pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21702 · v2 · pith:652H52FBnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas· cond-mat.stat-mech· cond-mat.str-el· hep-ex

Journey in quantum metrology and sensing from foundations to applications: a review

Priya Ghosh , Tanoy Kanti Konar , Debraj Rakshit , Aditi Sen De , Ujjwal Sen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 17:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elhep-ex
keywords quantum metrologyquantum sensingparameter estimationquantum Fisher informationatomic clocksquantum imagingquantum error correctionreservoir engineering
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum metrology reviews both frequentist and Bayesian estimation across unitary, noisy, and indefinite-causal-order channels for applications from atomic clocks to quantum imaging.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper assembles a broad survey of quantum metrology and sensing that begins with parameter-estimation foundations and extends through practical platforms. It treats single- and multi-parameter problems under both frequentist and Bayesian statistics. The survey examines how parameters are encoded in unitary evolution, noisy channels, thermometry, and indefinite causal order, then reviews correction and engineering techniques that protect or enhance those encodings. It also shows how the quantum Fisher information identifies useful resources and catalogs concrete uses in many-body systems, atomic ensembles, continuous-variable setups, imaging, illumination, clocks, interferometry, and laboratory realizations.

Core claim

A review of quantum metrology and sensing that systematically covers frequentist and Bayesian approaches to single- and multiparameter estimation, estimation under unitary and noisy channels, quantum thermometry, channels with indefinite causal order, quantum-error-correction-aided and reservoir-engineering strategies, the role of quantum Fisher information in resource detection, and applications ranging from quantum many-body sensors and atomic ensembles through atom-photon and continuous-variable systems to quantum imaging, quantum illumination, atomic clocks, atom interferometry, and experimental demonstrations on multiple physical platforms.

What carries the argument

Quantum Fisher information, used to quantify and detect resources that improve estimation precision beyond classical limits.

If this is right

  • Quantum resources remain advantageous for parameter estimation even when the encoding channel is noisy rather than purely unitary.
  • Quantum error correction and reservoir engineering can be combined with standard metrology protocols to maintain precision in the presence of decoherence.
  • The quantum Fisher information supplies a practical diagnostic for identifying which states and operations function as metrological resources.
  • Applications already reach laboratory demonstrations in atomic clocks, atom interferometers, and quantum imagers across several hardware platforms.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same estimation framework could be used to compare the performance of different physical platforms for a single sensing task.
  • Indefinite causal order might be tested as an additional resource in existing atomic-ensemble or continuous-variable sensors.
  • The review's separation of theoretical strategies from experimental platforms suggests a natural next step: quantitative benchmarks that map each strategy onto achievable precision in a given hardware.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen topics and cited works together give a balanced and reasonably complete picture of the field at the time of writing.

What would settle it

Identification of a substantial recent advance in one of the listed areas (for example, a new error-correction protocol for thermometry or an unmentioned experimental platform) that is entirely absent from the review would falsify the claim of comprehensive coverage.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21702 by Aditi Sen De, Debraj Rakshit, Priya Ghosh, Tanoy Kanti Konar, Ujjwal Sen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. A cartoon illustration of the general idea behind a sensing protocol. Imagine Alice entering her first day of school with a completely [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Nonlinear-enhanced frequency estimation [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Schematic of thermometry protocols discussed in Ref. [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) A model-independent schematic representation of a quantum thermal machine operating as a thermometer. The temperature of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. A schematic illustration of the key distinction between def [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Schematic representation of various metrological strate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Illustration of a private distributed quantum sensing net [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Measurement noise susceptibility in quantum estimation [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Time dependence of the QFI at the critical point of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Quantum imaging from a quantum metrology perspec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Quantum illumination: QFI-based enhancement of detec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. (a) A simplified optical layout of the squeezed-light enhanced gravitational wave detector GEO 600, which consists of the conventional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. A schematic illustration of a frequency-estimation proto [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p056_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Multiparameter sensing using a single NV centre [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p057_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a review on quantum metrology and sensing, from its foundations to current applications. Highlights of the review include consideration of both frequentist and Bayesian approaches to parameter estimation; single as well as multiparameter estimation; estimation for different encoding processes comprising unitary as well as noisy channels, quantum thermometry, and channels involving indefinite causal order; different estimation strategies incorporating also recent advances like quantum error correction-aided methods and reservoir engineering; usefulness of quantum Fisher information to detect resources; applications of quantum metrology in diverse arenas covering quantum many-body sensors, sensing protocols in atomic ensembles, atom-photon systems, and continuous-variable systems, quantum imaging, quantum illumination, atomic clocks and atom interferometry, etc; and experimental realizations of quantum sensors in different physical platforms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review article surveying quantum metrology and sensing from foundations to applications. It addresses frequentist and Bayesian parameter estimation approaches, single- and multiparameter estimation, encoding via unitary and noisy channels (including quantum thermometry and indefinite causal order), estimation strategies incorporating quantum error correction and reservoir engineering, the role of quantum Fisher information as a resource witness, applications across quantum many-body sensors, atomic ensembles, atom-photon and continuous-variable systems, quantum imaging, quantum illumination, atomic clocks, and atom interferometry, as well as experimental realizations on multiple physical platforms.

Significance. A well-executed review synthesizing these topics would be significant for the quantum information community by providing a consolidated reference that connects disparate methods and highlights recent advances such as QEC-aided sensing and reservoir engineering.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract ends with 'etc.'; the main text should explicitly delineate the full scope of covered applications to avoid any appearance of selective emphasis.
  2. Ensure consistent formatting of section headings and citation style throughout, particularly when transitioning between theoretical foundations and experimental sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the manuscript and the recommendation to accept. The summary provided accurately captures the scope and structure of the review.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper with no original derivations or predictions

full rationale

This is a review article whose abstract and scope explicitly describe a literature synthesis across frequentist/Bayesian methods, single/multiparameter estimation, unitary/noisy channels, QEC, reservoir engineering, QFI applications, and multiple experimental domains. No equations, derivations, parameter fits, or quantitative predictions are asserted by the authors themselves. All technical content is attributed to external citations. Consequently, no load-bearing step reduces to a self-definition, fitted input, or self-citation chain within the paper. The only relevant risk is coverage balance, which is outside the circularity analysis.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review paper the manuscript introduces no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all content is drawn from the prior literature being summarized.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5683 in / 1256 out tokens · 38341 ms · 2026-06-30T17:07:37.948386+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Modular non-Hermitian topology and its application to critical sensing

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Modular non-Hermitian systems enrich skin effect and bulk-boundary breakdown while enhancing sensing performance near spectral topological phase transitions, including multi-parameter cases.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

298 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Y . Chu, Y . Liu, H. Liu, and J. Cai, Quantum sensing with a single-qubit pseudo-hermitian system, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 020501 (2020)

    2020

  2. [2]

    J. Wiersig, Enhancing the sensitivity of frequency and en- ergy splitting detection by using exceptional points: Appli- cation to microcavity sensors for single-particle detection, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 203901 (2014)

    2014

  3. [3]

    Djorwe, Y

    P. Djorwe, Y . Pennec, and B. Djafari-Rouhani, Exceptional point enhances sensitivity of optomechanical mass sensors, Phys. Rev. Appl.12, 024002 (2019)

    2019

  4. [4]

    Hodaei, A

    H. Hodaei, A. U. Hassan, S. Wittek, H. Garcia-Gracia, R. El- Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, En- hanced sensitivity at higher-order exceptional points, Nature 548, 187 (2017)

    2017

  5. [5]

    Am-Shallem, R

    M. Am-Shallem, R. Kosloff, and N. Moiseyev, Exceptional points for parameter estimation in open quantum systems: analysis of the bloch equations, New Journal of Physics17, 113036 (2015)

    2015

  6. [6]

    Naghiloo, M

    M. Naghiloo, M. Abbasi, Y . N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Quantum state tomography across the exceptional point in a single dissipative qubit, Nature Physics15, 1232 (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    W. Ding, X. Wang, and S. Chen, Fundamental sensitivity lim- its for non-hermitian quantum sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 160801 (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    Fundamental Limits of Non-Hermitian Sensing from Quantum Fisher Information

    J. Wiersig and S. Rotter, Fundamental limits of non- hermitian sensing from quantum fisher information (2026), arXiv:2603.10614 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  9. [9]

    J. C. Budich and E. J. Bergholtz, Non-hermitian topological sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 180403 (2020)

    2020

  10. [10]

    L. Bao, B. Qi, and D. Dong, Exponentially enhanced quan- tum non-hermitian sensing via optimized coherent drive, Phys. Rev. Appl.17, 014034 (2022)

    2022

  11. [11]

    Sarkar, F

    S. Sarkar, F. Ciccarello, A. Carollo, and A. Bayat, Critical non-Hermitian topology induced quantum sensing, New J. Phys.26, 073010 (2024)

    2024

  12. [12]

    K. D. Agarwal, T. K. Konar, L. G. C. Lakkaraju, and A. S. De, Quantum-enhanced sensing from the inter- play of long-range interactions and non-hermiticity (2026), arXiv:2605.01912 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  13. [13]

    Koch and J

    F. Koch and J. C. Budich, Quantum non-hermitian topologi- cal sensors, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 013113 (2022)

    2022

  14. [14]

    Z. Guo, Z. Guo, T. Zhang, J. Song, H. Jiang, H. Chen, and H. Chen, Sensitivity of topological edge states in a non- Hermitian dimer chain, Photonics Res.9, 574 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    J. Kim, T. Ha, D. Kim, D. Lee, K.-S. Lee, J. Won, Y . Moon, and M. Lee, Third-order exceptional point in an ion–cavity system, Appl. Phys. Lett.123, 161104 (2023)

    2023

  16. [16]

    L. Xiao, Y . Chu, Q. Lin, H. Lin, W. Yi, J. Cai, and P. Xue, Non-hermitian sensing in the absence of exceptional points, 81 Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 180801 (2024)

    2024

  17. [17]

    X. Yu, X. Zhao, L. Li, X.-M. Hu, X. Duan, H. Yuan, and C. Zhang, Toward Heisenberg scaling in non-Hermitian metrology at the quantum regime, Sci. Adv.10, 10.1126/sci- adv.adk7616 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1126/sci- 2024

  18. [18]

    Parto, C

    M. Parto, C. Leefmans, J. Williams, R. M. Gray, and A. Marandi, Enhanced sensitivity via non-Hermitian topol- ogy, Light Sci. Appl.14, 1 (2025)

    2025

  19. [19]

    Wu, Y .-H

    Q.-C. Wu, Y .-H. Zhou, T. Liu, Y .-H. Kang, Q.-P. Su, and C.-P. Yang, Enhanced quantum sensing in time-modulated non-hermitian systems, Chinese Journal of Physics98, 1116–1129 (2025)

    2025

  20. [20]

    P.-R. Han, F. Wu, X.-J. Huang, H.-Z. Wu, C.-L. Zou, W. Yi, M. Zhang, H. Li, K. Xu, D. Zheng, H. Fan, J. Wen, Z.- B. Yang, and S.-B. Zheng, Enhancement of Sensitivity Near Exceptional Points in Dissipative Qubit-Resonator Systems, Adv. Quantum Technol.n/a, 2400446 (2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    Clavero-Rubio, T

    M. Clavero-Rubio, T. Ramos, and D. Porras, Vibrational parametric arrays with trapped ions: non-hermitian topolog- ical phases and quantum sensing, arXiv:2502.06960 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Y . L. Liuet al., Metrology with pt-symmetric cavities: En- hanced sensitivity near the pt-phase transition, Physical Re- view Letters117, 110802 (2016)

    2016

  23. [23]

    Hodaeiet al., Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order excep- tional points, Nature548, 187 (2017)

    H. Hodaeiet al., Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order excep- tional points, Nature548, 187 (2017)

    2017

  24. [24]

    W. Chen, S. K. Ozdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang, Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity, Nature548, 192 (2017)

    2017

  25. [25]

    Naghiloo, M

    M. Naghiloo, M. Abbasi, Y . N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Quantum state tomography across the exceptional point in a single dissipative qubit, Nature Physics15, 1232–1236 (2019)

    2019

  26. [26]

    Wiersig, Review of exceptional point-based sensors, Pho- tonics Research8, 1457 (2020)

    J. Wiersig, Review of exceptional point-based sensors, Pho- tonics Research8, 1457 (2020)

    2020

  27. [27]

    K. Yang, Y . Chu, N. Wang, and J. Cai, Practical advan- tage of non-hermitian enhanced quantum sensing (2026), arXiv:2603.20612 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Guoet al., Observation of non-hermitian topology and skin effect in ultracold atoms, Nature Physics17, 192 (2021)

    S. Guoet al., Observation of non-hermitian topology and skin effect in ultracold atoms, Nature Physics17, 192 (2021)

    2021

  29. [29]

    H. Wang, K. Jacobs, D. Fahey, Y . Hu, D. R. Englund, and M. E. Trusheim, Exceptional sensitivity near the bistable transition point of a hybrid quantum system, Nature Physics 10.1038/s41567-026-03217-3 (2026)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-026-03217-3 2026

  30. [30]

    S. S. Mirkhalaf, E. Witkowska, and L. Lepori, Supersensitive quantum sensor based on criticality in an antiferromagnetic spinor condensate, Phys. Rev. A101, 043609 (2020)

    2020

  31. [31]

    K. D. Agarwal, S. Mondal, A. Sahoo, D. Rakshit, A. Sen(De), and U. Sen, Quantum sensing with ultracold simulators in lattice and ensemble systems: A review, Inter- national Journal of Modern Physics C0, 2543006 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    Sahoo and D

    A. Sahoo and D. Rakshit, Enhanced sensing of a weak stark field under the influence of aubry-andré-harper criticality, Phys. Rev. A113, 022601 (2026)

    2026

  33. [33]

    Zwierz, C

    M. Zwierz, C. A. Pérez-Delgado, and P. Kok, General opti- mality of the heisenberg limit for quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 180402 (2010)

    2010

  34. [34]

    Zwierz, C

    M. Zwierz, C. A. Pérez-Delgado, and P. Kok, Ultimate lim- its to quantum metrology and the meaning of the heisenberg limit, Phys. Rev. A85, 042112 (2012)

    2012

  35. [35]

    Pang and T

    S. Pang and T. A. Brun, Quantum metrology for a general hamiltonian parameter, Phys. Rev. A90, 022117 (2014)

    2014

  36. [36]

    Giovannetti and L

    V . Giovannetti and L. Maccone, Sub-heisenberg estima- tion strategies are ineffective, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 210404 (2012)

    2012

  37. [37]

    D. Yang, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Efficient informa- tion retrieval for sensing via continuous measurement, Phys. Rev. X13, 031012 (2023)

    2023

  38. [38]

    Gietka, F

    K. Gietka, F. Metz, T. Keller, and J. Li, Adiabatic critical quantum metrology cannot reach the Heisenberg limit even when shortcuts to adiabaticity are applied, Quantum5, 489 (2021)

    2021

  39. [39]

    S.-B. Tang, H. Qin, B.-B. Liu, D.-Y . Wang, K. Cui, S.-L. Su, L.-L. Yan, and G. Chen, Enhancement of quantum sensing in a cavity-optomechanical system around the quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. A108, 053514 (2023)

    2023

  40. [40]

    Zhu, C.-S

    G.-L. Zhu, C.-S. Hu, H. Wang, W. Qin, X.-Y . Lü, and F. Nori, Nonreciprocal superradiant phase transitions and multicriti- cality in a cavity qed system, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 193602 (2024)

    2024

  41. [41]

    Yuan, H.-F

    J.-B. Yuan, H.-F. Liu, Y .-J. Song, S.-Q. Tang, X.-W. Wang, and L.-M. Kuang, Utilizing evolution time as a resource to enhance quantum sensing by probe qubit dephasing, Phys. Rev. A111, 062620 (2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    Garbe, O

    L. Garbe, O. Abah, S. Felicetti, and R. Puebla, Exponential time-scaling of estimation precision by reaching a quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 043061 (2022)

    2022

  43. [43]

    J. Ma, Y . Shen, J. Huang, and C. Lee, Quantum metrology via floquet-engineered two-axis twisting and turning dynamics, Phys. Rev. A112, L040602 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    Wilczek, Quantum time crystals, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Quantum time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 160401 (2012)

    2012

  45. [45]

    Li, Z.-X

    T. Li, Z.-X. Gong, Z.-Q. Yin, H. T. Quan, X. Yin, P. Zhang, L.-M. Duan, and X. Zhang, Space-time crystals of trapped ions, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 163001 (2012)

    2012

  46. [46]

    D. V . Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Floquet time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 090402 (2016)

    2016

  47. [47]

    Yousefjani, K

    R. Yousefjani, K. Sacha, and A. Bayat, Discrete time crys- tal phase as a resource for quantum-enhanced sensing, Phys. Rev. B111, 125159 (2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    Power-law-graded Ising Interactions Stabilize Time Crystals Realizing Quantum Energy Storage and Sensing

    A. Sahoo and D. Rakshit, Power-law interactions stabilize time crystals realizing quantum energy storage and sensing (2025), arXiv:2508.14847 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Iemini, R

    F. Iemini, R. Fazio, and A. Sanpera, Floquet time crystals as quantum sensors of ac fields, Phys. Rev. A109, L050203 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    Montenegro, M

    V . Montenegro, M. G. Genoni, A. Bayat, and M. G. A. Paris, Quantum metrology with boundary time crystals, Communi- cations Physics6, 304 (2023)

    2023

  51. [52]

    Gribben, A

    D. Gribben, A. Sanpera, R. Fazio, J. Marino, and F. Iemini, Boundary time crystals as AC sensors: Enhancements and constraints, SciPost Phys.18, 100 (2025)

    2025

  52. [53]

    Y . Jiao, W. Jiang, Y . Zhang, J. Bai, Y . He, H. Shen, J. Zhao, and S. Jia, Observation of multiple time crystals in a driven- dissipative system with rydberg gas, Nature Communications 16, 10.1038/s41467-025-64488-7 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-64488-7 2025

  53. [54]

    Ullah, H

    A. Ullah, H. Mermer, M. Özkurt, I. Lesanovsky, and Ö. E. Müstecaplıo˘glu, Harnessing floquet dynamics for selective metrology in few-qubit systems, arXiv:2510.26942 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [55]

    Iemini, A

    F. Iemini, A. Russomanno, J. Keeling, M. Schirò, M. Dal- monte, and R. Fazio, Boundary time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 035301 (2018)

    2018

  55. [56]

    Ding, Z.-K

    D.-S. Ding, Z.-K. Liu, B.-S. Shi, G.-C. Guo, K. Mølmer, and C. S. Adams, Enhanced metrology at the critical point of a many-body rydberg atomic system, Nature Physics18, 1447–1452 (2022). 82

    2022

  56. [57]

    Ilias, D

    T. Ilias, D. Yang, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Criticality- enhanced quantum sensing via continuous measurement, PRX Quantum3, 010354 (2022)

    2022

  57. [58]

    Ilias, D

    T. Ilias, D. Yang, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Criticality- enhanced electric field gradient sensor with single trapped ions, npj Quantum Information10, 10.1038/s41534-024- 00833-w (2024)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41534-024- 2024

  58. [59]

    Cabot, F

    A. Cabot, F. Carollo, and I. Lesanovsky, Continuous sens- ing and parameter estimation with the boundary time crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 050801 (2024)

    2024

  59. [60]

    D. Yang, M. Ketkar, K. Audenaert, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum cramér-rao precision limit of noisy contin- uous sensing, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 070802 (2026)

    2026

  60. [61]

    Luis, Quantum limits, nonseparable transformations, and nonlinear optics, Phys

    A. Luis, Quantum limits, nonseparable transformations, and nonlinear optics, Phys. Rev. A76, 035801 (2007)

    2007

  61. [62]

    Napolitano and M

    M. Napolitano and M. W. Mitchell, Nonlinear metrology with a quantum interface, New Journal of Physics12, 093016 (2010)

    2010

  62. [63]

    Gross, T

    C. Gross, T. Zibold, E. Nicklas, J. Estève, and M. K. Oberthaler, Nonlinear atom interferometer surpasses classi- cal precision limit, Nature464, 1165 (2010)

    2010

  63. [64]

    M. J. W. Hall and H. M. Wiseman, Does nonlinear metrology offer improved resolution? answers from quantum informa- tion theory, Phys. Rev. X2, 041006 (2012)

    2012

  64. [65]

    J. Joo, K. Park, H. Jeong, W. J. Munro, K. Nemoto, and T. P. Spiller, Quantum metrology for nonlinear phase shifts with entangled coherent states, Phys. Rev. A86, 043828 (2012)

    2012

  65. [66]

    R. J. Sewell, M. Napolitano, N. Behbood, G. Colangelo, F. Martin Ciurana, and M. W. Mitchell, Ultrasensitive atomic spin measurements with a nonlinear interferometer, Phys. Rev. X4, 021045 (2014)

    2014

  66. [67]

    Lenef, T

    A. Lenef, T. D. Hammond, E. T. Smith, M. S. Chapman, R. A. Rubenstein, and D. E. Pritchard, Rotation sensing with an atom interferometer, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 760 (1997)

    1997

  67. [68]

    Wildermuth, S

    S. Wildermuth, S. Hofferberth, I. Lesanovsky, E. Haller, L. M. Andersson, S. Groth, I. Bar-Joseph, P. Krüger, and J. Schmiedmayer, Microscopic magnetic-field imaging, Na- ture435, 440 (2005)

    2005

  68. [69]

    Canuel, F

    B. Canuel, F. Leduc, D. Holleville, A. Gauguet, J. Fils, A. Virdis, A. Clairon, N. Dimarcq, C. J. Bordé, A. Landra- gin, and P. Bouyer, Six-axis inertial sensor using cold-atom interferometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 010402 (2006)

    2006

  69. [70]

    Wildermuth, S

    S. Wildermuth, S. Hofferberth, I. Lesanovsky, S. Groth, P. Krüger, J. Schmiedmayer, and I. Bar-Joseph, Sensing electric and magnetic fields with bose-einstein condensates, Appl. Phys. Lett.88, 264103 (2006)

    2006

  70. [71]

    Aigner, L

    S. Aigner, L. D. Pietra, Y . Japha, O. Entin-Wohlman, T. David, R. Salem, R. Folman, and J. Schmiedmayer, Long- range order in electronic transport through disordered metal films, Science319, 1226 (2008)

    2008

  71. [72]

    Estève, C

    J. Estève, C. Gross, A. Weller, S. Giovanazzi, and M. K. Oberthaler, Squeezing and entanglement in a bose–einstein condensate, Nature455, 1216–1219 (2008)

    2008

  72. [73]

    J. E. Debs, P. A. Altin, T. H. Barter, D. Döring, G. R. Dennis, G. McDonald, R. P. Anderson, J. D. Close, and N. P. Robins, Cold-atom gravimetry with a bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A84, 033610 (2011)

    2011

  73. [74]

    Zhou, Z.-K

    M.-K. Zhou, Z.-K. Hu, X.-C. Duan, B.-L. Sun, L.-L. Chen, Q.-Z. Zhang, and J. Luo, Performance of a cold-atom gravimeter with an active vibration isolator, Phys. Rev. A86, 043630 (2012)

    2012

  74. [75]

    S. K. Steinke, S. Singh, P. Meystre, K. C. Schwab, and M. Vengalattore, Quantum backaction in spinor-condensate magnetometry, Phys. Rev. A88, 063809 (2013)

    2013

  75. [76]

    Y . Eto, H. Ikeda, H. Suzuki, S. Hasegawa, Y . Tomiyama, S. Sekine, M. Sadgrove, and T. Hirano, Spin-echo-based magnetometry with spinor bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A88, 031602 (2013)

    2013

  76. [77]

    H. T. Ng, Quantum-limited measurement of magnetic-field gradient with entangled atoms, Phys. Rev. A87, 043602 (2013)

    2013

  77. [78]

    Müntinga, H

    H. Müntinga, H. Ahlers, M. Krutzik, A. Wenzlawski, S. Arnold, D. Becker, K. Bongs, H. Dittus, H. Duncker, N. Gaaloul, C. Gherasim, E. Giese, C. Grzeschik, T. W. Hän- sch, O. Hellmig, W. Herr, S. Herrmann, E. Kajari, S. Klein- ert, C. Lämmerzahl, W. Lewoczko-Adamczyk, J. Malcolm, N. Meyer, R. Nolte, A. Peters, M. Popp, J. Reichel, A. Roura, J. Rudolph, M. ...

    2013

  78. [79]

    D. N. Aguilera, H. Ahlers, B. Battelier, A. Bawamia, A. Bertoldi, R. Bondarescu, K. Bongs, P. Bouyer, C. Brax- maier, L. Cacciapuoti, C. Chaloner, M. Chwalla, W. Ert- mer, M. Franz, N. Gaaloul, M. Gehler, D. Gerardi, L. Gesa, N. Gürlebeck, J. Hartwig, M. Hauth, O. Hellmig, W. Herr, S. Herrmann, A. Heske, A. Hinton, P. Ireland, P. Jet- zer, U. Johann, M. K...

    2014

  79. [80]

    Hudelist, J

    F. Hudelist, J. Kong, C. Liu, J. Jing, Z. Ou, and W. Zhang, Quantum metrology with parametric amplifier-based pho- ton correlation interferometers, Nature Communications5, 10.1038/ncomms4049 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms4049 2014

  80. [81]

    Carraz, C

    O. Carraz, C. Siemes, L. Massotti, R. Haagmans, and P. Sil- vestrin, A spaceborne gravity gradiometer concept based on cold atom interferometers for measuring earth’s gravity field, Microgravity Science and Technology26, 139 (2014)

    2014

Showing first 80 references.