Boiling the Frog is a new stateful multi-turn benchmark that finds an aggregate 44.4% strict attack success rate for incremental safety violations across nine AI models, with rates ranging from 20.5% to 92.9%.
Title resolution pending
8 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
8
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
dataset 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 8roles
dataset 1polarities
use dataset 1representative citing papers
MMEB-V3 benchmark shows omni-modality embedding models fail to enforce instruction-specified modality constraints and exhibit asymmetric, query-biased retrieval.
GTA-2 benchmark shows frontier models achieve below 50% on atomic tool tasks and only 14.39% success on realistic long-horizon workflows, with execution harnesses like Manus providing substantial gains.
PIVOT refines LLM agent trajectories through plan-inspect-evolve-verify stages using environment feedback, yielding up to 94% relative gains in constraint satisfaction and 3-5x token efficiency over prior refinement methods.
A two-axis taxonomy of student entropy and teacher-student divergence identifies informative tokens in on-policy distillation, allowing near-full performance with 10-50% of tokens.
CivBench trains models on turn-level states in Civilization V to predict victory probabilities, providing a progress-based evaluation of LLM strategic capabilities across 307 games with 7 models.
CRISP achieves 57-59% token reduction on MATH-500 with 9-16 point accuracy gains on Qwen3 models via iterative self-distillation of concise reasoning behavior.
Interactive evaluation of AI must be reframed as a distinct paradigm that maps interaction trajectories to judgments on process, recoverability, coordination, robustness, and system performance, supported by a two-axis taxonomy and design principles.
citing papers explorer
-
Boiling the Frog: A Multi-Turn Benchmark for Agentic Safety
Boiling the Frog is a new stateful multi-turn benchmark that finds an aggregate 44.4% strict attack success rate for incremental safety violations across nine AI models, with rates ranging from 20.5% to 92.9%.
-
MMEB-V3: Measuring the Performance Gaps of Omni-Modality Embedding Models
MMEB-V3 benchmark shows omni-modality embedding models fail to enforce instruction-specified modality constraints and exhibit asymmetric, query-biased retrieval.
-
GTA-2: Benchmarking General Tool Agents from Atomic Tool-Use to Open-Ended Workflows
GTA-2 benchmark shows frontier models achieve below 50% on atomic tool tasks and only 14.39% success on realistic long-horizon workflows, with execution harnesses like Manus providing substantial gains.
-
PIVOT: Bridging Planning and Execution in LLM Agents via Trajectory Refinement
PIVOT refines LLM agent trajectories through plan-inspect-evolve-verify stages using environment feedback, yielding up to 94% relative gains in constraint satisfaction and 3-5x token efficiency over prior refinement methods.
-
TIP: Token Importance in On-Policy Distillation
A two-axis taxonomy of student entropy and teacher-student divergence identifies informative tokens in on-policy distillation, allowing near-full performance with 10-50% of tokens.
-
CivBench: Progress-Based Evaluation for LLMs' Strategic Decision-Making in Civilization V
CivBench trains models on turn-level states in Civilization V to predict victory probabilities, providing a progress-based evaluation of LLM strategic capabilities across 307 games with 7 models.
-
CRISP: Compressed Reasoning via Iterative Self-Policy Distillation
CRISP achieves 57-59% token reduction on MATH-500 with 9-16 point accuracy gains on Qwen3 models via iterative self-distillation of concise reasoning behavior.
-
Interactive Evaluation Requires a Design Science
Interactive evaluation of AI must be reframed as a distinct paradigm that maps interaction trajectories to judgments on process, recoverability, coordination, robustness, and system performance, supported by a two-axis taxonomy and design principles.