Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Exploring the Expanding Universe and Dark Energy using the Statefinder Diagnostic

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0303009 v4 pith:3C6VXO7I submitted 2003-03-01 astro-ph gr-qchep-th

Exploring the Expanding Universe and Dark Energy using the Statefinder Diagnostic

classification astro-ph gr-qchep-th
keywords modelsstatefinderdarkenergychaplygindatadiagnostichigh
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The coming few years are likely to witness a dramatic increase in high quality Sn data as current surveys add more high redshift supernovae to their inventory and as newer and deeper supernova experiments become operational. Given the current variety in dark energy models and the expected improvement in observational data, an accurate and versatile diagnostic of dark energy is the need of the hour. This paper examines the Statefinder diagnostic in the light of the proposed SNAP satellite which is expected to observe about 2000 supernovae per year. We show that the Statefinder is versatile enough to differentiate between dark energy models as varied as the cosmological constant on the one hand, and quintessence, the Chaplygin gas and braneworld models, on the other. Using SNAP data, the Statefinder can distinguish a cosmological constant ($w=-1$) from quintessence models with $w \geq -0.9$ and Chaplygin gas models with $\kappa \leq 15$ at the $3\sigma$ level if the value of $\om$ is known exactly. The Statefinder gives reasonable results even when the value of $\om$ is known to only $\sim 20%$ accuracy. In this case, marginalizing over $\om$ and assuming a fiducial LCDM model allows us to rule out quintessence with $w \geq -0.85$ and the Chaplygin gas with $\kappa \leq 7$ (both at $3\sigma$). These constraints can be made even tighter if we use the Statefinders in conjunction with the deceleration parameter. The Statefinder is very sensitive to the total pressure exerted by all forms of matter and radiation in the universe. It can therefore differentiate between dark energy models at moderately high redshifts of $z \lleq 10$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Probing late-time deviations from $\Lambda$CDM with a quadratic dark energy expansion

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The QDEE model fits combined cosmological datasets better than Lambda CDM, shifts the Hubble constant higher, and shows strong Bayesian evidence in its favor.

  2. Ghost Dark Energy in the Modified Kaniadakis Cosmology

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.5

    Interacting ghost dark energy in Kaniadakis-corrected cosmology mildly shifts acceleration onset and approaches ΛCDM, remaining generally unstable though less so for larger λ.

  3. Cosmological implications of Bumblebee theory on an FLRW background

    gr-qc 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Bumblebee theory on an FLRW background yields a cosmological model whose single free parameter is fitted to supernovae observations, producing deceleration and dark energy behaviors that are compared to Lambda-CDM.