An RL-guided MCTS proof search for Tamarin finds more and shorter proofs than standard search across 16 protocol models.
hub Canonical reference
Generative Language Modeling for Automated Theorem Proving
Canonical reference. 80% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.
abstract
We explore the application of transformer-based language models to automated theorem proving. This work is motivated by the possibility that a major limitation of automated theorem provers compared to humans -- the generation of original mathematical terms -- might be addressable via generation from language models. We present an automated prover and proof assistant, GPT-f, for the Metamath formalization language, and analyze its performance. GPT-f found new short proofs that were accepted into the main Metamath library, which is to our knowledge, the first time a deep-learning based system has contributed proofs that were adopted by a formal mathematics community.
hub tools
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
representative citing papers
LLM-based agents in Lean solved 9 of 353 open Erdős problems and proved 44 of 492 OEIS conjectures at a few hundred dollars each.
Introduces rewriting categories to formalize proof equivariance and success invariance, shows LLM provers violate both, and demonstrates test-time aggregation recovers invariance and boosts performance.
CAM-Bench is a new Lean 4 theorem-proving benchmark of 1,000 problems in computational and applied mathematics, built from textbook exercises using a dependency-recovery pipeline to reconstruct local context.
ABD benchmark evaluates LLMs on producing parsimonious first-order exception formulas in three observation regimes using SMT verification, finding high validity but persistent parsimony and generalization gaps.
Massive activations are constant large values in LLMs that function as indispensable bias terms and concentrate attention probabilities on specific tokens.
ImProver 2 combines a data-efficient expert-iteration pipeline with a neurosymbolic scaffold to train a 7B model that outperforms larger models in Lean 4 proof optimization across structural metrics.
RMA, a multi-agent system with structured memory and iterative feedback loops, solves 8 out of 10 research-level math problems on the new First Proof benchmark and outperforms GPT-5.2R and Aletheia according to expert evaluation.
Lean Refactor uses retrieval from a curated multi-objective strategy database to guide frozen LLMs in refactoring Lean proofs, reporting over 70% token compression on benchmarks and improved version transfer.
OProver-32B achieves top Pass@32 scores on MiniF2F, ProverBench, and PutnamBench by combining continued pretraining with iterative agentic proving, retrieval, SFT on repairs, and RL on unresolved cases using a 6.86M-proof dataset.
Segment-level supervision extracts coherent proof segments to train policy models that achieve 61-66% success on miniF2F, outperforming step-level and whole-proof methods while also improving existing provers.
LLMs display accuracy gaps of up to 14 percentage points on the same geometry problems solely due to representation choice, with vector forms consistently weakest and a convert-then-solve prompt helping only high-capacity models.
A neuro-symbolic system using LLM-guided best-first search and Isabelle tools proves up to 77.6% of theorems on the seL4 benchmark, outperforming prior LLM methods and Sledgehammer.
VERGE decomposes LLM outputs into atomic claims, autoformalizes them to first-order logic, verifies with SMT solvers and consensus, and refines via minimal correction subsets, yielding 18.7% average uplift on reasoning benchmarks.
Aristotle reaches gold-medal-equivalent performance on 2025 IMO problems via integrated Lean proof search, informal lemma formalization, and a dedicated geometry solver.
DeepSeekMath 7B reaches 51.7% on MATH via continued pretraining on curated web math data and Group Relative Policy Optimization.
Continued pretraining of Code Llama on Proof-Pile-2 yields Llemma, an open math-specialized LLM that beats known open base models on MATH and supports tool use plus formal proving out of the box.
ToRA trains language models on interactive tool-use trajectories with imitation learning and output shaping to integrate reasoning and external tools, yielding 13-19% gains on math datasets and new highs like 44.6% on MATH for a 7B model.
On GSM8K, outcome-based supervision achieves similar final-answer error rates to process-based with less labeling, but process-based or learned reward models are needed to reach 3.4% reasoning error among correct solutions.
APPS benchmark shows models like GPT-Neo pass roughly 20% of test cases on introductory problems, indicating machine learning is beginning to learn basic coding.
NeuroNL2LTL presents a neurosymbolic system with verifier-in-the-loop RL training for NL-to-LTL translation, reporting 28% semantic equivalence and 86% satisfiability on 200k+ requirements across domains.
OptProver transfers formal theorem proving from Olympiad math to optimization via continual training, achieving SOTA Pass@1 and Pass@32 on a new Lean 4 benchmark while retaining general performance.
Proposes a three-layer framework using formal AI reasoning for verification, derivation, and discovery in wireless communications theory.
AI for math combines task-specific architectures and general foundation models to support research and advance AI reasoning capabilities.
citing papers explorer
-
Less Effort, Shorter Proofs: Reinforcement Learning for Security Protocol Analysis in Tamarin
An RL-guided MCTS proof search for Tamarin finds more and shorter proofs than standard search across 16 protocol models.
-
Advancing Mathematics Research with AI-Driven Formal Proof Search
LLM-based agents in Lean solved 9 of 353 open Erdős problems and proved 44 of 492 OEIS conjectures at a few hundred dollars each.
-
What are the Right Symmetries for Formal Theorem Proving?
Introduces rewriting categories to formalize proof equivariance and success invariance, shows LLM provers violate both, and demonstrates test-time aggregation recovers invariance and boosts performance.
-
CAM-Bench: A Benchmark for Computational and Applied Mathematics in Lean
CAM-Bench is a new Lean 4 theorem-proving benchmark of 1,000 problems in computational and applied mathematics, built from textbook exercises using a dependency-recovery pipeline to reconstruct local context.
-
ABD: Default Exception Abduction in Finite First Order Worlds
ABD benchmark evaluates LLMs on producing parsimonious first-order exception formulas in three observation regimes using SMT verification, finding high validity but persistent parsimony and generalization gaps.
-
Massive Activations in Large Language Models
Massive activations are constant large values in LLMs that function as indispensable bias terms and concentrate attention probabilities on specific tokens.
-
ImProver 2: Iteratively Self-Improving LMs for Neurosymbolic Proof Optimization
ImProver 2 combines a data-efficient expert-iteration pipeline with a neurosymbolic scaffold to train a 7B model that outperforms larger models in Lean 4 proof optimization across structural metrics.
-
RMA: an Agentic System for Research-Level Mathematical Problems
RMA, a multi-agent system with structured memory and iterative feedback loops, solves 8 out of 10 research-level math problems on the new First Proof benchmark and outperforms GPT-5.2R and Aletheia according to expert evaluation.
-
Lean Refactor: Multi-Objective Controllable Proof Optimization via Agentic Strategy Search
Lean Refactor uses retrieval from a curated multi-objective strategy database to guide frozen LLMs in refactoring Lean proofs, reporting over 70% token compression on benchmarks and improved version transfer.
-
OProver: A Unified Framework for Agentic Formal Theorem Proving
OProver-32B achieves top Pass@32 scores on MiniF2F, ProverBench, and PutnamBench by combining continued pretraining with iterative agentic proving, retrieval, SFT on repairs, and RL on unresolved cases using a 6.86M-proof dataset.
-
Rethinking Supervision Granularity: Segment-Level Learning for LLM-Based Theorem Proving
Segment-level supervision extracts coherent proof segments to train policy models that achieve 61-66% success on miniF2F, outperforming step-level and whole-proof methods while also improving existing provers.
-
Measuring Representation Robustness in Large Language Models for Geometry
LLMs display accuracy gaps of up to 14 percentage points on the same geometry problems solely due to representation choice, with vector forms consistently weakest and a convert-then-solve prompt helping only high-capacity models.
-
Neuro-Symbolic Proof Generation for Scaling Systems Software Verification
A neuro-symbolic system using LLM-guided best-first search and Isabelle tools proves up to 77.6% of theorems on the seL4 benchmark, outperforming prior LLM methods and Sledgehammer.
-
VERGE: Formal Refinement and Guidance Engine for Verifiable LLM Reasoning
VERGE decomposes LLM outputs into atomic claims, autoformalizes them to first-order logic, verifies with SMT solvers and consensus, and refines via minimal correction subsets, yielding 18.7% average uplift on reasoning benchmarks.
-
Aristotle: IMO-level Automated Theorem Proving
Aristotle reaches gold-medal-equivalent performance on 2025 IMO problems via integrated Lean proof search, informal lemma formalization, and a dedicated geometry solver.
-
DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models
DeepSeekMath 7B reaches 51.7% on MATH via continued pretraining on curated web math data and Group Relative Policy Optimization.
-
Llemma: An Open Language Model For Mathematics
Continued pretraining of Code Llama on Proof-Pile-2 yields Llemma, an open math-specialized LLM that beats known open base models on MATH and supports tool use plus formal proving out of the box.
-
ToRA: A Tool-Integrated Reasoning Agent for Mathematical Problem Solving
ToRA trains language models on interactive tool-use trajectories with imitation learning and output shaping to integrate reasoning and external tools, yielding 13-19% gains on math datasets and new highs like 44.6% on MATH for a 7B model.
-
Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback
On GSM8K, outcome-based supervision achieves similar final-answer error rates to process-based with less labeling, but process-based or learned reward models are needed to reach 3.4% reasoning error among correct solutions.
-
Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS
APPS benchmark shows models like GPT-Neo pass roughly 20% of test cases on introductory problems, indicating machine learning is beginning to learn basic coding.
-
NeuroNL2LTL: A Neurosymbolic Framework for Natural Language Translation of Linear Temporal Logic
NeuroNL2LTL presents a neurosymbolic system with verifier-in-the-loop RL training for NL-to-LTL translation, reporting 28% semantic equivalence and 86% satisfiability on 200k+ requirements across domains.
-
OptProver: Bridging Olympiad and Optimization through Continual Training in Formal Theorem Proving
OptProver transfers formal theorem proving from Olympiad math to optimization via continual training, achieving SOTA Pass@1 and Pass@32 on a new Lean 4 benchmark while retaining general performance.
-
Rethinking Wireless Communications through Formal Mathematical AI Reasoning
Proposes a three-layer framework using formal AI reasoning for verification, derivation, and discovery in wireless communications theory.
-
AI for Mathematics: Progress, Challenges, and Prospects
AI for math combines task-specific architectures and general foundation models to support research and advance AI reasoning capabilities.
-
Step-Video-T2V Technical Report: The Practice, Challenges, and Future of Video Foundation Model
Step-Video-T2V describes a 30B-parameter text-to-video model with custom Video-VAE, 3D DiT, flow matching, and Video-DPO that claims state-of-the-art results on a new internal benchmark.
-
Shaping Schema via Language Representation as the Next Frontier for LLM Intelligence Expanding
Advanced language representations shape LLMs' schemas to improve knowledge activation and problem-solving.
-
When control meets large language models: From words to dynamics
The paper proposes a bidirectional continuum between LLMs and control systems, covering LLM-assisted controller design, control-based LLM steering, and state-space modeling of LLMs.
-
Position: Multimodal Large Language Models Can Significantly Advance Scientific Reasoning
Position paper claims multimodal LLMs can significantly advance scientific reasoning and proposes a four-stage roadmap plus challenges and suggestions.