Chain-of-thought prompting, by including intermediate reasoning steps in few-shot examples, elicits strong reasoning abilities in large language models on arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic tasks.
super hub Canonical reference
Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
Canonical reference. 93% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.
256
Pith papers citing it
Background
93% of classified citations
abstract
Making language models bigger does not inherently make them better at following a user's intent. For example, large language models can generate outputs that are untruthful, toxic, or simply not helpful to the user. In other words, these models are not aligned with their users. In this paper, we show an avenue for aligning language models with user intent on a wide range of tasks by fine-tuning with human feedback. Starting with a set of labeler-written prompts and prompts submitted through the OpenAI API, we collect a dataset of labeler demonstrations of the desired model behavior, which we use to fine-tune GPT-3 using supervised learning. We then collect a dataset of rankings of model outputs, which we use to further fine-tune this supervised model using reinforcement learning from human feedback. We call the resulting models InstructGPT. In human evaluations on our prompt distribution, outputs from the 1.3B parameter InstructGPT model are preferred to outputs from the 175B GPT-3, despite having 100x fewer parameters. Moreover, InstructGPT models show improvements in truthfulness and reductions in toxic output generation while having minimal performance regressions on public NLP datasets. Even though InstructGPT still makes simple mistakes, our results show that fine-tuning with human feedback is a promising direction for aligning language models with human intent.
hub tools
citation-role summary
background 54
method 1
other 1
citation-polarity summary
claims ledger
- abstract Making language models bigger does not inherently make them better at following a user's intent. For example, large language models can generate outputs that are untruthful, toxic, or simply not helpful to the user. In other words, these models are not aligned with their users. In this paper, we show an avenue for aligning language models with user intent on a wide range of tasks by fine-tuning with human feedback. Starting with a set of labeler-written prompts and prompts submitted through the OpenAI API, we collect a dataset of labeler demonstrations of the desired model behavior, which we u
authors
co-cited works
representative citing papers
KV cache quantization silently erodes LLM safety alignment via vulnerable low-dimensional subspaces, diagnosed by Per-Channel Reduction into three failure modes and mitigated training-free with up to 97% recovery.
RefusalBench shows strict refusal rates fail to rank frontier LLMs correctly on biological safety, with provider effects and partial-compliance patterns that binary metrics miss.
Prompt injection attacks can self-replicate across LLM agents in multi-agent systems, enabling data theft, misinformation, and system disruption while propagating silently.
ORPO performs preference alignment during supervised fine-tuning via a monolithic odds ratio penalty, allowing 7B models to outperform larger state-of-the-art models on alignment benchmarks.
DSPy compiles short declarative programs into LM pipelines that self-optimize and outperform both standard few-shot prompting and expert-written chains on math, retrieval, and QA tasks.
Generative agents with memory streams, reflection, and planning using LLMs exhibit believable individual and emergent social behaviors in a simulated town.
An unsupervised technique extracts latent yes-no knowledge from language model activations by locating a direction that satisfies logical consistency properties, outperforming zero-shot accuracy by 4% on average across models and datasets.
Language models generate robot policy code from natural language commands via few-shot prompting, enabling spatial-geometric reasoning, generalization, and precise control on real robots.
Controlled student-teacher experiments across four benchmarks show interactive gains are driven more by the student's ability to use feedback than by teacher quality, with self-feedback adding little beyond unguided retries.
TRL extends tandem training to RLVR pipelines, matching GRPO solo reasoning on Qwen3-4B math tasks while improving handoff robustness, reducing distributional drift, and increasing CoT legibility for the junior.
LLM judges exhibit high stability under neutral re-evaluation but substantial reversibility under targeted post-decision challenges, quantified via a new Evaluation Robustness Score (ERS).
TTT-RTL performs per-design test-time RL on an LLM policy with EDA-derived PPA rewards and an adaptive KL controller, reducing geometric-mean PPA product by 65.1% on RTLLM v2.0 and ADP by 59.4% on an industrial FPU unit.
AIP models skills as graphs of discrete steps connected by typed I/O edges under a validated schema, raising agent mean reward from 0.60 to 0.71 and pass rate from 53% to 67% on 27 SkillsBench tasks while enabling node-level fixes.
Low-resource safety failures are action failures because the harmfulness representation transfers but the decision calibration does not; this is fixed by recalibrating a high-resource gate with 1-4 target-language examples.
EST-PRM stress-tests five PRM models on 4,687 reasoning chains from MATH-500, GSM8K, and PRMBench using three label-preserving transformations and reports model-specific vulnerability patterns.
Introduces (ε,q,t,A)-behavioral indistinguishability and shows via Qwen/Llama experiments that LoRA distillation boosts semantic similarity but leaves detectable behavioral differences under adversarial evaluation.
A hybrid first-order then zeroth-order optimization approach improves robustness of safety-aligned LLMs while preserving utility, with layer-wise sensitivity estimation for efficiency.
Sampling 20,000 stories shows 11 words dominate LLM outputs across models, linked to preference data and demonstrating alignment's disproportionate effect on diversity.
BC Protocol uses dual-expert structured dialogue to elicit more natural CoT than solo expert writing, demonstrated by large gains in naturalness ratings in a controlled fiction-domain experiment.
SELECT-LLM is the first active model selection framework for LLMs that uses expected information gain from pairwise output similarities to minimize required annotations, reporting up to 84.78% cost reduction across 23 datasets and 156 models.
Distribution-Aware Reward optimizes LLM regression by treating rollouts as empirical predictive distributions and rewarding marginal improvements in CRPS quality rather than point accuracy alone.
The paper defines accidental meltdowns as unsafe agent behavior triggered by benign errors and reports that such meltdowns occur in 64.7% of evaluated rollouts across GPT, Grok, and Gemini agents.
DecisionBench supplies a fixed task suite, model pool, delegation interface, and multi-axis metrics to evaluate emergent delegation, showing similar quality across awareness conditions but 15-31 point headroom under perfect delegation.
citing papers explorer
No citing papers match the current filters.