Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Possible Gravitational Microlensing of a Star in the Large Magellanic Cloud

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/9309052 v1 pith:64YS3Y5K submitted 1993-09-29 astro-ph gr-qchep-ph

Possible Gravitational Microlensing of a Star in the Large Magellanic Cloud

classification astro-ph gr-qchep-ph
keywords largematterstarsdetectedmachosmassivemicrolensingnormal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

There is now abundant evidence for the presence of large quantities of unseen matter surrounding normal galaxies, including our own$^{1,2}$. The nature of this `dark matter' is unknown, except that it cannot be made of normal stars, dust, or gas, as they would be easily detected. Exotic particles such as axions, massive neutrinos or other weakly interacting massive particles (collectively known as WIMPs) have been proposed)$^{3,4}$, but have yet to be detected. A less exotic alternative is normal matter in the form of bodies with masses ranging from that of a large planet to a few $ \msun$. Such objects, known collectively as massive compact halo objects$^5$ (MACHOs) might be brown dwarfs or `Jupiters' (bodies too small to produce their own energy by fusion), neutron stars, old white dwarfs, or black holes. Paczynski$^6$ suggested that MACHOs might act as gravitational microlenses, occasionally causing the apparent brightness of distant background stars temporarily to increase. We are conducting a microlensing experiment to determine whether the dark matter halo of our galaxy is made up of MACHOs. Here we report a candidate for a microlensing event, detected by monitoring the light curves of 1.8 million stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud for one year. The light curve shows no variation for most of the year of data taking, and an upward excursion lasting over 1 month, with a maximum increase of $\approx \bf 2$ mag. The most probable lens mass, inferred from the duration of the event, is $\bf \sim 0.1 \,\msun$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Self-lensing of moving gravitational-wave sources can break the microlensing crossing timescale degeneracy

    astro-ph.HE 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0

    Self-lensing of a moving GW chirp by an orbiting black hole yields a curve width and interference beats that together give the orbital distance and the black hole mass.

  2. Stellar microlensing surveys as a probe of Primordial Black Holes: status and prospects

    astro-ph.GA 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Stellar microlensing surveys exclude compact objects between 10^{-11} and 10^4 solar masses from making up all dark matter under standard assumptions.