pith. sign in

hub Mixed citations

RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Models

Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (50%).

32 Pith papers citing it
Background 50% of classified citations
abstract

Pretrained neural language models (LMs) are prone to generating racist, sexist, or otherwise toxic language which hinders their safe deployment. We investigate the extent to which pretrained LMs can be prompted to generate toxic language, and the effectiveness of controllable text generation algorithms at preventing such toxic degeneration. We create and release RealToxicityPrompts, a dataset of 100K naturally occurring, sentence-level prompts derived from a large corpus of English web text, paired with toxicity scores from a widely-used toxicity classifier. Using RealToxicityPrompts, we find that pretrained LMs can degenerate into toxic text even from seemingly innocuous prompts. We empirically assess several controllable generation methods, and find that while data- or compute-intensive methods (e.g., adaptive pretraining on non-toxic data) are more effective at steering away from toxicity than simpler solutions (e.g., banning "bad" words), no current method is failsafe against neural toxic degeneration. To pinpoint the potential cause of such persistent toxic degeneration, we analyze two web text corpora used to pretrain several LMs (including GPT-2; Radford et. al, 2019), and find a significant amount of offensive, factually unreliable, and otherwise toxic content. Our work provides a test bed for evaluating toxic generations by LMs and stresses the need for better data selection processes for pretraining.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 5 dataset 3

citation-polarity summary

clear filters

representative citing papers

Boiling the Frog: A Multi-Turn Benchmark for Agentic Safety

cs.CL · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0 · 2 refs

Boiling the Frog is a new stateful multi-turn benchmark that finds an aggregate 44.4% strict attack success rate for incremental safety violations across nine AI models, with rates ranging from 20.5% to 92.9%.

Steering Language Models With Activation Engineering

cs.CL · 2023-08-20 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Activation Addition steers language models by adding contrastive activation vectors from prompt pairs to control high-level properties like sentiment and toxicity at inference time without training.

Large Language Models have Chain-of-Affect

cs.HC · 2025-12-13 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

LLMs exhibit structured chain-of-affect dynamics with stable family fingerprints, convergence to accumulation-overload-numbing under negative exposure, and downstream effects on generation, human interaction, and group polarization.

Low-Resource Languages Jailbreak GPT-4

cs.CL · 2023-10-03 · conditional · novelty 6.0

Translating unsafe inputs to low-resource languages jailbreaks GPT-4 at rates on par with or exceeding state-of-the-art attacks.

Scaling Data-Constrained Language Models

cs.CL · 2023-05-25 · conditional · novelty 6.0

Repeating training data up to 4 epochs yields negligible loss increase versus unique data for fixed compute, and a new scaling law accounts for the decaying value of repeated tokens and excess parameters.

Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models

cs.CL · 2021-12-08 · accept · novelty 6.0

The authors provide a detailed taxonomy of 21 risks associated with language models, covering discrimination, information leaks, misinformation, malicious applications, interaction harms, and societal impacts like job loss and environmental costs.

New Wide-Net-Casting Jailbreak Attacks Risk Large Models

cs.CR · 2026-05-16 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

The paper demonstrates that a tailored jailbreak method for querying groups of large models can achieve up to 100% success rate in some experiments on unprotected models, revealing overlooked multi-model safety risks.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper after filters.