The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2210.03895 · v1 · pith:Z2IZANZB · submitted 2022-10-08 · cs.CV · cs.AI· cs.CR· cs.LG· stat.ML

ViewFool: Evaluating the Robustness of Visual Recognition to Adversarial Viewpoints

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:Z2IZANZBrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CV cs.AIcs.CRcs.LGstat.ML
keywords robustnessviewfoolviewpointadversarialviewpointsclassifiersimagerecognition
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated that visual recognition models lack robustness to distribution shift. However, current work mainly considers model robustness to 2D image transformations, leaving viewpoint changes in the 3D world less explored. In general, viewpoint changes are prevalent in various real-world applications (e.g., autonomous driving), making it imperative to evaluate viewpoint robustness. In this paper, we propose a novel method called ViewFool to find adversarial viewpoints that mislead visual recognition models. By encoding real-world objects as neural radiance fields (NeRF), ViewFool characterizes a distribution of diverse adversarial viewpoints under an entropic regularizer, which helps to handle the fluctuations of the real camera pose and mitigate the reality gap between the real objects and their neural representations. Experiments validate that the common image classifiers are extremely vulnerable to the generated adversarial viewpoints, which also exhibit high cross-model transferability. Based on ViewFool, we introduce ImageNet-V, a new out-of-distribution dataset for benchmarking viewpoint robustness of image classifiers. Evaluation results on 40 classifiers with diverse architectures, objective functions, and data augmentations reveal a significant drop in model performance when tested on ImageNet-V, which provides a possibility to leverage ViewFool as an effective data augmentation strategy to improve viewpoint robustness.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.