Boiling the Frog is a new stateful multi-turn benchmark that finds an aggregate 44.4% strict attack success rate for incremental safety violations across nine AI models, with rates ranging from 20.5% to 92.9%.
Title resolution pending
9 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 9roles
dataset 1polarities
use dataset 1representative citing papers
MMEB-V3 benchmark shows omni-modality embedding models fail to enforce instruction-specified modality constraints and exhibit asymmetric, query-biased retrieval.
GTA-2 benchmark shows frontier models achieve below 50% on atomic tool tasks and only 14.39% success on realistic long-horizon workflows, with execution harnesses like Manus providing substantial gains.
PIVOT refines LLM agent trajectories through plan-inspect-evolve-verify stages using environment feedback, yielding up to 94% relative gains in constraint satisfaction and 3-5x token efficiency over prior refinement methods.
A two-axis taxonomy of student entropy and teacher-student divergence identifies informative tokens in on-policy distillation, allowing near-full performance with 10-50% of tokens.
CivBench trains models on turn-level states in Civilization V to predict victory probabilities, providing a progress-based evaluation of LLM strategic capabilities across 307 games with 7 models.
CRISP achieves 57-59% token reduction on MATH-500 with 9-16 point accuracy gains on Qwen3 models via iterative self-distillation of concise reasoning behavior.
AtomisticSkills is a new harness framework with 100+ human-curated skills that lets general AI agents perform atomistic research tasks including simulations, screening, and analysis, shown on electrolyte design, CO2 capture, drug screening, and catalyst tasks.
Interactive evaluation of AI must be reframed as a distinct paradigm that maps interaction trajectories to judgments on process, recoverability, coordination, robustness, and system performance, supported by a two-axis taxonomy and design principles.
citing papers explorer
-
Boiling the Frog: A Multi-Turn Benchmark for Agentic Safety
Boiling the Frog is a new stateful multi-turn benchmark that finds an aggregate 44.4% strict attack success rate for incremental safety violations across nine AI models, with rates ranging from 20.5% to 92.9%.
-
MMEB-V3: Measuring the Performance Gaps of Omni-Modality Embedding Models
MMEB-V3 benchmark shows omni-modality embedding models fail to enforce instruction-specified modality constraints and exhibit asymmetric, query-biased retrieval.
-
GTA-2: Benchmarking General Tool Agents from Atomic Tool-Use to Open-Ended Workflows
GTA-2 benchmark shows frontier models achieve below 50% on atomic tool tasks and only 14.39% success on realistic long-horizon workflows, with execution harnesses like Manus providing substantial gains.
-
PIVOT: Bridging Planning and Execution in LLM Agents via Trajectory Refinement
PIVOT refines LLM agent trajectories through plan-inspect-evolve-verify stages using environment feedback, yielding up to 94% relative gains in constraint satisfaction and 3-5x token efficiency over prior refinement methods.
-
TIP: Token Importance in On-Policy Distillation
A two-axis taxonomy of student entropy and teacher-student divergence identifies informative tokens in on-policy distillation, allowing near-full performance with 10-50% of tokens.
-
CivBench: Progress-Based Evaluation for LLMs' Strategic Decision-Making in Civilization V
CivBench trains models on turn-level states in Civilization V to predict victory probabilities, providing a progress-based evaluation of LLM strategic capabilities across 307 games with 7 models.
-
CRISP: Compressed Reasoning via Iterative Self-Policy Distillation
CRISP achieves 57-59% token reduction on MATH-500 with 9-16 point accuracy gains on Qwen3 models via iterative self-distillation of concise reasoning behavior.
-
Harnessing AtomisticSkills for Agentic Atomistic Research
AtomisticSkills is a new harness framework with 100+ human-curated skills that lets general AI agents perform atomistic research tasks including simulations, screening, and analysis, shown on electrolyte design, CO2 capture, drug screening, and catalyst tasks.
-
Interactive Evaluation Requires a Design Science
Interactive evaluation of AI must be reframed as a distinct paradigm that maps interaction trajectories to judgments on process, recoverability, coordination, robustness, and system performance, supported by a two-axis taxonomy and design principles.