Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Massless scalar perturbations of the 5D Schwarzschild-Tangherlini black hole admit analytic in/up solutions built from a generalized Mano-Suzuki-Takasugi expansion, validated by matching its renormalized angular momentum to the Seiberg-Witt

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 07:53 UTC pith:4VLLDE3J

load-bearing objection Useful 5d geodesic and PN results wrapped around an MST-for-RCHE construction whose core parity step is not proven; the paper is worth refereeing but needs a major fix. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.08280 v2 pith:4VLLDE3J submitted 2026-07-09 gr-qc

5d Schwarzschild-Tangherlini spacetime: MST-like formalism for a Reduced Confluent Heun Equation

Donato Bini , Giorgio Di Russo , Veronica Fantini This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords Schwarzschild-Tangherlinireduced confluent Heun equationMST formalismSeiberg-Witten theorymassless scalar perturbationsrenormalized angular momentumpost-Newtonian expansionquasinormal modes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs, for the first time, a Mano-Suzuki-Takasugi (MST)-type solution for the reduced confluent Heun equation (RCHE) that governs massless scalar perturbations of the five-dimensional Schwarzschild-Tangherlini spacetime. The construction expresses the two independent solutions as infinite series of hypergeometric and Bessel functions whose coefficients obey a five-term recursion, and it is validated by matching the resulting renormalized angular momentum ν to the independent Seiberg-Witten result ν = 2a − 1. If correct, this gives analytic post-Newtonian and post-Minkowskian control of 5D scalar perturbations, a practical tool for gravitational self-force calculations, and a template for other RCHE problems such as fuzzball geometries. The same paper also derives resummed scattering angles, a Lyapunov exponent and eikonal quasinormal-mode frequencies, and a 2.5PN energy flux from circular orbits.

Core claim

The central claim is that the radial equation for massless scalar perturbations of the five-dimensional Schwarzschild-Tangherlini black hole—a reduced confluent Heun equation—can be solved by a generalization of the MST formalism. The 'in' solution is written as a sum over Gauss hypergeometric functions F_{ν+n}(y) (Eq. 6.8), the 'up' solution as a sum over Bessel functions f_{ν+n}(z) (Eq. 6.18), with coefficients determined by a five-term recursion that splits into two identical three-term recurrences (Eqs. 6.24–6.27). The authors demonstrate that, for ℓ = 2, the renormalized angular momentum ν extracted from this recursion equals 2a − 1, where a is the fundamental period computed from the q

What carries the argument

The central object is the reduced confluent Heun equation (RCHE), the radial ODE with regular singularities at 0 and ±M and an irregular singularity at infinity. The machinery is a generalized MST expansion: the in solution is an infinite sum of Gauss hypergeometric functions F_{ν+n}(y), the up solution an infinite sum of Bessel functions f_{ν+n}(z), and the coefficients satisfy a five-term recursion (Eq. 6.10) that decouples into even and odd three-term recurrences with identical coefficients. The validation uses the Seiberg-Witten dictionary that maps the same radial equation to the quantum curve of N = 2 SU(2) gauge theory, identifying the renormalized angular momentum ν with the fundamen

Load-bearing premise

The construction's validation rests on the guessed identity ν = 2a − 1, tested only at ℓ = 2, and on the deferred Borel-Laplace summability of the infinite series; if either fails, the claimed analytic control of 5D scalar perturbations is not established.

What would settle it

Evaluate the MST continued-fraction condition for ℓ = 1 or ℓ = 3 to order M⁴ω⁴ or higher and compare with the Seiberg-Witten expansion of 2a − 1 (Eq. 5.14); any mismatch for a single ℓ would disprove the guessed relation and remove the paper's main cross-check.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Analytic 'in' and 'up' solutions for 5D Schwarzschild-Tangherlini scalar perturbations become available at arbitrary post-Newtonian order, enabling systematic high-PN gravitational self-force computations.
  • The ν = 2a − 1 match at ℓ = 2 provides evidence that the MST-like recursion and the Seiberg-Witten quantum curve describe the same underlying object, reinforcing the SW-QNM correspondence in five dimensions.
  • The eikonal approximation yields the analytic quasinormal-mode formula ω = (1/(2M))(ℓ + M²μ²/ℓ − i√2(n + 1/2) + O(ℓ⁻²)), which agrees well with numerical integration for large ℓ.
  • The energy flux from circular orbits is computed through 2.5PN order for ℓ = 0,...,4, providing concrete benchmarks for future numerical and analytical studies.
  • The authors expect the method to extend to other RCHE problems, including D1-D5 fuzzballs and JMaRT geometries, and possibly to the doubly confluent Heun equation of extremal Reissner-Nordström black holes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The conjectured relation ν = (d − 3)(a − 1/2) suggests a universal dimension-dependent dictionary between MST renormalized angular momentum and Seiberg-Witten periods; if verified, it would let the MST technology transfer to any dimension where the radial equation is a confluent-type Heun equation.
  • The factorization of the five-term recursion into two identical three-term recurrences with a₁ = 0 enforced may be a structural signature of MST-solvable RCHEs; checking whether the same factorization occurs in fuzzball RCHEs could predict which perturbation problems admit the method.
  • The Borel-Laplace summability left open here means the in/up series should be treated as formal until a resurgence analysis is performed; a direct numerical integration of the radial equation at moderate Mω would provide a practical check independent of the Seiberg-Witten match.
  • The PN in-solution's removal of logarithmic terms by setting ν = ℓ + O(q) hints that ν could be defined purely by requiring resummability, a criterion that might replace the Seiberg-Witten cross-check in cases where no gauge-theory dual is known.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the five-dimensional Schwarzschild-Tangherlini spacetime, first at the geodesic level (scattering angle, radial action, geodesic deviation, Lyapunov exponent/eikonal quasinormal modes) and then for massless scalar perturbations. The central new claim is a Mano-Suzuki-Takasugi-type representation of the reduced confluent Heun equation governing the scalar radial perturbations: in/up solutions are written as infinite sums over hypergeometric (for the in solution) and Bessel (for the up solution) basis functions satisfying a three-term recursion, with the renormalized angular momentum ν obtained from a continued-fraction condition. The construction is validated by comparing ν at ℓ=2 with the quantum Seiberg-Witten result ν=2a−1. The paper also derives post-Newtonian energy-flux formulas for a scalar charge on a circular orbit up to 2.5PN order.

Significance. If the MST-like construction is correct, it would be a significant technical advance: it provides the first explicit MST-type formalism for an RCHE in a black-hole perturbation context, with potential applications to fuzzball and JMaRT geometries and to higher-dimensional self-force calculations. The geodesic section contains useful exact results, notably the scattering-angle integral (2.25), the hypergeometric resummation (2.28)-(2.29), and the eikonal/numerical QNM comparison in Table I. The flux formulas (7.36)-(7.38) are concrete PN benchmarks. The paper is also transparent in flagging the guessed nature of the general ν relation and the deferral of exact connection formulas. However, the central MST validation is undermined by a concrete error in the even/odd decomposition of the recursion, and the ν check is demonstrated only at ℓ=2. The significance is therefore conditional on repairing that gap.

major comments (3)
  1. [§VI.C, Eq. (6.27)] The equality α^{(o)}_{n+1}=α^{(e)}_n, β^{(o)}_{n+1}=β^{(e)}_n, γ^{(o)}_{n+1}=γ^{(e)}_n is false for the coefficients defined in (6.10): α_{2n+3}≠α_{2n}, γ_{2n+3}≠γ_{2n}, ε_{2n+3}≠ε_{2n}. The correct relation is a shift in ν: α_{2n+1}(ν)=α_{2n}(ν+1), and similarly for β and γ. Therefore the continued fraction (6.28) quantizes only the even subsequence; the odd subsequence obeys the same recursion with ν→ν+1 and in general gives a different quantization condition. The statement that 'no contribution from the odd part is allowed' and hence a1=0 is an assertion, not a consequence of the radial equation; setting a1=0 does not force a_{±3}, ... to vanish in the two-sided recurrence. Consequently the sums (6.8)/(6.18) are not shown to solve (4.6)/(6.15), and the ℓ=2 ν check at (6.29)-(6.30) tests only the even sector. This is a load-bearing gap in the central construction.
  2. [§VI.A, §VI.B (Borel-Laplace discussion)] The defining series (6.8) and (6.18) are formal infinite sums; the authors invoke Newton-polygon and multi-summability arguments (text before Eq. 6.11 and after Eq. 6.32) and state that exact analytic connection formulas are beyond scope. However, without a precise specification of the Borel-Laplace sectors, a proof that the summed functions satisfy the ODE, and a connection formula identifying them with the desired in/up boundary conditions, the proposed in/up solutions remain a formal ansatz. This does not by itself invalidate the approach, but it means the paper's central claim should be framed as a construction requiring a separate convergence/monodromy proof, not as a complete MST formalism.
  3. [§V and §VI.C, Eqs. (6.29)-(6.31)] The validation of the MST recursion against the SW result is demonstrated for ℓ=2 only, and the general relation ν=2a−1, or ν=(d−3)(a−1/2), is explicitly guessed. Since this relation is the only independent check of the recursion coefficients and of the renormalized angular momentum, the abstract's claim that 'the value agrees with an independent determination' is stronger than the evidence presented. The authors should either solve the corrected continued-fraction condition for several ℓ values and compare with Eq. (5.14), or clearly state that the validation is a single-point check.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (6.5)] The displayed equation has an extra '=0' after the source term; as written it contains two equals signs. This is likely a typesetting error and should be corrected.
  2. [Eq. (6.25)] In the definition of the odd recursion coefficients, 'β^{(0)}_n' should be 'β^{(o)}_n'.
  3. [§VI.C] 'continuous fraction' should be 'continued fraction'.
  4. [Eq. (2.6)] The relation 'Rφψφψ = RθψθψRθφθφ' is not dimensionally/structurally clear from (2.4); it appears to be missing an operator or a plus sign. Please clarify.
  5. [§VI, after Eq. (6.10)] The object in (6.10) is called a five-term recursion, but after collecting coefficients of F_{n+ν} it is actually a three-term recurrence with step 2. The terminology should be adjusted to avoid confusion.
  6. [References] Reference [56] is cited as a personal communication, which is unusual for a load-bearing statement; please replace it with a citable source or state the result differently. Several DOIs appear to be placeholder-like and should be checked.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the MST ν is fixed by its own continued fraction and compared with an independently computed SW period; the guessed ν=2a−1 relation is a limitation, not a fitted input.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained. In Sec. VI, the MST-like ansatz (6.8)/(6.18) is substituted into the RCHE (6.4), producing the five-term recursion (6.10) from the hypergeometric/Bessel shift relations; the renormalized angular momentum ν is then fixed by the continued-fraction condition (6.28), with the ℓ=2 result (6.29) obtained from that recursion alone. The SW calculation in Sec. V uses a different route (quantum curve (5.2), dictionary (5.4)–(5.5), recursion (5.11)–(5.12)) and is not fed back into the MST recursion. The agreement ν=2a−1 is therefore an internal consistency check between two independent procedures applied to the same ODE, not a reduction of the prediction to its inputs. The paper itself flags the relation as 'guessed' (Eq. 6.31) and verified only at ℓ=2; this is an inductive gap, not circularity. I also weighed the self-flagged limitations: the a1=0 odd-sector truncation ('Therefore, we must set the coefficient a1 = 0') and the deferred Borel-Laplace resummation ('beyond the scope of the present work') are omitted proofs that bear on correctness/completeness, but they do not make any claimed output identical to a fitted parameter or to a self-citation. The few self-citations (e.g., Refs. [26,27] for radial-action techniques) are contextual and not load-bearing for the MST/SW comparison.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities or fitted constants are introduced. The main assumptions are mathematical: the SW dictionary, the summability of the MST infinite sums, the guessed ν-relation, and the decoupling of the recursion.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The radial equation (4.6) maps to the SU(2) quantum Seiberg-Witten curve Q_{0,2} with the dictionary (5.3)-(5.5).
    This mapping, borrowed from Refs. [32,38-40], underlies both the SW determination of ν and the MST-like construction; it is not rederived here.
  • ad hoc to paper The MST-like infinite sums (6.8) and (6.18) are well-defined in the Borel-Laplace sense and encode the physical in/up solutions, with exact analytic connection formulas deferred.
    The authors state that exact analytic expressions for the domains of analyticity require an ad-hoc analysis beyond the scope of the present work.
  • ad hoc to paper The relation ν = 2a - 1, or ν = (d - 3)(a - 1/2), holds between the MST-like and SW renormalized angular momenta for generic ℓ.
    Only the ℓ = 2 case is checked, and the text explicitly calls the relation 'guessed' and in need of additional studies.
  • domain assumption The five-term recursion (6.10) decouples into two equivalent three-term recursions, with odd coefficients a_1 set to zero.
    This decoupling is needed to solve the recursion and to reconstruct the in/up solutions; the vanishing of odd contributions is asserted rather than proved from the physical boundary conditions.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 33052 in / 20359 out tokens · 192639 ms · 2026-08-02T07:53:14.746261+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the five-dimensional Schwarzschild-Tangherlini solution, with particular attention to its geodesic structure and massless scalar perturbations. In the probe limit, we present two applications. First, we compute the scattering angle for unbound geodesics showing both post-Newtonian and post-Minkowskian type expansions, and succeeding in resumming the resulting series in terms of hypergeometric functions. Second, we derive the Lyapunov exponent for deviations from a critical circular orbit, which is relevant to the eikonal estimation of quasinormal modes. We then investigate the dynamics of massless scalar $(s=0)$ perturbations, for which the radial equation becomes a Reduced Confluent Heun equation. In this $d=5$ Schwarzschild-Tangherlini case we develop an original extension of the standard Mano-Suzuki-Takasugi (MST) formalism and validate the construction by computing the renormalized angular-momentum parameter $\nu$, whose value agrees with an independent determination based on the quantum Seiberg-Witten formalism. Finally, we analyze the energy flux from circular orbits, obtaining post-Newtonian results through 2.5PN order.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08280 by Donato Bini, Giorgio Di Russo, Veronica Fantini.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The Newton’s polygon of Eq. (6.4) at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: The Newton’ polygon of Eq. (6.15) at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The radial action for massive particles in spherically symmetric geometries: Exact resummation at any PM order

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    The massive-particle radial action and scattering angle in Schwarzschild, Schwarzschild-Tangherlini and D3-brane geometries are resummed in hypergeometric/Fox-Wright form, and the massive scalar quantum a-cycle is ide...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 38 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The orthogonality relation of the spherical harmonics on S3 ∫ S3 dΩ3YℓmφmψY ∗ ℓ′m′ φm′ ψ =δℓℓ′δmφm′ φ δmψm′ ψ . (7.16)

  2. [2]

    (5.1) In the SW perspective, the confluence corresponds to the decoupling of the hypermultiplet of mass m3

    − 2Q(1 −m1 −m2) + 4u 4y(1 +y) . (5.1) In the SW perspective, the confluence corresponds to the decoupling of the hypermultiplet of mass m3. Opera- tionally, this is implemented by taking the double scal- ing limit Q → 0 and m3 → ∞, while keeping the product Qm3 as fixed, and identifying it with the new gauge cou- 11 pling q = −Qm3. The resulting curve is Q0...

  3. [3]

    + 4u 4(1 +y) + −1 + 2(m2 1 +m2

  4. [4]

    shift relation

    + 4(q −u) 4y , (5.2) through the introduction of the following dimensionless coordinate r =M √ 1 +y. (5.3) The dictionary for such a correspondence is the following m1 = −m2 =i√q, u = ( ℓ + 1 2 ) 2 −q, (5.4) with the gauge theory coupling q = M 2ω2 4 . (5.5) Some brief reminders are in order. In the non commutative Nekrasov-Shatashvili back- ground [43], ...

  5. [5]

    The completeness relation for spherical harmonics on S3 δS3(χ,χ ′) = ∑ ℓmφmψ Yℓmφmψ (χ)Y ∗ ℓmφmψ (χ′), (7.17) where χ = (θ,φ,ψ ) is a commonly used notation for all the angular variables. The non homogeneous equation (7.1) in presence of the source (7.2 ) can be made explicit as follows □ Ψ = ∑ ℓmφmψ ∫ dω 2πe−iωtYℓmφmψ (θ,φ,ψ )LrRℓmφmψω(r) = −4π ∫ dω 2πe−...

  6. [6]

    eikonal limit

    Radial action To this end, let start from Eq. (A8) where the redshift factor reads f (r) = 1 − ( M r ) d−3 . (A15) Assuming R(r) = r1−d 2 √ M 2 −Mdr3−dψ(r) (A16) one gets the following normal form ψ′′(r) + QW,dψ(r) = 0 , (A17) where QW,d = 1 4r2 (r3Md −M 3rd)2 [ 4M 6r2(1+d)ω2 + 2 ( d2 + 2d(ℓ − 3) + 2(ℓ − 3)ℓ + 8 ) Md+3rd+3 − M 6(d+2ℓ−4)(d+2ℓ−2)r2d+r6M 2d ...

  7. [7]

    (A32) Hence, the Fox-Wright function is a genuine extension of the generalized hypergeometric function

    Relation with the Generalized Hypergeometric Function When Ai = Bj = 1, the Fox-Wright function reduces to pΨq = ∏ p i=1 Γ(ai) ∏ q j=1 Γ(bj) pFq(a1,...,a p;b1,...,b q;z). (A32) Hence, the Fox-Wright function is a genuine extension of the generalized hypergeometric function. 22

  8. [8]

    (A34) The above series (A27) converges for every complex value of z whenever D> 0

    Convergence Let us introduce the notation Ap = p∑ i=1 Ai, Bq = q∑ j=1 Bj, (A33) and let us denote D = 1 + Bq − Ap. (A34) The above series (A27) converges for every complex value of z whenever D> 0. If D = 0 the series has a finite ra- dius of convergence depending on the parameters while when D < 0 the series generally diverges for z ̸= 0, al- though it ma...

  9. [9]

    (A35) The Mittag-Leffler Function The two-parameter Mittag-Leffler function can be written as Eα,β(z) = ∞∑ k=0 zk Γ(αk +β) = 1Ψ1 [ (1, 1) (β,α );z ]

    Special Cases The Wright Function The Wright function is obtained as 0Ψ1 [ − (β,α );z ] = ∞∑ k=0 zk k! Γ(αk +β). (A35) The Mittag-Leffler Function The two-parameter Mittag-Leffler function can be written as Eα,β(z) = ∞∑ k=0 zk Γ(αk +β) = 1Ψ1 [ (1, 1) (β,α );z ] . (A36) The Generalized Hypergeometric Function When all step parameters are equal to one, one reco...

  10. [10]

    Relation with the Fox H-Function The Fox-Wright function can often be represented as a particular case of the Fox H-function, pΨq(z) = H 1,p p,q+1(−z | · · · ), (A38) which places it within the hierarchy of generalized special functions together with the Meijer G-function and the generalized hypergeometric function. The Fox-Wright function therefore provi...

  11. [11]

    dimensional regularization

    PN-type solution to the radial equation (A8) We will not aim at discussing here in detail the generic d solution in comparison with the corresponding one in d = 4, since it deserves a specific treatment as well as ex- plicit examples in a context of dimensional regularization when d = 4 + ǫ. Dedicated studies on this topic are still in progress and will be...

  12. [12]

    (2.2)) ds2 =dθ2 + sin2θdφ2 + cos2θdψ2, (B1) 23 where the coordinates are xa = ( θ,φ,ψ ) vary in the ranges θ ∈ [0, π 2 ), φ,ψ ∈ [0, 2π)

    Metric and curvature Let us write the metric of S3 in the form (see Eq. (2.2)) ds2 =dθ2 + sin2θdφ2 + cos2θdψ2, (B1) 23 where the coordinates are xa = ( θ,φ,ψ ) vary in the ranges θ ∈ [0, π 2 ), φ,ψ ∈ [0, 2π). The spacetime (B1) is an Einstein manifold because of the property Rab − 2gab = 0, R = 6, (B2) also implying Rab;c = 0. The independent Riemann ten-...

  13. [13]

    M. Picone

    Wigner matrices on S3 ≃ SU (2) SinceS3 is diffeomorphic to the compact group SU (2), the Wigner matrices Dℓ m1m2(g), with g ∈SU (2), form an orthogonal basis of the space L2(SU (2)). Parametrizing g by the Euler angles, say ( φ,θ,ψ ), and introducing the generators of the rotations Ji g =e−iφJze−iθJye−iψJz, (B13) the matrix elements of the irreducible, uni...

  14. [14]

    Schwarzschild field in n dimensions and the dimensionality of space problem,

    F. R. Tangherlini, “Schwarzschild field in n dimensions and the dimensionality of space problem,” Nuovo Cim. 27, 636-651 (1963) doi:10.1007/BF02784569

    doi:10.1007/bf02784569 1963

  15. [15]

    Black strings and p-branes are unstable,

    R. Gregory and R. Laflamme, “Black strings and p-branes are unstable,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2837-2840 (1993) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2837 [arXiv:hep- th/9301052 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 1993

  16. [16]

    Black strings and p-branes,

    G. T. Horowitz and A. Strominger, “Black strings and p-branes,” Nuclear Physics B 360-1, 197-209 (1991) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90440-9

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90440-9 1991

  17. [17]

    Black Holes in Higher Di- mensional Space-Times,

    R. C. Myers and M. J. Perry, “Black Holes in Higher Di- mensional Space-Times,” Annals Phys. 172, 304 (1986) doi:10.1016/0003-4916(86)90186-7

    doi:10.1016/0003-4916(86)90186-7 1986

  18. [18]

    Instability of non-supersymmetric smooth geometries,

    V. Cardoso, O. J. C. Dias, J. L. Hovdebo and R. C. Myers, “Instability of non-supersymmetric smooth geometries,” Phys. Rev. D 73, 064031 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.064031 [arXiv:hep-th/0512277 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  19. [19]

    Bianchi, M

    M. Bianchi, M. Casolino and G. Rizzo, Nucl. Phys. B 954, 115010 (2020) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2020.115010 [arXiv:1904.01097 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    2-charge circular fuzz- balls and their perturbations,

    M. Bianchi and G. Di Russo, “2-charge circular fuzz- balls and their perturbations,” JHEP 08, 217 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2023)217 [arXiv:2212.07504 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Charge instability of JMaRT geometries,

    M. Bianchi, C. Di Benedetto, G. Di Russo and G. Sudano, “Charge instability of JMaRT geometries,” JHEP 09, 078 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2023)078 [arXiv:2305.00865 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Tidal resonances for fuzzballs,

    G. Di Russo, F. Fucito and J. F. Morales, “Tidal resonances for fuzzballs,” JHEP 04, 149 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2024)149 [arXiv:2402.06621 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Topological stars, black holes and generalized charged Weyl solutions,

    I. Bah and P. Heidmann, “Topological stars, black holes and generalized charged Weyl solutions,” JHEP 09, 147 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2021)147 [arXiv:2012.13407 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    On the stability and de- formability of top stars,

    M. Bianchi, G. Di Russo, A. Grillo, J. F. Morales and G. Sudano, “On the stability and de- formability of top stars,” JHEP 12, 121 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2023)121 [arXiv:2305.15105 [gr- qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Cavity effect in the quasinormal mode spectrum of topolog- ical stars,

    P. Heidmann, N. Speeney, E. Berti and I. Bah, “Cavity effect in the quasinormal mode spectrum of topolog- ical stars,” Phys. Rev. D 108, no.2, 024021 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.024021 [arXiv:2305.14412 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Charge (in)stability and superra- diance of Topological Stars,

    A. Cipriani, C. Di Benedetto, G. Di Russo, A. Grillo and G. Sudano, “Charge (in)stability and superra- diance of Topological Stars,” JHEP 07, 143 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2024)143 [arXiv:2405.06566 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Scalar perturba- tions of topological-star spacetimes,

    M. Bianchi, D. Bini and G. Di Russo, “Scalar perturba- tions of topological-star spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D 110, no.8, 084077 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.084077 [arXiv:2407.10868 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Scalar waves in a topological star spacetime: Self-force and radia- tive losses,

    M. Bianchi, D. Bini and G. Di Russo, “Scalar waves in a topological star spacetime: Self-force and radia- tive losses,” Phys. Rev. D 111, no.4, 044017 (2025) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.044017 [arXiv:2411.19612 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Scalar waves from unbound orbits in a topological star spacetime: PN re- construction of the field and radiation losses in a self- force approach,

    G. Di Russo, M. Bianchi and D. Bini, “Scalar waves from unbound orbits in a topological star spacetime: PN re- construction of the field and radiation losses in a self- force approach,” Phys. Rev. D 112, no.2, 024002 (2025) doi:10.1103/sycf-brn1 [arXiv:2502.21040 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Asymptot- ically flat rotating topological stars,

    P. Heidmann, P. Pani and J. E. Santos, “Asymptot- ically flat rotating topological stars,” JHEP 03, 108 (2026) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2026)108 [arXiv:2510.05200 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    Rotating Topological Stars,

    M. Bianchi, G. Dibitetto, J. F. Morales and A. Ruip´ erez , “Rotating Topological Stars,” JHEP 01, 046 (2026) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2026)046 [arXiv:2504.12235 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    W-solitons as prototypical black hole microstates,

    A. Dima, P. Heidmann, M. Melis, P. Pani and G. Patashuri, “W-solitons as prototypical black hole microstates,” Phys. Rev. D 112, no.12, 124056 (2025) doi:10.1103/2wcq-4xny [arXiv:2509.18245 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Analytic so- lutions of the Regge-Wheeler equation and the post- Minkowskian expansion,

    S. Mano, H. Suzuki and E. Takasugi, “Analytic so- lutions of the Regge-Wheeler equation and the post- Minkowskian expansion,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 96, 549-566 (1996) doi:10.1143/PTP.96.549 [arXiv:gr-qc/9605057 [gr- qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  34. [34]

    Analytic solu- tions of the Teukolsky equation and their low frequency expansions,

    S. Mano, H. Suzuki and E. Takasugi, “Analytic solu- tions of the Teukolsky equation and their low frequency expansions,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 95, 1079-1096 (1996) doi:10.1143/PTP.95.1079 [arXiv:gr-qc/9603020 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  35. [35]

    Analytic black hole per- turbation approach to gravitational radiation,

    M. Sasaki and H. Tagoshi, “Analytic black hole per- turbation approach to gravitational radiation,” Living Rev. Rel. 6, 6 (2003) doi:10.12942/lrr-2003-6 [arXiv:gr- qc/0306120 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2003

  36. [36]

    The mathematical theory of black holes,

    S. Chandrasekhar, “The mathematical theory of black holes,” Oxford Classic Texts in the Physical Sciences, Ed. revis. 1998, Oxford University Press, USA

    1998

  37. [37]

    Notes on AdS- Schwarzschild eikonal phase,

    A. Parnachev and K. Sen, “Notes on AdS- Schwarzschild eikonal phase,” JHEP 03, 289 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2021)289 [arXiv:2011.06920 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    Resummation of Universal Tails in Gravitational Wave- forms,

    M. M. Ivanov, Y. Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez and Z. Zhou, “Resummation of Universal Tails in Gravitational Wave- forms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, no.14, 141401 (2025) doi:10.1103/jzd1-qzkt [arXiv:2504.07862 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Topological stars and scalar wave equation: Exact resummation of the renormal- ized angular momentum in the eikonal limit,

    D. Bini and G. Di Russo, “Topological stars and scalar wave equation: Exact resummation of the renormal- ized angular momentum in the eikonal limit,” Phys. Rev. D 112, no.6, 064008 (2025) doi:10.1103/dw5y-4pv8 [arXiv:2506.14442 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Kerr space- time and scalar wave equation: Exact resumma- tion of the renormalized angular momentum in the eikonal limit,

    D. Bini, G. Di Russo and A. Geralico, “Kerr space- time and scalar wave equation: Exact resumma- tion of the renormalized angular momentum in the eikonal limit,” Phys. Rev. D 112, no.6, 064077 (2025) doi:10.1103/mzqw-wbvf [arXiv:2508.12046 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Higher Order Relativistic Periastron Advances and Binary Pulsars,

    T. Damour and G. Schaefer, “Higher Order Relativistic Periastron Advances and Binary Pulsars,” Nuovo Cim. B 101, 127 (1988) doi:10.1007/BF02828697

    doi:10.1007/bf02828697 1988

  42. [42]

    Characterizing geodesic deviations in a topological star spacetime: Massive, charged, spinning, and stringylike objects,

    D. Bini and G. Di Russo, “Characterizing geodesic deviations in a topological star spacetime: Massive, charged, spinning, and stringylike objects,” Phys. Rev. D 112, no.2, 024021 (2025) doi:10.1103/6xc4-wm2f [arXiv:2505.13020 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Geometric transport along circular orbits in station- 26 ary axisymmetric spacetimes,

    D. Bini, C. Cherubini, G. Cruciani and R. T. Jantzen, “Geometric transport along circular orbits in station- 26 ary axisymmetric spacetimes,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 13, 1771-1804 (2004) doi:10.1142/S0218271804005237 [arXiv:gr-qc/0407004 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  44. [44]

    Geodesic stability, Lyapunov expo- nents and quasinormal modes,

    V. Cardoso, A. S. Miranda, E. Berti, H. Witek and V. T. Zanchin, “Geodesic stability, Lyapunov expo- nents and quasinormal modes,” Phys. Rev. D 79, no.6, 064016 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.064016 [arXiv:0812.1806 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  45. [45]

    More on the SW-QNM correspondence,

    M. Bianchi, D. Consoli, A. Grillo and J. F. Morales, “More on the SW-QNM correspondence,” JHEP 01, 024 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2022)024 [arXiv:2109.09804 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  46. [46]

    Breit-Wigner res- onances and the quasinormal modes of anti-de Sit- ter black holes,

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso and P. Pani, “Breit-Wigner res- onances and the quasinormal modes of anti-de Sit- ter black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 79, 101501 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.101501 [arXiv:0903.5311 [gr- qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  47. [47]

    Advanced Methods in Black-Hole Perturba- tion Theory,

    P. Pani, “Advanced Methods in Black-Hole Perturba- tion Theory,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28, 1340018 (2013) doi:10.1142/S0217751X13400186 [arXiv:1305.6759 [gr- qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  48. [48]

    Light rings as observa- tional evidence for event horizons: long-lived modes, ergoregions and nonlinear instabilities of ultracom- pact objects,

    V. Cardoso, L. C. B. Crispino, C. F. B. Macedo, H. Okawa and P. Pani, “Light rings as observa- tional evidence for event horizons: long-lived modes, ergoregions and nonlinear instabilities of ultracom- pact objects,” Phys. Rev. D 90, no.4, 044069 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.044069 [arXiv:1406.5510 [gr- qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  49. [49]

    Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of spin-weighted spheroidal harmonics in four and higher dimensions,

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso and M. Casals, “Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of spin-weighted spheroidal harmonics in four and higher dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D 73, 024013 (2006) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D 73, 109902 (2006)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.109902 [arXiv:gr-qc/0511111 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  50. [50]

    Irregular Liouville Correlators and Connection For- mulae for Heun Functions,

    G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, D. Panea Lichtig and A. Tanzini, “Irregular Liouville Correlators and Connection For- mulae for Heun Functions,” Commun. Math. Phys. 397, no.2, 635-727 (2023) doi:10.1007/s00220-022-04497- 5 [arXiv:2201.04491 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Black Hole Quasinormal Modes and Seiberg–Witten Theory,

    G. Aminov, A. Grassi and Y. Hatsuda, “Black Hole Quasinormal Modes and Seiberg–Witten Theory,” An- nales Henri Poincare 23, no.6, 1951-1977 (2022) doi:10.1007/s00023-021-01137-x [arXiv:2006.06111 [hep - th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1951

  52. [52]

    CFT description of BH’s and ECO’s: QNMs, super- radiance, echoes and tidal responses,

    D. Consoli, F. Fucito, J. F. Morales and R. Poghossian, “CFT description of BH’s and ECO’s: QNMs, super- radiance, echoes and tidal responses,” JHEP 12, 115 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2022)115 [arXiv:2206.09437 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    Black hole perturbation theory and multiple polylogarithms,

    G. Aminov, P. Arnaudo, G. Bonelli, A. Grassi and A. Tanzini, “Black hole perturbation theory and multiple polylogarithms,” JHEP 11, 059 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2023)059 [arXiv:2307.10141 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    Scalar self- force effects in neutral W-soliton backgrounds,

    M. Bianchi, D. Bini and G. Di Russo, “Scalar self- force effects in neutral W-soliton backgrounds,” Phys. Rev. D 113, no.4, 044028 (2026) doi:10.1103/rf8g-yl2d [arXiv:2511.01402 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    Regular and Floquet bases for gauge and gravity theories: a non perturbative ap- proach,

    D. Fioravanti and M. Rossi, “Regular and Floquet bases for gauge and gravity theories: a non perturbative ap- proach,” [arXiv:2508.19960 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  56. [56]

    Quantization of Integrable Systems and Four Dimensional Gauge Theories,

    N. A. Nekrasov and S. L. Shatashvili, “Quantization of Integrable Systems and Four Dimensional Gauge Theories,” Contribution to: ICMP09, 265-289 (2009) doi:10.1142/9789814304634 0015 [arXiv:0908.4052 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  57. [57]

    Recursion relation for instanton count - ing for SU(2) N = 2 SYM in NS limit of Ω background,

    H. Poghosyan, “Recursion relation for instanton count - ing for SU(2) N = 2 SYM in NS limit of Ω background,” JHEP 05, 088 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2021)088 [arXiv:2010.08498 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  58. [58]

    Resumming post- Minkowskian and post-Newtonian gravitational wave- form expansions,

    A. Cipriani, G. Di Russo, F. Fucito, J. F. Morales, H. Poghosyan and R. Poghossian, “Resumming post- Minkowskian and post-Newtonian gravitational wave- form expansions,” SciPost Phys. 19, no.2, 057 (2025) doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.19.2.057 [arXiv:2501.19257 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Divergent Series, Summa- bility and Resurgence I,

    C. Mitschi and D. Sauzin, “Divergent Series, Summa- bility and Resurgence I,” Lect. Notes Math. 2153, pp. xxi+298, Springer, 2016, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28736-2

    doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28736-2 2016

  60. [60]

    Les fonctions r´ esurgentes. Tome I,

    J ´Ecalle, “Les fonctions r´ esurgentes. Tome I,” Publi- cations Math´ ematiques d’Orsay 81 [Mathematical Pub- lications of Orsay 81] , 5, Universit´ e de Paris-Sud, D´ epartement de Math´ ematiques, Orsay, 247 (1981)

    1981

  61. [61]

    S´ eries divergentes et th´ eories asympto- tiques,

    J. P. Ramis “S´ eries divergentes et th´ eories asympto- tiques,” Bull. Soc. Math. France, 121,74 (1993)

    1993

  62. [62]

    Divergent series, summability and resurgence. II

    M. Loday-Richaud, “Divergent series, summability and resurgence. II”, Lect. Notes Math., 2154, pp. xxiii+272, Springer, (2016) doi:10.1007/978-3-319-29075-1

    doi:10.1007/978-3-319-29075-1 2016

  63. [63]

    Scalar field self- force effects on a particle orbiting a Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black hole,

    D. Bini, G. Carvalho and A. Geralico, “Scalar field self- force effects on a particle orbiting a Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black hole,” Phys. Rev. D 94, no.12, 124028 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.124028 [arXiv:1610.02235 [gr- qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  64. [64]

    Turning black holes and D-branes inside out of their photon spheres,

    M. Bianchi and G. Di Russo, “Turning black holes and D-branes inside out of their photon spheres,” Phys. Rev. D 105, no.12, 126007 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.126007 [arXiv:2110.09579 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  65. [65]

    Turning rotating D-branes and black holes inside out their photon- halo,

    M. Bianchi and G. Di Russo, “Turning rotating D-branes and black holes inside out their photon- halo,” Phys. Rev. D 106, no.8, 086009 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.086009 [arXiv:2203.14900 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    Couch-Torrence conformal inversion, supersymmetry and conserved charges for D3-branes,

    M. Akhond, M. Bianchi, A. Cristofaro and F. Riccioni, “Couch-Torrence conformal inversion, supersymmetry and conserved charges for D3-branes,” [arXiv:2604.27815 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  67. [67]

    Reduction of a class of Fox-Wright psi functions for certain rational pa- rameters,

    A. R. Miller, I. S. Moskowitz, “Reduction of a class of Fox-Wright psi functions for certain rational pa- rameters,” Computers & Mathematics with Applica- tions, 30, Issue 11, 73-82, (1995) ISSN 0898-1221, https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-1221(95)00165-U

    doi:10.1016/0898-1221(95)00165-u 1995

  68. [68]

    Wolfram Research, FoxH, Wolfram Language Documen- tation, https://reference.wolfram.com/language/ ref/FoxH.html

  69. [69]

    Usseglio, personal communication

    D. Usseglio, personal communication

  70. [70]

    The supplemental material included both in the arxiv version and in the published version of the present paper contains all data that support the findings of this article