Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Resonance at bubble boundaries in a 2D quantum Ising model drives nearly ballistic true-vacuum domain growth on a large annealer.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-25 20:43 UTC pith:FQGO2RT4

load-bearing objection The paper demonstrates resonant bubble expansion in a 2D Ising false vacuum on a 4000-qubit annealer, with simulations supporting KPZ interface scaling, but hardware mapping fidelity is the key open question. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.25889 v1 pith:FQGO2RT4 submitted 2026-06-24 quant-ph hep-th

Resonant false vacuum decay in two dimensions on a 4000-qubit quantum annealer

Gregor Humar , Jean-Yves Desaules , Luka Pave\v{s}i\'c , Marko Ljubotina , Zlatko Papi\'c , Kristel Michielsen , Jaka Vodeb This is my paper
classification quant-ph hep-th
keywords false vacuum decayquantum Ising modelquantum annealerKardar-Parisi-Zhangmetastable statesdomain growthnonequilibrium dynamicsresonance condition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a regime of false vacuum decay in which domain growth outpaces nucleation by orders of magnitude because local resonance conditions control the process. It programs a quantum annealer with more than 4000 qubits to realize a two-dimensional quantum Ising model whose metastable spin-polarized state encodes the false vacuum. By seeding bubbles and setting the longitudinal field to a specific value, single-spin flips at bubble boundaries become resonant and enable kinetically constrained expansion. Combined experiment, tensor-network simulations, and stochastic modeling then show nearly ballistic growth of true-vacuum domains together with sub-ballistic interface broadening that matches Kardar-Parisi-Zhang universality. A reader would care because the setup gives experimental access to nonequilibrium metastable dynamics that appear in cosmology, quantum field theory, and strongly correlated matter.

Core claim

At a specific value of the longitudinal field, single-spin flips at the boundary of a seeded bubble become resonant, enabling kinetically constrained expansion. We observe nearly ballistic growth of true-vacuum domains with sub-ballistic interface broadening, consistent with Kardar--Parisi--Zhang universality. Our results establish a growth-dominated regime of false vacuum decay and show how large-scale quantum simulation can access nonequilibrium metastable dynamics relevant to quantum field theory, cosmology, and strongly correlated matter.

What carries the argument

The resonance condition for single-spin flips at the boundary of seeded bubbles, which kinetically constrains expansion in the two-dimensional quantum Ising model.

Load-bearing premise

The programmable quantum annealer accurately realizes the ideal two-dimensional quantum Ising model without dominant hardware errors or mapping artifacts that would invalidate the resonance condition or growth dynamics.

What would settle it

Measurements at the tuned longitudinal field that show no resonant single-spin flips at bubble boundaries or domain growth rates and interface broadening inconsistent with ballistic expansion and Kardar-Parisi-Zhang scaling would falsify the claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental realization of resonant false vacuum decay using a programmable quantum annealer with over 4000 qubits to implement a two-dimensional quantum Ising model. At a tuned value of the longitudinal field, single-spin flips at the boundary of seeded true-vacuum bubbles become resonant, enabling kinetically constrained expansion that outpaces nucleation. Combining hardware data with tensor-network simulations and stochastic circuit modeling, the authors observe nearly ballistic domain growth accompanied by sub-ballistic interface broadening, which they interpret as consistent with Kardar–Parisi–Zhang universality.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work establishes a growth-dominated regime of false-vacuum decay that is directly relevant to nonequilibrium dynamics in quantum field theory and cosmology. The scale of the quantum hardware demonstration, together with the explicit combination of experiment and multiple simulation methods, provides a concrete example of how programmable annealers can access metastable dynamics that are otherwise difficult to study.

major comments (2)
  1. [Device implementation and calibration (likely §3 or Methods)] The attribution of the observed ballistic growth to the resonant mechanism is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the manuscript does not appear to contain an explicit verification that the embedded hardware Hamiltonian (including all calibration offsets, crosstalk, and embedding overhead) reproduces the ideal resonance condition for boundary flips to within the transverse-field linewidth. Without such a check, conventional nucleation or diffusive dynamics cannot be ruled out as the source of the reported growth.
  2. [Results on domain growth and interface broadening (likely §4)] The quantitative comparison to KPZ universality relies on the measured growth exponent and interface-width scaling; the fitting details, including the precise time window used, error estimation, and explicit exclusion of alternative scaling forms (e.g., diffusive or logarithmic), must be shown to be robust against the finite coherence time and readout noise of the annealer.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction and model definition] Notation for the effective fields and the resonance condition should be defined once in the main text with a clear reference to the ideal Ising Hamiltonian parameters.
  2. [Figures 2–4] Figure captions for the growth curves should explicitly state the number of independent runs and the seeding protocol used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful and constructive report. The two major comments identify areas where additional detail would strengthen the manuscript. We address each point below and indicate where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Device implementation and calibration (likely §3 or Methods)] The attribution of the observed ballistic growth to the resonant mechanism is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the manuscript does not appear to contain an explicit verification that the embedded hardware Hamiltonian (including all calibration offsets, crosstalk, and embedding overhead) reproduces the ideal resonance condition for boundary flips to within the transverse-field linewidth. Without such a check, conventional nucleation or diffusive dynamics cannot be ruled out as the source of the reported growth.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of the resonance condition on the embedded hardware is important for attributing the dynamics to the resonant mechanism. The original manuscript relies on the agreement between hardware results, tensor-network simulations of the ideal model, and stochastic circuit modeling that incorporates measured noise and calibration offsets, but does not present a dedicated hardware-level check of the resonance condition. In the revised manuscript we will add a new Methods subsection that reports (i) small-cluster spectroscopy used to calibrate the longitudinal-field value at which boundary flips become resonant and (ii) a direct comparison of the measured resonance linewidth against the ideal-model prediction after accounting for embedding overhead and crosstalk. These data will be shown to confirm that the resonance condition is satisfied within the transverse-field linewidth, thereby ruling out conventional nucleation as the dominant process. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on domain growth and interface broadening (likely §4)] The quantitative comparison to KPZ universality relies on the measured growth exponent and interface-width scaling; the fitting details, including the precise time window used, error estimation, and explicit exclusion of alternative scaling forms (e.g., diffusive or logarithmic), must be shown to be robust against the finite coherence time and readout noise of the annealer.

    Authors: We accept that the fitting procedures require more explicit documentation to demonstrate robustness. The original analysis already incorporates the stochastic circuit model that includes measured coherence times and readout noise, and the reported exponents are obtained from fits over multiple independent runs. In the revision we will add an appendix that (i) states the exact time windows used for the growth-exponent and interface-width fits, (ii) details the bootstrap error estimation, and (iii) presents chi-squared comparisons showing that the KPZ scaling form is statistically preferred over diffusive and logarithmic alternatives even after the noise model is applied. These additions will make the robustness against hardware imperfections fully transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: claims rest on hardware observation plus independent simulations

full rationale

The abstract and visible text contain no equations, fitted parameters presented as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The central claim (resonant bubble expansion observed on the annealer) is supported by direct experiment combined with separate tensor-network and circuit modeling; none of the enumerated circularity patterns are exhibited because no derivation step reduces to its own inputs by construction. This is the normal self-contained case.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted or audited.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5737 in / 1132 out tokens · 25123 ms · 2026-06-25T20:43:23.074104+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

From cosmology to quantum matter, metastable states often decay through the nucleation and growth of competing domains, with false vacuum decay providing the paradigmatic example of this process. Here we demonstrate a distinct regime in which domain growth outpaces nucleation by orders of magnitude and is controlled by local resonance conditions. Using a programmable quantum annealer with more than 4000 qubits, we realize a two-dimensional quantum Ising model whose metastable spin-polarized state encodes a false vacuum. At a specific value of the longitudinal field, single-spin flips at the boundary of a seeded bubble become resonant, enabling kinetically constrained expansion. Combining experiment with tensor-network simulations and stochastic circuit modeling, we observe nearly ballistic growth of true-vacuum domains with sub-ballistic interface broadening, consistent with Kardar--Parisi--Zhang universality. Our results establish a growth-dominated regime of false vacuum decay and show how large-scale quantum simulation can access nonequilibrium metastable dynamics relevant to quantum field theory, cosmology, and strongly correlated matter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.25889 by Gregor Humar, Jaka Vodeb, Jean-Yves Desaules, Kristel Michielsen, Luka Pave\v{s}i\'c, Marko Ljubotina, Zlatko Papi\'c.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. False vacuum decay in long-range interacting quantum systems

    quant-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    In long-range Ising chains the false-vacuum bounce action scales as B∼h^{-1/σ} for σ<1 and recovers Coleman B∼h^{-1} (plus h^{σ-2} corrections) for 1<σ<2, with algebraic tails that leave the leading exponents intact.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Coleman, Fate of the false vacuum: Semiclassical theory, Phys

    S. Coleman, Fate of the false vacuum: Semiclassical theory, Phys. Rev. D15, 2929 (1977)

    1977

  2. [2]

    Voloshin, I

    M. Voloshin, I. Y. Kobzarev, and L. B. Okun, On bubbles in metastable vacuum, Yad. Fiz.20, 1229 (1974)

    1974

  3. [3]

    Coleman and F

    S. Coleman and F. De Luccia, Gravitational effects on and of vacuum decay, Phys. Rev. D21, 3305 (1980)

    1980

  4. [4]

    Linde, Decay of the false vacuum at finite temperature, Nuclear Physics B216, 421 (1983)

    A. Linde, Decay of the false vacuum at finite temperature, Nuclear Physics B216, 421 (1983)

    1983

  5. [5]

    Sachdev, Quantum phase transitions, Physics world12, 33 (1999)

    S. Sachdev, Quantum phase transitions, Physics world12, 33 (1999)

    1999

  6. [6]

    Iachello and N

    F. Iachello and N. V. Zamfir, Quantum phase transitions in mesoscopic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 212501 (2004)

    2004

  7. [7]

    de la Torre, D

    A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, and M. A. Sentef, Colloquium: Nonthermal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 041002 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    H¨ anggi, P

    P. H¨ anggi, P. Talkner, and M. Borkovec, Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after Kramers, Rev. Mod. Phys.62, 251 (1990)

    1990

  9. [9]

    A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, M. P. A. Fisher, A. Garg, and W. Zwerger, Dynamics of the dissipative two-state system, Rev. Mod. Phys.59, 1 (1987)

    1987

  10. [10]

    Macieszczak, M

    K. Macieszczak, M. Gutta, I. Lesanovsky, and J. P. Garrahan, Towards a theory of metastability in open quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 240404 (2016)

    2016

  11. [11]

    C. Yin, F. M. Surace, and A. Lucas, Theory of metastable states in many-body quantum systems, Phys. Rev. X15, 011064 (2025)

    2025

  12. [12]

    A. H. Guth, Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems, Phys. Rev. D23, 347 (1981)

    1981

  13. [13]

    Isidori, G

    G. Isidori, G. Ridolfi, and A. Strumia, On the metastability of the Standard Model vacuum, Nuclear Physics B609, 387 (2001)

    2001

  14. [14]

    Degrassi, S

    G. Degrassi, S. Di Vita, J. Elias-Miro, J. R. Espinosa, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori, and A. Strumia, Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the standard model at NNLO, Journal of High Energy Physics2012, 1 (2012)

    2012

  15. [15]

    Caprini, M

    C. Caprini, M. Chala, G. C. Dorsch, M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, T. Konstandin, J. Kozaczuk, G. Nardini, J. M. No, K. Rummukainen,et al., Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2020(03), 024

  16. [16]

    A. N. Kuznetsov and P. G. Tinyakov, False vacuum decay induced by particle collisions, Phys. Rev. D56, 1156 (1997)

    1997

  17. [17]

    Paveˇ si´ c, M

    L. Paveˇ si´ c, M. Di Liberto, and S. Montangero, Scattering and induced false vacuum decay in the two-dimensional quantum Ising model, arXiv e-Prints (2026), arXiv:2509.02702 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  18. [18]

    Gregory, I

    R. Gregory, I. G. Moss, and B. Withers, Black holes as bubble nucleation sites, Journal of High Energy Physics2014, 1 (2014)

    2014

  19. [19]

    Gelmini and M

    G. Gelmini and M. Gleiser, Kinetics of sub-critical bubbles and the electroweak transition, Nuclear Physics B419, 129 (1994)

    1994

  20. [20]

    Enqvist and I

    K. Enqvist and I. Vilja, Induced nucleation in weak first order phase transitions, Physics Letters B344, 98 (1995)

    1995

  21. [21]

    A. H. Guth and E. J. Weinberg, Cosmological consequences of a first-order phase transition in the su 5 grand unified model, Phys. Rev. D23, 876 (1981)

    1981

  22. [22]

    Sarangi, G

    S. Sarangi, G. Shiu, and B. Shlaer, Rapid tunneling and percolation in the landscape, International Journal of Modern Physics A24, 741 (2009)

    2009

  23. [23]

    Gleiser and R

    M. Gleiser and R. C. Howell, Resonant nucleation, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 151601 (2005)

    2005

  24. [24]

    X. Wang, A. Yosifov, A. Iyer, and J. Sun, Entanglement-facilitated macroscopic cluster formation in quantum many-body dynamics (2026), arXiv:2605.22947 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    S. B. Rutkevich, Decay of the metastable phase ind= 1 andd= 2 Ising models, Phys. Rev. B60, 14525 (1999)

    1999

  26. [26]

    Lagnese, F

    G. Lagnese, F. M. Surace, M. Kormos, and P. Calabrese, False vacuum decay in quantum spin chains, Phys. Rev. B104, L201106 (2021)

    2021

  27. [27]

    Pomponio, M

    O. Pomponio, M. A. Werner, G. Zarand, and G. Takacs, Bloch oscillations and the lack of the decay of the false vacuum in a one-dimensional quantum spin chain, SciPost Phys.12, 061 (2022)

    2022

  28. [28]

    Darbha, M

    S. Darbha, M. Kornjaˇ ca, F. Liu, J. Balewski, M. R. Hirsbrunner, P. L. S. Lopes, S.-T. Wang, R. Van Beeumen, D. Camps, and K. Klymko, False vacuum decay and nucleation dynamics in neutral atom systems, Phys. Rev. B110, 155103 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    Zenesini, A

    A. Zenesini, A. Berti, R. Cominotti, C. Rogora, I. G. Moss, T. P. Billam, I. Carusotto, G. Lamporesi, A. Recati, and G. Ferrari, False vacuum decay via bubble formation in ferromagnetic superfluids, Nature Physics20, 558 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Cominotti, C

    R. Cominotti, C. Baroni, C. Rogora, D. Andreoni, G. Guarda, G. Lamporesi, G. Ferrari, and A. Zenesini, Observation of temperature effects on false vacuum decay in atomic quantum gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 183401 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    Y.-X. Chao, P. Ge, Z.-X. Hua, C. Jia, X. Wang, X. Liang, Z. Yue, R. Lu, M. K. Tey, X. Wang, and L. You, Probing false vacuum decay and bubble nucleation in a Rydberg atom array, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 120407 (2026)

    2026

  32. [32]

    B. Song, S. Dutta, S. Bhave, J.-C. Yu, E. Carter, N. Cooper, and U. Schneider, Realizing discontinuous quantum phase transitions in a strongly correlated driven optical lattice, Nat. Phys.18, 259 (2022)

    2022

  33. [33]

    Z.-H. Zhu, Y. Liu, G. Lagnese, F. M. Surace, W.-Y. Zhang, M.-G. He, J. C. Halimeh, M. Dalmonte, S. C. Morampudi, F. Wilczek, Z.-S. Yuan, and J.-W. Pan, Probing false vacuum decay on a cold-atom gauge-theory quantum simulator, arXiv e-Prints (2024), arXiv:2411.12565 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    D. Luo, F. M. Surace, A. De, A. Lerose, E. R. Bennewitz, B. Ware, A. Schuckert, Z. Davoudi, A. V. Gorshkov, O. Katz, et al., Quantum simulation of bubble nucleation across a quantum phase transition, arXiv e-Prints (2025), arXiv:2505.09607 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Vodeb, J.-Y

    J. Vodeb, J.-Y. Desaules, A. Hallam, A. Rava, G. Humar, D. Willsch, F. Jin, M. Willsch, K. Michielsen, and Z. Papi´ c, Stirring the false vacuum via interacting quantized bubbles on a 5,564-qubit quantum annealer, Nature physics21, 386 10 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    Shavit, S

    G. Shavit, S. Nadj-Perge, and G. Refael, Ephemeral superconductivity atop the false vacuum, Nature Communications 16, 2047 (2025)

    2047

  37. [37]

    Borla, A

    U. Borla, A. Lazarides, C. Groß, and J. C. Halimeh, Microscopic dynamics of false vacuum decay in the 2 + 1D quantum Ising model, arXiv e-Prints (2026), arXiv:2601.04305 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    Osterholz, F

    P. Osterholz, F. Bensch, S. Tang, S. B. Sheela, B. Sbierski, I. Lesanovsky, and C. Groß, Collective cluster nucleation dynamics in quantum magnets, arXiv e-Prints (2026), arXiv:2512.04656 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page arXiv 2026

  39. [39]

    See the Supplemental Online Material for further details of the experiments and numerical results

  40. [40]

    A. D. King, S. Suzuki, J. Raymond, A. Zucca, T. Lanting, F. Altomare, A. J. Berkley, S. Ejtemaee, E. Hoskinson, S. Huang, E. Ladizinsky, A. J. R. MacDonald, G. Marsden, T. Oh, G. Poulin-Lamarre, M. Reis, C. Rich, Y. Sato, J. D. Whittaker, J. Yao, R. Harris, D. A. Lidar, H. Nishimori, and M. H. Amin, Coherent quantum annealing in a programmable 2,000 qubit...

    2022

  41. [41]

    A. D. King, J. Raymond, T. Lanting, R. Harris, A. Zucca, F. Altomare, A. J. Berkley, K. Boothby, S. Ejtemaee, C. Enderud, E. Hoskinson, S. Huang, E. Ladizinsky, A. J. R. MacDonald, G. Marsden, R. Molavi, T. Oh, G. Poulin-Lamarre, M. Reis, C. Rich, Y. Sato, N. Tsai, M. Volkmann, J. D. Whittaker, J. Yao, A. W. Sandvik, and M. H. Amin, Quantum critical dynam...

    2023

  42. [42]

    A. D. King, A. Nocera, M. M. Rams, J. Dziarmaga, R. Wiersema, W. Bernoudy, J. Raymond, N. Kaushal, N. Heinsdorf, R. Harris, K. Boothby, F. Altomare, M. Asad, A. J. Berkley, M. Boschnak, K. Chern, H. Christiani, S. Cibere, J. Connor, M. H. Dehn, R. Deshpande, S. Ejtemaee, P. Farre, K. Hamer, E. Hoskinson, S. Huang, M. W. Johnson, S. Kortas, E. Ladizinsky, ...

    2025

  43. [43]

    Silvi, V

    P. Silvi, V. Giovannetti, S. Montangero, M. Rizzi, J. I. Cirac, and R. Fazio, Homogeneous binary trees as ground states of quantum critical Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. A81, 062335 (2010)

    2010

  44. [44]

    Haegeman, C

    J. Haegeman, C. Lubich, I. Oseledets, B. Vandereycken, and F. Verstraete, Unifying time evolution and optimization with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B94, 165116 (2016)

    2016

  45. [45]

    Bauernfeind and M

    D. Bauernfeind and M. Aichhorn, Time dependent variational principle for tree tensor networks, SciPost Phys.8, 024 (2020)

    2020

  46. [46]

    O. R. Bellwood, H. P. Casagrande, and W. J. Munro, Fractal path strategies for efficient two-dimensional density matrix renormalization group simulations, Phys. Rev. B112, 224433 (2025)

    2025

  47. [47]

    Balducci, A

    F. Balducci, A. Gambassi, A. Lerose, A. Scardicchio, and C. Vanoni, Localization and melting of interfaces in the two- dimensional quantum Ising model, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 120601 (2022)

    2022

  48. [48]

    Paveˇ si´ c, D

    L. Paveˇ si´ c, D. Jaschke, and S. Montangero, Constrained dynamics and confinement in the two-dimensional quantum Ising model, Phys. Rev. B111, L140305 (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    ˇZnidariˇ c, Spin transport in a one-dimensional anisotropic Heisenberg model, Phys

    M. ˇZnidariˇ c, Spin transport in a one-dimensional anisotropic Heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 220601 (2011)

    2011

  50. [50]

    Ljubotina, M

    M. Ljubotina, M. ˇZnidariˇ c, and T. Prosen, Spin diffusion from an inhomogeneous quench in an integrable system, Nature Communications8, 16117 (2017)

    2017

  51. [51]

    Ilievski, J

    E. Ilievski, J. De Nardis, M. Medenjak, and T. Prosen, Superdiffusion in one-dimensional quantum lattice models, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 230602 (2018)

    2018

  52. [52]

    Kardar, G

    M. Kardar, G. Parisi, and Y.-C. Zhang, Dynamic scaling of growing interfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett.56, 889 (1986)

    1986

  53. [53]

    Analog-Digital Quantum Computing with Quantum Annealing Processors

    R. Deshpande, M. Kheirkhah, C. Rich, R. Harris, J. Raymond, E. Hoskinson, P. Sathe, A. J. Berkley, S. Paul, B. Barch, D. A. Lidar, M. M¨ uller, G. Aeppli, A. D. King, and M. H. Amin, Analog-digital quantum computing with quantum annealing processors, arXiv e-Prints (2026), arXiv:2603.15534 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  54. [54]

    D-Wave Systems,Technical Description of the D-Wave Quantum Processing Unit, Tech. Rep. (D-Wave Systems Inc., Burnaby, BC, Canada, 2020) D-Wave User Manual 09-1109A-V

    2020

  55. [55]

    Bravyi, D

    S. Bravyi, D. P. DiVincenzo, and D. Loss, Schrieffer-wolff transformation for quantum many-body systems, Annals of Physics326, 2793 (2011)

    2011

  56. [56]

    brickwork structure

    F. Baccari, D. Bacilieri, M. Ballarin, F. P. Barone, F. Campaioli, A. G. Catalano, G. Cataldi, A. Coppi, A. Costantini, A. Datta, A. D. Girolamo, D. Jaschke, S. B. Koˇ zi´ c, G. Magnifico, C. Mordini, S. Montangero, S. Notarnicola, A. Pagano, L. Pavesic, D. Rattacaso, M. Rigobello, N. Reini´ c, S. Scarlatella, I. Siloi, P. Silvi, M. Tesoro, G. Torre, and ...

    2025

  57. [57]

    and King A

    Boothby, K. and King A. D. and Raymond, J.,Zephyr Topology of D-Wave Quantum Processors, Tech. Rep. (D-Wave Systems Inc., Burnaby, BC, Canada, 2021)

    2021

  58. [58]

    J. E. Hopcroft and R. M. Karp, Ann 5/2 algorithm for maximum matchings in bipartite graphs, SIAM Journal on Computing 2, 225 (1973)

    1973

  59. [59]

    Bar-Yehuda and S

    R. Bar-Yehuda and S. Even, A local-ratio theorem for approximating the weighted vertex cover problem, inNorth-Holland Mathematics Studies, Vol. 109 (Elsevier, 1985) pp. 27–45

    1985

  60. [60]

    A. A. Hagberg, D. A. Schult, and P. J. Swart, Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using networkx, in Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference, edited by G. Varoquaux, T. Vaught, and J. Millman (Pasadena, CA USA, 2008) pp. 11 – 15

    2008