What we think about multiparticle amplitudes

A.A.Rosly; K.G.Selivanov

What we think about multiparticle amplitudes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv hep-th/9610070 v2 pith:IRBMLET4 submitted 1996-10-10 hep-th hep-ph

What we think about multiparticle amplitudes

A.A.Rosly , K.G.Selivanov This is my paper

classification hep-th hep-ph

keywords amplitudesbecauseconsideredexampleexampleslessmainmultiparticle

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

0 comments

read the original abstract

The paper is withdrawn because we realized triviality of the main considered example. Less trivial examples are provided in other our papers on the subject.

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Perturbiner methods in scattering amplitude
hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 5.5

Perturbiner multi-particle solutions of classical field equations generate Berends–Giele currents and tree-level amplitudes across scalars, gauge theory, gravity, NLSM, AdS, and one-loop integrands, including several ...