pith. sign in

arxiv: 2306.09733 · v1 · submitted 2023-06-16 · ✦ hep-th

Note on tree NLSM amplitudes and soft theorems

Kang Zhou , Fang-Stars Wei This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 08:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords non-linear sigma modeltree amplitudesAdler zerosoft theoremsdouble copybi-adjoint scalarexpanded formula
0
0 comments X

The pith

Universality of the Adler zero plus double-copy structure fixes all tree-level non-linear sigma model amplitudes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that the single-soft Adler zero, which vanishes the amplitude when one external momentum goes to zero, holds universally at tree level for the non-linear sigma model. Combined with the known double-copy relation that expresses NLSM amplitudes as sums over bi-adjoint scalar amplitudes, this single condition is enough to determine every tree amplitude in an expanded formula. The authors first verify the zero for four points by kinematics, then impose the same zero on the general expanded expression to solve for the coefficients. They also extract the double-soft factors that follow from the resulting formula.

Core claim

By requiring that every tree NLSM amplitude in the expanded formula vanishes under a single soft limit (the Adler zero), and using the double-copy decomposition into bi-adjoint scalar amplitudes, the coefficients of the expansion are completely fixed, thereby determining all tree-level NLSM amplitudes and yielding the associated double-soft factors.

What carries the argument

The expanded formula that writes each NLSM amplitude as a linear combination of bi-adjoint scalar amplitudes, with coefficients fixed by the universal Adler zero.

If this is right

  • All higher-point tree NLSM amplitudes are fixed once the four-point case is known.
  • Double-soft factors for NLSM follow directly from the expanded expression.
  • The same soft condition can be used to construct amplitudes in any theory whose single-soft behavior is universal.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method may extend to other effective field theories whose soft theorems are known.
  • If the expanded formula can be lifted to loops, it would give a new route to loop-level NLSM amplitudes.
  • The approach isolates the minimal data (single-soft vanishing) needed to reconstruct the theory at tree level.

Load-bearing premise

The Adler zero must hold for every tree-level NLSM amplitude, not just the four-point case.

What would settle it

An independent computation of a five- or six-point tree NLSM amplitude that fails to vanish in a single soft limit would contradict the constructed formula.

read the original abstract

We use the universality of single soft behavior, together with the double copy structure, to completely determine the tree amplitudes of non-linear sigma model (NLSM). We first figure out the Adler's zero for $4$-point NLSM amplitudes, by considering kinematics. Then, we assume the universality of the Adler's zero, and use this requirement to construct general tree NLSM amplitudes in the expanded formula, i.e., the formula of expanding NLSM amplitudes to bi-adjoint scalar amplitudes. We also derive double soft factors for tree NLSM amplitudes, based on the resulting expanded formula.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the universality of single soft behavior (Adler's zero), combined with the double-copy structure, completely determines tree-level NLSM amplitudes. It verifies the 4-point Adler zero from kinematics alone, assumes universality for n>4 to fix coefficients in the expansion of NLSM amplitudes into bi-adjoint scalar amplitudes, and derives double soft factors from the resulting formula.

Significance. If the universality assumption is justified and the resulting amplitudes are consistent with NLSM properties, the work would provide a compact construction of higher-point tree amplitudes and soft theorems via double copy, avoiding direct Lagrangian computations. The kinematic verification of the 4-point case and the explicit derivation of double soft factors are clear strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim that soft behavior plus double copy 'completely determines' the amplitudes rests on the assumption of Adler zero universality for n>4. The manuscript provides no derivation of this universality from the NLSM nonlinear shift symmetry for n>4, nor any comparison of the constructed amplitudes against known expressions (CHY integrands, Feynman rules, or existing literature results). This assumption directly fixes the coefficients in the expanded formula and is therefore load-bearing.
  2. It is not shown whether the single-soft condition uniquely determines the expansion coefficients for general n, or whether the resulting amplitudes satisfy other NLSM properties (e.g., correct factorization channels or matching to the NLSM Lagrangian at higher multiplicity). Without such a check the determination claim remains conditional on the assumption alone.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract states that universality is assumed; the body should explicitly flag every step that relies on this assumption rather than on a derived property.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 4 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that soft behavior plus double copy 'completely determines' the amplitudes rests on the assumption of Adler zero universality for n>4. The manuscript provides no derivation of this universality from the NLSM nonlinear shift symmetry for n>4, nor any comparison of the constructed amplitudes against known expressions (CHY integrands, Feynman rules, or existing literature results). This assumption directly fixes the coefficients in the expanded formula and is therefore load-bearing.

    Authors: The manuscript explicitly states that the 4-point Adler zero is verified from kinematics and that universality is assumed for n>4 to fix the coefficients in the expanded formula. The central claim is therefore conditional on this assumption, as noted in the abstract. We do not derive the universality from the nonlinear shift symmetry for n>4, nor do we compare the resulting amplitudes to CHY integrands, Feynman rules, or other literature expressions, as the focus is on the construction via the assumption and the subsequent derivation of double soft factors. revision: no

  2. Referee: It is not shown whether the single-soft condition uniquely determines the expansion coefficients for general n, or whether the resulting amplitudes satisfy other NLSM properties (e.g., correct factorization channels or matching to the NLSM Lagrangian at higher multiplicity). Without such a check the determination claim remains conditional on the assumption alone.

    Authors: The single-soft condition is applied to determine the coefficients in the expanded formula for general n. The manuscript does not include a proof of uniqueness under this condition alone, nor explicit checks of factorization channels or matching to the NLSM Lagrangian at higher multiplicity. The determination remains under the stated universality assumption, with the derived double soft factors serving as a consistency check within this framework. revision: no

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Derivation of Adler zero universality from the NLSM nonlinear shift symmetry for n>4
  • Proof that the single-soft condition uniquely determines the expansion coefficients
  • Verification that the amplitudes satisfy factorization channels and match the NLSM Lagrangian at higher multiplicity
  • Comparison of the constructed amplitudes to CHY integrands, Feynman rules, or other known expressions

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; explicit assumption used to construct amplitudes

full rationale

The paper states it derives the 4-point Adler zero from kinematics alone, then explicitly assumes universality for higher points and imposes the soft condition on the expanded formula (NLSM in terms of bi-adjoint scalars) to fix coefficients. This is presented transparently as the construction method rather than a hidden derivation or prediction. No self-citations, self-definitional loops, or fitted inputs renamed as independent results appear in the provided text. The chain is self-contained given the stated assumption, with no reduction of the central claim to an unverified tautology by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete. The construction explicitly invokes the universality of the Adler zero as an assumption and the double-copy relation as given structure; both are treated as external inputs rather than derived inside the paper.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Universality of the Adler zero for all multiplicities and all external legs in NLSM
    Stated in the abstract as the requirement used to construct the general amplitudes.
  • domain assumption Double-copy structure relating NLSM to bi-adjoint scalar theory
    Invoked together with soft behavior to determine the amplitudes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5612 in / 1339 out tokens · 16995 ms · 2026-05-24T08:33:00.426574+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A new recursion relation for tree-level NLSM amplitudes based on hidden zeros

    hep-th 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A recursion for NLSM tree amplitudes based on hidden zeros reproduces the Adler zero, generates amplitudes from Tr(φ³) via δ-shift, expands them into bi-adjoint scalars, and claims these plus factorization uniquely de...

  2. Constructing tree amplitudes of scalar EFT from double soft theorem

    hep-th 2024-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A method constructs tree amplitudes of scalar EFTs from the double soft theorem by determining the explicit double soft factor during the construction process.

  3. Can Locality, Unitarity, and Hidden Zeros Completely Determine Tree-Level Amplitudes?

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Locality, unitarity, and hidden zeros determine tree-level YM and NLSM amplitudes by reconstructing their soft theorems.

  4. Soft theorems of tree-level ${\rm Tr}(\phi^3)$, YM and NLSM amplitudes from $2$-splits

    hep-th 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Extends a 2-split factorization approach to reproduce known leading and sub-leading soft theorems for Tr(φ³) and YM single-soft and NLSM double-soft amplitudes while deriving higher-order universal forms and a kinemat...

  5. New recursive construction for tree NLSM and SG amplitudes, and new understanding of enhanced Adler zero

    hep-th 2023-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Recursive construction of off-shell NLSM and SG tree amplitudes from bootstrapped low-point ones via universal soft behaviors, automatically producing enhanced Adler zeros on-shell.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers · 25 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Evidence for a New Soft Graviton Theorem

    F. Cachazo and A. Strominger, “Evidence for a New Soft Graviton Theorem,” [arXiv:1404.4091 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Subleading soft theorem in arbitrary dimension from scattering equations

    B. U. W. Schwab and A. Volovich, “Subleading Soft Theorem in Arbitrary Dimensions from Scattering Equations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, no.10, 101601 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.101601 [arXiv:1404.7749 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.101601 2014

  3. [3]

    Soft Graviton Theorem in Arbitrary Dimensions

    N. Afkhami-Jeddi, “Soft Graviton Theorem in Arbitrary Dimensions,” [arXiv:1405.3533 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    Effective Field Theories from Soft Limits

    C. Cheung, K. Kampf, J. Novotny and J. Trnka, “Effective Field Theories from Soft Limits of Scattering Amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, no.22, 221602 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.221602 [arXiv:1412.4095 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.221602 2015

  5. [5]

    Recursion relations from soft theorems

    H. Luo and C. Wen, “Recursion relations from soft theorems,” JHEP 03, 088 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2016)088 [arXiv:1512.06801 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep03(2016)088 2016

  6. [6]

    Vector Effective Field Theories from Soft Limits

    C. Cheung, K. Kampf, J. Novotny, C. H. Shen, J. Trnka and C. Wen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, no.26, 261602 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.261602 [arXiv:1801.01496 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.261602 2018

  7. [7]

    Soft Bootstrap and Supersymmetry

    H. Elvang, M. Hadjiantonis, C. R. T. Jones and S. Paranjape, “Soft Bootstrap and Supersymmetry,” JHEP 01, 195 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2019)195 [arXiv:1806.06079 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2019)195 2019

  8. [8]

    Extensions of Theories from Soft Limits

    F. Cachazo, P. Cha and S. Mizera, “Extensions of Theories from Soft Limits,” JHEP 06, 170 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2016)170 [arXiv:1604.03893 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2016)170 2016

  9. [9]

    Scattering Amplitudes from Soft Theorems and Infrared Behavior

    L. Rodina, “Scattering Amplitudes from Soft Theorems and Infrared Behavior,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, no.7, 071601 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.071601 [arXiv:1807.09738 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.071601 2019

  10. [10]

    Constructing Amplitudes from Their Soft Limits

    C. Boucher-Veronneau and A. J. Larkoski, “Constructing Amplitudes from Their Soft Limits,” JHEP 09, 130 (2011) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2011)130 [arXiv:1108.5385 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep09(2011)130 2011

  11. [11]

    The Tree Formula for MHV Graviton Amplitudes

    D. Nguyen, M. Spradlin, A. Volovich and C. Wen, “The Tree Formula for MHV Graviton Amplitudes,” JHEP 07, 045 (2010) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2010)045 [arXiv:0907.2276 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2010)045 2010

  12. [12]

    Bremsstrahlung of very low-energy quanta in elementary particle collisions,

    F. E. Low, “Bremsstrahlung of very low-energy quanta in elementary particle collisions,” Phys. Rev. 110, 974 (1958)

    work page 1958

  13. [13]

    Infrared photons and gravitons,

    S. Weinberg, “Infrared photons and gravitons,” Phys. Rev. 140, B516 (1965)

    work page 1965

  14. [14]

    Soft sub-leading divergences in Yang-Mills amplitudes

    E. Casali, “Soft sub-leading divergences in Yang-Mills amplitudes,” JHEP 08, 077 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2014)077 [arXiv:1404.5551 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep08(2014)077 2014

  15. [15]

    New Recursion Relations for Tree Amplitudes of Gluons

    R. Britto, F. Cachazo and B. Feng, “New recursion relations for tree amplitudes of gluons,” Nucl. Phys. B 715, 499-522 (2005) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.02.030 [arXiv:hep-th/0412308 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.02.030 2005

  16. [16]

    Direct Proof Of Tree-Level Recursion Relation In Yang-Mills Theory

    R. Britto, F. Cachazo, B. Feng and E. Witten, “Direct proof of tree-level recursion relation in Yang-Mills theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 181602 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.181602 [arXiv:hep-th/0501052 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.181602 2005

  17. [17]

    Scattering Equations and KLT Orthogonality

    F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, “Scattering Equations and Kawai-Lewellen-Tye Orthogonality,” Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) no. 6, 065001, arXiv:1306.6575 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  18. [18]

    Scattering of Massless Particles in Arbitrary Dimension

    F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, “Scattering of Massless Particles in Arbitrary Dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) no. 17, 171601, arXiv:1307.2199 [hep-th]. – 24 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  19. [19]

    Scattering of Massless Particles: Scalars, Gluons and Gravitons

    F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, “Scattering of Massless Particles: Scalars, Gluons and Gravitons,” JHEP 1407 (2014) 033, arXiv:1309.0885 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  20. [20]

    Einstein-Yang-Mills Scattering Amplitudes From Scattering Equations

    F. Cachazo, S. He and E. Y. Yuan, “Einstein-Yang-Mills Scattering Amplitudes From Scattering Equations,” JHEP 1501, 121 (2015) [arXiv:1409.8256 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  21. [21]

    Scattering Equations and Matrices: From Einstein To Yang-Mills, DBI and NLSM

    F. Cachazo, S. He and E. Y. Yuan, “Scattering Equations and Matrices: From Einstein To Yang-Mills, DBI and NLSM,” JHEP 1507, 149 (2015) [arXiv:1412.3479 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  22. [22]

    Tree level amplitudes from soft theorems

    K. Zhou, “Tree level amplitudes from soft theorems,” JHEP 03, 021 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2023)021 [arXiv:2212.12892 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep03(2023)021 2023

  23. [23]

    A Relation Between Tree Amplitudes of Closed and Open Strings,

    H. Kawai, D. C. Lewellen and S. H. Tye, “A Relation Between Tree Amplitudes of Closed and Open Strings,” Nucl. Phys. B 269, 1 (1986)

    work page 1986

  24. [24]

    New Relations for Gauge-Theory Amplitudes

    Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco and H. Johansson, “New Relations for Gauge-Theory Amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. D 78, 085011 (2008) [arXiv:0805.3993 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  25. [25]

    Scattering amplitudes in N=2 Maxwell-Einstein and Yang-Mills/Einstein supergravity

    M. Chiodaroli, M. Gnaydin, H. Johansson and R. Roiban, “Scattering amplitudes in N = 2 Maxwell-Einstein and Yang-Mills/Einstein supergravity,” JHEP 1501, 081 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2015)081 [arXiv:1408.0764 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2015)081 2015

  26. [26]

    Color-Kinematics Duality for QCD Amplitudes

    H. Johansson and A. Ochirov, “Color-Kinematics Duality for QCD Amplitudes,” JHEP 1601, 170 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2016)170 [arXiv:1507.00332 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2016)170 2016

  27. [27]

    Double copy for massive quantum particles with spin,

    H. Johansson and A. Ochirov, “Double copy for massive quantum particles with spin,” JHEP 1909, 040 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2019)040 [arXiv:1906.12292 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2019)040 1909

  28. [28]

    S. L. Adler, ”Consistency conditions on the strong interactions implied by a partially conserved axial vector current,” Phys. Rev. 137 (1965) B1022–B1033

    work page 1965

  29. [29]

    New Double Soft Emission Theorems

    F. Cachazo, S. He and E. Y. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 92, no.6, 065030 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.065030 [arXiv:1503.04816 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.065030 2015

  30. [30]

    Y. J. Du and H. Luo, JHEP 08, 058 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2015)058 [arXiv:1505.04411 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep08(2015)058 2015

  31. [31]

    MULTI - GLUON CROSS-SECTIONS AND FIVE JET PRODUCTION AT HADRON COLLIDERS,

    R. Kleiss and H. Kuijf, “MULTI - GLUON CROSS-SECTIONS AND FIVE JET PRODUCTION AT HADRON COLLIDERS,” Nucl. Phys. B 312, 616 (1989). – 25 –

    work page 1989