Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Resetting the Optimizer in Deep RL: An Empirical Study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.17833 v2 pith:EAFKGNHP submitted 2023-06-30 cs.LG cs.AI

Resetting the Optimizer in Deep RL: An Empirical Study

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords iterationdeepoptimizationalgorithmdemonstrateestimatesfunctiongradient
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We focus on the task of approximating the optimal value function in deep reinforcement learning. This iterative process is comprised of solving a sequence of optimization problems where the loss function changes per iteration. The common approach to solving this sequence of problems is to employ modern variants of the stochastic gradient descent algorithm such as Adam. These optimizers maintain their own internal parameters such as estimates of the first-order and the second-order moments of the gradient, and update them over time. Therefore, information obtained in previous iterations is used to solve the optimization problem in the current iteration. We demonstrate that this can contaminate the moment estimates because the optimization landscape can change arbitrarily from one iteration to the next one. To hedge against this negative effect, a simple idea is to reset the internal parameters of the optimizer when starting a new iteration. We empirically investigate this resetting idea by employing various optimizers in conjunction with the Rainbow algorithm. We demonstrate that this simple modification significantly improves the performance of deep RL on the Atari benchmark.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Trace-Mediated Peak Bias: Bridging Temporal Credit Assignment and Cognitive Heuristics in Deep Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Eligibility traces in deep RL create a peak bias by amplifying distal TD errors into gradient shocks that fixed-step SGD cannot normalize, leading to overestimation of peak-reward trajectories and a mechanistic accoun...