Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

FactCHD: Benchmarking Fact-Conflicting Hallucination Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.12086 v3 pith:7W5N6FZW submitted 2023-10-18 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CVcs.IRcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CVcs.IRcs.LG
keywords factchdllmsdetectionfact-conflictinghallucinationsbenchmarkdatasetevidence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite their impressive generative capabilities, LLMs are hindered by fact-conflicting hallucinations in real-world applications. The accurate identification of hallucinations in texts generated by LLMs, especially in complex inferential scenarios, is a relatively unexplored area. To address this gap, we present FactCHD, a dedicated benchmark designed for the detection of fact-conflicting hallucinations from LLMs. FactCHD features a diverse dataset that spans various factuality patterns, including vanilla, multi-hop, comparison, and set operation. A distinctive element of FactCHD is its integration of fact-based evidence chains, significantly enhancing the depth of evaluating the detectors' explanations. Experiments on different LLMs expose the shortcomings of current approaches in detecting factual errors accurately. Furthermore, we introduce Truth-Triangulator that synthesizes reflective considerations by tool-enhanced ChatGPT and LoRA-tuning based on Llama2, aiming to yield more credible detection through the amalgamation of predictive results and evidence. The benchmark dataset is available at https://github.com/zjunlp/FactCHD.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. FActBench: A Benchmark for Fine-grained Automatic Evaluation of LLM-Generated Text in the Medical Domain

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Unanimous voting between NLI and chain-of-thought fact-checking yields scores closest to medical expert judgments on three of four tasks in the new FActBench benchmark.

Pith tools