Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Evaluation of ChatGPT for NLP-based Mental Health Applications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.15727 v1 pith:R4JGYMBS submitted 2023-03-28 cs.CL cs.AI

Evaluation of ChatGPT for NLP-based Mental Health Applications

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords classificationdetectionchatgptclasshealthlanguagementaltasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLM) have been successful in several natural language understanding tasks and could be relevant for natural language processing (NLP)-based mental health application research. In this work, we report the performance of LLM-based ChatGPT (with gpt-3.5-turbo backend) in three text-based mental health classification tasks: stress detection (2-class classification), depression detection (2-class classification), and suicidality detection (5-class classification). We obtained annotated social media posts for the three classification tasks from public datasets. Then ChatGPT API classified the social media posts with an input prompt for classification. We obtained F1 scores of 0.73, 0.86, and 0.37 for stress detection, depression detection, and suicidality detection, respectively. A baseline model that always predicted the dominant class resulted in F1 scores of 0.35, 0.60, and 0.19. The zero-shot classification accuracy obtained with ChatGPT indicates a potential use of language models for mental health classification tasks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mental-R1: Aligning LLM Reasoning for Mental Health Assessment

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CRPO extends group relative policy optimization with stage-dependent uncertainty modeling and reports a 10.4 percentage point weighted F1 gain over RL baselines across 8 mental health datasets.

  2. Can We Trust LLMs for Mental Health Screening? Consistency, ASR Robustness, and Evidence Faithfulness

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Phi-4 and Gemma-2-9B maintain high intra-model consistency (ICC > 0.89) and ASR robustness for HADS scoring while Llama-3.1-8B degrades sharply, with all models showing score-evidence dissociation.

  3. Beyond Semantics: An Evidential Reasoning-Aware Multi-View Learning Framework for Trustworthy Mental Health Prediction

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A multi-view evidential framework combines semantic and reasoning information to improve accuracy and provide trustworthy uncertainty estimates for mental health prediction on text data.