Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The future is different: Large pre-trained language models fail in prediction tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.00384 v2 pith:ACYTWDAE submitted 2022-11-01 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LGcs.SI

The future is different: Large pre-trained language models fail in prediction tasks

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LGcs.SI
keywords modelswhenfuturelanguagelplmperformancetaskstime
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Large pre-trained language models (LPLM) have shown spectacular success when fine-tuned on downstream supervised tasks. Yet, it is known that their performance can drastically drop when there is a distribution shift between the data used during training and that used at inference time. In this paper we focus on data distributions that naturally change over time and introduce four new REDDIT datasets, namely the WALLSTREETBETS, ASKSCIENCE, THE DONALD, and POLITICS sub-reddits. First, we empirically demonstrate that LPLM can display average performance drops of about 88% (in the best case!) when predicting the popularity of future posts from sub-reddits whose topic distribution changes with time. We then introduce a simple methodology that leverages neural variational dynamic topic models and attention mechanisms to infer temporal language model representations for regression tasks. Our models display performance drops of only about 40% in the worst cases (2% in the best ones) when predicting the popularity of future posts, while using only about 7% of the total number of parameters of LPLM and providing interpretable representations that offer insight into real-world events, like the GameStop short squeeze of 2021

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. TS-Reasoner: Domain-Oriented Time Series Inference Agents for Reasoning and Automated Analysis

    cs.LG 2024-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    TS-Reasoner is a domain-oriented agent using LLMs, computational tools, and error feedback for multi-step time series inference, showing better performance than general LLMs on understanding and reasoning benchmarks.

  2. When LLM Meets Time Series: Can LLMs Perform Multi-Step Time Series Reasoning and Inference

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    TSAIA, a new benchmark, tests eight LLMs on 1,054 multi-step time series tasks and finds they cannot reliably complete the required workflows.