LLaDA is a scalable diffusion-based language model that matches autoregressive LLMs like LLaMA3 8B on tasks and surpasses GPT-4o on reversal poem completion.
super hub Baseline reference
Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Them
Baseline reference. 55% of citing Pith papers use this work as a benchmark or comparison.
112
Pith papers citing it
Baseline
55% of classified citations
abstract
BIG-Bench (Srivastava et al., 2022) is a diverse evaluation suite that focuses on tasks believed to be beyond the capabilities of current language models. Language models have already made good progress on this benchmark, with the best model in the BIG-Bench paper outperforming average reported human-rater results on 65% of the BIG-Bench tasks via few-shot prompting. But on what tasks do language models fall short of average human-rater performance, and are those tasks actually unsolvable by current language models? In this work, we focus on a suite of 23 challenging BIG-Bench tasks which we call BIG-Bench Hard (BBH). These are the task for which prior language model evaluations did not outperform the average human-rater. We find that applying chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting to BBH tasks enables PaLM to surpass the average human-rater performance on 10 of the 23 tasks, and Codex (code-davinci-002) to surpass the average human-rater performance on 17 of the 23 tasks. Since many tasks in BBH require multi-step reasoning, few-shot prompting without CoT, as done in the BIG-Bench evaluations (Srivastava et al., 2022), substantially underestimates the best performance and capabilities of language models, which is better captured via CoT prompting. As further analysis, we explore the interaction between CoT and model scale on BBH, finding that CoT enables emergent task performance on several BBH tasks with otherwise flat scaling curves.
hub tools
citation-role summary
dataset 12
background 9
method 1
citation-polarity summary
claims ledger
- abstract BIG-Bench (Srivastava et al., 2022) is a diverse evaluation suite that focuses on tasks believed to be beyond the capabilities of current language models. Language models have already made good progress on this benchmark, with the best model in the BIG-Bench paper outperforming average reported human-rater results on 65% of the BIG-Bench tasks via few-shot prompting. But on what tasks do language models fall short of average human-rater performance, and are those tasks actually unsolvable by current language models? In this work, we focus on a suite of 23 challenging BIG-Bench tasks which we
authors
co-cited works
representative citing papers
LiveBench is a contamination-limited LLM benchmark with auto-scored challenging tasks from recent sources across math, coding, reasoning and more, where top models score below 70%.
PAL improves few-shot reasoning accuracy by having LLMs generate executable programs rather than text-based chains of thought, outperforming much larger models on math and logic benchmarks.
Scaling improves LLM social simulation fidelity in most opinion and behavior tasks but not for human cognitive bias calibration or low-resource domains.
A meta-benchmarking framework organizes 452 LLM benchmarks into 41 O*NET Generalized Work Activities and 38 BIAN domains, using discrimination-coverage-recency weights to scale K-factors in an Elo tournament for comparable financial-services scores.
PrincipalBench exposes a sharp split in frontier LLMs between selective and over-refusing behavior on multi-party loyalty, with prompt scaffolding and KL distillation reducing harm rates but only along an existing leak/over-refusal trade-off.
Presents a distribution-aware scheduling framework for LLM inference that reduces P99 TTLT by 35-50% and TTFT by 34-47% versus SRPT with perfect length knowledge using statistical signals instead of predictions.
SELECT-LLM is the first active model selection framework for LLMs that uses expected information gain from pairwise output similarities to minimize required annotations, reporting up to 84.78% cost reduction across 23 datasets and 156 models.
ReElicit uses LLMs to elicit adaptive feature embeddings for Gaussian process Bayesian optimization of system prompts under aggregate-only feedback, outperforming baselines across ten tasks with a 30-evaluation budget.
A new benchmark dataset drawn from Japan's National Assessment of Academic Ability supplies real exam layouts, diagrams, Japanese text, and nationwide student response distributions for evaluating multimodal LLMs.
Post-Reasoning boosts LLM accuracy by reversing the usual answer-after-reasoning order, delivering mean relative gains of 17.37% across 117 model-benchmark pairs with zero extra cost.
LOVER creates an unsupervised logic-regularized verifier that reaches 95% of supervised verifier performance on reasoning tasks across 10 datasets.
Medical VLMs frequently select negated options that contradict visible chest X-ray findings, achieving only ~30% accuracy on direct presence probes, but a post-hoc consistency verifier raises accuracy above 95%.
Presents verifiable counterfactual process supervision that generates annotated trajectories via template-aware error injection on symbolic chains, improving Best-of-8 reranking on logical reasoning benchmarks with preliminary math transfer.
Large language models exhibit normative conformity in addition to informational conformity, and subtle social context can direct which group they conform to.
WORC improves multi-agent LLM reasoning to 82.2% average accuracy by predicting and compensating for the weakest agent via targeted extra sampling rather than uniform reinforcement.
MARS fine-tunes autoregressive models to predict multiple tokens per step via continued training on instruction data, achieving 1.5-1.7x throughput while matching baseline accuracy and supporting real-time speed adjustment.
PEEM is a multi-criteria LLM-based evaluator for prompts and responses that aligns with standard accuracy while enabling zero-shot prompt optimization via feedback.
KV cache compression causes task-dependent degradation in high-density reasoning due to disrupted CoT links; ShotKV mitigates this by preserving few-shot examples as indivisible semantic units through phase separation, delivering 9-18% accuracy gains and 11% latency reduction.
DeepSeek-V2 delivers top-tier open-source LLM performance using only 21B active parameters by compressing the KV cache 93.3% and cutting training costs 42.5% via MLA and DeepSeekMoE.
Medusa augments LLMs with multiple decoding heads and tree-based attention to predict and verify several tokens in parallel, yielding 2.2-3.6x inference speedup via two fine-tuning regimes.
EvoPrompt uses LLMs to run evolutionary operators on populations of prompts, outperforming human-engineered prompts by up to 25% on BIG-Bench Hard tasks across 31 datasets.
Large language models can optimize by being prompted with histories of past solutions and scores to propose better ones, producing prompts that raise accuracy up to 8% on GSM8K and 50% on Big-Bench Hard over human-designed baselines.
PoT prompting improves numerical reasoning by having language models write programs executed by a computer instead of performing calculations in natural language chains of thought, with an average 12% gain over CoT.
citing papers explorer
-
LiveBench: A Challenging, Contamination-Limited LLM Benchmark
LiveBench is a contamination-limited LLM benchmark with auto-scored challenging tasks from recent sources across math, coding, reasoning and more, where top models score below 70%.
-
DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model
DeepSeek-V2 delivers top-tier open-source LLM performance using only 21B active parameters by compressing the KV cache 93.3% and cutting training costs 42.5% via MLA and DeepSeekMoE.
-
Medusa: Simple LLM Inference Acceleration Framework with Multiple Decoding Heads
Medusa augments LLMs with multiple decoding heads and tree-based attention to predict and verify several tokens in parallel, yielding 2.2-3.6x inference speedup via two fine-tuning regimes.
-
Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling
InternVL 2.5 is the first open-source MLLM to surpass 70% on the MMMU benchmark via model, data, and test-time scaling, with a 3.7-point gain from chain-of-thought reasoning.
-
Enhancing the Reasoning Ability of Multimodal Large Language Models via Mixed Preference Optimization
Mixed Preference Optimization with the MMPR dataset boosts multimodal CoT reasoning, lifting InternVL2-8B to 67.0 accuracy on MathVista (+8.7 points) and matching the 76B model.
-
Inference Scaling Laws: An Empirical Analysis of Compute-Optimal Inference for Problem-Solving with Language Models
Empirical analysis shows scaling inference compute via strategies like tree search can be more efficient than scaling model parameters, with 7B models plus novel search outperforming 34B models.
-
DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence
An open-source MoE code model matches GPT-4 Turbo on coding and math benchmarks while expanding to 338 languages and 128K context length.
-
MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark
MMLU-Pro is a revised benchmark that makes language model evaluation harder and more stable by using ten options per question and emphasizing reasoning over simple knowledge recall.
-
LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code
LiveCodeBench collects 400 recent contest problems to create a contamination-free benchmark evaluating LLMs on code generation and related capabilities like self-repair and execution.
-
DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models
DeepSeekMath 7B reaches 51.7% on MATH via continued pretraining on curated web math data and Group Relative Policy Optimization.
-
mPLUG-Owl3: Towards Long Image-Sequence Understanding in Multi-Modal Large Language Models
mPLUG-Owl3 introduces hyper attention blocks to integrate vision and language for long image-sequence understanding and reports SOTA results on single-image, multi-image, and video benchmarks.
-
DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligence
DeepSeek-Coder open-source models trained on 2T code tokens with fill-in-the-blank pretraining achieve SOTA results among open models and surpass closed-source Codex and GPT-3.5 on code benchmarks.
-
DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models
DeepSeekMoE 2B matches GShard 2.9B performance and approaches a dense 2B model; the 16B version matches LLaMA2-7B at 40% compute by using fine-grained expert segmentation plus shared experts.
-
Mixtral of Experts
Mixtral 8x7B is a sparse MoE LLM activating 2 of 8 experts per layer that matches or exceeds Llama 2 70B and GPT-3.5 on benchmarks while using only 13B active parameters.
-
Yi: Open Foundation Models by 01.AI
Yi models are 6B and 34B open foundation models pretrained on 3.1T curated tokens that achieve strong benchmark results through data quality and targeted extensions like long context and vision alignment.
-
DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism
DeepSeek LLM 67B exceeds LLaMA-2 70B on code, mathematics and reasoning benchmarks after pre-training on 2 trillion tokens and alignment via SFT and DPO.
-
Reinforcement Learning for LLM Post-Training: A Survey
A survey deriving a unified policy gradient framework for LLM post-training methods and providing technical comparisons of PPO, GRPO, DPO variants.
- Lessons from the Trenches on Reproducible Evaluation of Language Models