pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

A Survey of Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Models

Canonical reference. 100% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

24 Pith papers citing it
Background 100% of classified citations
abstract

In this paper, we survey recent advances in Reinforcement Learning (RL) for reasoning with Large Language Models (LLMs). RL has achieved remarkable success in advancing the frontier of LLM capabilities, particularly in addressing complex logical tasks such as mathematics and coding. As a result, RL has emerged as a foundational methodology for transforming LLMs into LRMs. With the rapid progress of the field, further scaling of RL for LRMs now faces foundational challenges not only in computational resources but also in algorithm design, training data, and infrastructure. To this end, it is timely to revisit the development of this domain, reassess its trajectory, and explore strategies to enhance the scalability of RL toward Artificial SuperIntelligence (ASI). In particular, we examine research applying RL to LLMs and LRMs for reasoning abilities, especially since the release of DeepSeek-R1, including foundational components, core problems, training resources, and downstream applications, to identify future opportunities and directions for this rapidly evolving area. We hope this review will promote future research on RL for broader reasoning models. Github: https://github.com/TsinghuaC3I/Awesome-RL-for-LRMs

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 6

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 19 2025 5

roles

background 6

polarities

background 6

representative citing papers

Beyond Mode Collapse: Distribution Matching for Diverse Reasoning

cs.AI · 2026-05-19 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

DMPO approximates forward KL minimization in on-policy RL by aligning the policy to a group-level reward-proportional target distribution, yielding 9-12% relative gains over GRPO on NP-Bench and smaller gains on math reasoning.

Entropy Polarity in Reinforcement Fine-Tuning: Direction, Asymmetry, and Control

cs.LG · 2026-05-12 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0 · 2 refs

Entropy polarity is a signed token-level quantity derived from a first-order approximation of entropy change that predicts whether RL updates expand or contract policy entropy in LLM fine-tuning, revealing an asymmetry between high- and low-probability tokens.

Thinking Sparks!: Emergent Attention Heads in Reasoning Models During Post Training

cs.AI · 2025-09-30 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Post-training on reasoning tasks sparks the emergence of specialized attention heads that enable structured computation, with SFT adding stable heads while GRPO uses dynamic activation and pruning tied to reward signals, and controllable think models relying on compensatory heads instead of specific

StaRPO: Stability-Augmented Reinforcement Policy Optimization

cs.AI · 2026-04-10 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

StaRPO improves LLM reasoning by adding autocorrelation function and path efficiency stability metrics to RL policy optimization, yielding higher accuracy and fewer logic errors on reasoning benchmarks.

POPI: Personalizing LLMs via Optimized Natural Language Preference Inference

cs.CL · 2025-10-17 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

POPI distills user preferences into reusable natural-language summaries via a shared inference model and conditions a generator on them, trained jointly with RL to improve personalization quality while cutting context length by up to 10x on benchmarks.

Rethinking Entropy Interventions in RLVR: An Entropy Change Perspective

cs.LG · 2025-10-11 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

Derives a token-level entropy change approximation revealing four factors, identifies limitations in prior entropy interventions, and proposes STEER which adaptively reweights tokens to mitigate collapse and improve performance on math and coding benchmarks.

Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models

cs.AI · 2026-01-18 · unverdicted · novelty 4.0

The survey structures agentic reasoning for LLMs into foundational, self-evolving, and collective multi-agent layers while distinguishing in-context orchestration from post-training optimization and reviewing applications across domains.

citing papers explorer

Showing 24 of 24 citing papers.