pith. sign in

hub Mixed citations

Attention is not Explanation

Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (62%).

19 Pith papers citing it
Background 62% of classified citations
abstract

Attention mechanisms have seen wide adoption in neural NLP models. In addition to improving predictive performance, these are often touted as affording transparency: models equipped with attention provide a distribution over attended-to input units, and this is often presented (at least implicitly) as communicating the relative importance of inputs. However, it is unclear what relationship exists between attention weights and model outputs. In this work, we perform extensive experiments across a variety of NLP tasks that aim to assess the degree to which attention weights provide meaningful `explanations' for predictions. We find that they largely do not. For example, learned attention weights are frequently uncorrelated with gradient-based measures of feature importance, and one can identify very different attention distributions that nonetheless yield equivalent predictions. Our findings show that standard attention modules do not provide meaningful explanations and should not be treated as though they do. Code for all experiments is available at https://github.com/successar/AttentionExplanation.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 8

citation-polarity summary

roles

background 7

polarities

background 5 support 2

representative citing papers

Large Vision-Language Models Get Lost in Attention

cs.AI · 2026-05-07 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

In LVLMs, attention can be replaced by random Gaussian weights with little or no performance loss, indicating that current models get lost in attention rather than efficiently using visual context.

Interpretable Question Answering on Knowledge Bases and Text

cs.CL · 2019-06-26 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

Compares LIME, input perturbation and attention for explaining QA on KB+text; proposes automatic evaluation paradigm and finds input perturbation superior in both automatic and human studies.

citing papers explorer

Showing 19 of 19 citing papers.