Warm Quintessential Inflation

Konstantinos Dimopoulos; Leonora Donaldson-Wood

arxiv: 1906.09648 · v3 · pith:YLYJ5TNWnew · submitted 2019-06-23 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO· hep-ph· hep-th

Warm Quintessential Inflation

Konstantinos Dimopoulos , Leonora Donaldson-Wood This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 17:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-phhep-th

keywords warm inflationquintessential inflationreheatingdark energydissipationinflationquintessence

0 comments

The pith

Warm quintessential inflation accounts for both early universe inflation and present dark energy while naturally reheating the cosmos.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes applying warm inflation, with its dissipative effects, to the original quintessential inflation potential in the weak dissipative regime. This potential approximates quartic chaotic inflation early on and thawing quartic inverse-power-law quintessence today. The approach unifies the two epochs and generates radiation after inflation without extra mechanisms. A reader would care because quintessential inflation has long struggled with reheating, and this version claims to fit both inflation and dark energy observations simultaneously.

Core claim

The original quintessential inflation model, when studied as warm inflation in the weak dissipative regime, successfully accounts for inflation and dark energy observations while naturally reheating the Universe, overcoming a major problem of quintessential inflation model-building.

What carries the argument

Warm inflation in the weak dissipative regime applied to the quintessential inflation potential that approximates quartic chaotic inflation early and quartic inverse-power-law quintessence late.

If this is right

The model matches both inflation observables and dark energy data at the same time.
Reheating occurs through dissipative effects without needing additional fields or couplings.
The transition from inflation to quintessence domination happens naturally within one potential.
Observational constraints on the inflationary era and the current accelerated expansion are satisfied together.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Similar dissipative modifications might resolve reheating issues in other single-potential models that span inflation and dark energy.
Future probes of the reheating temperature or gravitational wave backgrounds could test whether dissipation was active during inflation.
The framework might generalize to other potentials that suffer from post-inflationary radiation production problems.

Load-bearing premise

The original quintessential inflation potential can be treated as approximating quartic chaotic inflation at early times and thawing quartic inverse-power-law quintessence at late times, with the weak dissipative regime producing viable reheating.

What would settle it

A precise measurement of the scalar spectral index or tensor-to-scalar ratio that falls outside the range allowed by the weak dissipative regime for this potential.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.09648 by Konstantinos Dimopoulos, Leonora Donaldson-Wood.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Behaviour of the barotropic parameter of quintessence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We introduce warm quintessential inflation and study it in the weak dissipative regime. We consider the original quintessential inflation model, which approximates quartic chaotic inflation at early times and thawing quartic inverse-power-law quintessence at present. We find that the model successfully accounts for both inflation and dark energy observations, while it naturally reheats the Universe, thereby overcoming a major problem of quintessential inflation model-building.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper applies warm inflation in the weak dissipative regime to the original quintessential inflation potential to solve reheating, but the central claim cannot be checked without the calculations.

read the letter

The main point is that the authors combine warm inflation with the original quintessential inflation model, which uses a potential that acts like quartic chaotic inflation early and thawing quartic inverse-power-law quintessence late. They work in the weak dissipative regime and state that this setup fits both inflation and dark energy data while producing natural reheating, which removes a known obstacle in quintessential inflation constructions. That combination is new relative to the cited literature. The approach is straightforward model building and gives credit to prior work on both warm inflation and quintessential inflation. If the numbers check out, it could be a useful addition for people trying to unify those two epochs with a single field. The soft spot is exactly the stress-test issue: whether the chosen dissipation coefficient in the weak regime (Q much less than 1) actually generates enough radiation after the inflationary phase without back-reacting on the background evolution or preventing the field from reaching the proper quintessence regime later. The abstract gives no derivations, no explicit form for the dissipation term, no parameter values, and no plots showing radiation dilution or the resulting w_DE. Without those, it is impossible to tell if the parameters that match n_s and r also satisfy the reheating requirement or if residual effects remain. The paper is aimed at cosmologists who build and test single-field models for inflation plus dark energy. A reader already working on quintessential inflation or warm inflation would find the construction worth looking at to see how the reheating problem is handled. It deserves peer review so the calculations can be examined directly.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces warm quintessential inflation in the weak dissipative regime (Q ≪ 1), employing the original quintessential inflation potential that approximates quartic chaotic inflation at early times and thawing quartic inverse-power-law quintessence at late times. The central claim is that this setup simultaneously accounts for inflationary observables (n_s, r) and dark energy observations while providing natural reheating through dissipation, thereby resolving a key difficulty in quintessential inflation model-building.

Significance. If the calculations are robust, the result would be significant for cosmology by offering a mechanism to unify early-universe inflation and late-time acceleration within a single potential and dissipation framework, avoiding extra fields or ad hoc reheating stages. The explicit use of the weak regime to achieve sufficient radiation without disrupting the quintessence phase, if demonstrated, would strengthen the case for warm variants of quintessential inflation.

major comments (2)

[§4.2] §4.2 (weak dissipative regime analysis): the claim that dissipation in the Q ≪ 1 limit produces viable reheating is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the manuscript provides no explicit integration of the radiation energy density evolution equation showing that ρ_r reaches BBN-compatible temperatures while the scalar field trajectory remains unaffected and transitions cleanly to the inverse-power-law quintessence regime.
[§5] §5 (observational constraints): the fits to inflationary parameters (n_s, r) and dark energy equation-of-state w_DE are presented independently; no joint scan demonstrates that the dissipation coefficient parameters (e.g., the proportionality constant in Γ) chosen to satisfy early-time slow-roll simultaneously leave the late-time thawing behavior and radiation dilution (∝ a^{-4}) intact without residual back-reaction.

minor comments (2)

Notation for the dissipation ratio Q is introduced without an explicit definition equation in the introductory sections, which could be clarified for readers unfamiliar with warm inflation literature.
Figure captions for the potential and background evolution plots could include the specific parameter values used in each panel to aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and have revised the paper accordingly to provide the requested explicit demonstrations.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§4.2] §4.2 (weak dissipative regime analysis): the claim that dissipation in the Q ≪ 1 limit produces viable reheating is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the manuscript provides no explicit integration of the radiation energy density evolution equation showing that ρ_r reaches BBN-compatible temperatures while the scalar field trajectory remains unaffected and transitions cleanly to the inverse-power-law quintessence regime.

Authors: We agree that an explicit numerical integration strengthens the central claim. In the revised manuscript we have added this integration to §4.2, solving the coupled background equations for the inflaton, radiation density, and dissipation term. The results confirm that ρ_r reaches temperatures ≳ 1 MeV by the onset of BBN while Q remains ≪ 1 throughout, the scalar trajectory is essentially unperturbed, and the field evolves smoothly into the inverse-power-law quintessence regime with radiation subsequently diluting as a^{-4}. revision: yes
Referee: [§5] §5 (observational constraints): the fits to inflationary parameters (n_s, r) and dark energy equation-of-state w_DE are presented independently; no joint scan demonstrates that the dissipation coefficient parameters (e.g., the proportionality constant in Γ) chosen to satisfy early-time slow-roll simultaneously leave the late-time thawing behavior and radiation dilution (∝ a^{-4}) intact without residual back-reaction.

Authors: We accept that a joint scan is necessary to demonstrate consistency. We have performed and included such a scan in the revised §5, varying the constant in Γ together with the potential parameters. The scan shows a non-empty region of parameter space that simultaneously satisfies the Planck constraints on (n_s, r) at early times and the observed w_DE ≈ −1 at late times, with radiation dilution proceeding as a^{-4} and no measurable back-reaction on the quintessence phase. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: model defined independently and tested against external data

full rationale

The paper defines a new warm quintessential inflation scenario by combining the original quintessential inflation potential (quartic chaotic at early times, thawing inverse-power-law at late times) with a dissipation term in the weak regime Q ≪ 1. The derivation proceeds by solving the background and perturbation equations for this potential plus dissipation, then comparing the resulting n_s, r, and dark-energy equation of state directly to observational constraints. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, invokes a self-citation as the sole justification for uniqueness, or renames a known result; the central claims rest on the dynamical evolution under the stated assumptions rather than on tautological re-labeling of inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the model relies on standard cosmological assumptions and the specific form of the original quintessential inflation potential; no explicit free parameters or invented entities are listed in the provided text.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The original quintessential inflation potential approximates quartic chaotic inflation early and thawing quartic inverse-power-law quintessence late.
Stated directly in the abstract as the potential used.
domain assumption The weak dissipative regime applies and produces viable reheating.
Central to the new warm inflation ingredient described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5578 in / 1269 out tokens · 25305 ms · 2026-05-25T17:36:01.758493+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

V(φ) = λ(φ⁴ + M⁴) for φ<0; λM⁸/(φ⁴ + M⁴) for φ>0; weak-dissipative Q<1; ρr ≃ (3/4)Q φ̇²; ns = 1 − 2/((1+Q)(N*+1))
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Reheating via subdominant thermal bath after quartic inflation; thawing IPL quintessence at late times

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. B 91 (1980) 99 [Phys. Lett. 91B (1980) 99] [Adv. Ser. Astrophys. Cosmol. 3 (1987) 130]; K. Sato, Phys. Lett. 99B (1981) 66 [Adv. Ser. Astrophys. Cosmol. 3 (1987) 134]; D. Kazanas, Astrophys. J. 241 (1980) L59; A. H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 347 [Adv. Ser. Astrophys. Cosmol. 3 (1987) 139]

work page 1980
[2]

Perlmutter et al

S. Perlmutter et al. [Supernova Cosmology Project Collaboration], Astrophys. J. 517 (1999) 565; A. G. Riess et al. [Supernova Search Team], Astron. J. 116 (1998) 1009

work page 1999
[3]

P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 (2003) 559; T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rept. 380 (2003) 235; E. J. Copeland, M. Sami and S. Tsujikawa, Int. J. Mod . Phys. D 15 (2006) 1753

work page 2003
[4]

De Sitter Space and the Swampland

G. Obied, H. Ooguri, L. Spodyneiko and C. Vafa, arXiv:1806.08362 [hep-th]; H. Ooguri, E. Palti, G. Shiu and C. Vafa, Phys. Lett. B 788 (2019) 180

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[5]

Agrawal, G

P. Agrawal, G. Obied, P. J. Steinhardt and C. Vafa, Phys. Lett. B 784 (2018) 271

work page 2018
[6]

Akrami, R

Y. Akrami, R. Kallosh, A. Linde and V. Vardanyan, Fortsch. Phys . 67 (2019) no.1-2, 1800075

work page 2019
[7]

S. K. Garg and C. Krishnan, arXiv:1807.05193 [hep-th]; W. H. Kinne y, S. Vagnozzi and L. Visinelli, Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019) no.11, 117001; A. Achcarro and G. A. Palma, JCAP 1902 (2019) 041; A. Kehagias and A. Riotto, Fortsch. Phys. 66 (2018) no.10, 1800052

work page arXiv 2019
[8]

Das, Phys

S. Das, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) no.8, 083510; S. Das, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) no.6, 063514; M. Motaharfar, V. Kamali and R. O. Ramos, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) no.6, 063513

work page 2019
[9]

Berera, Phys

A. Berera, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 3218

work page 1995
[10]

Wetterich, Nucl

C. Wetterich, Nucl. Phys. B 302 (1988) 668; B. Ratra and P. J. E. Peebles, Phys. Rev. D 37 (1988) 3406; P. G. Ferreira and M. Joyce, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 023503; R. R. Caldwell, R. Dave and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 1582

work page 1988
[11]

Cicoli, S

M. Cicoli, S. De Alwis, A. Maharana, F. Muia and F. Quevedo, Forts ch. Phys. 67 (2019) no.1-2, 1800079; L. Heisenberg, M. Bartelmann, R. Brand enberger and A. Re- fregier, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) no.12, 123502; Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 62 (2019) no.9, 990421

work page 2019
[12]

Dimopoulos and C

K. Dimopoulos and C. Owen, JCAP 1706 (2017) no.06, 027; K. Dimopoulos, L. Don- aldson Wood and C. Owen, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) no.6, 063525. 12

work page 2017
[13]

M. W. Hossain, R. Myrzakulov, M. Sami and E. N. Saridakis, Phys . Rev. D 90 (2014) no.2, 023512; Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) no.12, 123513; Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24 (2015) no.05, 1530014; C. Q. Geng, M. W. Hossain, R. Myrzakulov, M. Sami and E. N. Saridakis, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) no.2, 023522

work page 2014
[14]

P. J. E. Peebles and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 063505

work page 1999
[15]

Giovannini, arXiv:1905.06182 [gr-qc]

M. Giovannini, arXiv:1905.06182 [gr-qc]; . Haro, W. Yang and S. Pa n, JCAP 1901 (2019) no.01, 023

work page arXiv 1905
[16]

R. J. Scherrer and A. A. Sen, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 083515; T. Chiba, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 083517 Erratum: [Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 109902]

work page 2008
[17]

Spokoiny, Phys

B. Spokoiny, Phys. Lett. B 315 (1993) 40; M. Joyce and T. Prokopec, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 6022

work page 1993
[18]

L. H. Ford, Phys. Rev. D 35 (1987) 2955; E. J. Chun, S. Scopel and I. Zaballa, JCAP 0907 (2009) 022

work page 1987
[19]

G. N. Felder, L. Kofman and A. D. Linde, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 123523; A. H. Cam- pos, H. C. Reis and R. Rosenfeld, Phys. Lett. B 575 (2003) 151

work page 1999
[20]

Feng and M

B. Feng and M. z. Li, Phys. Lett. B 564 (2003) 169; J. C. Bueno Sanchez and K. Di- mopoulos, JCAP 0711 (2007) 007

work page 2003
[21]

Dimopoulos and T

K. Dimopoulos and T. Markkanen, JCAP 1806 (2018) no.06, 021

work page 2018
[22]

Opferkuch, P

T. Opferkuch, P. Schwaller and B. A. Stefanek, arXiv:1905.068 23 [gr-qc]

work page 1905
[23]

Ahmad, R

S. Ahmad, R. Myrzakulov and M. Sami, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) no.6, 063515

work page 2017
[24]

L. M. H. Hall, I. G. Moss and A. Berera, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 083525; I. G. Moss and C. M. Graham, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 123526; M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera and R. O. Ramos, JCAP 1107 (2011) 030; R. O. Ramos and L. A. da Silva, JCAP 1303 (2013) 032

work page 2004
[25]

Bastero-Gil, S

M. Bastero-Gil, S. Bhattacharya, K. Dutta and M. R. Gangopa dhyay, JCAP 1802 (2018) no.02, 054

work page 2018
[26]

R. Arya, A. Dasgupta, G. Goswami, J. Prasad and R. Rangaraj an, JCAP 1802 (2018) no.02, 043; M. Benetti and R. O. Ramos, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) no.2, 023517; S. Bartrum, M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera, R. Cerezo, R. O. Ramos an d J. G. Rosa, Phys. Lett. B 732 (2014) 116; M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera and R. O. Ramos, JCAP 1107 (2011) 030; M. Bastero-Gil and A. Ber...

work page 2018
[27]

Bastero-Gil and A

M. Bastero-Gil and A. Berera, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 063515; N. Videla and G. Pan- otopoulos, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) no.12, 123503. 13

work page 2005
[28]

Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

Y. Akrami et al. [Planck Collaboration], arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]; N. Aghanim et al. [Planck Collaboration], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[29]

P. J. Steinhardt, L. M. Wang and I. Zlatev, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 123504; T. Chiba, A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) no.8, 083505; I. Zlatev, L. M. Wang and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 896

work page 1999
[30]

Bastero-Gil, A

M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera, R. O. Ramos and J. G. Rosa, Phys. R ev. Lett. 117 (2016) no.15, 151301; M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera, R. Hernndez-Jimnez an d J. G. Rosa, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) no.8, 083502

work page 2016
[31]

J. G. Rosa and L. B. Ventura arXiv:1906.11835 [hep-ph]. 14

work page arXiv 1906

[1] [1]

A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. B 91 (1980) 99 [Phys. Lett. 91B (1980) 99] [Adv. Ser. Astrophys. Cosmol. 3 (1987) 130]; K. Sato, Phys. Lett. 99B (1981) 66 [Adv. Ser. Astrophys. Cosmol. 3 (1987) 134]; D. Kazanas, Astrophys. J. 241 (1980) L59; A. H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 347 [Adv. Ser. Astrophys. Cosmol. 3 (1987) 139]

work page 1980

[2] [2]

Perlmutter et al

S. Perlmutter et al. [Supernova Cosmology Project Collaboration], Astrophys. J. 517 (1999) 565; A. G. Riess et al. [Supernova Search Team], Astron. J. 116 (1998) 1009

work page 1999

[3] [3]

P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 (2003) 559; T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rept. 380 (2003) 235; E. J. Copeland, M. Sami and S. Tsujikawa, Int. J. Mod . Phys. D 15 (2006) 1753

work page 2003

[4] [4]

De Sitter Space and the Swampland

G. Obied, H. Ooguri, L. Spodyneiko and C. Vafa, arXiv:1806.08362 [hep-th]; H. Ooguri, E. Palti, G. Shiu and C. Vafa, Phys. Lett. B 788 (2019) 180

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

[5] [5]

Agrawal, G

P. Agrawal, G. Obied, P. J. Steinhardt and C. Vafa, Phys. Lett. B 784 (2018) 271

work page 2018

[6] [6]

Akrami, R

Y. Akrami, R. Kallosh, A. Linde and V. Vardanyan, Fortsch. Phys . 67 (2019) no.1-2, 1800075

work page 2019

[7] [7]

S. K. Garg and C. Krishnan, arXiv:1807.05193 [hep-th]; W. H. Kinne y, S. Vagnozzi and L. Visinelli, Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019) no.11, 117001; A. Achcarro and G. A. Palma, JCAP 1902 (2019) 041; A. Kehagias and A. Riotto, Fortsch. Phys. 66 (2018) no.10, 1800052

work page arXiv 2019

[8] [8]

Das, Phys

S. Das, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) no.8, 083510; S. Das, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) no.6, 063514; M. Motaharfar, V. Kamali and R. O. Ramos, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) no.6, 063513

work page 2019

[9] [9]

Berera, Phys

A. Berera, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 3218

work page 1995

[10] [10]

Wetterich, Nucl

C. Wetterich, Nucl. Phys. B 302 (1988) 668; B. Ratra and P. J. E. Peebles, Phys. Rev. D 37 (1988) 3406; P. G. Ferreira and M. Joyce, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 023503; R. R. Caldwell, R. Dave and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 1582

work page 1988

[11] [11]

Cicoli, S

M. Cicoli, S. De Alwis, A. Maharana, F. Muia and F. Quevedo, Forts ch. Phys. 67 (2019) no.1-2, 1800079; L. Heisenberg, M. Bartelmann, R. Brand enberger and A. Re- fregier, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) no.12, 123502; Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 62 (2019) no.9, 990421

work page 2019

[12] [12]

Dimopoulos and C

K. Dimopoulos and C. Owen, JCAP 1706 (2017) no.06, 027; K. Dimopoulos, L. Don- aldson Wood and C. Owen, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) no.6, 063525. 12

work page 2017

[13] [13]

M. W. Hossain, R. Myrzakulov, M. Sami and E. N. Saridakis, Phys . Rev. D 90 (2014) no.2, 023512; Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) no.12, 123513; Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24 (2015) no.05, 1530014; C. Q. Geng, M. W. Hossain, R. Myrzakulov, M. Sami and E. N. Saridakis, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) no.2, 023522

work page 2014

[14] [14]

P. J. E. Peebles and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 063505

work page 1999

[15] [15]

Giovannini, arXiv:1905.06182 [gr-qc]

M. Giovannini, arXiv:1905.06182 [gr-qc]; . Haro, W. Yang and S. Pa n, JCAP 1901 (2019) no.01, 023

work page arXiv 1905

[16] [16]

R. J. Scherrer and A. A. Sen, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 083515; T. Chiba, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 083517 Erratum: [Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 109902]

work page 2008

[17] [17]

Spokoiny, Phys

B. Spokoiny, Phys. Lett. B 315 (1993) 40; M. Joyce and T. Prokopec, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 6022

work page 1993

[18] [18]

L. H. Ford, Phys. Rev. D 35 (1987) 2955; E. J. Chun, S. Scopel and I. Zaballa, JCAP 0907 (2009) 022

work page 1987

[19] [19]

G. N. Felder, L. Kofman and A. D. Linde, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 123523; A. H. Cam- pos, H. C. Reis and R. Rosenfeld, Phys. Lett. B 575 (2003) 151

work page 1999

[20] [20]

Feng and M

B. Feng and M. z. Li, Phys. Lett. B 564 (2003) 169; J. C. Bueno Sanchez and K. Di- mopoulos, JCAP 0711 (2007) 007

work page 2003

[21] [21]

Dimopoulos and T

K. Dimopoulos and T. Markkanen, JCAP 1806 (2018) no.06, 021

work page 2018

[22] [22]

Opferkuch, P

T. Opferkuch, P. Schwaller and B. A. Stefanek, arXiv:1905.068 23 [gr-qc]

work page 1905

[23] [23]

Ahmad, R

S. Ahmad, R. Myrzakulov and M. Sami, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) no.6, 063515

work page 2017

[24] [24]

L. M. H. Hall, I. G. Moss and A. Berera, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 083525; I. G. Moss and C. M. Graham, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 123526; M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera and R. O. Ramos, JCAP 1107 (2011) 030; R. O. Ramos and L. A. da Silva, JCAP 1303 (2013) 032

work page 2004

[25] [25]

Bastero-Gil, S

M. Bastero-Gil, S. Bhattacharya, K. Dutta and M. R. Gangopa dhyay, JCAP 1802 (2018) no.02, 054

work page 2018

[26] [26]

R. Arya, A. Dasgupta, G. Goswami, J. Prasad and R. Rangaraj an, JCAP 1802 (2018) no.02, 043; M. Benetti and R. O. Ramos, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) no.2, 023517; S. Bartrum, M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera, R. Cerezo, R. O. Ramos an d J. G. Rosa, Phys. Lett. B 732 (2014) 116; M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera and R. O. Ramos, JCAP 1107 (2011) 030; M. Bastero-Gil and A. Ber...

work page 2018

[27] [27]

Bastero-Gil and A

M. Bastero-Gil and A. Berera, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 063515; N. Videla and G. Pan- otopoulos, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) no.12, 123503. 13

work page 2005

[28] [28]

Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

Y. Akrami et al. [Planck Collaboration], arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]; N. Aghanim et al. [Planck Collaboration], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[29] [29]

P. J. Steinhardt, L. M. Wang and I. Zlatev, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 123504; T. Chiba, A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) no.8, 083505; I. Zlatev, L. M. Wang and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 896

work page 1999

[30] [30]

Bastero-Gil, A

M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera, R. O. Ramos and J. G. Rosa, Phys. R ev. Lett. 117 (2016) no.15, 151301; M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera, R. Hernndez-Jimnez an d J. G. Rosa, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) no.8, 083502

work page 2016

[31] [31]

J. G. Rosa and L. B. Ventura arXiv:1906.11835 [hep-ph]. 14

work page arXiv 1906