pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

Training Language Models to Self-Correct via Reinforcement Learning

Canonical reference. 71% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

22 Pith papers citing it
Background 71% of classified citations
abstract

Self-correction is a highly desirable capability of large language models (LLMs), yet it has consistently been found to be largely ineffective in modern LLMs. Current methods for training self-correction typically depend on either multiple models, a more advanced model, or additional forms of supervision. To address these shortcomings, we develop a multi-turn online reinforcement learning (RL) approach, SCoRe, that significantly improves an LLM's self-correction ability using entirely self-generated data. To build SCoRe, we first show that variants of supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on offline model-generated correction traces are often insufficient for instilling self-correction behavior. In particular, we observe that training via SFT falls prey to either a distribution mismatch between mistakes made by the data-collection policy and the model's own responses, or to behavior collapse, where learning implicitly prefers only a certain mode of correction behavior that is often not effective at self-correction on test problems. SCoRe addresses these challenges by training under the model's own distribution of self-generated correction traces and using appropriate regularization to steer the learning process into learning a self-correction behavior that is effective at test time as opposed to fitting high-reward responses for a given prompt. This regularization process includes an initial phase of multi-turn RL on a base model to generate a policy initialization that is less susceptible to collapse, followed by using a reward bonus to amplify self-correction. With Gemini 1.0 Pro and 1.5 Flash models, we find that SCoRe achieves state-of-the-art self-correction performance, improving the base models' self-correction by 15.6% and 9.1% respectively on MATH and HumanEval.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 7

citation-polarity summary

roles

background 7

representative citing papers

Vision Harnessing Agent for Open Ad-hoc Segmentation

cs.CV · 2026-05-19 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

VASA is a vision-guided agent for open ad-hoc segmentation that creates and validates masks through planning, tool use, and error recovery, outperforming baselines on the new PARS benchmark and RefCOCOm.

HuatuoGPT-o1, Towards Medical Complex Reasoning with LLMs

cs.CL · 2024-12-25 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

HuatuoGPT-o1 achieves superior medical complex reasoning by using a verifier to curate reasoning trajectories for fine-tuning and then applying RL with verifier-based rewards.

R2V Agent: Teaching SLMs When to Ask for Help

cs.LG · 2026-05-15 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

R2V-Agent combines an SLM policy trained via BC and DPO with a step-level risk-calibrated router using Brier scores and CVaR to escalate to LLM only on high residual failure risk, improving success-cost tradeoffs on HumanEval+, TextWorld, and TerminalBench.

citing papers explorer

Showing 22 of 22 citing papers.