Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Leading higher-derivative corrections to binary gravitational waves appear at 5PN order and are set by the black hole's ℓ=2 tidal Love number k+_2.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 12:10 UTC pith:ZK46K4ZE

load-bearing objection A technically strong, carefully cross-checked computation that makes a concrete 5PN prediction for EMRI fluxes in higher-derivative gravity, but the headline universality rests on a minimal-coupling assumption the authors themselves flag as unproven. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.07070 v2 pith:ZK46K4ZE submitted 2026-06-05 gr-qc hep-th

Gravitational waveforms from binaries in higher-derivative gravity: a Love story

Pablo A. Cano , Francesco Fucito , Jose F. Morales , Alejandro Ruip\'erez This is my paper
classification gr-qc hep-th MSC 83C2583C3583C57 PACS 04.30.-w04.25.Nx04.70.Bw
keywords higher-derivative gravityeffective field theorygravitational wavesblack hole perturbation theoryLove numberspost-Newtonian expansionextreme-mass-ratio inspiraltidal deformability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper asks what the first observable signature of higher-derivative (non-Einstein) gravity would be in the gravitational-wave signal of a star orbiting a black hole. Working in a generic effective field theory with cubic and quartic contractions of the Riemann tensor, the authors compute the waveform and energy flux for an extreme-mass-ratio circular inspiral using black-hole perturbation theory. They find that the leading beyond-General-Relativity correction enters at 5PN order (velocity order v^10), and that it is universally proportional to the static ℓ=2 tidal Love number of the black hole—a measure of how easily the geometry deforms under a quadrupole perturbation. This tidal, finite-size effect dominates over corrections to the wave equation and orbital motion, which start at 6PN (cubic terms) and 8PN (quartic terms). If correct, a measurement of the 5PN term in the inspiral waveform would directly probe the combination of EFT couplings encoded in the Love number.

Core claim

For the effective action S_EFT = (1/2κ^2)∫d^4x√−g [R + λ_3 C_3 + λ_4 C_2^2 + ...], the energy flux radiated to infinity by a test particle of mass μ on a circular orbit of radius r_0 = M/v^2 around a non-rotating black hole of mass M is dE/dt = (32μ^2 v^10)/(5M^2)(η_GR + δη), where the higher-derivative correction δη = 4k+_2 v^10 − v^12(k−_2/6 + 88k+_2/21 + 612λ_3/M^4) + ... appears at 5PN and is controlled by the Love numbers k+_2 = 28λ_3/M^4 + (1008/25)λ_4/M^6 and k−_2 = −20λ_3/M^4 − (432/25)λ_4/M^6 + (96/5)λ̃_4/M^6. The corresponding corrections to the waveform multipoles are δΓ^ev_ℓm = 2k+_2 v^10 (1 + 3v^2/2 + ...) δ_ℓ2 δ_m2 + ... and δΓ^odd_ℓm = −3k−_2 v^10 (1 + 8v^2/3 + ...) δ_ℓ2 δ_m1

What carries the argument

The calculation rests on the master equations for odd- and even-parity metric perturbations of the corrected Schwarzschild background, derived here with arbitrary sources (generalizations of the Regge–Wheeler and Zerilli equations). These are not confluent-Heun type once higher-derivative terms are included, so the authors construct homogeneous solutions in a Post-Minkowskian expansion resummed into hypergeometric functions, then fix the incoming boundary condition at the horizon by matching the near-zone solution against the near-horizon static solution. The matching constant is the tidal Love number of the geometry; it multiplies the tidal response term z^{2ℓ+1} in the near-zone wavefuncti

Load-bearing premise

The test particle is treated as minimally coupled, with no higher-derivative terms in its worldline action; if the point-particle limit of a black hole in this EFT contains such terms at or below 5PN, the universal Love-number proportionality in (1.7) would acquire additional coefficients or fail.

What would settle it

Derive the worldline action for a point-like black hole in the EFT (1.1) (the authors state this is open) and check the order of the first matter coupling: if a term appears at v^10 (5PN) or lower, the flux formula (1.7) is incomplete; if the first correction is at 6PN or higher, the claimed 5PN universality stands. A shorter route: compute the 5PN contribution to the two-body flux via scattering amplitudes including finite-size (Love) effects and compare with δη in (1.7).

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The first beyond-GR effect in an EMRI waveform is a 5PN amplitude/phase shift proportional to k+_2, ahead of the 6PN (cubic) and 8PN (quartic) corrections from the wave equation and geodesic motion.
  • The static Love numbers computed via different formalisms (Regge–Wheeler-Zerilli vs Teukolsky) emerge as the direct physical observables in the flux, confirming their robustness across prescriptions.
  • The numerical fits (Eqs. 6.7–6.9) provide a ready template for the energy flux up to the ISCO, usable for generating inspiral waveforms in extreme-mass-ratio systems.
  • For a rotating primary, the same finite-size mechanism is expected to shift the leading effect to 2PN order, through modifications of the spin-induced multipole moments.
  • The angular-momentum flux satisfies dJ/dt = (1/Ω_orb) dE/dt, so the same 5PN correction appears in both energy and angular-momentum emission.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the minimal-coupling assumption for the test particle holds, the 5PN coefficient directly measures the combination 28λ_3/M^4 + (1008/25)λ_4/M^6, making EMRIs a clean probe of the EFT couplings independent of the UV completion.
  • The dominance of finite-size effects over propagation corrections suggests that amplitude-based EFT computations that omit tidal (worldline) terms may systematically miss the leading beyond-GR contribution; incorporating the Love number as a worldline Wilson coefficient should restore agreement.
  • The scalar toy model in Sec. 4 shows the same (2ℓ+1)PN Love-number proportionality at 3PN for ℓ=1, hinting that this is a general feature of static, parity-preserving higher-derivative theories rather than an accident of the quadrupole mode.
  • A natural next test is a calculation for eccentric or inclined orbits; since the Love-number term is a function of orbital frequency, the 5PN correction should appear as a definite combination of harmonic modes that could be checked against direct time-domain simulations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies gravitational-wave emission by a test particle on a circular orbit around a non-rotating black hole in higher-derivative gravity with cubic and quartic Riemann invariants. The authors derive odd- and even-parity master equations with arbitrary sources, construct Post-Minkowskian solutions via a modified confluent-Heun ansatz, and match the horizon-regular static solutions to extract the static tidal Love numbers. They then compute the waveform and the energy/angular-momentum fluxes up to 6PN. The central result is that the leading beyond-GR correction to the energy flux appears at 5PN and is proportional to the even-parity ℓ=2 Love number k+_2, with the first subleading correction at 6PN depending also on k−_2 and λ3. The paper includes numerical checks of the analytic formulas and an ancillary Mathematica file with the long expressions.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides a concrete, falsifiable connection between black-hole tidal Love numbers in higher-derivative gravity and an observable quantity, the EMRI energy flux. The derivation is systematic: master equations are derived from the action, the static Love numbers are recomputed rather than imported, the GR limit is checked against the known 22PN flux, and the analytic results are compared with independent numerical integrations. The ancillary file and the explicit intermediate expressions are a strength. However, the key prediction rests on the minimally-coupled point-particle model of Sec. 5.4, and the authors themselves flag in Sec. 7 that the correct EFT worldline action for a black-hole point particle in this theory is an open problem. Because the numerical validation tests only the internal consistency of the minimal-coupling model, the claimed universal 5PN Love-number scaling is conditional on an externally imposed assumption.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 5.6, Sec. 7, Refs. [20,34,38–41]] The paper disagrees with previous EFT/amplitude-based analyses that place the leading beyond-GR corrections at higher PN order. The authors attribute this to previous works having overlooked the tidal finite-size effect, but no detailed reconciliation is provided. Since the central takeaway is that finite-size effects dominate over the higher-derivative corrections to the wave equation and geodesic motion, the reader needs to see why amplitude/EFT calculations [34,39,40] do not produce the same 5PN term. Possible explanations include different definitions of the point-particle action, different resummations, or genuine omission of tidal operators. Without an explicit mapping between formalisms, the disagreement leaves a correctness-risk concern for the main physical conclusion.
  2. [Abstract and Sec. 1; Eq. (1.7), Sec. 6] The paper repeatedly states that higher-derivative corrections 'always appear at 5PN order', but the formulas and numerical results show that this is not true for all couplings and modes: λ̃4 enters the energy flux only at v^12 (6PN), the even-sector λ̃4 correction vanishes identically, and for ℓ≥3 the corrections start at 6PN or higher. Eq. (1.7) itself contains no λ̃4 term at v^10. The abstract and the summary in Sec. 1 should be qualified to say that the leading corrections in the λ3 and λ4 theories appear at 5PN for the dominant ℓ=2 mode.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4.1] Typo: 'More conceretely' should be 'More concretely'.
  2. [Sec. 3.2] The text reads 'when substituting these ansatzë on the linearized field equations'; the nonstandard plural should be 'ansätze' or 'ansatzes'.
  3. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption says the panels show 'cubic higher-derivative corrections', but the surrounding text discusses the λ3, λ4, and λ̃4 theories separately. Please clarify which coupling each panel corresponds to.
  4. [Sec. 5.3, Eqs. (5.55)–(5.60)] The matching that determines δF_odd,2 and δF_ev,2 is done in the static x→0 limit, and the same coefficients are then used in the finite-frequency waveform. One sentence explaining why the static Love numbers control the (2ℓ+1)PN waveform correction would improve the self-containedness of the presentation.
  5. [Sec. 5.6, Eq. (5.83)] The relation dJ/dt = (1/Ω_orb) dE/dt follows in GR for circular orbits; with higher-derivative corrections to Ω_orb, the equation is still correct as written, but the reader may appreciate an explicit note that Ω_orb here is the corrected orbital frequency from Eq. (2.18).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the 5PN Love-number proportionality is a derived output; self-citations in [25,57] are not load-bearing. The main caveat is the acknowledged minimal-coupling assumption, which is a correctness risk, not a circular input.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The master equations (3.13) and (3.24) are derived from the action (1.1); the PM solutions are constructed explicitly with the displayed polynomials P and \tilde P in Secs. 5.1-5.2; the static Love numbers are recomputed in Sec. 5.3 by matching near-zone solutions rather than imported, with agreement against [25] used only as a cross-check; and the waveform/flux formulas (5.68)-(5.78) follow from the Green-function integrals. The GR limit is checked against the known 22PN flux, and the numerical section independently verifies the v^10 scaling. The self-citations to [57] (solution method) and [25] (Love-number conventions) are methodological and terminological, not load-bearing: the present paper re-derives the coefficients, and the central claim does not reduce to those citations. The only flagged limitation is in Sec. 7: the point particle is treated as minimally coupled via Eq. (5.61), and the authors state that field redefinitions would generically induce worldline higher-derivative terms, 'We expect that a modification of the matter source due to metric redefinitions would only introduce contributions starting at 6PN.' That expectation is unproven, but it is an assumption about an external validity condition, not a circular step: nothing in the derivation fits k+_2 to the v^10 flux coefficient or defines the Love number as the flux. Therefore there is no significant circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim is built on an EFT action imported from [34], a linear-in-coupling perturbative scheme, a minimally coupled point particle, and a matched-asymptotic PM solution ansatz borrowed from [57]. None of these are fitted; the λ couplings remain theory inputs whose numerical values are chosen only for the validation plots.

free parameters (3)
  • λ3 = None (theory input; numerical test value λ3/M^4 = 10^{-4} in §6)
    Coupling of the cubic Riemann term in (1.1); central formulas are linear in it, but it is not fitted in this paper.
  • λ4 = None (theory input; numerical test value λ4/M^6 = 10^{-4} in §6)
    Coupling of the quartic Riemann term in (1.1); appears in the Love numbers and final flux formulas, but is not fitted here.
  • \tilde{λ}4 = None (theory input; numerical test value \tilde{λ}4/M^6 = 10^{-4} in §6)
    Parity-odd quartic coupling in (1.1); contributes only to the odd sector and is not fitted in this paper.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The EFT action (1.1) with cubic and quartic Riemann contractions captures the leading parity-preserving higher-derivative gravity effects up to eight derivatives.
    Imported from [34]; used throughout Sections 1 and 2 as the starting action.
  • domain assumption All results are first order in the higher-derivative couplings λ3, λ4, \tilde{λ}4; higher orders are neglected.
    Stated in §2.1 and used in the numerical validation; linear-in-coupling extraction in §6.
  • domain assumption The point particle is minimally coupled, with the standard geodesic stress tensor (5.61)–(5.64).
    Used to build the source terms in the master equations; the authors explicitly flag in the Conclusions that a black-hole point limit may require higher-derivative matter terms.
  • domain assumption Solutions of the corrected master equations take the PM ansatz (5.12)/(5.35): hypergeometric functions times polynomials in x, resumming the r-dependence.
    Extends [57]; no convergence proof is given, though the numerical checks support the computed orders.
  • domain assumption The static Love numbers k±_2 are related to the coefficients δF by the rescaling (5.57) from [25].
    The final proportionality (1.7) uses this convention; the paper recomputes δF in §5.3 but imports the k± nomenclature from [25].

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 34360 in / 14269 out tokens · 160977 ms · 2026-08-02T12:10:13.310442+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the emission of gravitational waves by a test particle orbiting a non-rotating black hole in higher-derivative gravity theories with cubic and quartic contractions of the Riemann tensor. To this aim, we first derive the master equations describing even- and odd-parity perturbations in the presence of an arbitrary source term, and then construct a Post-Minkowskian expansion of the solutions to the homogeneous master equations. Specializing to a circular binary system, we compute the Post-Newtonian expansion of the waveform, as well as the energy and angular-momentum fluxes at infinity. We show that higher-derivative corrections to the waveform and to the fluxes always appear at 5PN order, and are universally proportional to the Love number describing the deformability of the geometry under the $\ell=2$ mode perturbation. These analytical results are validated against numerical computations, which also allow us to extend the analysis to larger velocities.

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The radial action for massive particles in spherically symmetric geometries: Exact resummation at any PM order

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    The massive-particle radial action and scattering angle in Schwarzschild, Schwarzschild-Tangherlini and D3-brane geometries are resummed in hypergeometric/Fox-Wright form, and the massive scalar quantum a-cycle is ide...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 56 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [12]

    Punturo et al.,The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Class

    M. Punturo et al.,The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010) 194002

    2010

  2. [13]

    Cardoso, E

    V. Cardoso, E. Franzin, A. Maselli, P. Pani and G. Raposo,Testing strong-field gravity with tidal Love numbers,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 084014, [1701.01116]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  3. [14]

    Di Russo, F

    G. Di Russo, F. Fucito and J. F. Morales,Tidal resonances for fuzzballs,JHEP04(2024) 149, [2402.06621]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  4. [15]

    Bianchi, D

    M. Bianchi, D. Consoli, A. Grillo, J. F. Morales, P. Pani and G. Raposo,The multipolar structure of fuzzballs,JHEP01(2021) 003, [2008.01445]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  5. [16]

    Cardoso, S

    V. Cardoso, S. Hopper, C. F. B. Macedo, C. Palenzuela and P. Pani,Gravitational-wave signatures of exotic compact objects and of quantum corrections at the horizon scale,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 084031, [1608.08637]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  6. [17]

    Ikeda, M

    T. Ikeda, M. Bianchi, D. Consoli, A. Grillo, J. F. Morales, P. Pani et al.,Black-hole microstate spectroscopy: Ringdown, quasinormal modes, and echoes,Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 066021, [2103.10960]. – 40 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  7. [18]

    Blanchet,Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves,Living Rev

    L. Blanchet,Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves,Living Rev. Rel.17(2014) 2, [1310.1528]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  8. [19]

    Berti et al.,Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment,2505.23895

    E. Berti et al.,Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment,2505.23895

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [20]

    Cardoso, M

    V. Cardoso, M. Kimura, A. Maselli and L. Senatore,Black Holes in an Effective Field Theory Extension of General Relativity,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 251105, [1808.08962]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  10. [21]

    Cai and K.-D

    S. Cai and K.-D. Wang,Non-vanishing of tidal Love numbers,1906.06850

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

  11. [22]

    De Luca, J

    V. De Luca, J. Khoury and S. S. C. Wong,Implications of the weak gravity conjecture for tidal Love numbers of black holes,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 044066, [2211.14325]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  12. [23]

    Katagiri, V

    T. Katagiri, V. Cardoso, T. Ikeda and K. Yagi,Tidal response beyond vacuum general relativity with a canonical definition,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 084081, [2410.02531]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [24]

    Barbosa, P

    S. Barbosa, P. Brax, S. Fichet and L. de Souza,Running Love numbers and the Effective Field Theory of gravity,JCAP07(2025) 071, [2501.18684]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  14. [25]

    P. A. Cano,Love numbers beyond GR from the modified Teukolsky equation,JHEP07(2025) 152, [2502.20185]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  15. [26]

    L. Wang, L. Lehner, M. Micol and R. Sturani,Matching Tidal Deformability (Wilson) Coefficients to Black Hole Love Numbers in Higher-Curvature Gravity,2604.04259

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [27]

    P. A. Cano, K. Fransen, T. Hertog and S. Maenaut,Gravitational ringing of rotating black holes in higher-derivative gravity,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 024064, [2110.11378]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  17. [28]

    D. Li, A. Hussain, P. Wagle, Y. Chen, N. Yunes and A. Zimmerman,Isospectrality breaking in the Teukolsky formalism,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 104026, [2310.06033]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  18. [29]

    P. A. Cano and M. David,Isospectrality in Effective Field Theory Extensions of General Relativity,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 191401, [2407.12080]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [30]

    Polchinski,Renormalization and Effective Lagrangians,Nucl

    J. Polchinski,Renormalization and Effective Lagrangians,Nucl. Phys. B231(1984) 269–295

    1984

  20. [31]

    G. P. Lepage,What is Renormalization?, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics, 6, 1989.hep-ph/0506330

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1989

  21. [32]

    Baker, D

    T. Baker, D. Psaltis and C. Skordis,Linking Tests of Gravity On All Scales: from the Strong-Field Regime to Cosmology,Astrophys. J.802(2015) 63, [1412.3455]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  22. [33]

    C. M. Will,The Confrontation between general relativity and experiment,Living Rev. Rel.9 (2006) 3, [gr-qc/0510072]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  23. [34]

    Endlich, V

    S. Endlich, V. Gorbenko, J. Huang and L. Senatore,An effective formalism for testing extensions to General Relativity with gravitational waves,JHEP09(2017) 122, [1704.01590]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  24. [35]

    Gruzinov and M

    A. Gruzinov and M. Kleban,Causality Constrains Higher Curvature Corrections to Gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.24(2007) 3521–3524, [hep-th/0612015]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  25. [36]

    X. O. Camanho, J. D. Edelstein, J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov,Causality Constraints on Corrections to the Graviton Three-Point Coupling,JHEP02(2016) 020, [1407.5597]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  26. [37]

    P. A. Cano and A. Ruipérez,Leading higher-derivative corrections to Kerr geometry,JHEP 05(2019) 189, [1901.01315]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  27. [38]

    Sennett, R

    N. Sennett, R. Brito, A. Buonanno, V. Gorbenko and L. Senatore,Gravitational-Wave Constraints on an Effective Field-Theory Extension of General Relativity,Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 044056, [1912.09917]. – 41 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  28. [39]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, P. Pichini, G. Travaglini and P. Vives Matasan,Spinning binary dynamics in cubic effective field theories of gravity,JHEP08(2024) 188, [2405.13826]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [40]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Travaglini and P. Vives Matasan,Spinning quadrupoles in effective field theories of gravity,2412.17958

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [41]

    Liu and N

    H. Liu and N. Yunes,Robust and improved constraints on higher-curvature gravitational effective-field-theory with the GW170608 event,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 084049, [2407.08929]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [42]

    Regge and J

    T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler,Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity,Phys. Rev.108(1957) 1063–1069

    1957

  32. [43]

    F. J. Zerilli,Effective potential for even parity Regge-Wheeler gravitational perturbation equations,Phys. Rev. Lett.24(1970) 737–738

    1970

  33. [44]

    N. Sago, H. Nakano and M. Sasaki,Gauge problem in the gravitational selfforce. 1. Harmonic gauge approach in the Schwarzschild background,Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 104017, [gr-qc/0208060]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  34. [45]

    Nakano, N

    H. Nakano, N. Sago and M. Sasaki,Gauge problem in the gravitational selfforce. 2. First postNewtonian force under Regge-Wheeler gauge,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 124003, [gr-qc/0308027]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  35. [46]

    S. A. Teukolsky,Rotating black holes - separable wave equations for gravitational and electromagnetic perturbations,Phys. Rev. Lett.29(1972) 1114–1118

    1972

  36. [47]

    Poisson,Gravitational radiation from a particle in circular orbit around a black hole

    E. Poisson,Gravitational radiation from a particle in circular orbit around a black hole. 1: Analytical results for the nonrotating case,Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 1497–1510

    1993

  37. [48]

    Cutler, E

    C. Cutler, E. Poisson, G. J. Sussman and L. S. Finn,Gravitational radiation from a particle in circular orbit around a black hole. 2: Numerical results for the nonrotating case,Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 1511–1518

    1993

  38. [49]

    Tagoshi and T

    H. Tagoshi and T. Nakamura,Gravitational waves from a point particle in circular orbit around a black hole: Logarithmic terms in the postNewtonian expansion,Phys. Rev. D49 (1994) 4016–4022

    1994

  39. [50]

    Sasaki,PostNewtonian expansion of the ingoing wave Regge-Wheeler function,Prog

    M. Sasaki,PostNewtonian expansion of the ingoing wave Regge-Wheeler function,Prog. Theor. Phys.92(1994) 17–36, [gr-qc/9402042]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  40. [51]

    Tagoshi and M

    H. Tagoshi and M. Sasaki,PostNewtonian expansion of gravitational waves from a particle in circular orbit around a Schwarzschild black hole,Prog. Theor. Phys.92(1994) 745–772, [gr-qc/9405062]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  41. [52]

    Shibata, M

    M. Shibata, M. Sasaki, H. Tagoshi and T. Tanaka,Gravitational waves from a particle orbiting around a rotating black hole: PostNewtonian expansion,Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 1646–1663, [gr-qc/9409054]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  42. [53]

    Poisson,Gravitational radiation from a particle in circular orbit around a black hole

    E. Poisson,Gravitational radiation from a particle in circular orbit around a black hole. 6. Accuracy of the postNewtonian expansion,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 5719–5723, [gr-qc/9505030]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  43. [54]

    S. Mano, H. Suzuki and E. Takasugi,Analytic solutions of the Teukolsky equation and their low frequency expansions,Prog. Theor. Phys.95(1996) 1079–1096, [gr-qc/9603020]. – 42 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  44. [55]

    Y. Mino, M. Sasaki, M. Shibata, H. Tagoshi and T. Tanaka,Black hole perturbation: Chapter 1,Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.128(1997) 1–121, [gr-qc/9712057]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  45. [56]

    Fucito and J

    F. Fucito and J. F. Morales,Post Newtonian emission of gravitational waves from binary systems: a gauge theory perspective,JHEP03(2024) 106, [2311.14637]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [57]

    Cipriani, G

    A. Cipriani, G. Di Russo, F. Fucito, J. F. Morales, H. Poghosyan and R. Poghossian, Resumming post-Minkowskian and post-Newtonian gravitational waveform expansions, SciPost Phys.19(2025) 057, [2501.19257]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  47. [58]

    Aminov, A

    G. Aminov, A. Grassi and Y. Hatsuda,Black Hole Quasinormal Modes and Seiberg-Witten Theory,2006.06111

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  48. [59]

    Bianchi, D

    M. Bianchi, D. Consoli, A. Grillo and J. F. Morales,QNMs of branes, BHs and fuzzballs from Quantum SW geometries,2105.04245

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [60]

    Bianchi, D

    M. Bianchi, D. Consoli, A. Grillo and J. F. Morales,More on the SW-QNM correspondence, JHEP01(2022) 024, [2109.09804]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  50. [61]

    Bonelli, C

    G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, D. P. Lichtig and A. Tanzini,Exact solution of Kerr black hole perturbations via CFT2 and instanton counting: Greybody factor, quasinormal modes, and Love numbers,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 044047, [2105.04483]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  51. [62]

    Bonelli, C

    G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, D. P. Lichtig and A. Tanzini,Irregular Liouville correlators and connection formulae for Heun functions,2201.04491

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [63]

    Consoli, F

    D. Consoli, F. Fucito, J. F. Morales and R. Poghossian,CFT description of BH’s and ECO’s: QNMs, superradiance, echoes and tidal responses,JHEP12(2022) 115, [2206.09437]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  53. [64]

    Y. F. Bautista, G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, A. Tanzini and Z. Zhou,Black hole perturbation theory meets CFT2: Kerr-Compton amplitudes from Nekrasov-Shatashvili functions,Phys. Rev. D 109(2024) 084071, [2312.05965]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  54. [65]

    Aminov, P

    G. Aminov, P. Arnaudo, G. Bonelli, A. Grassi and A. Tanzini,Black hole perturbation theory and multiple polylogarithms,2307.10141

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [66]

    Bianchi, G

    M. Bianchi, G. Dibitetto and J. F. Morales,Gauge theory meets cosmology,JCAP12(2024) 040, [2408.03243]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  56. [67]

    Fucito, J

    F. Fucito, J. F. Morales and R. Russo,Gravitational wave forms for extreme mass ratio collisions from supersymmetric gauge theories,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 044054, [2408.07329]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [68]

    Cipriani, F

    A. Cipriani, F. Fucito, C. Heissenberg, J. F. Morales and R. Russo,”Waveforms” at the Horizon,2602.05766

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [69]

    de Rham, J

    C. de Rham, J. Francfort and J. Zhang,Black Hole Gravitational Waves in the Effective Field Theory of Gravity,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 024079, [2005.13923]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  59. [70]

    C. T. Cunningham, R. H. Price and V. Moncrief,Radiation from collapsing relativistic stars. I - Linearized odd-parity radiation,Astrophys. J.224(1978) 643

    1978

  60. [71]

    F. J. Zerilli,Perturbation analysis for gravitational and electromagnetic radiation in a reissner-nordstroem geometry,Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 860–868

    1974

  61. [72]

    D. Bini, G. Carvalho and A. Geralico,Scalar field self-force effects on a particle orbiting a Reissner-Nordström black hole,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 124028, [1610.02235]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  62. [73]

    Chandrasekhar,The mathematical theory of black holes

    S. Chandrasekhar,The mathematical theory of black holes. 1985. – 43 –

    1985

  63. [74]

    Martel and E

    K. Martel and E. Poisson,Gravitational perturbations of the Schwarzschild spacetime: A Practical covariant and gauge-invariant formalism,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 104003, [gr-qc/0502028]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  64. [75]

    Fujita,Gravitational Waves from a Particle in Circular Orbits around a Schwarzschild Black Hole to the 22nd Post-Newtonian Order,Prog

    R. Fujita,Gravitational Waves from a Particle in Circular Orbits around a Schwarzschild Black Hole to the 22nd Post-Newtonian Order,Prog. Theor. Phys.128(2012) 971–992, [1211.5535]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  65. [76]

    Bernard, S

    L. Bernard, S. Giri, L. Lehner and R. Sturani,Generic EFT-motivated beyond general relativity gravitational wave tests and their curvature dependence: From observation to interpretation,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 124013, [2507.17143]

    arXiv 2025

  66. [77]

    P. A. Cano, B. Ganchev, D. R. Mayerson and A. Ruipérez,Black hole multipoles in higher-derivative gravity,JHEP12(2022) 120, [2208.01044]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  67. [78]

    S. E. Gralla and R. M. Wald,A Rigorous Derivation of Gravitational Self-force,Class. Quant. Grav.25(2008) 205009, [0806.3293]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  68. [79]

    de Rham and A

    C. de Rham and A. J. Tolley,Speed of gravity,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 063518, [1909.00881]. – 44 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020