest K Ryu, Yongxin Chen, Wuchen Li, and Stanley Osher. Vector and matrix op- timal mass transport: theory, algorithm, and applications.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 40(5):A3675–A3698, 2018. 19

  57. [57]

    Matrix optimal mass transport: a quantum mechanical approach.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 63(8):2612–2619, 2018

    Yongxin Chen, Tryphon T Georgiou, and Allen Tannenbaum. Matrix optimal mass transport: a quantum mechanical approach.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 63(8):2612–2619, 2018. 19

  58. [58]

    Wasserstein geometry of quantum states and optimal transport of matrix-valued measures

    Yongxin Chen, Tryphon T Georgiou, and Allen Tannenbaum. Wasserstein geometry of quantum states and optimal transport of matrix-valued measures. InEmerging Applications of Control and Systems Theory, pages 139–150. Springer, 2018. 19 57

  59. [59]

    JuliánAgredo.AWasserstein-typedistancetomeasuredeviationfromequilibriumof quantumMarkovsemigroups.OpenSystems&InformationDynamics,20(02):1350009,

  60. [60]

    On exponential convergence of generic quantum Markov semigroups in a Wasserstein-type distance.International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 107(4):909–925, 2016

    J Agredo. On exponential convergence of generic quantum Markov semigroups in a Wasserstein-type distance.International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 107(4):909–925, 2016. 19

  61. [61]

    Foundationofquantumoptimaltransportandapplications.Quantum Information Processing, 19(1):25, 2020

    KazukiIkeda. Foundationofquantumoptimaltransportandapplications.Quantum Information Processing, 19(1):25, 2020. 19

  62. [62]

    On the mean field and classical limitsofquantummechanics.CommunicationsinMathematicalPhysics,343(1):165–205,

    François Golse, Clément Mouhot, and Thierry Paul. On the mean field and classical limitsofquantummechanics.CommunicationsinMathematicalPhysics,343(1):165–205,

  63. [63]

    Towards optimal transport for quantum densities

    Emanuele Caglioti, François Golse, and Thierry Paul. Towards optimal transport for quantum densities. preprint, Dec 2018. 19

  64. [64]

    François Golse. The quantum N-body problem in the mean-field and semiclassical regime.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2118):20170229, 2018. 19

  65. [65]

    The Schrödinger equation in the mean-field and semiclassical regime.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 223(1):57–94, 2017

    François Golse and Thierry Paul. The Schrödinger equation in the mean-field and semiclassical regime.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 223(1):57–94, 2017. 19

  66. [66]

    Wave packets and the quadratic Monge– Kantorovich distance in quantum mechanics.Comptes Rendus Mathematique, 356(2):177–197, 2018

    François Golse and Thierry Paul. Wave packets and the quadratic Monge– Kantorovich distance in quantum mechanics.Comptes Rendus Mathematique, 356(2):177–197, 2018. 19

  67. [67]

    Quantum Optimal Transport is Cheaper.Journal of Statistical Physics, 2020

    Emanuele Caglioti, François Golse, and Thierry Paul. Quantum Optimal Transport is Cheaper.Journal of Statistical Physics, 2020. 19

  68. [68]

    Quantum monge-kantorovichproblemandtransportdistancebetweendensitymatrices.Phys- ical Review Letters, 129(11), 2022

    Shmuel Friedland, Michał Eckstein, Sam Cole, and Karol Życzkowski. Quantum monge-kantorovichproblemandtransportdistancebetweendensitymatrices.Phys- ical Review Letters, 129(11), 2022. 19

  69. [69]

    Strongkantorovich duality for quantum optimal transport with generic cost and optimal couplings on quantum bits, 2026

    GergelyBunth,JózsefPitrik,TamásTitkos,andDánielVirosztek. Strongkantorovich duality for quantum optimal transport with generic cost and optimal couplings on quantum bits, 2026. 19

  70. [70]

    Quantum wasserstein generative adversarial networks

    Shouvanik Chakrabarti, Huang Yiming, Tongyang Li, Soheil Feizi, and Xiaodi Wu. Quantum wasserstein generative adversarial networks. InAdvances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems, pages 6781–6792, 2019. 19

  71. [71]

    Quantum optimal transport with quantum channels.Annales Henri Poincaré, 22(10):3199–3234, 2021

    Giacomo De Palma and Dario Trevisan. Quantum optimal transport with quantum channels.Annales Henri Poincaré, 22(10):3199–3234, 2021. 19 58

  72. [72]

    Wasserstein dis- tances and divergences of order𝑝by quantum channels, 2026

    Gergely Bunth, József Pitrik, Tamás Titkos, and Dániel Virosztek. Wasserstein dis- tances and divergences of order𝑝by quantum channels, 2026. 19

  73. [73]

    Metricpropertyof quantum wasserstein divergences.Physical Review A, 110(2), August 2024

    GergelyBunth, JózsefPitrik, TamásTitkos, andDánielVirosztek. Metricpropertyof quantum wasserstein divergences.Physical Review A, 110(2), August 2024. 19

  74. [74]

    Triangle inequality for a quantum wasserstein divergence, 2025

    Melchior Wirth. Triangle inequality for a quantum wasserstein divergence, 2025. 19

  75. [75]

    Balance between quantum Markov semi- groups.Annales Henri Poincaré, 19(6):1747–1786, 2018

    Rocco Duvenhage and Machiel Snyman. Balance between quantum Markov semi- groups.Annales Henri Poincaré, 19(6):1747–1786, 2018. 19

  76. [76]

    On quantum versions of the classical Wasserstein distance.Stochastics, 89(6-7):910–922, 2017

    J Agredo and Franco Fagnola. On quantum versions of the classical Wasserstein distance.Stochastics, 89(6-7):910–922, 2017. 19

  77. [77]

    The Monge distance between quan- tum states.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 31(45):9095, 1998

    Karol Zyczkowski and Wojeciech Slomczynski. The Monge distance between quan- tum states.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 31(45):9095, 1998. 19

  78. [78]

    The Monge metric on the sphere and geometryofquantumstates.JournalofPhysicsA:MathematicalandGeneral,34(34):6689,

    Karol Zyczkowski and Wojciech Slomczynski. The Monge metric on the sphere and geometryofquantumstates.JournalofPhysicsA:MathematicalandGeneral,34(34):6689,

  79. [79]

    Cambridge University Press, 2017

    Ingemar Bengtsson and Karol Życzkowski.Geometry of Quantum States: An Introduc- tion to Quantum Entanglement. Cambridge University Press, 2017. 19

  80. [80]

    J. Maas, S. Rademacher, T. Titkos, and D. Virosztek.Optimal Transport on Quantum Structures. Bolyai Society Mathematical Studies. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. 19

Showing first 80 references.