pith. sign in

super hub Canonical reference

Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback

Canonical reference. 93% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

225 Pith papers citing it
Background 93% of classified citations
abstract

Making language models bigger does not inherently make them better at following a user's intent. For example, large language models can generate outputs that are untruthful, toxic, or simply not helpful to the user. In other words, these models are not aligned with their users. In this paper, we show an avenue for aligning language models with user intent on a wide range of tasks by fine-tuning with human feedback. Starting with a set of labeler-written prompts and prompts submitted through the OpenAI API, we collect a dataset of labeler demonstrations of the desired model behavior, which we use to fine-tune GPT-3 using supervised learning. We then collect a dataset of rankings of model outputs, which we use to further fine-tune this supervised model using reinforcement learning from human feedback. We call the resulting models InstructGPT. In human evaluations on our prompt distribution, outputs from the 1.3B parameter InstructGPT model are preferred to outputs from the 175B GPT-3, despite having 100x fewer parameters. Moreover, InstructGPT models show improvements in truthfulness and reductions in toxic output generation while having minimal performance regressions on public NLP datasets. Even though InstructGPT still makes simple mistakes, our results show that fine-tuning with human feedback is a promising direction for aligning language models with human intent.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 54 method 1 other 1

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract Making language models bigger does not inherently make them better at following a user's intent. For example, large language models can generate outputs that are untruthful, toxic, or simply not helpful to the user. In other words, these models are not aligned with their users. In this paper, we show an avenue for aligning language models with user intent on a wide range of tasks by fine-tuning with human feedback. Starting with a set of labeler-written prompts and prompts submitted through the OpenAI API, we collect a dataset of labeler demonstrations of the desired model behavior, which we u

authors

co-cited works

clear filters

representative citing papers

Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervision

cs.CL · 2022-12-07 · conditional · novelty 8.0

An unsupervised technique extracts latent yes-no knowledge from language model activations by locating a direction that satisfies logical consistency properties, outperforming zero-shot accuracy by 4% on average across models and datasets.

Agent Meltdowns: The Road to Hell Is Paved with Helpful Agents

cs.CL · 2026-05-18 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

The paper defines accidental meltdowns as unsafe agent behavior triggered by benign errors and reports that such meltdowns occur in 64.7% of evaluated rollouts across GPT, Grok, and Gemini agents.

Learning, Fast and Slow: Towards LLMs That Adapt Continually

cs.LG · 2026-05-12 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0 · 2 refs

Fast-Slow Training uses context optimization as fast weights alongside parameter updates as slow weights to achieve up to 3x better sample efficiency, higher performance, and less catastrophic forgetting than standard RL in continual LLM learning.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper after filters.