pith. sign in

arxiv: 2310.15893 · v1 · submitted 2023-10-24 · ✦ hep-th

New recursive construction for tree NLSM and SG amplitudes, and new understanding of enhanced Adler zero

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 06:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords nonlinear sigma modelspecial Galileonsoft theoremsAdler zerorecursive constructiontree amplitudesoff-shell amplitudesdouble copy
0
0 comments X

The pith

A bottom-up recursive method using universal soft behaviors constructs all tree NLSM and special Galileon amplitudes from three- and four-point off-shell cases and shows enhanced Adler zeros as faster-than-naive vanishing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a construction for tree amplitudes in the nonlinear sigma model and special Galileon theory that starts from the assumption of universal soft behaviors together with double-copy structure. It first extends amplitudes to off-shell versions with two external legs off-shell, which permits odd numbers of legs, then bootstraps the three- and four-point cases and derives their soft behaviors. These soft behaviors are inverted to produce a recursive formula that builds every higher-point off-shell amplitude as an expansion in bi-adjoint scalar theory amplitudes. On-shell, odd-point amplitudes vanish and the enhanced Adler zero appears automatically. The zero is thereby understood directly as the soft factor vanishing to higher order than the power of soft momentum appearing in the expansion formula.

Core claim

By bootstrapping three- and four-point off-shell amplitudes and inverting the exact soft theorems they imply, all higher-point off-shell NLSM and SG amplitudes are obtained recursively in the form of expansions to bi-adjoint scalar theory amplitudes; in the on-shell limit the enhanced Adler zero then follows because the soft behaviors vanish faster than the degree expected from naive power counting of soft momentum in those expansions.

What carries the argument

Inversion of universal soft theorems applied to off-shell amplitudes with two legs off-shell, expressed as recursive expansions in bi-adjoint scalar theory amplitudes.

If this is right

  • All tree-level off-shell amplitudes of NLSM and SG are determined by the three- and four-point cases alone.
  • On-shell amplitudes with an odd number of external legs vanish identically.
  • Enhanced Adler zeros admit explicit formulas in the expansion language and arise automatically without reference to a Lagrangian.
  • The same soft-behavior inversion does not produce consistent amplitudes for Born-Infeld or Dirac-Born-Infeld theories.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same inversion procedure might be tested on other effective theories whose soft theorems are known to be universal.
  • Because the construction is formulated entirely in terms of expansions to bi-adjoint scalar amplitudes, it supplies a direct link between the soft structure of NLSM/SG and the color-kinematics duality already present at the level of bi-adjoint scalars.
  • The observation that the zero is stronger than naive power counting suggests that similar over-vanishing could appear in higher-loop or higher-derivative extensions once the corresponding soft theorems are derived.

Load-bearing premise

The soft behaviors derived from the three- and four-point cases are universal and can be inverted to generate all higher-point off-shell amplitudes.

What would settle it

An explicit five-point NLSM amplitude whose soft limit fails to match the result obtained by inverting the four-point soft theorem derived from the three-point case would falsify the recursive construction.

read the original abstract

We propose a new bottom up method to construct tree amplitudes of non-linear sigma model (NLSM) and special Galileon theory (SG), based on assuming the universality of soft behaviors and the double copy structure. We extend the on-shell amplitudes to off-shell ones with two off-shell external legs, which allow the numbers of external legs to be odd. Then the $3$-point and $4$-point off-shell amplitudes can be bootstrapped, and the soft behaviors of $4$-point NLSM and SG amplitudes can be derived from them. The universality of soft behaviors allows us to invert the resulted soft theorems to construct higher-point off-shell amplitudes recursively, and express them in the formula of expansions to tree amplitudes of bi-adjoint scalar theory. We emphasize that the exact forms of universal soft behaviors are derived, rather than assumed as the input. Back to the on-shell limit, amplitudes with odd numbers of external legs vanish automatically, and the enhanced Adler zero emerge. From the bottom up perspective without the aid of a Lagrangian, the enhanced Adler zero are understood as that soft behaviors vanish faster than the degree expected from the naive power counting of soft momentum in the formula of expansions. Interestingly, such "zero" have explicit formulas and can be interpreted naturally. For tree amplitudes of Born-Infeld and Dirac-Born-Infeld theories, our method for construction does not make sense, but the enhanced Adler zero can be studied similarly.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a bottom-up recursive method to construct tree-level amplitudes in NLSM and SG theories. It extends on-shell amplitudes to off-shell ones with two legs off-shell (allowing odd multiplicity), bootstraps the 3- and 4-point off-shell amplitudes, derives their soft behaviors, and invokes the universality of those behaviors to invert the soft theorems and recursively generate all higher-point off-shell amplitudes via expansions in bi-adjoint scalar theory. In the on-shell limit this automatically produces vanishing odd-point amplitudes and yields an interpretation of the enhanced Adler zero as soft vanishing faster than naive power counting.

Significance. If the universality assumption is independently justified and the recursion is consistent, the construction supplies an explicit Lagrangian-free route to these amplitudes together with a bottom-up account of the enhanced Adler zero; the explicit formulas for the zeros are a concrete strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract (recursive construction paragraph)] The central recursion (described in the abstract) derives soft factors only from the bootstrapped 3- and 4-point off-shell amplitudes and then assumes the same soft degree and coefficient structure persists for all n>4. No symmetry argument, factorization check, or explicit 5-point verification is supplied to ground this extrapolation, which is load-bearing for every higher-point amplitude.
  2. [Abstract] The statement that 'the exact forms of universal soft behaviors are derived, rather than assumed as the input' holds only up to 4 points; the inversion step for n>4 rests on the unproven universality and therefore inherits the same circularity risk noted in the stress-test.
minor comments (1)
  1. The phrase 'the formula of expansions to tree amplitudes of bi-adjoint scalar theory' is used repeatedly without an explicit equation or reference; a concrete expression or section citation would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

Thank you for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract (recursive construction paragraph)] The central recursion (described in the abstract) derives soft factors only from the bootstrapped 3- and 4-point off-shell amplitudes and then assumes the same soft degree and coefficient structure persists for all n>4. No symmetry argument, factorization check, or explicit 5-point verification is supplied to ground this extrapolation, which is load-bearing for every higher-point amplitude.

    Authors: The soft factors and their precise degree and coefficient structure are derived explicitly from the bootstrapped 3- and 4-point off-shell amplitudes, which themselves follow from the double-copy construction with bi-adjoint scalar amplitudes. The recursion for n>4 then applies these derived forms under the assumption of universality of soft behavior, which is a standard feature of NLSM and SG theories. While the manuscript does not contain an explicit 5-point verification or a new symmetry proof, the resulting higher-point expressions reproduce known on-shell amplitudes and the enhanced Adler zero, providing consistency checks. The bottom-up construction is presented as relying on this universality assumption rather than deriving it anew for each n. revision: no

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The statement that 'the exact forms of universal soft behaviors are derived, rather than assumed as the input' holds only up to 4 points; the inversion step for n>4 rests on the unproven universality and therefore inherits the same circularity risk noted in the stress-test.

    Authors: The quoted statement refers specifically to the derivation of the exact functional form (including the soft degree and the numerical coefficients in the soft factor) from the 3- and 4-point off-shell amplitudes that were independently bootstrapped. These forms are not taken as input; they are computed. The subsequent recursive step for n>4 invokes the separate assumption that the same forms remain valid, which is the universality hypothesis of the approach. This is not circular: the low-point derivation fixes the soft factors once and for all, after which the inversion generates higher-point amplitudes in the bi-adjoint scalar basis. Any potential consistency issues are addressed by the automatic emergence of the correct on-shell limits and vanishing odd-point amplitudes. revision: no

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Absence of an explicit 5-point verification, factorization check, or independent symmetry argument establishing that the soft-factor coefficients derived at 4 points persist unchanged for all higher n.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Soft behaviors derived from 3/4-point cases assumed universal to recursively define all higher-point amplitudes

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "the 3-point and 4-point off-shell amplitudes can be bootstrapped, and the soft behaviors of 4-point NLSM and SG amplitudes can be derived from them. The universality of soft behaviors allows us to invert the resulted soft theorems to construct higher-point off-shell amplitudes recursively, and express them in the formula of expansions to tree amplitudes of bi-adjoint scalar theory. We emphasize that the exact forms of universal soft behaviors are derived, rather than assumed as the input."

    Soft behaviors are obtained exclusively from the bootstrapped 3- and 4-point amplitudes; universality is then invoked to apply those same behaviors at all higher n, directly defining the recursive construction and the resulting amplitudes. The higher-point results are therefore generated by extrapolating the low-point fit rather than by an independent derivation, making the claimed bottom-up construction dependent on the assumption applied to the initial cases.

full rationale

The derivation bootstraps 3- and 4-point off-shell amplitudes, extracts their soft behaviors, then assumes those behaviors are universal in order to invert soft theorems and recursively construct all higher-point amplitudes (and thereby obtain the enhanced Adler zero). While the low-point forms are derived rather than posited, the extension to n>4 and the claimed bottom-up understanding both rest on the unverified universality step; the higher amplitudes are therefore defined by applying the low-point pattern to all cases. This produces moderate circularity in the central recursive construction without an independent grounding (symmetry, Lagrangian, or external check) for the extrapolation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on domain assumptions of universal soft behaviors and double copy structure that are invoked to enable the recursive step but receive no independent evidence in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Universality of soft behaviors for NLSM and SG amplitudes
    Invoked to allow inversion of soft theorems for recursive construction of higher-point amplitudes
  • domain assumption Double copy structure relating NLSM and SG to bi-adjoint scalar theory
    Used to express the constructed amplitudes as expansions in bi-adjoint scalar tree amplitudes

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5786 in / 1271 out tokens · 27553 ms · 2026-05-24T06:51:55.341947+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A new recursion relation for tree-level NLSM amplitudes based on hidden zeros

    hep-th 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A recursion for NLSM tree amplitudes based on hidden zeros reproduces the Adler zero, generates amplitudes from Tr(φ³) via δ-shift, expands them into bi-adjoint scalars, and claims these plus factorization uniquely de...

  2. Constructing tree amplitudes of scalar EFT from double soft theorem

    hep-th 2024-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A method constructs tree amplitudes of scalar EFTs from the double soft theorem by determining the explicit double soft factor during the construction process.

  3. Can Locality, Unitarity, and Hidden Zeros Completely Determine Tree-Level Amplitudes?

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Locality, unitarity, and hidden zeros determine tree-level YM and NLSM amplitudes by reconstructing their soft theorems.

  4. Soft theorems of tree-level ${\rm Tr}(\phi^3)$, YM and NLSM amplitudes from $2$-splits

    hep-th 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Extends a 2-split factorization approach to reproduce known leading and sub-leading soft theorems for Tr(φ³) and YM single-soft and NLSM double-soft amplitudes while deriving higher-order universal forms and a kinemat...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 34 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    New Recursion Relations for Tree Amplitudes of Gluons

    R. Britto, F. Cachazo and B. Feng, “New recursion relations for tree amplitudes of gluons,” Nucl. Phys. B 715, 499-522 (2005) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.02.030 [arXiv:hep-th/0412308 [hep-th]]

  2. [2]

    Direct Proof Of Tree-Level Recursion Relation In Yang-Mills Theory

    R. Britto, F. Cachazo, B. Feng and E. Witten, “Direct proof of tree-level recursion relation in Yang-Mills theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 181602 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.181602 [arXiv:hep-th/0501052 [hep-th]]

  3. [3]

    Scattering Amplitudes and the Positive Grassmannian

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, A. B. Goncharov, A. Postnikov and J. Trnka, “Grassmannian Geometry of Scattering Amplitudes,” Cambridge University Press, 2016, ISBN 978-1-107-08658-6, 978-1-316-57296-2 doi:10.1017/CBO9781316091548 [arXiv:1212.5605 [hep-th]]

  4. [4]

    The Amplituhedron

    N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Trnka, “The Amplituhedron,” JHEP 10, 030 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2014)030 [arXiv:1312.2007 [hep-th]]

  5. [5]

    Into the Amplituhedron

    N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Trnka, “Into the Amplituhedron,” JHEP 12, 182 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2014)182 [arXiv:1312.7878 [hep-th]]

  6. [6]

    Bremsstrahlung of very low-energy quanta in elementary particle collisions,

    F. E. Low, “Bremsstrahlung of very low-energy quanta in elementary particle collisions,” Phys. Rev. 110, 974 (1958)

  7. [7]

    Infrared photons and gravitons,

    S. Weinberg, “Infrared photons and gravitons,” Phys. Rev. 140, B516 (1965)

  8. [8]

    Evidence for a New Soft Graviton Theorem

    F. Cachazo and A. Strominger, “Evidence for a New Soft Graviton Theorem,” [arXiv:1404.4091 [hep-th]]

  9. [9]

    Soft sub-leading divergences in Yang-Mills amplitudes

    E. Casali, “Soft sub-leading divergences in Yang-Mills amplitudes,” JHEP 08, 077 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2014)077 [arXiv:1404.5551 [hep-th]]

  10. [10]

    Subleading soft theorem in arbitrary dimension from scattering equations

    B. U. W. Schwab and A. Volovich, “Subleading Soft Theorem in Arbitrary Dimensions from Scattering Equations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, no.10, 101601 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.101601 [arXiv:1404.7749 [hep-th]]

  11. [11]

    Soft Graviton Theorem in Arbitrary Dimensions

    N. Afkhami-Jeddi, “Soft Graviton Theorem in Arbitrary Dimensions,” [arXiv:1405.3533 [hep-th]]

  12. [12]

    Effective Field Theories from Soft Limits

    C. Cheung, K. Kampf, J. Novotny and J. Trnka, “Effective Field Theories from Soft Limits of Scattering Amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, no.22, 221602 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.221602 [arXiv:1412.4095 [hep-th]]

  13. [13]

    On-Shell Recursion Relations for Effective Field Theories

    C. Cheung, K. Kampf, J. Novotny, C. H. Shen and J. Trnka, “On-Shell Recursion Relations for Effective Field Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, no.4, 041601 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.041601 [arXiv:1509.03309 [hep-th]]

  14. [14]

    A Periodic Table of Effective Field Theories

    C. Cheung, K. Kampf, J. Novotny, C. H. Shen and J. Trnka, “A Periodic Table of Effective Field Theories,” JHEP 02, 020 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2017)020, [arXiv:1611.03137 [hep-th]]

  15. [15]

    Recursion relations from soft theorems

    H. Luo and C. Wen, “Recursion relations from soft theorems,” JHEP 03, 088 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2016)088 [arXiv:1512.06801 [hep-th]]

  16. [16]

    Vector Effective Field Theories from Soft Limits

    C. Cheung, K. Kampf, J. Novotny, C. H. Shen, J. Trnka and C. Wen, “Vector Effective Field Theories from Soft Limits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, no.26, 261602 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.261602 [arXiv:1801.01496 [hep-th]]

  17. [17]

    Soft Bootstrap and Supersymmetry

    H. Elvang, M. Hadjiantonis, C. R. T. Jones and S. Paranjape, “Soft Bootstrap and Supersymmetry,” JHEP – 33 – 01, 195 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2019)195 [arXiv:1806.06079 [hep-th]]

  18. [18]

    Extensions of Theories from Soft Limits

    F. Cachazo, P. Cha and S. Mizera, “Extensions of Theories from Soft Limits,” JHEP 06, 170 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2016)170 [arXiv:1604.03893 [hep-th]]

  19. [19]

    Scattering Amplitudes from Soft Theorems and Infrared Behavior

    L. Rodina, “Scattering Amplitudes from Soft Theorems and Infrared Behavior,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, no.7, 071601 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.071601 [arXiv:1807.09738 [hep-th]]

  20. [20]

    Constructing Amplitudes from Their Soft Limits

    C. Boucher-Veronneau and A. J. Larkoski, “Constructing Amplitudes from Their Soft Limits,” JHEP 09, 130 (2011) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2011)130 [arXiv:1108.5385 [hep-th]]

  21. [21]

    The Tree Formula for MHV Graviton Amplitudes

    D. Nguyen, M. Spradlin, A. Volovich and C. Wen, “The Tree Formula for MHV Graviton Amplitudes,” JHEP 07, 045 (2010) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2010)045 [arXiv:0907.2276 [hep-th]]

  22. [22]

    Tree level amplitudes from soft theorems

    K. Zhou, “Tree level amplitudes from soft theorems,” JHEP 03, 021 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2023)021 [arXiv:2212.12892 [hep-th]]

  23. [23]

    A Relation Between Tree Amplitudes of Closed and Open Strings,

    H. Kawai, D. C. Lewellen and S. H. Tye, “A Relation Between Tree Amplitudes of Closed and Open Strings,” Nucl. Phys. B 269, 1 (1986)

  24. [24]

    New Relations for Gauge-Theory Amplitudes

    Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco and H. Johansson, “New Relations for Gauge-Theory Amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. D 78, 085011 (2008) [arXiv:0805.3993 [hep-ph]]

  25. [25]

    Scattering amplitudes in N=2 Maxwell-Einstein and Yang-Mills/Einstein supergravity

    M. Chiodaroli, M. Gnaydin, H. Johansson and R. Roiban, “Scattering amplitudes in N = 2 Maxwell-Einstein and Yang-Mills/Einstein supergravity,” JHEP 1501, 081 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2015)081 [arXiv:1408.0764 [hep-th]]

  26. [26]

    Color-Kinematics Duality for QCD Amplitudes

    H. Johansson and A. Ochirov, “Color-Kinematics Duality for QCD Amplitudes,” JHEP 1601, 170 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2016)170 [arXiv:1507.00332 [hep-ph]]

  27. [27]

    Double copy for massive quantum particles with spin,

    H. Johansson and A. Ochirov, “Double copy for massive quantum particles with spin,” JHEP 1909, 040 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2019)040 [arXiv:1906.12292 [hep-th]]

  28. [28]

    Scattering Equations and KLT Orthogonality

    F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, “Scattering Equations and Kawai-Lewellen-Tye Orthogonality,” Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) no. 6, 065001, arXiv:1306.6575 [hep-th]

  29. [29]

    Scattering of Massless Particles in Arbitrary Dimension

    F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, “Scattering of Massless Particles in Arbitrary Dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) no. 17, 171601, arXiv:1307.2199 [hep-th]

  30. [30]

    Scattering of Massless Particles: Scalars, Gluons and Gravitons

    F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, “Scattering of Massless Particles: Scalars, Gluons and Gravitons,” JHEP 1407 (2014) 033, arXiv:1309.0885 [hep-th]

  31. [31]

    Einstein-Yang-Mills Scattering Amplitudes From Scattering Equations

    F. Cachazo, S. He and E. Y. Yuan, “Einstein-Yang-Mills Scattering Amplitudes From Scattering Equations,” JHEP 1501, 121 (2015) [arXiv:1409.8256 [hep-th]]

  32. [32]

    Scattering Equations and Matrices: From Einstein To Yang-Mills, DBI and NLSM

    F. Cachazo, S. He and E. Y. Yuan, “Scattering Equations and Matrices: From Einstein To Yang-Mills, DBI and NLSM,” JHEP 1507, 149 (2015) [arXiv:1412.3479 [hep-th]]

  33. [33]

    Unifying Relations for Scattering Amplitudes

    C. Cheung, C. H. Shen and C. Wen, “Unifying Relations for Scattering Amplitudes,” JHEP 1802, 095 (2018) [arXiv:1705.03025 [hep-th]]

  34. [34]

    Note on differential operators, CHY integrands, and unifying relations for amplitudes

    K. Zhou and B. Feng, “Note on differential operators, CHY integrands, and unifying relations for amplitudes,” JHEP 1809, 160 (2018) [arXiv:1808.06835 [hep-th]]. – 34 –

  35. [35]

    Transmuting CHY formulae

    M. Bollmann and L. Ferro, “Transmuting CHY formulae,” JHEP 1901, 180 (2019) [arXiv:1808.07451 [hep-th]]

  36. [36]

    Note on tree NLSM amplitudes and soft theorems

    K. Zhou and F. S. Wei, “Note on tree NLSM amplitudes and soft theorems,” [arXiv:2306.09733 [hep-th]]

  37. [37]

    MULTI - GLUON CROSS-SECTIONS AND FIVE JET PRODUCTION AT HADRON COLLIDERS,

    R. Kleiss and H. Kuijf, “MULTI - GLUON CROSS-SECTIONS AND FIVE JET PRODUCTION AT HADRON COLLIDERS,” Nucl. Phys. B 312, 616 (1989)

  38. [38]

    Abelian Z-theory: NLSM amplitudes and alpha'-corrections from the open string

    J. J. M. Carrasco, C. R. Mafra and O. Schlotterer, “Abelian Z-theory: NLSM amplitudes and α’-corrections from the open string,” JHEP 06, 093 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2017)093 [arXiv:1608.02569 [hep-th]]

  39. [39]

    Gauge invariance induced relations and the equivalence between distinct approaches to NLSM amplitudes

    Y. J. Du and Y. Zhang, “Gauge invariance induced relations and the equivalence between distinct approaches to NLSM amplitudes,” JHEP 07, 177 (2018) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2018)177 [arXiv:1803.01701 [hep-th]]

  40. [40]

    Expansion of Einstein-Yang-Mills theory by differential operators,

    B. Feng, X. Li and K. Zhou, “Expansion of Einstein-Yang-Mills theory by differential operators,” Phys. Rev. D 100, no.12, 125012 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.125012 [arXiv:1904.05997 [hep-th]]

  41. [41]

    Unified web for expansions of amplitudes,

    K. Zhou, “Unified web for expansions of amplitudes,” JHEP 10, 195 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2019)195 [arXiv:1908.10272 [hep-th]]

  42. [42]

    Scalar BCJ Bootstrap,

    T. V. Brown, K. Kampf, U. Oktem, S. Paranjape and J. Trnka, “Scalar BCJ Bootstrap,” [arXiv:2305.05688 [hep-th]]. – 35 –