REVIEW 5 cited by
Large Language Models in Law: A Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Large Language Models in Law: A Survey
read the original abstract
The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly impacted the traditional judicial industry. Moreover, recently, with the development of AI-generated content (AIGC), AI and law have found applications in various domains, including image recognition, automatic text generation, and interactive chat. With the rapid emergence and growing popularity of large models, it is evident that AI will drive transformation in the traditional judicial industry. However, the application of legal large language models (LLMs) is still in its nascent stage. Several challenges need to be addressed. In this paper, we aim to provide a comprehensive survey of legal LLMs. We not only conduct an extensive survey of LLMs, but also expose their applications in the judicial system. We first provide an overview of AI technologies in the legal field and showcase the recent research in LLMs. Then, we discuss the practical implementation presented by legal LLMs, such as providing legal advice to users and assisting judges during trials. In addition, we explore the limitations of legal LLMs, including data, algorithms, and judicial practice. Finally, we summarize practical recommendations and propose future development directions to address these challenges.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Measuring & Mitigating Over-Alignment for LLMs in Multilingual Criminal Law Courts
New benchmark quantifies language- and model-dependent over-alignment in criminal law LLM use and identifies abliteration as an effective mitigation with minimal performance cost.
-
Measuring & Mitigating Over-Alignment for LLMs in Multilingual Criminal Law Courts
Creates TF-RefusalBench to quantify over-alignment in LLMs on criminal-law tasks across four languages and shows abliteration mitigates refusals with little performance loss.
-
Civil Court Simulation with Large Language Models
Multi-agent LLM framework simulates Chinese civil trials through five-stage procedures with memory and retrieval, producing judgments strong in liability allocation and multi-item decisions.
-
Large language models replicate and predict human cooperation across experiments in game theory
Llama-3.1-8B with a multi-step reasoning-and-filter prompt reproduces human cooperation rates across 121 dyadic games (MSD=0.031, r=0.89), outperforming Nash-equilibrium predictions (MSD=0.096, r=0.78).
-
A Survey on Knowledge Distillation of Large Language Models
A comprehensive survey of knowledge distillation for LLMs structured around algorithms, skill enhancement, and vertical applications, highlighting data augmentation as a key enabler.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.