Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 63 references

This paper establishes that the massive-particle radial action in Schwarzschild and related spherically symmetric spacetimes resums exactly at any post-Minkowskian order, and that in 4D Schwarzschild the quantum a-cycle equals this radial a

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 01:00 UTC pith:RRZHOVYN

load-bearing objection A genuinely new 4D massive radial-action resummation with a plausible but only low-order-checked qSW dictionary; treat the all-order quantum link as a conjecture. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.14802 v1 pith:RRZHOVYN submitted 2026-07-16 gr-qc

The radial action for massive particles in spherically symmetric geometries: Exact resummation at any PM order

Donato Bini , Giorgio Di Russo This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords radial actionmassive particlesSchwarzschild spacetimepost-Minkowskian expansionhypergeometric functionsSeiberg-Witten curvesscattering angleeikonal limit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that the radial action for a massive particle on a hyperbolic geodesic in the Schwarzschild spacetime—and in two other spherically symmetric geometries—can be exactly resummed at any post-Minkowskian (PM) order in the eikonal limit, not just computed term by term. The resummation packages the entire infinite PM series into a few hypergeometric functions, with the impact-parameter variable entering only as their argument, and the scattering angle follows by differentiation. In the 4-dimensional Schwarzschild case the paper further claims that the quantum a-cycle, i.e. the renormalized angular momentum of massive scalar perturbations, is simply related to this same radial action in the eikonal limit, extending a known massless gauge-gravity dictionary. If true, this gives a practical analytic handle on massive-particle scattering and on high-order perturbative corrections in black-hole physics.

Core claim

In the eikonal limit (large angular momentum j and asymptotic momentum p∞), the massive-particle radial action for hyperbolic-like geodesics in the Schwarzschild spacetime is shown to take the closed form I_r = I_r^0 + μ M Σ_{k=0}^∞ p∞^{1−2k} W(k), where each W(k) is a combination of regularized hypergeometric functions whose only variable is x ∝ p∞/j; differentiation with respect to j yields the resummed scattering angle χ + π/2 = χ_1/j + Σ_k p∞^{−2k} H(k). The same packaging works in the Schwarzschild-Tangherlini family, where the series becomes a Fox-Wright function, and in the D3-brane geometry, where the scattering and instantonic radial actions are related by the Couch-Torrence inversi

What carries the argument

The central object is the massive radial action I_r(γ,j) = ∫ p_r dr along a hyperbolic-like geodesic, written in the eikonal limit as a PM series whose coefficients are reorganized into regularized hypergeometric functions via Eq. (2.34)-(2.37). The companion mechanism is the dictionary (2.70)-(2.71) that identifies the massive scalar radial equation in Schwarzschild with the N_f = 3 quantum Seiberg-Witten curve, so that the quantum a-cycle—computed through a continued-fraction recursion—is equated in the eikonal limit with the radial action. In higher dimensions, the Fox-Wright function plays the same packaging role for the Schwarzschild-Tangherlini series.

Load-bearing premise

The identity between the quantum a-cycle and the radial action rests on a dictionary between the massive scalar equation and the Seiberg-Witten curve, which is verified only at the first few orders; a higher-order mismatch would break that identity even if the geodesic resummation itself stands.

What would settle it

Compute the quantum a-cycle from the continued-fraction recursion (2.67) to the next order in q beyond Eq. (2.84), apply the dictionary (2.70)-(2.71), and compare the resulting eikonal-limit series against the next π-sector coefficient Iπ_7 in the radial-action expansion (2.32); a mismatch at that order would falsify the claimed a-cycle/radial-action relation. The geodesic resummation itself can be independently checked by comparing its expanded form (2.46) with independently known higher-order PM scattering angles.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the resummation (2.34) is correct, the scattering angle for massive particles in Schwarzschild is completely determined at all PM orders by the single eikonal variable x ∝ p∞/j, eliminating the need for order-by-order integration.
  • If the dictionary (2.70)-(2.71) is correct, the renormalized angular momentum of massive scalar perturbations can be read off directly from the geodesic radial action, providing fully resummed input for black-hole perturbation theory.
  • The Fox-Wright representation for Schwarzschild-Tangherlini gives a d-dimensional closed form for the radial action and scattering angle, whose expansion around d = 4 + ε can be used in dimensional regularization.
  • The expanded a_D-cycle, although not resummed, supplies the instanton-sector contribution of the dual period for massive scalar perturbations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the a-cycle/radial-action dictionary holds to all orders, high-order instantonic corrections to quasi-normal-mode frequencies in the eikonal regime could be extracted from geodesic data alone, bypassing the costly instanton expansion.
  • The uniform structure of W(k) suggests the same hypergeometric resummation may extend to bound orbits by analytic continuation in angular momentum, turning the scattering-angle formula into a boundary-to-bound dictionary for massive binaries.
  • The appearance of Fox-Wright functions in both 4D and higher-dimensional radial actions hints that dimensional-regularization poles in scattering observables may themselves be resummable, giving an analytic handle on the ε-expansion without truncating at finite order.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper computes the radial action for massive particles on hyperbolic geodesics in 4D Schwarzschild, Schwarzschild-Tangherlini, and D3-brane spacetimes. In the 4D Schwarzschild case, beginning from a post-Minkowskian expansion, it claims an exact all-order resummation of the radial action—and hence the scattering angle—in terms of regularized hypergeometric functions, Eqs. (2.34)–(2.45), with the first five terms checked against known expansions in Eq. (2.46). The paper further constructs a quantum Seiberg-Witten (qSW) dictionary for massive scalar perturbations, Eq. (2.70)–(2.71), and identifies the quantum a-cycle with the π-sector of the radial action in the eikonal limit, Eq. (2.72). For Schwarzschild-Tangherlini, Fox-Wright resummations are proposed for the radial action and scattering angle, and for D3-branes the relation between the scattering radial action and SW cycles is studied.

Significance. If the claims are correct, the paper provides a practically useful analytic resummation of the massive-particle radial action and scattering angle in spherically symmetric spacetimes, going beyond previous null-geodesic results. The proposed massive-field qSW dictionary is novel and potentially significant for black-hole perturbation theory, since the MST formalism is not available for massive fields. A clear strength is the explicit low-order verification against known PM series, Eq. (2.46), which makes the classical geodesic resummation credible. However, the advertised all-order exactness of both the radial-action resummation and the massive qSW dictionary is not backed by a proof; the latter is checked only through a few 1/j orders. The paper is therefore a useful contribution whose central claims require substantial strengthening before publication.

major comments (3)
  1. [§II.A, Eqs. (2.27)–(2.34)] The step from the formal triple sum (2.29) to the resummed expression (2.34) is asserted but not derived. The sums contain singular factors such as tan(πn) and Γ(s−n) at integer n, so one must specify the summation order and limiting prescription, and give the convergence domain or an analytic-continuation theorem for the regularized hypergeometric functions. The five-term check in Eq. (2.46) is strong evidence but does not establish the claim of exactness at all PM orders. Please provide a derivation or explicitly state that the displayed equality is conjectural beyond the checked orders.
  2. [§II.D, Eqs. (2.70)–(2.72), Table I] The central quantum-classical link—the identification of the qSW a-cycle with the massive radial action in the eikonal limit—is verified only by matching the first three displayed π-sector coefficients (1/j, 1/j^3, 1/j^5) in Eq. (2.72). The continued-fraction solution (2.67) is presented only to O(q^3) in Table I, and no argument is given that the dictionary (2.70)–(2.71) remains exact at higher orders. Since the abstract advertises this relation as exact, the paper should either supply an all-order proof or clearly reframe the claim as a finite-order matching and adjust the conclusions accordingly.
  3. [§IV and Abstract/Conclusions] The abstract and concluding remarks state that the D3-brane results apply to massive particles, but Section IV explicitly treats 'propagation of massless probes' and uses the null condition H = g^{μν}P_μ P_ν = 0 in Eq. (4.3). The D3-brane radial action and SW-cycle results are therefore massless, not massive. This mismatch should be corrected, and the scope of the D3-brane claims in the abstract should be restricted accordingly.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract] Typo: 'genralization' should be 'generalization'.
  2. [§II.A, Eq. (2.46)] The phrase 'reproduces known results' lacks a specific citation. Please identify the known PM/scattering-angle results and the order to which the comparison was performed.
  3. [§II.C, Table I] Only the first three a_i coefficients are displayed, yet Eq. (2.72) requires higher orders in q to reach 1/j^5. State how many terms were actually used and whether the higher coefficients are available, perhaps in an ancillary file.
  4. [§II.C, Eq. (2.37)] The notation p̃F_q for regularized hypergeometric functions is used without definition; please define it in the text.
  5. [§III, Eq. (3.10)] The symbols M_d, M_3, and r_h are used in Eq. (3.10) without clear definitions; please spell out the relation to the ADM mass and the notation for the dimensional reduction.
  6. [§IV, Eq. (4.3)] The symbol H is used both for the harmonic function in Eq. (4.1) and for the Hamiltonian in Eq. (4.3), which is confusing. Please use distinct notation.
  7. [References] Several references are incomplete or lack titles, e.g., Refs. [31], [38], and [53]. Please complete the bibliographic information.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the radial-action resummation is a self-contained integral/series derivation, and the qSW a-cycle comparison is an independent non-fitted check; the unproven all-order dictionary is a completeness risk, not circularity.

full rationale

The central radial-action result (2.34) follows from the geodesic mass-shell condition (2.3)-(2.5), the exact integral (2.10), the PM expansion (2.22)-(2.29), and the stated resummation into regularized hypergeometric functions; no parameter is fitted to the claimed output, and Eq. (2.46) provides an external check against known PM series. The qSW part is also non-circular: the a-cycle is computed from the quantum Seiberg-Witten curve (2.63) via the continued-fraction equation (2.67)/Table I, independently of the radial action. The dictionary (2.70) is an ODE-to-qSW identification under y=(r-2M)/(2M), and the eikonal identifications (2.71) are standard WKB relations; the matching (2.72) is a genuine non-fitted comparison with the first pi-sector coefficients (2.32). The main limitation is that only coefficients through 1/j^5 are matched (a-cycle computed only to O(q^3)), so the all-order equality is asserted rather than proven; that is a completeness/correctness risk, not circularity. Self-citations [4,6] supply the massless dictionary as background, but the massive check is performed in this paper, so they are not load-bearing. The D3-branes section's massless/massive wording inconsistency is an error, not a circular step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; the physical quantities mu, M, j, p_inf enter as inputs. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced. The main burden is carried by the unproved resummation identities and the qSW dictionary, which are mathematical/domain assumptions rather than invented entities.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The Damour-Schaefer prescription: PM-expanding the integrand and integrating to xi_max=1 with Hadamard finite part gives the correct PM radial action at all orders.
    Invoked in Section II A after Eq. (2.23) and attributed to Ref. [39]; the paper does not prove the rule order by order for massive particles.
  • ad hoc to paper The qSW dictionary (2.70) maps the massive scalar radial equation to the N_f=3 quantum Seiberg-Witten curve.
    Eqs. (2.70)-(2.72): parameters are chosen so the ODEs coincide, but the mapping is not derived from first principles and is tested only against low-order coefficients.
  • domain assumption The eikonal identifications omega = mu/hbar sqrt(1+p_inf^2) and ell = M mu j/hbar - 1/2 connect wave parameters to geodesic conserved quantities.
    Eq. (2.71) is stated as reproducing the eikonal limit; no detailed justification is given for the angular-momentum identification beyond leading order.
  • standard math The formal triple sum (2.27)-(2.29) may be resummed term-by-term into regularized hypergeometric functions, with singular n terms defined by limits.
    Eqs. (2.29)-(2.37): convergence, analytic continuation, and interchange of sums are not proved; the paper relies on formal identity.
  • domain assumption Couch-Torrence symmetry gives I_r(r_+,infinity)=I_r(0,r_-) for D3-branes.
    Eqs. (4.8)-(4.10): used to identify the scattering and instantonic radial actions; the authors themselves state the origin of CT symmetry remains unknown.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 31208 in / 14954 out tokens · 124353 ms · 2026-08-02T01:00:24.466537+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We compute the massive particles radial action along hyperboliclike geodesics in various spherically symmetric spacetimes: the standard $4d$ Schwarzschild spacetime, its $d$-dimensional genralization known as Schwarzschild-Tangherlini solutions and for the D3-branes spacetimes, showing useful resummation properties in terms of special (hypergeometric, Fox-Wright) functions in the eikonal limit and generalizing previous results valid for null geodesics. As a consequence, the scattering angle can be resummed too, and we explicitly display the resummed expressions. In addition, in the more interesting situation of a $4d$ Schwarzschild black hole spacetime, following the approach of the quantum Seiberg-Witten curves to the radial equation associated with a massive scalar field, we show that the quantum $a$-cycle (or, equivalently, the \lq\lq renormalized angular momentum") is simply related to radial action also in this massive case, providing fully resummed expressions. Finally, we display the explicit, expanded-form expression of the dual $a_D$-cycle, for which, however, no resummed expressions have been derived yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Therefore, one can de- fine two different (dual) cycles,aanda D, forming a basis of its non-trivial homology

    InN= 2SU(2) SYM theory, the Coulomb-branch moduli space can be classically 1 represented by an elliptic curve, which is a double cover of the com- plex plane with two branch cuts, and is topologi- cally equivalent to a torus. Therefore, one can de- fine two different (dual) cycles,aanda D, forming a basis of its non-trivial homology

  2. [2]

    prepotential,

    SYM theories admit a low-energy effective descrip- tion encoded in an analytic function known as the “prepotential,” denoted asFbelow. InN= 2 SU(2) SYM, the prepotential is related, in a re- markable way, to the Coulomb-branch modulus pa- rameter via the quantum Matone relation [16, 17], i.e., to bothaanda D. It is also worth to recall that, because of it...

  3. [3]

    classical

    The above mentioned elliptic curve can be embed- ded into the Nekrasov-Shatashvili Ω-background [18], and becomes a second order ordinary dif- ferential equation. On the other hand, in two- dimensional Liouville conformal field theory it is well known that the five-point conformal block with one degenerate insertion is governed by a Belavin- Polyakov-Zamo...

  4. [4]

    braiding

    The Alday-Gaiotto-Tachikawa duality establishes a correspondence between the partition functions of Liouville conformal field theory in two dimensions and the analogous object arising fromN= 2 SYM theory in four dimensions with gauge groupSU(2) [21]. Combining the two pictures, it is possible to derive formulae for the connection matrices relat- ing the a...

  5. [5]

    Finally, on the connection formulae it is possible to impose the boundary conditions describing quasi normal modes (QNMs) frequencies. Given the solu- tion with ingoing boundary conditions at the hori- zon, the connection formulae allow one to rewrite it as a linear combination of solutions ingoing and outgoing at infinity. The requirement that the coef- ...

  6. [6]

    This remarkable application of SW approach to black hole perturbation theory has been tested sev- eral times for different geometries, including both black holes and smooth, horizonless configurations such as fuzzballs [27–32]. The accuracy of QNM frequencies can be improved by including more and more instantonic contribu- tions, which appear as a power s...

  7. [7]

    effective poten- tial

    Beyond QNM computations, the SW approach has also been used to compute tidal deformations [33], as well as the superradiant amplification factor [34, 35]. More recently, it has also been applied to waveform reconstruction [36–38]. To make a long story short, by using the SW formal- ism we provide here a number of useful information for further development...

    1944

  8. [8]

    These results (at least at the classical level) generalize what has been done long ago in Refs

    Classical SW curve forN f = 3theory Following the notation of [28] we will discuss below how to obtain the prepotentialFfrom both from the classical curve and the quantum curve. These results (at least at the classical level) generalize what has been done long ago in Refs. [41, 42]

  9. [9]

    Obtaining the prepotential from the classical curve The SW curve, Eqs. (2.53) and (2.54), in the case of theN f = 3 theory is given by P0(x) =x 2 −u ′ +q x+ 1 2 −m 1 −m 2 −m 3 , PR(x) = (x−m 1)(x−m2), P L(x)=x−m3 .(2.73) After the massless probe limitµ= 0, the dictionary (2.70) becomes q= 2ir sω, u= ℓ+ 1 2 2 , r s = 2M , m1 =−m 2 =m 3 = q 2 , u ′ =u+ q 2 ...

  10. [10]

    turning ponts

    Obtaining the prepotential from the quantum curve Using the dictionary (2.74) in the continuous fraction relation (2.67), we find (perturbatively) the following ex- pression fora(u) a(u) = √u+ 60u−59 256(u−1) √u q2 + −73920u5 + 512400u4 −1087380u 3 + 965435u2 −344347u+ 27848 262144(u−1) 3u3/2(u−4)(4u−1) q4 + q6 67108864(u−9)(u−4) 2(u−1) 5u5/2(4u−9)(4u−1) ...

  11. [11]

    Boundary to bound dictio- nary for generic Kerr orbits,

    R. Gonzo and C. Shi, “Boundary to bound dictio- nary for generic Kerr orbits,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.8, 084065 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.084065 [arXiv:2304.06066 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    Resummation of Universal Tails in Gravitational Wave- forms,

    M. M. Ivanov, Y. Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez and Z. Zhou, “Resummation of Universal Tails in Gravitational Wave- forms,” [arXiv:2504.07862 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    Notes on AdS- Schwarzschild eikonal phase,

    A. Parnachev and K. Sen, “Notes on AdS- Schwarzschild eikonal phase,” JHEP03, 289 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2021)289 [arXiv:2011.06920 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Topological Stars and scalar wave equation: Exact resummation of the renormalized angular momentum in the eikonal limit,

    D. Bini and G. Di Russo, “Topological Stars and scalar wave equation: Exact resummation of the renormalized angular momentum in the eikonal limit,” [arXiv:2506.14442 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    The spin- ning self-force EFT: 1SF waveform recursion relation and Compton scattering,

    D. Akpinar, V. del Duca and R. Gonzo, “The spin- ning self-force EFT: 1SF waveform recursion relation and Compton scattering,” [arXiv:2504.02025 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  16. [16]

    Kerr space- time and scalar wave equation: Exact resumma- tion of the renormalized angular momentum in the eikonal limit,

    D. Bini, G. Di Russo and A. Geralico, “Kerr space- time and scalar wave equation: Exact resumma- tion of the renormalized angular momentum in the eikonal limit,” Phys. Rev. D112, no.6, 064077 (2025) doi:10.1103/mzqw-wbvf [arXiv:2508.12046 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Analytic solu- tions of the Teukolsky equation and their low frequency expansions,

    S. Mano, H. Suzuki and E. Takasugi, “Analytic solu- tions of the Teukolsky equation and their low frequency expansions,” Prog. Theor. Phys.95, 1079-1096 (1996) doi:10.1143/PTP.95.1079 [arXiv:gr-qc/9603020 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  18. [18]

    Analytic black hole per- turbation approach to gravitational radiation,

    M. Sasaki and H. Tagoshi, “Analytic black hole per- turbation approach to gravitational radiation,” Living Rev. Rel.6, 6 (2003) doi:10.12942/lrr-2003-6 [arXiv:gr- qc/0306120 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2003

  19. [19]

    Topological stars, black holes and generalized charged Weyl solutions,

    I. Bah and P. Heidmann, “Topological stars, black holes and generalized charged Weyl solutions,” JHEP09, 147 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2021)147 [arXiv:2012.13407 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    Topological Stars and Black Holes,

    I. Bah and P. Heidmann, “Topological Stars and Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126, no.15, 151101 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.151101 [arXiv:2011.08851 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Scalar waves from unbound orbits in a topological star spacetime: PN re- construction of the field and radiation losses in a self- force approach,

    G. Di Russo, M. Bianchi and D. Bini, “Scalar waves from unbound orbits in a topological star spacetime: PN re- construction of the field and radiation losses in a self- force approach,” Phys. Rev. D112, no.2, 024002 (2025) doi:10.1103/sycf-brn1 [arXiv:2502.21040 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Scattering angle in a topological star spacetime: A self-force approach,

    M. Bianchi, D. Bini and G. Di Russo, “Scattering angle in a topological star spacetime: A self-force approach,” Phys. Rev. D112, no.4, 044008 (2025) doi:10.1103/cz6k- wqpn [arXiv:2506.04876 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Scalar waves in a topological star spacetime: Self-force and radia- tive losses,

    M. Bianchi, D. Bini and G. Di Russo, “Scalar waves in a topological star spacetime: Self-force and radia- tive losses,” Phys. Rev. D111, no.4, 044017 (2025) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.044017 [arXiv:2411.19612 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Electric - magnetic dual- ity, monopole condensation, and confinement in N=2 su- persymmetric Yang-Mills theory,

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “Electric - magnetic dual- ity, monopole condensation, and confinement in N=2 su- persymmetric Yang-Mills theory,” Nucl. Phys. B426, 21 TABLE II: List of the exact expressions for the coefficients entering Eq. (A1). C0 1 2 1−2u1 2u1+2u3−1 − u3 u1 CE,1 − i√u3 √2u1+4u3−1√u1 √2u1+2u3−1 CF,1 − 2((8u3−2)u2 1+(8u2 3−6u3+1)u1−2u2 3+u3) ...

    arXiv 1994

  25. [25]

    Monopoles, duality and chi- ral symmetry breaking in N=2 supersymmetric QCD,

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “Monopoles, duality and chi- ral symmetry breaking in N=2 supersymmetric QCD,” Nucl. Phys. B431, 484-550 (1994) doi:10.1016/0550- 3213(94)90214-3 [arXiv:hep-th/9408099 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  26. [26]

    Instantons and recursion relations in N=2 SUSY gauge theory,

    M. Matone, “Instantons and recursion relations in N=2 SUSY gauge theory,” Phys. Lett. B357, 342-348 (1995) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(95)00920-G [arXiv:hep- th/9506102 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 1995

  27. [27]

    Matone’s relation in the presence of gravitational couplings,

    R. Flume, F. Fucito, J. F. Morales and R. Poghos- sian, “Matone’s relation in the presence of gravitational couplings,” JHEP04, 008 (2004) doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/2004/04/008 [arXiv:hep-th/0403057 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  28. [28]

    Quantization of Integrable Systems and Four Dimensional Gauge Theo- ries,

    N. A. Nekrasov and S. L. Shatashvili, “Quantization of Integrable Systems and Four Dimensional Gauge Theo- ries,” doi:10.1142/9789814304634 0015 [arXiv:0908.4052 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Turning rotating D-branes and black holes inside out their photon- halo,

    M. Bianchi and G. Di Russo, “Turning rotating D-branes and black holes inside out their photon- halo,” Phys. Rev. D106, no.8, 086009 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.086009 [arXiv:2203.14900 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Regular and Floquet bases for gauge and gravity theories: a non perturbative ap- proach,

    D. Fioravanti and M. Rossi, “Regular and Floquet bases for gauge and gravity theories: a non perturbative ap- proach,” [arXiv:2508.19960 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Li- 22 ouville Correlation Functions from Four-dimensional Gauge Theories,

    L. F. Alday, D. Gaiotto and Y. Tachikawa, “Li- 22 ouville Correlation Functions from Four-dimensional Gauge Theories,” Lett. Math. Phys.91, 167-197 (2010) doi:10.1007/s11005-010-0369-5 [arXiv:0906.3219 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  32. [32]

    N=2 dualities,

    D. Gaiotto, “N=2 dualities,” JHEP08, 034 (2012) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2012)034 [arXiv:0904.2715 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  33. [33]

    CFT description of BH’s and ECO’s: QNMs, super- radiance, echoes and tidal responses,

    D. Consoli, F. Fucito, J. F. Morales and R. Poghossian, “CFT description of BH’s and ECO’s: QNMs, super- radiance, echoes and tidal responses,” JHEP12, 115 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2022)115 [arXiv:2206.09437 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Irregular Liouville Correlators and Connection For- mulae for Heun Functions,

    G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, D. Panea Lichtig and A. Tanzini, “Irregular Liouville Correlators and Connection For- mulae for Heun Functions,” Commun. Math. Phys. 397, no.2, 635-727 (2023) doi:10.1007/s00220-022-04497- 5 [arXiv:2201.04491 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Black Hole Quasinormal Modes and Seiberg–Witten Theory,

    G. Aminov, A. Grassi and Y. Hatsuda, “Black Hole Quasinormal Modes and Seiberg–Witten Theory,” An- nales Henri Poincare23, no.6, 1951-1977 (2022) doi:10.1007/s00023-021-01137-x [arXiv:2006.06111 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1951

  36. [36]

    Aminov, P

    G. Aminov, P. Arnaudo, G. Bonelli, A. Grassi and A. Tanzini, JHEP11, 059 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2023)059 [arXiv:2307.10141 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    QNMs of branes, BHs and fuzzballs from quantum SW geometries,

    M. Bianchi, D. Consoli, A. Grillo and J. F. Morales, “QNMs of branes, BHs and fuzzballs from quantum SW geometries,” Phys. Lett. B824, 136837 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136837 [arXiv:2105.04245 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2022

  38. [38]

    More on the SW-QNM correspondence,

    M. Bianchi, D. Consoli, A. Grillo and J. F. Morales, “More on the SW-QNM correspondence,” JHEP01, 024 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2022)024 [arXiv:2109.09804 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    2-charge circular fuzz- balls and their perturbations,

    M. Bianchi and G. Di Russo, “2-charge circular fuzz- balls and their perturbations,” JHEP08, 217 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2023)217 [arXiv:2212.07504 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    On the stability and de- formability of top stars,

    M. Bianchi, G. Di Russo, A. Grillo, J. F. Morales and G. Sudano, “On the stability and de- formability of top stars,” JHEP12, 121 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2023)121 [arXiv:2305.15105 [gr- qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Di Russo and A

    G. Di Russo and A. Tokareva, [arXiv:2510.06813 [hep- th]]

    arXiv

  42. [42]

    Bianchi, D

    M. Bianchi, D. Bini and G. Di Russo, Phys. Rev. D113, no.4, 044028 (2026) doi:10.1103/rf8g-yl2d [arXiv:2511.01402 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2026

  43. [43]

    Tidal resonances for fuzzballs,

    G. Di Russo, F. Fucito and J. F. Morales, “Tidal resonances for fuzzballs,” JHEP04, 149 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2024)149 [arXiv:2402.06621 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Superradiance: New Frontiers in Black Hole Physics,

    R. Brito, V. Cardoso and P. Pani, “Superradiance: New Frontiers in Black Hole Physics,” Lect. Notes Phys. 906, pp.1-237 (2015) 2020, ISBN 978-3-319-18999-4, 978-3-319-19000-6, 978-3-030-46621-3, 978-3-030-46622- 0 doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19000-6 [arXiv:1501.06570 [gr- qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  45. [45]

    Cipriani, C

    A. Cipriani, C. Di Benedetto, G. Di Russo, A. Grillo and G. Sudano, JHEP07, 143 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2024)143 [arXiv:2405.06566 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Scalar perturba- tions of topological-star spacetimes,

    M. Bianchi, D. Bini and G. Di Russo, “Scalar perturba- tions of topological-star spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.8, 084077 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.084077 [arXiv:2407.10868 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Resumming post- Minkowskian and post-Newtonian gravitational wave- form expansions,

    A. Cipriani, G. Di Russo, F. Fucito, J. F. Morales, H. Poghosyan and R. Poghossian, “Resumming post- Minkowskian and post-Newtonian gravitational wave- form expansions,” SciPost Phys.19, no.2, 057 (2025) doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.19.2.057 [arXiv:2501.19257 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    P. A. Cano, F. Fucito, J. F. Morales and A. Ruip´ erez, [arXiv:2606.07070 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [49]

    Higher Order Relativistic Periastron Advances and Binary Pulsars,

    T. Damour and G. Schaefer, “Higher Order Relativistic Periastron Advances and Binary Pulsars,” Nuovo Cim. B101, 127 (1988) doi:10.1007/BF02828697

    doi:10.1007/bf02828697 1988

  50. [50]

    Solutions of four-dimensional field the- ories via M-theory,

    E. Witten, “Solutions of four-dimensional field the- ories via M-theory,” Nucl. Phys. B500, 3-42 (1997) doi:10.1201/9781482268737-38 [arXiv:hep-th/9703166 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  51. [51]

    Introduction to Seiberg-Witten theory and its stringy origin,

    W. Lerche, “Introduction to Seiberg-Witten theory and its stringy origin,” Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.55, 83-117 (1997) doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(97)00073-X [arXiv:hep- th/9611190 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 1997

  52. [52]

    Nekrasov Functions and Exact Bohr-Zommerfeld Integrals,

    A. Mironov and A. Morozov, “Nekrasov Functions and Exact Bohr-Zommerfeld Integrals,” JHEP04, 040 (2010) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2010)040 [arXiv:0910.5670 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  53. [53]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes from supersymmetric gauge the- ory and integrability,

    D. Gregori and D. Fioravanti, “Quasinormal modes of black holes from supersymmetric gauge the- ory and integrability,” PoSICHEP2022, 422 doi:10.22323/1.414.0422

    work page doi:10.22323/1.414.0422

  54. [54]

    A new method for ex- act results on Quasinormal Modes of Black Holes,

    D. Fioravanti and D. Gregori, “A new method for ex- act results on Quasinormal Modes of Black Holes,” [arXiv:2112.11434 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [55]

    Integrability and cy- cles of deformedN= 2 gauge theory,

    D. Fioravanti and D. Gregori, “Integrability and cy- cles of deformedN= 2 gauge theory,” Phys. Lett. B 804, 135376 (2020) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135376 [arXiv:1908.08030 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2020

  56. [56]

    Couch and R.J

    W.E. Couch and R.J. Torrence, Gen Relat Gravit16, 789–792 (1984) doi.org/10.1007/BF00762916

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00762916 1984

  57. [57]

    From Boundary Data to Bound States,

    G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto, “From Boundary Data to Bound States,” JHEP01, 072 (2020) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2020)072 [arXiv:1910.03008 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    From boundary data to bound states. Part II. Scattering angle to dynam- ical invariants (with twist),

    G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto, “From boundary data to bound states. Part II. Scattering angle to dynam- ical invariants (with twist),” JHEP02, 120 (2020) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2020)120 [arXiv:1911.09130 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  59. [59]

    From bound- ary data to bound states. Part III. Radiative effects,

    G. Cho, G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto, “From bound- ary data to bound states. Part III. Radiative effects,” JHEP04, 154 (2022) [erratum: JHEP07, 002 (2022)] doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2022)154 [arXiv:2112.03976 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  60. [60]

    Sixth post- Newtonian local-in-time dynamics of binary sys- tems,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Sixth post- Newtonian local-in-time dynamics of binary sys- tems,” Phys. Rev. D102, no.2, 024061 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.024061 [arXiv:2004.05407 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  61. [61]

    Turning black holes and D-branes inside out of their photon spheres,

    M. Bianchi and G. Di Russo, “Turning black holes and D-branes inside out of their photon spheres,” Phys. Rev. D105, no.12, 126007 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.126007 [arXiv:2110.09579 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  62. [62]

    Generalized 23 Couch-Torrence symmetry for rotating extremal black holes in maximal supergravity,

    M. Cvetic, C. N. Pope and A. Saha, “Generalized 23 Couch-Torrence symmetry for rotating extremal black holes in maximal supergravity,” Phys. Rev. D102, no.8, 086007 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.086007 [arXiv:2008.04944 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  63. [63]

    5d Schwarzschild- Tangherlini spacetime: MST-like formalism for a Re- duced Confluent Heun Equation,

    D. Bini, G. Di Russo and V. Fantini, “5d Schwarzschild- Tangherlini spacetime: MST-like formalism for a Re- duced Confluent Heun Equation,” [arXiv:2607.08280 [gr- qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv