FRB dispersion measures directly constrain suppression of the matter power spectrum due to feedback at k ~ 0.1-3 h/Mpc, reduce posterior variance by a factor of ~8 at k~1 h/Mpc, and exclude extreme large-scale feedback scenarios at ~2 sigma.
Title resolution pending
5 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
5
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 5roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
A search of repeating FRBs identifies RM flare candidates in FRB 20121102A, FRB 20201124A, and FRB 20180916B, suggesting such events may be common and tied to dynamic magneto-ionic environments.
No statistically significant excess of associations is found between CHIME FRBs and Swift GRBs after spatial, redshift, and temporal filtering, consistent with random coincidences.
Wideband observations show M28A giant pulses differ from FRB 20200120E bursts in duration, luminosity, timing statistics, and spectral structure, yielding no strong evidence for a direct link.
The PINK updates enhance the CELEBI FRB pipeline with better astrometry, time-frequency gating, polarization calibration, DM optimization tools, and a software container for improved efficiency and localization of events like FRB 20251019A.
citing papers explorer
-
Signatures of Suppressed Matter Clustering revealed by Fast Radio Bursts
FRB dispersion measures directly constrain suppression of the matter power spectrum due to feedback at k ~ 0.1-3 h/Mpc, reduce posterior variance by a factor of ~8 at k~1 h/Mpc, and exclude extreme large-scale feedback scenarios at ~2 sigma.