The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2302.00763 · v1 · pith:ZKQ7OI7Q · submitted 2023-02-01 · cs.LG · cs.AI· cs.CL

Collaborating with language models for embodied reasoning

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:ZKQ7OI7Qrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL
keywords abilityreasoningtaskslanguageplannersystemactoragents
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Reasoning in a complex and ambiguous environment is a key goal for Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents. While some sophisticated RL agents can successfully solve difficult tasks, they require a large amount of training data and often struggle to generalize to new unseen environments and new tasks. On the other hand, Large Scale Language Models (LSLMs) have exhibited strong reasoning ability and the ability to to adapt to new tasks through in-context learning. However, LSLMs do not inherently have the ability to interrogate or intervene on the environment. In this work, we investigate how to combine these complementary abilities in a single system consisting of three parts: a Planner, an Actor, and a Reporter. The Planner is a pre-trained language model that can issue commands to a simple embodied agent (the Actor), while the Reporter communicates with the Planner to inform its next command. We present a set of tasks that require reasoning, test this system's ability to generalize zero-shot and investigate failure cases, and demonstrate how components of this system can be trained with reinforcement-learning to improve performance.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Moltbook Files: A Harmless Slopocalypse or Humanity's Last Experiment

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    An AI-agent social platform generated mostly neutral content whose use in fine-tuning reduced model truthfulness comparably to human Reddit data, suggesting limited unique harm but flagging tail risks like secret leaks.

  2. A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents

    cs.AI 2023-08 accept novelty 6.0

    A survey of LLM-based autonomous agents that proposes a unified framework for their construction and reviews applications in social science, natural science, and engineering along with evaluation methods and future di...

  3. Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges

    cs.CL 2024-01 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The paper surveys LLM-based multi-agent systems, covering simulated domains, agent profiling and communication, mechanisms for capacity growth, and common benchmarks.