Pith. sign in

REVIEW

GI-PIP: Do We Require Impractical Auxiliary Dataset for Gradient Inversion Attacks?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.11748 v3 pith:NIVRHLPE submitted 2024-01-22 cs.CR cs.AIcs.LG

GI-PIP: Do We Require Impractical Auxiliary Dataset for Gradient Inversion Attacks?

classification cs.CR cs.AIcs.LG
keywords datagi-pipdistributiongradientinversionattacksauxiliarygan-based
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Deep gradient inversion attacks expose a serious threat to Federated Learning (FL) by accurately recovering private data from shared gradients. However, the state-of-the-art heavily relies on impractical assumptions to access excessive auxiliary data, which violates the basic data partitioning principle of FL. In this paper, a novel method, Gradient Inversion Attack using Practical Image Prior (GI-PIP), is proposed under a revised threat model. GI-PIP exploits anomaly detection models to capture the underlying distribution from fewer data, while GAN-based methods consume significant more data to synthesize images. The extracted distribution is then leveraged to regulate the attack process as Anomaly Score loss. Experimental results show that GI-PIP achieves a 16.12 dB PSNR recovery using only 3.8% data of ImageNet, while GAN-based methods necessitate over 70%. Moreover, GI-PIP exhibits superior capability on distribution generalization compared to GAN-based methods. Our approach significantly alleviates the auxiliary data requirement on both amount and distribution in gradient inversion attacks, hence posing more substantial threat to real-world FL.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.