Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Investigation of the cause of the discrepancies between calculated running sums for nuclear matrix elements of two-neutrino double-β decay

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.01719 v2 pith:AXNSC2GM submitted 2023-04-04 nucl-th hep-exhep-phnucl-ex

Investigation of the cause of the discrepancies between calculated running sums for nuclear matrix elements of two-neutrino double-β decay

classification nucl-th hep-exhep-phnucl-ex
keywords calculationsbetacausedecaydecreasedouble-qrparunning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

A qualitative difference in the running sum for the nuclear matrix element of the two-neutrino double-$\beta$ decay of $^{136}$Xe was found four years ago between quasiparticle random-phase approximation (QRPA) and shell model calculations. The former result has large increase and decrease with respect to the excitation energy of the intermediate state, and the latter one is an almost monotonically and mildly increasing function. My QRPA calculations independently of the above one do not have a remarkable decrease. This discrepancy is a serious problem affecting the reliability of calculations of the neutrinoless double-$\beta$ decay, and the cause was unknown. I perform several relevant test calculations and make an analytical consideration to find the cause, which is found to be in the strength of the attractive interactions. The possible major local decrease in the running sum is also explained analytically. The interactions of my QRPA calculation are appropriate in terms of the strength, thus the almost monotonic behavior is reasonable.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.