Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 58 references

This paper establishes that every static, spherically symmetric charged solution of quasitopological gravity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics can be promoted to an exact radiating Vaidya-type solution by letting the mass and charge inte

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 04:23 UTC pith:72VVWHOO

load-bearing objection Useful Vaidya kit for QTG+NED, but Eq. (4.7) is wrong and needs correction before acceptance. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.22856 v1 pith:72VVWHOO submitted 2026-07-24 gr-qc

Vaidya-Type Solutions of Quasitopological Gravity Interacting with Nonlinear Electrodynamics

Valeri P. Frolov , Chul-Moon Yoo , Andrei Zelnikov This is my paper
classification gr-qc MSC 83C5783C1583D05 PACS 04.50.Kd04.40.Nr04.20.Jb
keywords Vaidya-type solutionsquasitopological gravitynonlinear electrodynamicsBorn-Infeld electrodynamicsnull currentsregular black holesBirkhoff theoremhigher-curvature gravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that the move classically used to build the Vaidya radiating black hole in Einstein gravity—promoting integration constants to functions of a null coordinate—works in full for quasitopological gravity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics in any dimension. Starting from any static charged solution, one sets the charge Q to Q(v) and the mass parameter to μ(v), and the field equations reduce to two first-order equations for H = r^{D-1}h(p). Consistency is restored by a conserved null electric current and a null energy flux that the paper constructs explicitly. This turns every known static charged QTG solution into a time-dependent, exact radiating counterpart, with the Born–Infeld example worked out in closed form.

Core claim

The central claim is that the QTG field equations for a general spherically symmetric metric f(v,r), N(v,r) simplify, when written in advanced null coordinates, to G_vv + N f G_vr = N H,v, G_vr = -N H,r, G_rr = 2 r^{D-3}(N,r/N) h'(p), where H = r^{D-1}h(p) and h(p) characterizes the quasitopological gravity model. For matter with stress tensor of the form T_mu_nu = T gamma_mu_nu + sigma v,mu v,nu (so T_rr = 0), these imply N,r = 0 and reduce to H,v = (2κ/(D-2)) sigma and H,r = -(2κ/(D-2)) T. For nonlinear electrodynamics, Gauss's law gives the displacement D = K E = N Q(v)/r^{D-2}, the current is j^r = -Qdot/(4π N r^{D-2}), and stress-energy conservation fixes sigma = χ(v) - Qdot Φ/(4π). Int

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is H = r^{D-1}h(p), where h(p) is the free function defining the quasitopological gravity model through the reduced Lagrangian L = G_2 - □φ G_3 + G_4 R - ...; p is the primary curvature invariant p = (1-f)/r^2. The paper shows the field equations for the general Vaidya-type ansatz reduce to three compact relations (4.5) that make the v- and r-derivatives of H directly equal to the matter sources sigma and T. This reduction, combined with the matter ansatz T_mu_nu = T gamma_mu_nu + sigma v,mu v,nu (with T_rr = 0), is what turns the problem into a pair of first-order equations and ultimately into the charge-promotion rule Q → Q(v).

Load-bearing premise

The paper asserts, rather than derives, that the system (4.3) simplifies to (4.5) with all h'' terms cancelling, and this reduction, together with the matter ansatz (4.6) with T_rr = 0, is what carries every example; if even one h'' term survives in the combination used, the construction fails.

What would settle it

Take a two-term quasitopological model h(p) = p + αℓ^2 p^2, construct the Vaidya-type metric by promoting Q to Q(v) in the static charged solution, and substitute the resulting f(v,r) into the unreduced expression for G_vr in (4.3) with N = 1; the relation G_vr = -H,r must hold identically for all v and r. If any term proportional to h'' remains, the reduction (4.5) is false and the construction collapses. A simpler check is the Maxwell limit (b→∞): the final metric must coincide with the known charged Vaidya solution of the corresponding QTG model, term by term.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Every static charged QTG solution, for any nonlinear electrodynamics, immediately yields an exact time-dependent radiating counterpart; the paper demonstrates this for Maxwell and Born–Infeld electrodynamics.
  • The resulting spacetimes describe black holes whose mass and charge evolve under charged null currents and neutral null radiation, providing concrete models for accretion, collapse, and evaporation in higher-curvature gravity.
  • A generalized Birkhoff theorem holds: in the absence of null fluxes, spherically symmetric solutions with stress tensors of the form (3.1) are necessarily static, both for gravity and, analogously, for the electrodynamic sector.
  • The construction extends to asymptotically de Sitter or anti-de Sitter spacetimes by shifting h(p) to h(p) - 2Λ/((D-2)(D-1)), so the radiating solutions can be adapted to cosmological settings.
  • The integrability conditions (4.7) guarantee that the derived H automatically satisfies the radial equation once the null flux is chosen, making the recipe algorithmic for any NED model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This reading suggests the reduction to (4.5) encodes a hidden integrability structure: the cancellation of all h'' terms must be an identity of quasitopological gravity, not an accident of the chosen ansatz, and it is what makes the Vaidya lifting work for arbitrary h(p).
  • One consequence the paper leaves implicit is that the same promotion rule should apply to any matter theory whose stress tensor has the form (4.6) and whose static solutions carry integration constants—for example, scalar or Proca fields—so the method is likely a general 'Vaidya apparatus' for 2D-reduced gravities.
  • A direct testable extension is to pick a non-polynomial h(p) beyond the Born–Infeld type, numerically compute H from (6.22) and the metric f = 1 - r^2 p, and verify the full field equations without the reduction (4.5); this would confirm the cancellation mechanism in practice.
  • The 4D limit of the Born–Infeld example, with higher-curvature terms switched off, should reduce to the standard charged Vaidya geometry; verifying that limit checks the normalization and the physical meaning of the null flux.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper presents a method for constructing Vaidya-type (radiating, spherically symmetric) solutions of quasitopological gravity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics in arbitrary spacetime dimension. Starting from known static charged solutions, the integration constants (mass and charge) are promoted to functions of the advanced null time v. The authors show that the resulting geometry is supported by a conserved null current and a null energy flux, and they provide explicit examples for the Maxwell and Born–Infeld cases. The main technical ingredients are a two-dimensional dilaton reduction, a generalized Birkhoff theorem, and a reduction of the field equations to a pair of first-order equations for H = r^{D-1} h(p).

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper gives a systematic and elegant generation of exact dynamical charged black-hole solutions in higher-curvature gravity, with potential applications to collapse, accretion, and evaporation. The paper also provides a generalized Birkhoff theorem and explicit formulas for the sources. These are useful and nontrivial results. However, a key integrability/conservation statement is incorrectly stated, so the proof of the general promotion construction needs repair before the claim can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2, Eq. (4.7); §5, Eqs. (5.12)–(5.14); §7.1, Eq. (7.8)] The claim that the conservation law (2.8) implies Eqs. (4.7) is not correct. For the Maxwell Vaidya solution with N=1, the coefficient T in (4.6) is T = -Q²/(8π r^{D-2}) (as required by (4.9) and given in the correct form in (6.20); note (5.12) appears to have a typo). Then T,r = (D-2)Q²/(8π r^{D-1}), which is not r^{-1}T. If T is interpreted as the angular scalar, then for Maxwell T ∝ r^{-2D+4}, and again T,r ≠ r^{-1}T. The same failure occurs for the Born–Infeld components (7.8), for which the actual identity is T_coeff,r = (D-2) T_ang/r. Thus Eq. (4.7) as written is internally inconsistent with the paper's own examples. The integrability of (4.9) requires only σ,r = -N T,v; the second relation should be corrected and its precise role clarified. This affects the general-NED construction in §6.2 and the verification in §7.1.
  2. [§4.1, Eqs. (4.3)–(4.5)] The reduction from the three-component system (4.3) to the simplified relations (4.5) is stated as following from 'appropriate combinations', but the derivation is not shown. Since p(v,r) now depends on v through f, it is essential to demonstrate explicitly that all h'' terms cancel and that exactly the H,v structure of (4.5) emerges. This reduction is the technical engine for every subsequent result, so the authors should provide the computation or at least the key identities.
  3. [§5, Eq. (5.12)] Eq. (5.12) is dimensionally inconsistent with Eq. (6.20) and with the result (5.14). For N=1 and E=Q/r^{D-2}, the coefficient required by (4.9) is T = -E² r^{D-2}/(8π) = -Q²/(8π r^{D-2}), not -E²/(8π r^{D-2}). With the printed form, integration would not yield the flux (5.13). Please correct (5.12) and check the subsequent derivation.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§1] The introduction says 'In Section 7, we extend' twice; the second occurrence should refer to Section 6 or the section numbering should be fixed.
  2. [§4.2, Eq. (4.6)] The ansatz line contains a typesetting ambiguity: it is not clear whether the second relation is T_{\mu\nu}=T\gamma_{\mu\nu}+\sigma v_\mu v_\nu or an expression with raised indices. Please clarify the index positions and the definitions of T and T.
  3. [§7.1] The sentence after Eq. (7.8), claiming that the conditions (4.7) are satisfied, should be updated after (4.7) is corrected; as written it is not true for the displayed Born–Infeld stress components.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the construction is a self-contained solution-generating technique and the self-citations are input/external checks, not load-bearing definitions of the result.

full rationale

The paper's central move is to promote the charge and mass integration constants of a static QTG+NED solution to functions of the advanced null time, then to solve the field equations for the accompanying current and null flux. This is a standard Vaidya-type construction and is not circular: the dynamic geometry is taken from the static branch, and the sources are derived from Gauss's law and stress-energy conservation rather than fitted to a target answer. The technical assertions that carry the derivation, notably the reduction of (4.3) to (4.5) and the matter ansatz (4.6) with integrability conditions (4.7), are not fully derived in the text, and Eq. (4.7) appears to contain a factor-(D-2) error relative to the paper's own Maxwell and Born-Infeld components (those satisfy T,r = (D-2) T / r in the notation of (6.20), not T,r = T/r). That is a correctness concern, not an input-output identity. The static solutions of Ref. [1] are used as input examples and one author overlaps, but the method itself is derived inside the paper and does not reduce to that citation; no uniqueness theorem is imported from same-author work to forbid alternatives. The Birkhoff argument of Sec. 3 is self-contained. Therefore there is no significant circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

No ingredients are fitted to data: this is an exact-solution construction, and the arbitrary functions (mass, charge, neutral flux) are the standard free data of Vaidya-type solutions. The load-bearing inputs are the prior 2D reduction of QTG ([45]) and the static charged solutions ([1], co-authored by Frolov). No new entities are introduced: the null current and null fluid flux are standard matter sources matched to the geometry.

free parameters (6)
  • mass function M(v) / mu(v)
    Arbitrary function of advanced time obtained by promoting the mass integration constant; sets the energy scale of the solution. Not fitted to any data (standard Vaidya free data).
  • charge function Q(v)
    Arbitrary function of advanced time; promotion of the electric charge constant. Drives the null current j^r = -Qdot/(4 pi r^{D-2}). Free input.
  • neutral null flux chi(v)
    Arbitrary function in sigma(v,r); describes mass loss/gain not associated with charge. Free input.
  • QTG model function h(p) = p/sqrt(1 + l^4 p^2) in the worked example
    Defines the quasitopological gravity model; arbitrary in the general formalism and fixed to a Born-Infeld-type form for the explicit solutions.
  • Born-Infeld scale b and curvature scale l
    Dimensionful constants of the electromagnetic and gravitational models; inputs taken from the model definitions, not fitted here.
  • cosmological constant Lambda
    Optional input parameter when de Sitter or anti-de Sitter asymptotics are included (Section 6.3).
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption The spherically symmetric QTG action reduces exactly to the 2D dilaton Lagrangian (2.17) with G2, G3, G4 given by (2.18).
    Imported from [45] (Bueno et al.); all field equations (2.29) and therefore (4.3)-(4.5) depend on this exact reduction. Section 2.2.
  • domain assumption QTG curvature invariants Z_j exist such that spherical reduction yields field equations no higher than second order.
    Definitional property of quasitopological gravity, cited to [2]. Section 1.
  • domain assumption Static charged QTG+NED solutions of [1] exist and are parametrized by mass and charge integration constants.
    Starting point of the promotion; taken from the authors' own prior paper [1]. Sections 1, 5, 7.1.
  • domain assumption For matter whose 2D stress tensor satisfies T_mu nu proportional to gamma_mu nu, the spherically symmetric solution admits a Killing vector (generalized Birkhoff theorem).
    Proved inside the paper as a lemma (Section 3, Eqs. (3.1)-(3.7)) using the structure of G_mu nu; it justifies starting from the static form.
  • standard math Standard warped-product geometry identities: Ricci decomposition (2.10), 2D conservation (2.8), Levi-Civita identities (3.4)-(3.6).
    Standard differential geometry in the warped metric ansatz (2.2); used throughout.
  • domain assumption For a general NED Lagrangian L(F), the equation D = K(F) E = Q/r^{D-2} determines E(r,Q) uniquely.
    Used to write E = E(r,Q) in (6.14) for a broad class of nonlinear theories; may fail for non-monotonic K(F). Section 6.2.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 14411 in / 45026 out tokens · 398409 ms · 2026-08-01T04:23:43.673633+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We construct Vaidya-type solutions of quasitopological gravity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics in arbitrary spacetime dimensions. Starting from the corresponding static spherically symmetric charged solutions, we obtain their dynamical counterparts by promoting the integration constants, in particular the mass and electric charge, to arbitrary functions of the advanced or retarded null coordinate. We show that the resulting field equations are satisfied provided suitable charge-carrying null currents and null fluid fluxes are included. The formalism applies to a broad class of nonlinear electromagnetic theories and provides a simple and systematic method for generating exact radiating charged solutions in quasitopological gravity.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 20 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    INTRODUCTION In this paper, we investigate Vaidya-type solutions of quasitopological gravity (QTG) coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics. We show that these time-dependent solutions arise naturally by promoting the integration constants of the corresponding static configurations, in particular the mass and electric charge, to functions of the advanced or r...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    modified gravity

    QTG DILA TON 2D ACTION AND FIELD EQUA TIONS 2.1. Metric In what follows, we consider two-dimensional dilaton gravity derived within the framework of the QTG model. We begin by introducing the notation that will be used throughout this paper. LetMbe aD-dimensional space- time equipped with a metricg AB ds2 =g ABdX AdX B, A, B= 0,1, . . . , D−1.(2.1) We con...

  3. [3]

    In this paper, we extend this result to qu- asitopological gravities coupled to matter whose stress– energy tensor satisfies a specific set of conditions

    GENERALIZED BIRKHOFF THEOREM It has been shown that the Birkhoff theorem holds for a broad class of vacuum quasitopological gravity (QTG) models [20]. In this paper, we extend this result to qu- asitopological gravities coupled to matter whose stress– energy tensor satisfies a specific set of conditions. In particular, we demonstrate that the Birkhoff the...

  4. [4]

    Equations Let us now consider a special class of interesting time- dependent solutions of the QTG equations

    V AIDY A-TYPE SOLUTIONS OF QTG EQUA TIONS 4.1. Equations Let us now consider a special class of interesting time- dependent solutions of the QTG equations. To this end, we first rewrite the static metric (3.10) in advanced-time coordinates. Specifically, we introduce 2 dv=dt+ dr f N.(4.1) In coordinates (v, r) the metric (3.10) takes the form ds2 =−N 2f d...

  5. [5]

    In the absence of null flux 6 this solution is nothing but a QTG analogue of a higher dimensional Reissner–Nordstr¨ om metric

    V AIDY A-TYPE REISSNER–NORDSTR ¨OM SOLUTION IN QTG As a first example we consider a Vaidya-type Reissner– Nordstr¨ om solution in QTG. In the absence of null flux 6 this solution is nothing but a QTG analogue of a higher dimensional Reissner–Nordstr¨ om metric. This metric and its properties were discussed in [1], where further references can be found (se...

  6. [6]

    V AIDY A-TYPE SOLUTIONS IN QTG COUPLED TO NONLINEAR ELECTRODYNAMICS 6.1. Action and field equations Let us demonstrate that the approach developed in the previous section can be readily extended to construct Vaidya-type solutions in quasitopological gravity (QTG) coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics. Static spherically symmetric solutions of this theory w...

  7. [7]

    double Born-Infeld model

    AN EXAMPLE To illustrate a developed approach let us consider spe- cial interesting Vaidya-type solutions. First, let us note that a particular model of quasitopo- logical gravity (QTG) coupled to nonlinear electrody- namics is completely specified by the choice of two func- tions, h=h(p), D=D(E).(7.1) 9 The first function,h=h(p), characterizes the QTG se...

  8. [8]

    Our construction starts from the corresponding static, spherically symmetric charged so- lutions and is based on a remarkably simple observa- tion

    DISCUSSION In this paper we have developed a general method for constructing Vaidya-type solutions in quasitopological gravity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics in arbitrary spacetime dimensions. Our construction starts from the corresponding static, spherically symmetric charged so- lutions and is based on a remarkably simple observa- tion. After rewr...

  9. [9]

    Charged black holes in quasitopological gravity coupled to Born-Infeld nonlin- ear electrodynamics,

    J. Pinedo Soto and V. P. Frolov, “Charged black holes in quasitopological gravity coupled to Born-Infeld nonlin- ear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D113, 124044 (2026), arXiv:2604.06632 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  10. [10]

    (gen- eralized) quasi-topological gravities at all orders,

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, and R. A. Hennigar, “(gen- eralized) quasi-topological gravities at all orders,” Classical and Quantum Gravity37, 015002 (2019), arXiv:1909.07983 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    All higher-curvature gravities as generalized quasi-topological gravities,

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, J. Moreno, and A. Mur- cia, “All higher-curvature gravities as generalized quasi-topological gravities,” JHEP11, 062 (2019), arXiv:1906.00987 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    Generalized quasi-topological gravities: the whole shebang,

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar, M. Lu, and J. Moreno, “Generalized quasi-topological gravities: the whole shebang,” Class. Quant. Grav.40, 015004 (2023), arXiv:2203.05589 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    A new cubic theory of gravity in five dimensions: black hole, Birkhoff’s theorem and C- function,

    J. Oliva and S. Ray, “A new cubic theory of gravity in five dimensions: black hole, Birkhoff’s theorem and C- function,” Classical and Quantum Gravity27, 225002 (2010)

    2010

  14. [14]

    Gener- alized quasitopological gravity,

    R. A. Hennigar, D. Kubiznak, and R. B. Mann, “Gener- alized quasitopological gravity,” Phys. Rev. D95, 104042 (2017), arXiv:1703.01631 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  15. [15]

    Black holes in quasi-topological gravity,

    R. C. Myers and B. Robinson, “Black holes in quasi-topological gravity,” JHEP08, 067 (2010), arXiv:1003.5357 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  16. [16]

    Classification of generalized quasitopological gravities,

    J. Moreno and A. J. Murcia, “Classification of generalized quasitopological gravities,” Phys. Rev. D108, 044016 (2023), arXiv:2304.08510 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    Regular black holes from pure gravity,

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, and R. A. Hennigar, “Regular black holes from pure gravity,” Physics Letters B861, 139260 (2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    Regular black holes inspired by quasitopological grav- ity,

    V. P. Frolov, A. Koek, J. P. Soto, and A. Zelnikov, “Regular black holes inspired by quasitopological grav- ity,” Phys. Rev. D111, 044034 (2025)

    2025

  19. [19]

    J. A. Pinedo Soto,Modified Gravity and Regular Black Hole Models, Ph.D. thesis, University of Alberta (2025), arXiv:2511.12902 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Buchdahl limits in theories with reg- ular black holes,

    P. Bueno, R. A. Hennigar, ´Angel J. Murcia, and A. Vicente-Cano, “Buchdahl limits in theories with reg- ular black holes,” (2026), arXiv:2512.19796 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2026

  21. [22]

    Quasitopological gravity and double- copy formalism,

    V. P. Frolov, “Quasitopological gravity and double- copy formalism,” Phys. Rev. D113, 064023 (2026), arXiv:2512.14674 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2026

  22. [23]

    Regular geometries from singu- lar matter in quasi-topological gravity,

    P. Bueno, R. A. Hennigar, ´Angel J. Murcia, and A. Vicente-Cano, “Regular geometries from singu- lar matter in quasi-topological gravity,” (2026), arXiv:2603.10110 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2026

  23. [24]

    Cos- mic Inflation From Regular Black Holes,

    K. Sueto, R. Yoshimoto, and P. A. Cano, “Cos- mic Inflation From Regular Black Holes,” (2026), arXiv:2604.04601 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  24. [25]

    All 2D generalized dilaton theories from d≥4 gravities,

    J. Borissova, “All 2D generalized dilaton theories from d≥4 gravities,” Phys. Rev. D113, 124088 (2026), arXiv:2603.06786 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  25. [26]

    Regular black holes from pure gravity in four dimensions,

    J. Borissova and R. Carballo-Rubio, “Regular black holes from pure gravity in four dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D113, 124004 (2026), arXiv:2602.16773 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  26. [27]

    g ttgrr =−1 black hole thermody- namics in extended quasi-topological gravity,

    J. Borissova, “g ttgrr =−1 black hole thermody- namics in extended quasi-topological gravity,” (2026), arXiv:2604.24101 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  27. [28]

    Birkhoff implies quasi-topological,

    P. Bueno, R. A. Hennigar, and ´A. J. Murcia, “Birkhoff implies quasi-topological,” Class. Quant. Grav.43, 095020 (2026), arXiv:2510.25823 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2026

  28. [29]

    Non-singular general-relativistic gravita- tional collapse,

    J. M. Bardeen, “Non-singular general-relativistic gravita- tional collapse,” inProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Gravitation and the Theory of Relativity (GR5), Vol. 174 (Tbilisi, 1968)

    1968

  29. [30]

    Spherically Symmet- ric Collapse in Quantum Gravity,

    V. P. Frolov and G. A. Vilkovisky, “Spherically Symmet- ric Collapse in Quantum Gravity,” Phys. Lett. B106, 307 (1981)

    1981

  30. [31]

    Vacuum nonsingular black hole,

    I. Dymnikova, “Vacuum nonsingular black hole,” General Relativity and Gravitation24, 235 (1992)

    1992

  31. [32]

    Formation and evaporation of nonsin- gular black holes,

    S. A. Hayward, “Formation and evaporation of nonsin- gular black holes,” Physical Review Letters96, 031103 (2006)

    2006

  32. [33]

    Notes on nonsingular models of black holes,

    V. P. Frolov, “Notes on nonsingular models of black holes,” Physical Review D94, 104056 (2016)

    2016

  33. [34]

    Regular black holes: A short topic review,

    C. Lan, H. Yang, Y. Guo, and Y.-G. Miao, “Regular black holes: A short topic review,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics62, 202 (2023)

    2023

  34. [35]

    Bambi, ed.,Regular Black Holes: Towards a New Paradigm of Gravitational Collapse, Springer Series in Astrophysics and Cosmology (Springer Singapore, 2023)

    C. Bambi, ed.,Regular Black Holes: Towards a New Paradigm of Gravitational Collapse, Springer Series in Astrophysics and Cosmology (Springer Singapore, 2023)

    2023

  35. [36]

    Towards a non-singular paradigm of black hole physics,

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. D. Filippo, S. Liberati, M. Visser, J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o, A. Bonanno, J. Borissova, V. Boyanov, V. Cardoso, F. D. Porro, A. Eichhorn, D. Jampolski, P. Mart ´ ın-Moruno, J. Mazza, T. Mc- Maken, A. Panassiti, P. Pani, A. Platania, L. Rezzolla, and V. Vellucci, “Towards a non-singular paradigm of black hole physics,” Journal of Cos...

    2025

  36. [37]

    Through a black hole into a new universe?

    V. P. Frolov, M. A. Markov, and V. F. Mukhanov, “Through a black hole into a new universe?” Phys. Lett. B216, 272 (1989)

    1989

  37. [38]

    Black Holes as Possible Sources of Closed and Semi- 12 closed Worlds,

    V. P. Frolov, M. A. Markov, and V. F. Mukhanov, “Black Holes as Possible Sources of Closed and Semi- 12 closed Worlds,” Phys. Rev. D41, 383 (1990)

    1990

  38. [39]

    How many new worlds are inside a black hole?

    C. Barrabes and V. P. Frolov, “How many new worlds are inside a black hole?” Phys. Rev. D53, 3215 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9511136

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  39. [40]

    Universes inside a Λ black hole,

    I. G. Dymnikova, A. Dobosz, M. L. Fil’chenkov, and A. A. Gromov, “Universes inside a Λ black hole,” Physics Letters B506, 351 (2001)

    2001

  40. [41]

    Charged regular black holes from quasi-topological gravities ind≥5,

    C.-H. Hao, J. Jing, and J. Wang, “Charged regular black holes from quasi-topological gravities ind≥5,” (2026), arXiv:2512.04604 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2026

  41. [42]

    Charg- ing up regular black holes,

    R. Carballo-Rubio, C. Coviello, and V. Vellucci, “Charg- ing up regular black holes,” (2026), arXiv:2607.07831 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  42. [43]

    Nonpoly- nomial lagrangian approach to regular black holes,

    A. Coll´ eaux, S. Chinaglia, and S. Zerbini, “Nonpoly- nomial lagrangian approach to regular black holes,” In- ternational Journal of Modern Physics D27, 1830002 (2018)

    2018

  43. [44]

    Black holes of a general two-dimensional dilaton gravity theory,

    J. P. S. Lemos and P. M. S´ a, “Black holes of a general two-dimensional dilaton gravity theory,” Phys. Rev. D 49, 2897 (1994)

    1994

  44. [45]

    Evapo- ration of regular black holes in 2d dilaton gravity,

    J. Barenboim, A. V. Frolov, and G. Kunstatter, “Evapo- ration of regular black holes in 2d dilaton gravity,” Phys. Rev. D111, 104068 (2025)

    2025

  45. [46]

    No drama in two-dimensional black hole evaporation,

    J. Barenboim, A. V. Frolov, and G. Kunstatter, “No drama in two-dimensional black hole evaporation,” Phys. Rev. Res.6, L032055 (2024)

    2024

  46. [47]

    Regular black hole formation in four-dimensional non-polynomial gravities,

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar, and ´Angel J. Mur- cia, “Regular black hole formation in four-dimensional non-polynomial gravities,” (2025), arXiv:2509.19016 [gr- qc]

    arXiv 2025

  47. [48]

    Regular black holes in quasitopological gravity: Null shells and mass inflation,

    V. P. Frolov and A. Zelnikov, “Regular black holes in quasitopological gravity: Null shells and mass inflation,” (2026), arXiv:2601.01861 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  48. [49]

    On mass inflation and thin shells in quasi-topological grav- ity,

    F. Di Filippo, D. Kubiznak, and A. Srinivasan, “On mass inflation and thin shells in quasi-topological grav- ity,” (2026), arXiv:2604.27980 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  49. [50]

    Inner- extremal regular black holes from pure gravity,

    F. Di Filippo, I. Kol´ aˇ r, and D. Kubiznak, “Inner- extremal regular black holes from pure gravity,” Phys. Rev. D111, L041505 (2025), arXiv:2404.07058 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  50. [51]

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler,Gravi- tation(W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973)

    1973

  51. [52]

    The scalar invari- ants of a general gravitational metric,

    V. V. Narlikar and K. R. Karmarkar, “The scalar invari- ants of a general gravitational metric,” Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences, Section A29, 91 (1949)

    1949

  52. [53]

    Regular black holes from Oppenheimer-Snyder collapse,

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar, A. J. Mur- cia, and A. Vicente-Cano, “Regular black holes from Oppenheimer-Snyder collapse,” Phys. Rev. D112, 064039 (2025), arXiv:2505.09680 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  53. [54]

    Foundations of the new field the- ory,

    M. Born and L. Infeld, “Foundations of the new field the- ory,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character144, 425 (1934)

    1934

  54. [55]

    Many faces of Born-Infeld theory,

    S. V. Ketov, “Many faces of Born-Infeld theory,” in 7th International Wigner Symposium (Wigsym 7)(2001) arXiv:hep-th/0108189

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  55. [56]

    Topics in Born-Infeld electrodynamics,

    R. Kerner, A. L. Barbosa, and D. V. Gal’tsov, “Topics in Born-Infeld electrodynamics,” AIP Conf. Proc.589, 377 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0108026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  56. [57]

    Introductory Notes on Non-linear Elec- trodynamics and its Applications,

    D. P. Sorokin, “Introductory Notes on Non-linear Elec- trodynamics and its Applications,” Fortsch. Phys.70, 2200092 (2022), arXiv:2112.12118 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  57. [58]

    Born–infeld theory of electromagnetism,

    Y. Yang, “Born–infeld theory of electromagnetism,” in Mathematical Physics with Differential Equations(Ox- ford University Press, 2023) Chap. 14, pp. 323–428

    2023

  58. [59]

    Constraints on sin- gularity resolution by nonlinear electrodynamics,

    A. Bokuli´ c, I. Smoli´ c, and T. Juri´ c, “Constraints on sin- gularity resolution by nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D106, 064020 (2022)

    2022