Pith. sign in

2601.18137 , archivePrefix =

12 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

12 Pith papers citing it

citation-role summary

dataset 1

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 12

roles

dataset 1

polarities

use dataset 1

representative citing papers

Benchmarking Open-Ended Multi-Agent Coordination in Language Agents

cs.AI · 2026-06-06 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

ALEM benchmark reveals LLM agents achieve only ~6% normalized return in open-ended multi-agent settings, with communication as the main driver of coordination and individual task competence not implying coordination competence.

Boiling the Frog: A Multi-Turn Benchmark for Agentic Safety

cs.CL · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0 · 2 refs

Boiling the Frog is a new stateful multi-turn benchmark that finds an aggregate 44.4% strict attack success rate for incremental safety violations across nine AI models, with rates ranging from 20.5% to 92.9%.

Trip+: Benchmarking Agents in Personalized Interactive Travel Planning

cs.AI · 2026-06-19 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Trip+ benchmark evaluates language model agents on generating and revising personalized minute-level travel itineraries under dynamic interactions, finding consistent gaps where models produce feasible but exhausting plans that ignore traveler profiles.

TIP: Token Importance in On-Policy Distillation

cs.LG · 2026-04-15 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0 · 3 refs

A two-axis taxonomy of student entropy and teacher-student divergence identifies informative tokens in on-policy distillation, allowing near-full performance with 10-50% of tokens.

Harnessing AtomisticSkills for Agentic Atomistic Research

physics.chem-ph · 2026-05-18 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

AtomisticSkills is a new harness framework with 100+ human-curated skills that lets general AI agents perform atomistic research tasks including simulations, screening, and analysis, shown on electrolyte design, CO2 capture, drug screening, and catalyst tasks.

Interactive Evaluation Requires a Design Science

cs.AI · 2026-05-18 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

Interactive evaluation of AI must be reframed as a distinct paradigm that maps interaction trajectories to judgments on process, recoverability, coordination, robustness, and system performance, supported by a two-axis taxonomy and design principles.

citing papers explorer

Showing 12 of 12 citing papers.

  • Benchmarking Open-Ended Multi-Agent Coordination in Language Agents cs.AI · 2026-06-06 · unverdicted · none · ref 70

    ALEM benchmark reveals LLM agents achieve only ~6% normalized return in open-ended multi-agent settings, with communication as the main driver of coordination and individual task competence not implying coordination competence.

  • Boiling the Frog: A Multi-Turn Benchmark for Agentic Safety cs.CL · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · none · ref 95 · 2 links

    Boiling the Frog is a new stateful multi-turn benchmark that finds an aggregate 44.4% strict attack success rate for incremental safety violations across nine AI models, with rates ranging from 20.5% to 92.9%.

  • GTA-2: Benchmarking General Tool Agents from Atomic Tool-Use to Open-Ended Workflows cs.CL · 2026-04-17 · conditional · none · ref 19

    GTA-2 benchmark shows frontier models achieve below 50% on atomic tool tasks and only 14.39% success on realistic long-horizon workflows, with execution harnesses like Manus providing substantial gains.

  • Remember When It Matters: Proactive Memory Agent for Long-Horizon Agents cs.AI · 2026-07-09 · accept · none · ref 22

    A separate memory agent that selectively injects reminders into an unmodified action agent improves long-horizon task performance by up to 8.3 percentage points.

  • Trip+: Benchmarking Agents in Personalized Interactive Travel Planning cs.AI · 2026-06-19 · unverdicted · none · ref 2

    Trip+ benchmark evaluates language model agents on generating and revising personalized minute-level travel itineraries under dynamic interactions, finding consistent gaps where models produce feasible but exhausting plans that ignore traveler profiles.

  • PIVOT: Bridging Planning and Execution in LLM Agents via Trajectory Refinement cs.AI · 2026-05-11 · unverdicted · none · ref 26

    PIVOT refines LLM agent trajectories through plan-inspect-evolve-verify stages using environment feedback, yielding up to 94% relative gains in constraint satisfaction and 3-5x token efficiency over prior refinement methods.

  • TIP: Token Importance in On-Policy Distillation cs.LG · 2026-04-15 · unverdicted · none · ref 17 · 3 links

    A two-axis taxonomy of student entropy and teacher-student divergence identifies informative tokens in on-policy distillation, allowing near-full performance with 10-50% of tokens.

  • CivBench: Progress-Based Evaluation for LLMs' Strategic Decision-Making in Civilization V cs.AI · 2026-04-09 · unverdicted · none · ref 44

    CivBench trains models on turn-level states in Civilization V to predict victory probabilities, providing a progress-based evaluation of LLM strategic capabilities across 307 games with 7 models.

  • CRISP: Compressed Reasoning via Iterative Self-Policy Distillation cs.LG · 2026-03-05 · conditional · none · ref 27

    On-policy reverse-KL self-distillation from a “be concise” teacher cuts reasoning length up to 56% while preserving or slightly improving math accuracy across several models.

  • Harnessing AtomisticSkills for Agentic Atomistic Research physics.chem-ph · 2026-05-18 · unverdicted · none · ref 112

    AtomisticSkills is a new harness framework with 100+ human-curated skills that lets general AI agents perform atomistic research tasks including simulations, screening, and analysis, shown on electrolyte design, CO2 capture, drug screening, and catalyst tasks.

  • Interactive Evaluation Requires a Design Science cs.AI · 2026-05-18 · unverdicted · none · ref 69

    Interactive evaluation of AI must be reframed as a distinct paradigm that maps interaction trajectories to judgments on process, recoverability, coordination, robustness, and system performance, supported by a two-axis taxonomy and design principles.

  • MMEB-V3: Measuring the Performance Gaps of Omni-Modality Embedding Models cs.IR · 2026-04-25 · conditional · none · ref 41

    On 190 tasks and a 12-direction cross-modal diagnostic, seven embedding models frequently fail to honor explicit target-modality instructions: retrieval is biased toward the query modality and instruction-induced shifts are misaligned.