Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Fine-mixing: Mitigating Backdoors in Fine-tuned Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.09545 v1 pith:6KDF2YFP submitted 2022-10-18 cs.CL cs.CRcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.CRcs.LG
keywords weightsbackdoorfine-tunedlanguagemodelspre-trainedattacksbackdoors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) are known to be vulnerable to backdoor attacks. In Natural Language Processing (NLP), DNNs are often backdoored during the fine-tuning process of a large-scale Pre-trained Language Model (PLM) with poisoned samples. Although the clean weights of PLMs are readily available, existing methods have ignored this information in defending NLP models against backdoor attacks. In this work, we take the first step to exploit the pre-trained (unfine-tuned) weights to mitigate backdoors in fine-tuned language models. Specifically, we leverage the clean pre-trained weights via two complementary techniques: (1) a two-step Fine-mixing technique, which first mixes the backdoored weights (fine-tuned on poisoned data) with the pre-trained weights, then fine-tunes the mixed weights on a small subset of clean data; (2) an Embedding Purification (E-PUR) technique, which mitigates potential backdoors existing in the word embeddings. We compare Fine-mixing with typical backdoor mitigation methods on three single-sentence sentiment classification tasks and two sentence-pair classification tasks and show that it outperforms the baselines by a considerable margin in all scenarios. We also show that our E-PUR method can benefit existing mitigation methods. Our work establishes a simple but strong baseline defense for secure fine-tuned NLP models against backdoor attacks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Breaking the Rounding Trap: Securing LLMs against Quantization-Conditioned Backdoors

    cs.CR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    QuantGuard uses differentiable rounding control to break quantization-boundary backdoors in LLMs, reducing post-quantization attack success to clean-model levels across six models and INT8/FP4/NF4.

  2. Patronus: Identifying and Mitigating Transferable Backdoors in Pre-trained Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Patronus finds transferable backdoor triggers in pre-trained language models via input-side multi-trigger contrastive search and neutralizes them with input filtering and adversarial training.

  3. Lethe: Purifying Backdoored Large Language Models with Knowledge Dilution

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LETHE uses parameter-level model merging plus prompt-level word definitions to dilute backdoor behavior in LLMs, cutting attack success to below 7% in most tested settings.

  4. Large Language Models in Cybersecurity: Applications, Vulnerabilities, and Defense Techniques

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that maps LLM applications, vulnerabilities, and defenses across eight cybersecurity domains, but with significant citation and rigor problems.

Pith tools