Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 cited by

A two-stage visual controller lets drones finish the last 10 meters from a single target photo by first estimating pose, then imagining how each candidate move would look.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-11 19:51 UTC pith:UVT45UUL

load-bearing objection Solid new aerial image-goal benchmark and a clean two-stage method; the “last-meter precision” framing is oversold relative to ~29 m / ~39° errors and single-step sim evaluation. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.04352 v1 pith:UVT45UUL submitted 2026-07-05 cs.CV

Last-Meter Precision Navigation for UAVs: A Diffusion-Refined Aerial Visual Servoing Approach

Yaxuan Li , Jiarui Zeng , Shaofei Huang , Zhedong Zheng This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords UAV navigationvisual servoinglast-meter precisiondiffusion world modeltrigonometric pose regressionimage-goal navigationPairUAV benchmarkmonocular aerial control
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Last-meter UAV navigation means getting a drone within about 10 meters of a goal when GPS is unreliable, using only a monocular camera and a target photograph. The paper argues that direct pose regression fails under scale ambiguity, angle wrap-around, and large viewpoint changes, and that existing datasets do not stress close-range aerial terminal approach. DreamNav therefore first predicts a coarse heading and range with a trigonometric (sine-cosine) head plus geometric displacement cues, then uses a diffusion world model to synthesize the view that would result from each nearby candidate action and keeps the action whose imagined image best matches the target. A new benchmark of 4.8 million image pairs across 72 scenes supplies the training and zero-shot test data. On held-out scenes the full system improves heading accuracy and success rate over visual-servoing and foundation-model baselines, showing that visual imagination can refine metric control without GNSS.

Core claim

DreamNav's coarse-to-fine loop—trigonometric regression of heading and range followed by diffusion-based visual imagination of candidate actions—yields lower heading error and higher 10-meter success than strong servoing and foundation-model baselines on unseen outdoor aerial scenes from PairUAV.

What carries the argument

DreamNav: Stage I regresses continuous yaw and range with a sine-cosine parameterization and dual-cue (appearance + SuperGlue displacement) ViT input; Stage II builds a small local grid of candidates, synthesizes each next view with a ControlNet-style diffusion world model conditioned on the source image and pose tokens, and selects the candidate whose synthesized image has lowest pixel MSE to the true target.

Load-bearing premise

That a single-step two-degree-of-freedom command (fixed camera pitch, continuous yaw and range only) whose quality is scored by pixel match between a diffusion-generated image and the target is a faithful enough proxy for closed-loop outdoor last-meter flight.

What would settle it

Fly the same source-target pairs on a real multirotor with the identical single-step controller and measure whether the Stage-II MSE-selected action still yields higher 10 m success and lower heading error than Stage I alone and the reported baselines.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A target photograph alone can replace GNSS for terminal approach once the coarse-to-fine visual loop is available.
  • Trigonometric (sin/cos) heads become the default for continuous heading regression under large viewpoint change.
  • Pre-trained diffusion world models can serve as test-time verifiers that improve generalization without extra labeled flight data.
  • PairUAV-scale image-pair supervision makes single-image aerial visual servoing a measurable research problem rather than an ad-hoc demo.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same imagination-then-select loop could be iterated multi-step for longer-horizon image-goal flight if the world model remains geometrically consistent.
  • Pixel-MSE selection may be replaceable by a learned visual-similarity head once more real outdoor trajectories become available.
  • The 2-DoF abstraction suggests that full 6-DoF terminal docking may still need an explicit altitude or pitch channel before the method transfers to package delivery on balconies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper studies monocular image-goal last-meter UAV navigation and proposes DreamNav, a two-stage aerial visual servoing method. Stage I fine-tunes a ViT on a dual-cue input (source RGB plus SuperGlue-derived dense displacement) and regresses range in log space and yaw via sine/cosine parameterization. Stage II builds a 3x3 local candidate grid around the coarse pose, synthesizes next views with a ControlNet-style latent diffusion model conditioned on the source image and pose tokens, and selects the candidate by pixel MSE to the target image. The authors introduce PairUAV (4.8M ordered pairs from University-1652, 72 scenes, held-out scene split) and report that Stage II reaches MAE_H 38.78°, MAE_R 29.16 m, and SR 23.51% under a 10 m threshold, outperforming adapted AI2THOR, DINOv3-ViT7B, and Sample4Geo on heading and success, with ablations attributing large gains to trigonometric regression and dual-cue fusion.

Significance. If the protocol is accepted as a valid proxy for terminal aerial visual servoing, the work is a useful contribution: PairUAV is substantially larger and more navigation-oriented than prior ObjectNav/aerial benchmarks in Table 1, the trigonometric + dual-cue Stage I design is well motivated and ablated, and the diffusion look-ahead idea is a concrete attempt to inject geometry-aware verification into continuous pose regression. Code and dataset links are provided, which supports reproducibility. The absolute numbers, however, show that the method still operates far from true last-meter precision, so the main lasting value is likely the benchmark and the Stage I regression recipe rather than a solved terminal-navigation system.

major comments (3)
  1. Abstract, §1, and §3.1 frame the task as last-meter precision (reaching the target within the final ~10 m), but Table 2 reports Stage-II MAE_R = 29.16 m and SR = 23.51% under d_succ = 10 m. Mean range error is nearly 3× the stated horizon and most episodes fail the success criterion. Relative gains over near-random-heading baselines (~90°) do not establish absolute terminal precision. The paper should either retitle/reframe the claim around single-step relative-pose estimation under large viewpoint change, or add multi-step closed-loop evaluation that actually drives error into the last-meter regime.
  2. §3.1 restricts the agent to single-step 2-DoF continuous control (fixed pitch ψ=45°, only Δθ and Δr), and §4.3 / Eq. (18) selects the refined pose by argmin of pixel MSE between a diffusion-synthesized view and the true target image. This is a weak proxy for closed-loop aerial visual servoing: there is no multi-step execution, no real-sensor noise, and no demonstration that generative MSE ranks true geometric pose rather than appearance similarity. Without closed-loop rollouts or a correlation study between MSE rank and pose error, the navigation claim does not transfer from the PairUAV single-step protocol.
  3. Table 3 shows that trigonometric regression and dual-cue fusion drive most of the gain (SR 6.00% → 19.81%), while Stage II only lifts SR from 19.81% to 23.51% and MAE_H from 40.29° to 38.78°. The abstract and contribution bullets present diffusion-refined imagination as a core part of the method; the ablations indicate it is a modest refinement. The paper should either strengthen Stage II (denser search, better ranking metric, multi-step imagination) or rebalance the claims so that Stage I is the primary technical contribution.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No load-bearing circularity: empirical single-step pose regression and MSE selection on held-out scenes; only minor self-use of University-1652 assets for PairUAV construction.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [§3.2 Dataset Construction; Table 1]
    "We build upon the University-1652 dataset Zheng et al. (2020), adopting its established protocol and 3D environments, which span 1,652 buildings across 72 universities. ... This methodology yields a new, large-scale dataset of 4,817,232 ordered navigation instances"

    University-1652 is prior work by the same corresponding author; PairUAV is constructed by exhaustive pairing of its existing views. This is ordinary asset reuse for a new task, not a load-bearing uniqueness claim or fitted parameter that forces the navigation metrics, so it raises the score only to 1.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are empirical performance numbers (Table 2: MAE_H 38.78°, MAE_R 29.16 m, SR 23.51% on the 39-scene held-out split) obtained by training a ViT regressor (trigonometric sin/cos + log-range losses, Eqs. 4-6) plus a ControlNet-style diffusion model (standard denoising loss L_diff plus auxiliary RGB pose-consistency, Eqs. 14-17) and selecting among a fixed 3x3 local candidate grid by pixel MSE to the given target image (Eq. 18). Training and test scenes are disjoint by construction (33 vs 39 universities). The target image used at inference is an external observation, not a quantity defined by the fitted pose parameters; therefore the reported MAE/SR are not forced by definition or by a fitted input renamed as prediction. The only self-reference is the reuse of University-1652 3-D assets (Zheng et al. 2020, same corresponding author) to generate the new PairUAV pair set; this is ordinary dataset construction, not a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that underwrites the method. No equation equates a claimed prediction to its own training target, no uniqueness result is imported from prior author papers to forbid alternatives, and no known empirical pattern is merely renamed. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against the external baselines (AI2THOR, DINOv3, Sample4Geo). Score 1 only for the minor, non-load-bearing self-use of the prior asset collection.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 5 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central ranking claim rests on a simplified 2-DoF monocular task definition, SuperGlue-derived geometric cues, a hand-chosen local candidate grid, and generative MSE as a pose verifier, all evaluated on Google Earth university renders. Free parameters are ordinary training/search knobs; domain assumptions about fixed pitch and single-step success dominate risk more than invented physics-like entities.

free parameters (6)
  • loss weight λ (L_total = L_dist + λ L_rot)
    Balances range vs rotation losses in Stage I; not derived, chosen for training stability.
  • range log scale γ
    Compresses range dynamic range in Eq. 4; hand-chosen scale factor.
  • SuperGlue confidence threshold τ and Gaussian bandwidth σ
    Control which matches enter the dense displacement field D(p) in Eq. 2.
  • candidate grid offsets Ωθ={−10°,0°,+10°}, Ωd={−1.5,0,+1.5}
    Defines the Stage II search neighborhood; fixed by design, not learned.
  • diffusion auxiliary weights λ_rgb, λ_θ, λ_d, λ_n
    Trade off denoising loss vs frozen RGB pose-consistency terms in Eqs. 16–17.
  • success distance d_succ = 10 m
    Defines SR; chosen to match approximate GPS accuracy, not measured terminal precision.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Relative terminal navigation is fully captured by continuous yaw change Δθ and range change Δr at fixed camera pitch 45° (2-DoF action space).
    Stated in §3.1; abstracts altitude, pitch, and zoom. If false in real flight, the task does not match last-meter approach.
  • domain assumption Google Earth University-1652 renders with ordered pair relative poses are a valid testbed for open-world aerial visual servoing generalization.
    Dataset construction §3.2; all quantitative claims rest on this simulated distribution.
  • ad hoc to paper Pixel-wise MSE between a pose-conditioned diffusion synthesis and the true target image ranks candidate poses by true geometric correctness.
    Inference Eq. 18; core of Stage II selection. Not proven equivalent to pose error.
  • domain assumption Sparse SuperGlue matches diffused into a dense field provide reliable geometric cues under large viewpoint change.
    §4.2 dual-cue construction; Stage I heading gains depend on this.
  • standard math Sin/cos regression plus log-range regression is a stable parameterization for continuous aerial pose control.
    Standard angle-wrap mitigation; used in Eqs. 4–5.
invented entities (2)
  • PairUAV benchmark independent evidence
    purpose: Provide large-scale image-pair supervision and evaluation for 2-DoF aerial image-goal navigation.
    New dataset asset curated from University-1652; independent of the DreamNav model once released.
  • Dual-cue displacement representation X (source RGB + dense match displacement) no independent evidence
    purpose: Inject cross-view geometric position cues into the ViT regressor beyond appearance concatenation.
    Method-specific input construction in §4.2; not an external physical entity, but a paper-introduced representation claimed to fix conv equivariance issues.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 17546 in / 3799 out tokens · 43672 ms · 2026-07-11T19:51:26.800023+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we study the last-meter precision navigation for UAVs, e.g., autonomously reaching a target within the final 10 meters using monocular vision. This task is challenging due to scale ambiguity, rotation discontinuities, and the need for fine-grained spatial reasoning. Existing methods often fail under large viewpoint changes or lack generalization to unseen environments. To this end, we propose DreamNav, a coarse-to-fine diffusion-refined aerial visual servoing framework. In the first coarse-estimation stage, a robust regression policy employs a trigonometric parameterization to predict rotation by jointly modeling sine and cosine components, effectively mitigating optimization instabilities caused by angular periodicity. Given this coarse estimate, the second diffusion-refined stage utilizes a pre-trained world model to simulate future visual observations for candidate actions, selecting the trajectory that minimizes visual discrepancy with the target through a process of visual imagination. To support rigorous evaluation, we contribute PairUAV, a large-scale benchmark comprising 4.8 million image pairs across 72 scenes, curated from the University-1652 dataset. Extensive experiments show DreamNav outperforms strong visual servoing and foundation model baselines in accuracy and generalization, with zero-shot transfer to unseen scenes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.04352 by Jiarui Zeng, Shaofei Huang, Yaxuan Li, Zhedong Zheng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Last-Meter Precision Navigation. (Left) Many drone applications, such as package delivery, ne￾cessitate high-precision localization during the final approach, a phase where GNSS signals are often unreliable or unavailable, particularly for resolving vertical position. (Right) To overcome this challenge, we frame the task as a visual servoing problem, where the drone esti￾mates the relative pose between its… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overall architecture of our DreamNav. It consists of two successive stages, i.e., the first Coarse-Estimation Stage and the second Diffusion-Refined Stage. (Top) In the Coarse-Estimation stage, given a source and a target image, we regress a coarse relative pose consisting of the heading angle and range from the source to the target. (Bottom) In the Diffusion-Refined stage, we condition a ControlNet-style … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Qualitative visualization of DreamNav. (a) Illustration of the two-stage inference pro￾cess. In Stage I, we generate candidate next views by perturbing the predicted action in range and heading, where the 3×3 grid shows synthesized views under different conditioned offsets. The selected candidate is then refined in Stage II to produce a more accurate matched view, which is compared with the ground truth. (… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. PACE: Polar Axis-Conditioned Estimation for PairUAV Relative Localization

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A shared image-pair network beats a single-head baseline by giving heading and range their own decoder readouts—PACE's raw model scores 0.002460 on the PairUAV hidden test.

  2. RASR: Range-Aware Scale Recovery for Metric UAV Navigation

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    Range-aware residual correction on a compact descriptor from frozen MASt3R geometry yields PairUAV distance/heading commands with online score 0.003189, beating single global scale calibration.

  3. RASR: Range-Aware Scale Recovery for Metric UAV Navigation

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    Range-aware residual correction on frozen pairwise geometry lowers metric distance error for image-goal UAV navigation below global scale calibration on PairUAV (0.003189 vs 0.003424 total error).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

121 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Scaling Learning Algorithms Towards

    Bengio, Yoshua and LeCun, Yann , booktitle =. Scaling Learning Algorithms Towards

  2. [2]

    and Osindero, Simon and Teh, Yee Whye , journal =

    Hinton, Geoffrey E. and Osindero, Simon and Teh, Yee Whye , journal =. A Fast Learning Algorithm for Deep Belief Nets , volume =

  3. [3]

    2016 , publisher=

    Deep learning , author=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  4. [4]

    Drones , volume=

    Advancement challenges in UAV swarm formation control: A comprehensive review , author=. Drones , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  5. [5]

    Intelligence, Physical and Black, Kevin and Brown, Noah and Darpinian, James and Dhabalia, Karan and Driess, Danny and Esmail, Adnan and Equi, Michael and Finn, Chelsea and Fusai, Niccolo and others , journal=. _

  6. [6]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09747 , year=

    Fast: Efficient action tokenization for vision-language-action models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09747 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    Drones , volume=

    A Comprehensive Survey on Short-Distance Localization of UAVs , author=. Drones , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  8. [8]

    2020 , url =

    Global Positioning System (GPS) Standard Positioning Service (SPS) Performance Standard , institution =. 2020 , url =

    2020

  9. [9]

    2019 international conference on unmanned aircraft systems (icuas) , pages=

    The urban last mile problem: Autonomous drone delivery to your balcony , author=. 2019 international conference on unmanned aircraft systems (icuas) , pages=. 2019 , organization=

    2019

  10. [10]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  11. [11]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Robothor: An open simulation-to-real embodied ai platform , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  12. [12]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , volume=

    Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity , author=. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , volume=

  13. [13]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Superglue: Learning feature matching with graph neural networks , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  14. [14]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Navigating to objects specified by images , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

  15. [15]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Aerialvln: Vision-and-language navigation for uavs , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

  16. [16]

    ECCV (11) , year=

    Towards Natural Language-Guided Drones: GeoText-1652 Benchmark with Spatial Relation Matching , author=. ECCV (11) , year=

  17. [17]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    An intriguing failing of convolutional neural networks and the coordconv solution , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  18. [18]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , volume=

    Vision-based UAV self-positioning in low-altitude urban environments , author=. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  19. [19]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.00288 , year=

    UAV-ON: A Benchmark for Open-World Object Goal Navigation with Aerial Agents , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.00288 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , pages=

    Navigation world models , author=. Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , pages=

  21. [21]

    Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , pages=

    Prior does matter: Visual navigation via denoising diffusion bridge models , author=. Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , pages=

  22. [22]

    International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management , volume =

    Hwang, Jinsoo and Choe, Ja Young (Jacey) , title =. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management , volume =. 2019 , month =. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-07-2018-0558 , url =

    work page doi:10.1108/ijchm-07-2018-0558 2019

  23. [23]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Sample4geo: Hard negative sampling for cross-view geo-localisation , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

  24. [24]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.06817 , year=

    Rt-1: Robotics transformer for real-world control at scale , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.06817 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.21906 , year=

    Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Embodied Reasoning from Pretrained Knowledge , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.21906 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    Webber and Arulmani kuppusamy and Mohd

    Vinayak patki and Abolfazl Mehbodniya and Julian L. Webber and Arulmani kuppusamy and Mohd. Improving the geo-drone-based route for effective communication and connection stability improvement in the emergency area ad-hoc network , journal =. 2022 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102558 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.seta.2022.102558 2022

  27. [27]

    SocialDrone: An Integrated Social Media and Drone Sensing System for Reliable Disaster Response , year=

    Rashid, Md Tahmid and Zhang, Daniel Yue and Wang, Dong , booktitle=. SocialDrone: An Integrated Social Media and Drone Sensing System for Reliable Disaster Response , year=

  28. [28]

    2016 , eprint=

    GeoTextTagger: High-Precision Location Tagging of Textual Documents using a Natural Language Processing Approach , author=. 2016 , eprint=

    2016

  29. [29]

    Disaster Information Collection into Geographic Information System using Rescue Robots , year=

    Meguro, Jun-ichi and Ishikawa, Kiitirou and Hasizume, Takumi and Takiguchi, Jun-ichi and Noda, Itsuki and Hatayama, Mitinori , booktitle=. Disaster Information Collection into Geographic Information System using Rescue Robots , year=

  30. [30]

    Proceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning , pages =

    Learning to Map Natural Language Instructions to Physical Quadcopter Control using Simulated Flight , author =. Proceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning , pages =. 2020 , editor =

    2020

  31. [31]

    Pattern Recognition , volume=

    Multiple-environment self-adaptive network for aerial-view geo-localization , author=. Pattern Recognition , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  32. [32]

    and Gupta, Abhinav and Fei-Fei, Li and Farhadi, Ali , booktitle=

    Zhu, Yuke and Mottaghi, Roozbeh and Kolve, Eric and Lim, Joseph J. and Gupta, Abhinav and Fei-Fei, Li and Farhadi, Ali , booktitle=. Target-driven visual navigation in indoor scenes using deep reinforcement learning , year=

  33. [33]

    ACM Multimedia , year =

    Bokun Wang and Yang Yang and Xing Xu and Alan Hanjalic and Heng Tao Shen , title =. ACM Multimedia , year =

  34. [34]

    CVPR , year=

    Uav-human: A large benchmark for human behavior understanding with unmanned aerial vehicles , author=. CVPR , year=

  35. [35]

    Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=

    UAVM'23: 2023 Workshop on UAVs in Multimedia: Capturing the World from a New Perspective , author=. Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=

    2023

  36. [36]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , volume=

    Adaptive boosting for domain adaptation: Toward robust predictions in scene segmentation , author=. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  37. [37]

    Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia Workshop , year=

    The 2nd Workshop on UAVs in Multimedia: Capturing the World from a New Perspective , author=. Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia Workshop , year=

  38. [38]

    2008 , publisher=

    Introduction to information retrieval , author=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  39. [39]

    1999 , publisher=

    Modern information retrieval , author=. 1999 , publisher=

    1999

  40. [40]

    Agricultural Robots-Fundamentals and Application , year=

    Fundamental research on unmanned aerial vehicles to support precision agriculture in oil palm plantations , author=. Agricultural Robots-Fundamentals and Application , year=

  41. [41]

    ACM Multimedia , year=

    Guided attention network for object detection and counting on drones , author=. ACM Multimedia , year=

  42. [42]

    ACM Multimedia , year=

    Eye in the sky: Drone-based object tracking and 3d localization , author=. ACM Multimedia , year=

  43. [43]

    ICAUS , year=

    Research on Drone Delivery Paths in Controlled Areas Under Public Health Events , author=. ICAUS , year=

  44. [44]

    ACM Multimedia , year=

    Enhancing situational awareness with adaptive firefighting drones: leveraging diverse media types and classifiers , author=. ACM Multimedia , year=

  45. [45]

    arXiv:2208.11036 , year=

    CitySim: A Drone-Based Vehicle Trajectory Dataset for Safety Oriented Research and Digital Twins , author=. arXiv:2208.11036 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    ACM Multimedia , year=

    University-1652: A multi-view multi-source benchmark for drone-based geo-localization , author=. ACM Multimedia , year=

  47. [47]

    IEEE Data Eng

    Modern information retrieval: A brief overview , author=. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. , year=

  48. [48]

    ACM TOMM , year=

    Dual-path convolutional image-text embeddings with instance loss , author=. ACM TOMM , year=

  49. [49]

    ICLR , year=

    Composed Image Retrieval with Text Feedback via Multi-grained Uncertainty Regularization , author=. ICLR , year=

  50. [50]

    CVPR , year=

    Connecting language and vision for natural language-based vehicle retrieval , author=. CVPR , year=

  51. [51]

    arXiv:2012.07620 , year=

    Understanding image retrieval re-ranking: a graph neural network perspective , author=. arXiv:2012.07620 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  52. [52]

    arXiv:2212.09381 , year=

    Cognitive Accident Prediction in Driving Scenes: A Multimodality Benchmark , author=. arXiv:2212.09381 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [53]

    TNNLS , year=

    Parameter-efficient person re-identification in the 3d space , author=. TNNLS , year=

  54. [54]

    International Journal of Computer Vision , year=

    U-Turn: Crafting Adversarial Queries with Opposite-Direction Features , author=. International Journal of Computer Vision , year=

  55. [55]

    International Journal of Computer Vision , year=

    Rectifying pseudo label learning via uncertainty estimation for domain adaptive semantic segmentation , author=. International Journal of Computer Vision , year=

  56. [56]

    pattern recognition , year=

    Content-based image retrieval using computational visual attention model , author=. pattern recognition , year=

  57. [57]

    Information Processing & Management , year=

    A deep look into neural ranking models for information retrieval , author=. Information Processing & Management , year=

  58. [58]

    ACM SIGIR , year=

    Neural networks for information retrieval , author=. ACM SIGIR , year=

  59. [59]

    ACM SIGIR , year=

    Adarank: a boosting algorithm for information retrieval , author=. ACM SIGIR , year=

  60. [60]

    2004 , publisher=

    Information retrieval: Algorithms and heuristics , author=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  61. [61]

    ECCV , year=

    Stacked cross attention for image-text matching , author=. ECCV , year=

  62. [62]

    ICCV , year=

    Visual semantic reasoning for image-text matching , author=. ICCV , year=

  63. [63]

    EMNLP-IJCNLP , year=

    Bridging the gap between relevance matching and semantic matching for short text similarity modeling , author=. EMNLP-IJCNLP , year=

  64. [64]

    ACL , year=

    Enhanced LSTM for Natural Language Inference , author=. ACL , year=

  65. [65]

    Multimodal Machine Learning:

    Tadas Baltrusaitis and Chaitanya Ahuja and Louis. Multimodal Machine Learning:. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , year =

  66. [66]

    LXMERT : Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformers

    Tan, Hao and Bansal, Mohit. LXMERT : Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformers. EMNLP-IJCNLP. 2019

    2019

  67. [67]

    ICML , year =

    Alec Radford and Jong Wook Kim and Chris Hallacy and Aditya Ramesh and Gabriel Goh and Sandhini Agarwal and Girish Sastry and Amanda Askell and Pamela Mishkin and Jack Clark and Gretchen Krueger and Ilya Sutskever , title =. ICML , year =

  68. [68]

    ACM SIGIR , year=

    Attentive moment retrieval in videos , author=. ACM SIGIR , year=

  69. [69]

    IEEE TMM , year=

    Self-supervised Correlation Learning for Cross-Modal Retrieval , author=. IEEE TMM , year=

  70. [70]

    TIP , year=

    Scalable deep hashing for large-scale social image retrieval , author=. TIP , year=

  71. [71]

    ICML , year =

    Hao Fei and Shengqiong Wu and Yafeng Ren and Meishan Zhang , title =. ICML , year =

  72. [72]

    Cross-Lingual Semantic Role Labeling with High-Quality Translated Training Corpus

    Fei, Hao and Zhang, Meishan and Ji, Donghong. Cross-Lingual Semantic Role Labeling with High-Quality Translated Training Corpus. 2020

    2020

  73. [73]

    IJCAI , year =

    Conversational Semantic Role Labeling with Predicate-Oriented Latent Graph , author =. IJCAI , year =

  74. [74]

    ACM SIGIR , year =

    Hao Fei and Chenliang Li and Donghong Ji and Fei Li , title =. ACM SIGIR , year =

  75. [75]

    AAAI , year =

    Hao Fei and Donghong Ji and Bobo Li and Yijiang Liu and Yafeng Ren and Fei Li , title =. AAAI , year =

  76. [76]

    EMNLP , year =

    Hao Fei and Yafeng Ren and Donghong Ji , title =. EMNLP , year =

  77. [77]

    ACM SIGIR , year=

    Deconfounded video moment retrieval with causal intervention , author=. ACM SIGIR , year=

  78. [78]

    ACM SIGIR , year=

    Structured and natural responses co-generation for conversational search , author=. ACM SIGIR , year=

  79. [79]

    AAAI , year=

    Boundary proposal network for two-stage natural language video localization , author=. AAAI , year=

  80. [80]

    2022 , organization=

    Video as Conditional Graph Hierarchy for Multi-Granular Question Answering , author=. 2022 , organization=

    2022

Showing first 80 references.