REVIEW 6 cited by
The Dependence of Halo Clustering on Halo Formation History, Concentration, and Occupation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
The Dependence of Halo Clustering on Halo Formation History, Concentration, and Occupation
read the original abstract
We investigate the dependence of dark matter halo clustering on halo formation time, density profile concentration, and subhalo occupation number, using high-resolution numerical simulations of a LCDM cosmology. We confirm results that halo clustering is a function of halo formation time, and that this trend depends on halo mass. For the first time, we show unequivocally that halo clustering is a function of halo concentration and show that the dependence of halo bias on concentration, mass, and redshift can be accurately parameterized in a simple way: b(c,M|z) = b(M|z) b(c|M/M*). The scaling between bias and concentration changes sign with the value of M/M*: high concentration (early forming) objects cluster more strongly for M <~ M* while low concentration (late forming) objects cluster more strongly for rare high-mass halos, M >~ M*. We show the first explicit demonstration that host dark halo clustering depends on the halo occupation number (of dark matter subhalos) and discuss implications for halo model calculations of dark matter power spectra and galaxy clustering statistics. The effect of these halo properties on clustering is strongest for early-forming dwarf-mass halos, which are significantly more clustered than typical halos of their mass. Our results suggest that isolated low-mass galaxies (e.g. low surface-brightness dwarfs) should have more slowly-rising rotation curves than their clustered counterparts, and may have consequences for the dearth of dwarf galaxies in voids. They also imply that self calibrating richness-selected cluster samples with their clustering properties might overestimate cluster masses and bias cosmological parameter estimation.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Anisotropic Secondary Bias of Dark Matter Haloes in a $\Lambda$CDM Universe
Halo spin and elongation create a direction-dependent clustering signal that is governed by alignment with the surrounding cosmic web, whereas orientation-averaged secondary bias is governed by tidal anisotropy.
-
Web-Halo Model Peak-Background Split (WHM-PBS): halo bias as a distribution, not a number
Halo bias is derived as an environment-inherited probability distribution whose spread simultaneously produces halo stochasticity, EFT prior bands, and the measured bias–concentration inversion at M ≈ 1.7×10¹³ h⁻¹M☉.
-
Columba: isolated dwarf galaxy populations in diverse cosmological environments simulated with a cold interstellar medium
New hydrodynamical simulations show that dwarf galaxy stellar mass-halo mass relations and star formation histories are more influenced by host halo concentration than by the 5 cMpc scale environment.
-
Revisiting the 'Lensing is Low' Problem with UNIONS
New UNIONS galaxy-galaxy lensing data around CMASS galaxies indicates no significant lensing is low problem, with joint HOD fits to GGL and GC favoring a slightly lower matter power spectrum amplitude than Planck.
-
Cosmic web stripping and starvation of low-mass filament galaxies in TNG50
Low-mass filament galaxies in TNG50 exhibit smaller asymmetric cold gas discs due to cosmic web tidal fields causing altered accretion or starvation and late-time stripping, while integrated stellar and halo propertie...
-
Secondary Dependence of Baryonic Effects on the Density Profile of Dark Matter Halos
Baryonic effects on dark matter halo density profiles exhibit strong secondary dependence on concentration (up to 15% variations at small scales for lower-mass halos) and weaker dependence on large-scale environment (~2%).
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.